Managed care for preventive services: a review of policy options

Patient-centered approach to building problem solving skills among older primary care patients: problems identified and resolved

This article describes problems identified by older primary care patients enrolled in Problem Solving Therapy (PST), and explores factors associated with successful problem resolution. PST patients received 1 to 8, 45-min sessions with a social worker. Patients identified problems in their lives and directed the focus of subsequent sessions as consistent with the steps of PST. The 107 patients identified 568 problems, 59% of which were resolved. Most commonly identified problems included health related issues such as need for exercise or weight loss activities, medical care and medical equipment needs, home and garden maintenance, and gathering information on their medical condition. Problems identified by patients were 2.2 times more likely to be solved than those identified by a health care professional. Using PST in primary care may facilitate patients in addressing key health and wellness issues.

Are HMOs bad for health maintenance?

This study examines the impact of Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) coverage on the provision of preventive medicine. We investigate whether any association reflects selection effects on the part of patients and/or physicians or a causal impact of managed care itself. Causal effects may occur on the supply side or the demand side. Using a large national database of Medicare and non-Medicare patients, we investigate these issues for eight common preventive medical procedures. We find that preventive care is substantially higher with HMO coverage than with traditional fee-for-service reimbursement. Our findings also suggest that the impact of HMOs on preventive medicine is a causal one, and does not merely reflect selection effects. Both supply-side (e.g. provider) and demand-side (e.g. patient) factors appear to play a role in the higher incidence of preventive care among HMO enrollees. Patient demand effects are stronger for simple treatments such as physicals, while supply-side effects seem to dominate for relatively complex preventive care procedures such as mammograms.

Integrating occupational health services and occupational prevention services

BACKGROUND

Despite the human and monetary costs of occupational injury and illness, occupational health care has focused more on treatment than prevention, and prevention is not part of many clinical occupational health practices. This represents a failure of occupational health care to meet the health care needs of the working patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE searches were conducted for literature on occupational medical treatment and the prevention of occupational injury and illness were reviewed to for linkages between prevention and treatment. Policy discussions which identify examples of programs that integrated prevention and treatment were included.

RESULTS

Although examples of the integration of clinical and preventive occupational health services exist, there are challenges and barriers to such integration. These include inaction by clinicians who do not recognize their potential role in prevention; the absence of a relationship between the clinician and an employer willing to participate in prevention; economic disincentives against prevention; and the absence of tools that evaluate clinicians on their performance in prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Research is needed to improve and promote clinical occupational health preventive services.

Managed care: a critical review

Widely perceived and accepted as the simplest way to control escalating health care costs, managed care is the way health care is now, and will continue to be, delivered in the foreseeable future. Growing numbers of Medicaid beneficiaries are required to participate in managed health care and Medicare beneficiaries are strongly encouraged to do so. In essence, America's poor and elderly are serving as the vanguard for health care reform. This article describes the evolution of managed care in the United States, then examines the implications of the transfer of financial risk to health care providers; the impact of managed care on existing inequalities in access to health care and services; the quality of managed care compared with fee-for-service arrangements; and the delivery of mental health services under managed care. We suggest that the role of the social work profession in managed care should be to mitigate the costs borne by clients, and offer specific suggestions for advocates in this arena.

Cost-sharing and the utilization of clinical preventive services

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the effect of different forms of patient cost-sharing on the utilization of clinical preventive services or if the effect varies by type of health plan.

OBJECTIVES

To assess empirically the relationships between the utilization of recommended preventive services and different forms of patient cost-sharing and how the effect is mediated by type of preventive service (counseling, blood pressure, Pap smear, mammogram), type of cost-sharing (deductibles/coinsurance, copayments), and type of health plan (HMO, PPO/indemnity plan).

RESEARCH DESIGN

Sixteen logit models were estimated to assess variation in receiving recommended preventive care as a function of cost-sharing within plan type.

SUBJECTS

A sample of 10,872 employees, aged 18 to 64 years, of seven large companies served by 52 health plans with diverse cost-sharing arrangements who responded to the Pacific Business Group on Health, Health Plan Value Check Survey (response rate, 50.3%).

MEASURES

Receipt of recommended preventive care was based on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines. The effect of cost-sharing was measured as the percentage change in the probability of receiving recommended preventive care in the cost-sharing group compared to the non cost-sharing group.

RESULTS

The negative effect of patient cost-sharing was greatest on preventive counseling in PPO/indemnity plans (-15%) and on mammograms in all health plan types (-9%-10%). The effect on Pap smears was negative (-8%-10%) for deductibles/coinsurance in PPO/indemnity plans and copayments in HMOs. The effect of cost-sharing on blood pressure was mixed. Deductibles/coinsurance had a greater negative effect than copayments.

CONCLUSIONS

Eliminating patient cost-sharing for selected preventive services may be a relatively easy and effective means of increasing utilization of recommended clinical preventive care.

Health Education's Contributions to Public Health in the Twentieth Century: A Glimpse Through Health Promotion's Rear-View Mirror

A lesson of the first half of the century was that growth and technological development brought new health problems and challenges in their wake, many of which were to prove more intractable to technological fixes than the ones that had been so dramatically fixed before. Massive expansions of resources in support of the extension of these medical fixes resulted in an escalation of costs that had to be reigned in by breaking from the resource-based planning cycle that had prevailed through two eras of expansion. The 1970s ushered in an era of cost containment as the central theme of new policies. They included provisions for health promotion that sought to find new handles on the intractable social and behavioral aspects of the demand for health care resources, especially through primary prevention and building of capacity for community, family, and individual self-management of health problems and programs. Lessons from this era for public health in the next century are considered.

A world view model of health care utilization: the impact of social and provider context on health care decision-making

This article provides a conceptual model illustrating the filtering effect that social factors have on a health care event. Individual, family and social network filters translate the symptom for the patient before and after s/he enters the health care delivery system. Simultaneously, managed care and provider filters shape what resource is provided by the health care provider to the patient. Basic premises are that decision-making about health care utilization is a complex social interaction and that better attention to the social context will increase the likelihood of effective health care occurring.

Are physicians less likely to recommend preventive services to low-SES patients?

BACKGROUND

Do low-SES adult patients visiting private primary care clinics differ from higher SES adult patients in their need for eight preventive services or in receiving either a recommendation for or the needed services?

METHODS

Randomly identified adult patients were surveyed within 2 weeks of a visit to 22 clinics in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. Questions assessed patient recollection of the latest receipt of eight services and whether needed services had been recommended during the visit or received then soon after.

RESULTS

Of those surveyed, 4,245 patients (1,650 low SES) responded (84.3%), showing that low SES patients were less likely to be up to date for cholesterol measurement, Pap smear, mammography, breast exam, and flu or pneumonia shots (P < 0.004), but not for blood pressure measurement. Low-SES patients needing services received recommendations to have them and actually received them at the same rate as higher SES patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The 22 primary care clinics studied appear to be recommending and providing needed preventive services to visiting patients at the same rate regardless of income or insurance status. The reasons for differences in prevention status by SES are complex but the low proportion of all patients receiving recommendations for needed services suggests the need to take advantage of all visits for updating prevention needs.

Exercising purchasing power for preventive care

Public and private purchasers can shift the focus of the health care system from managing the delivery of medical services to improving health. We report on the efforts of the Pacific Business Group on Health to include health promotion and disease prevention in its definition of health care value, to pay health plans based on their performance in providing appropriate preventive care, and to encourage employers and workers to choose health plans that excel in promoting health. This example serves as a model for other purchasing groups by combining economic incentives and systems of accountability to achieve public health goals.