A cross-sectional study comparing variation in body surface area and chemotherapy dosing in pediatric oncology using two different methods

Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight

Background

Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown.

Purpose

To compare body surface area in patients at extremes of height and weight using both formulas to determine whether a difference affected chemotherapy dose.

Methods

Anthropometric data were extracted from the 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital and Health Statistics. Data for both males and females were examined. The 50th percentiles of weight and height were used to calculate the body surface area with both formulas. Calculations were repeated using the 5th through 95th percentiles for weight, then the 5th through 95th percentiles for height, and so forth until all extremes of height and weight were examined. Each body surface area was used to calculate a chemotherapy dose. A difference of ≥4.5% in dose was considered clinically significant.

Results

Differences were apparent in both males and females. Dosing differences were most apparent in patients in the 50th, 75th or 95th percentile for both height and weight. Differences are also noted in other percentiles, suggesting that patients of smaller stature may also be affected.

Conclusion

Guidelines recommend full doses of chemotherapy for patients with curative intent but do not specify which body surface area formula is preferred. Our results imply that the Mosteller equation provides a greater chemotherapy dose, and this difference may be clinically significant in patients who are in the 50th to 95th percentiles for height, weight or both. Further study is necessary to validate these results and determine the impact on patient outcomes.

Bevacizumab dosing strategy in paediatric cancer patients based on population pharmacokinetic analysis with external validation

Aim

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab and various dosing strategies for this agent in paediatric patients.

Methods

Data were collected from 232 paediatric patients (1971 concentrations) in five studies, with a wide range of age (0.5 – 21 years), body weight (BWT; 5.9 – 125 kg), and regimens (5 – 15 mg kg^–1 biweekly or triweekly). Data from 152 patients (1427 concentrations) and 80 patients (544 concentrations) were used for model building and external validation, respectively. Steady‐state exposure was simulated under BWT‐based, body surface area (BSA)‐based, ideal body weight (IBW)‐based, and tier‐based doses. NONMEM and R were used for analyses.

Results

Typical estimates of clearance, central volume of distribution (V1), and median half‐life were 9.04 ml h^–1, 2851 ml, and 19.6 days, respectively. Clearance decreased with increasing albumin. Clearance and V1 increased with BWT and were higher in male patients. Clearance and V1 were lower in children with primary central nervous system (CNS) tumours than in children with sarcomas, resulting in 49% higher trough (Cmin) and 29% higher peak (Cmax) concentrations. BWT‐adjusted clearance and V1 remained unchanged across ages. Paediatric Cmin was similar to adult Cmin under all dosing strategies. Paediatric Cmax exceeded adult Cmax under tier‐based doses.

Conclusions

BWT‐adjusted pharmacokinetic parameter estimates in paediatric patients were similar to those in adults, and similar across ages. Bevacizumab exposure was higher in children with primary CNS tumours than in children with sarcomas. BSA‐based, IBW‐based, and tier‐based doses offered no substantial advantage over the BWT‐based dose currently used in adults for bevacizumab. Given the similarity in pharmacokinetics among many monoclonal antibodies, this may help to develop practical paediatric dosing guidelines for other therapeutic antibodies.