Titania-Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite-Based Philadelphia-Positive Leukemia Therapy

Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) leukemia is a type of blood cancer also known as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), affecting 20-30% of adults diagnosed worldwide and having an engraved prognosis as compared to other types of leukemia. The current treatment regimens mainly rely on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and bone marrow transplants. To date, several generations of TKIs have been developed due to associated resistance and frequent relapse, with cardiovascular system anomalies being the most devastating complication. Nanotechnology has the potential to address these limitations by the targeted drug delivery and controlled release of TKIs. This study focused on the titanium dioxide (TiO2) and graphene oxide (GO) nanocomposite employment to load nilotinib and ponatinib TKIs for therapy of Ph+ leukemia cell line (K562) and Ba/F3 cells engineered to express BCR-ABL oncogene. Meanwhile, after treatment, the oncogene expressing fibroblast cells (Rat-1 P185) were evaluated for their colony formation ability under 3D conditions. To validate the nanocomposite formation, the TiO2-GO nanocomposites were characterized by scanning electron microscope, DLS, XRD, FTIR, zeta potential, EDX, and element mapping. The TKI-loaded TiO2-GO was not inferior to the free drugs after evaluating their effects by a cell viability assay (XTT), apoptosis induction, and colony formation inhibition. The cell signaling pathways of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), signal transducers and activators of transcription 5 (STAT5), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk1/2) were also investigated by Western blot. These signaling pathways were significantly downregulated in the TKI-loaded TiO2-GO-treated groups. Based on the findings above, we can conclude that TiO2-GO exhibited excellent drug delivery potential that can be used for Ph+ leukemia therapy in the future, subject to further investigations.

Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis: An Evidence-Based Classification (Revised)

INTRODUCTION

Drug induced acute pancreatitis is a difficult diagnosis for clinicians. We previously published an "Evidence-Based Classification System" on Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis widely used by clinicians to assist in the identification of drugs. Unfortunately, this prior analysis based only on published case reports has been misunderstood. The prior review did not include studies with higher evidentiary value, such as randomized trials, case-control studies, and/or pharmacoepidemiologic studies. The use of the prior classification system has led to many patients being inappropriately labeled as having drug-induced acute pancreatitis. We now propose a "Revised" Evidence- Based Classification System for the purpose of determining which drugs cause acute pancreatitis based on the Grading of Recommendations, Development, and Evaluation criteria.

METHODS

A search of the English Language literature was performed to identify all case reports with medication and/or drug induced acute pancreatitis. We divided the drugs implicated as causing acute pancreatitis into four groups based on the quality of evidence as defined by GRADE quality parameters.

RESULTS

Although 141 drugs were identified in the literature as causing acute pancreatitis, only 106 drugs published in the literature as causing acute pancreatitis were high quality case reports. Only 3 drugs had evidence as causing acute pancreatitis from randomized controlled clinical trials, including 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine.

DISCUSSION

The vast majority of drugs implicated as causing acute pancreatitis in the literature have low or very low quality of evidence supporting those claims.

Pharmacology and pharmacovigilance of protein kinase inhibitors

Protein kinase inhibitors experienced their advent in the 2000s. Their market introduction made it possible to constitute a class of targeted therapies administered orally. This name was chosen to mark a break with conventional chemotherapy drugs, but it is important to stress that these are multi-target drugs with complex affinity profiles. Adverse effects can be explained by direct interactions with their targets of interest, chosen for their indications (on-target) but also interactions with other targets (off-target). The adverse effect profiles of these drugs are therefore varied and it is possible to identify common profiles related to inhibitions of common targets. Identification of these targets has improved the global understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the onset of adverse drug reactions as well as of the related diseases, and makes it possible to predict the adverse effect profile of new protein kinase inhibitors based on their affinities. In this review, we describe the main adverse drug reactions associated with protein kinase inhibitors, their frequency and their plausible mechanisms of action.

Arterial hypertension assessment in a population with chronic myeloid leukemia

Treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), whose introduction in 2001 improved the survival rate after 5 years from 40 to 90%. The longevity increase has been accompanied by a higher incidence of cardiovascular events (CVE) that can be explained due to the sum of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) together with the secondary effects of the TKI. The effect of the TKI over the blood pressure control is still unknown. An observational cross-sectional study of patients with CML under treatment with TKI (imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib) was conducted. Blood pressure was analyzed through sphygmomanometer and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). A total of 73 patients were included, 57 treated with a single line of treatment. 32.9% of the total of individuals under this study showed uncontrolled blood pressure according to the ABPM. The factors related to uncontrolled BP were overweight, dyslipidemia, alcohol use, pulse wave velocity a high/very high cardiovascular risk. The subjects who received treatment with nilotinib did present worse control of their blood pressure in ABPM than those treated with imatinib and dasatinib (p = 0.041). This finding could indicate that an uncontrolled blood pressure is implied in the pro-inflammatory and pro-atherogenic mechanism underlying the development of the cardiovascular disease in those patients under treatment with nilotinib. The ABPM is a useful tool in the diagnosis and treatment of HT, being the reason why it should be included in the assessment of patients with CML whose HT diagnosis proves uncertain.

Drug induced pancreatitis: A systematic review of case reports to determine potential drug associations

OBJECTIVE

A current assessment of case reports of possible drug-induced pancreatitis is needed. We systematically reviewed the case report literature to identify drugs with potential associations with acute pancreatitis and the burden of evidence supporting these associations.

METHODS

A protocol was developed a priori (PROSPERO CRD42017060473). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and additional sources to identify cases of drug-induced pancreatitis that met accepted diagnostic criteria of acute pancreatitis. Cases caused by multiple drugs or combination therapy were excluded. Established systematic review methods were used for screening and data extraction. A classification system for associated drugs was developed a priori based upon the number of cases, re-challenge, exclusion of non-drug causes of acute pancreatitis, and consistency of latency.

RESULTS

Seven-hundred and thirteen cases of potential drug-induced pancreatitis were identified, implicating 213 unique drugs. The evidence base was poor: exclusion of non-drug causes of acute pancreatitis was incomplete or poorly reported in all cases, 47% had at least one underlying condition predisposing to acute pancreatitis, and causality assessment was not conducted in 81%. Forty-five drugs (21%) were classified as having the highest level of evidence regarding their association with acute pancreatitis; causality was deemed to be probable or definite for 19 of these drugs (42%). Fifty-seven drugs (27%) had the lowest level of evidence regarding an association with acute pancreatitis, being implicated in single case reports, without exclusion of other causes of acute pancreatitis.

DISCUSSION

Much of the case report evidence upon which drug-induced pancreatitis associations are based is tenuous. A greater emphasis on exclusion of all non-drug causes of acute pancreatitis and on quality reporting would improve the evidence base. It should be recognized that reviews of case reports, are valuable scoping tools but have limited strength to establish drug-induced pancreatitis associations.

REGISTRATION

CRD42017060473.

Sorafenib-Induced Acute Pancreatitis in a Patient with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and recently for radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory metastatic differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Several side effects have been described including alterations in amylase and lipase levels. Nonetheless, only a few cases of pancreatitis during renal carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma treatment have been described.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the first case report of sorafenib-induced acute pancreatitis during the treatment of thyroid carcinoma.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a 60-year-old Latin woman with RAI-refractory papillary thyroid carcinoma, T4bN1bM1, sorafenib was indicated due to locally recurrent, metastatic, and progressive lung involvement without iodine uptake. Therapy was initiated (200 mg) every 8 h. Three days after starting the medication, abdominal pain, nausea, and emesis appeared. A blood test revealed elevated amylase (343 U/L RV: 28-100) and lipase (1,969 U/L RV: 23-300) levels, but no other findings, confirming acute mild pancreatitis. Hypertriglyceridemia, hypercalcemia, and alcohol and biliary etiologies were ruled out and sorafenib-acute pancreatitis was concluded. Two weeks later, sorafenib was resumed without recurrence. To date, this is the tenth sorafenib-related pancreatitis report and the first in a patient with RAI-refractory metastatic DTC.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib-acute pancreatitis may develop in patients with RAI-refractory thyroid cancer. This adverse event seems to be inde-pendent of the treatment duration and administered dose. Resuming the medication with an adjusted dose after pancreatitis resolution may be safe.

Sorafenib-induced Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Sorafenib has been approved to increase the survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Acute pancreatitis is an uncommon complication of sorafenib treatment. Only a few cases of sorafenib-induced acute pancreatitis have been reported in the English literature. We herein present the case of a 56-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib at 200 mg once daily. After six days of treatment, he suffered epigastric pain. Laboratory tests showed markedly elevated serum amylase and lipase levels. Imaging studies demonstrated negative findings. Sorafenib-induced acute pancreatitis was diagnosed after reviewing his history. The sorafenib treatment was discontinued, and his symptoms were resolved seven days later. To date, this case had the shortest duration and the lowest dosage of sorafenib to have induced acute pancreatitis.

Pazopanib and pancreatic toxicity: a case report

Background

Pazopanib is an oral multitargeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, used as a single agent to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma. Treatment with other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors is known to be associated with asymptomatic elevations of serum amylase and lipase levels. As regards the pazopanib, data are lacking in literature.

Case presentation

We report one case of pancreatic toxicity associated with pazopanib administration. Before starting treatment, patient had no risk factors for pancreatitis. The patient, an Italian 68 years old woman, started pazopanib at doses of 800 mg daily as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Six months after the start of treatment, blood tests showed for the first time a significant increase in serum lipase and amylase in the absence of symptoms and radiological findings of pancreatitis. The patient continued treatment without interruptions or dose reductions. However, the continuation of the treatment led to a further increase of pancreatic enzymes. We tried to continue the treatment by reducing the dose but only the discontinuation was associated with normalization of amylase and lipase’s levels. On the other hand the treatment with pazopanib got prolonged response of the disease in the absence of signs of pancreatitis. We therefore decided to continue treatment with pazopanib 400 mg daily with close monitoring of blood levels of pancreatic enzymes.

Conclusions

We hypothesize that the increase of pancreatic enzymes is not a dose-dependent event. The mechanism for pancreatic toxicity induced by tyrosine-kinase inhibitors is unknown and no predictive factors have been identified. There are no clear guidelines on the management of the drug in the presence of pancreatic enzyme increase. In any case, we believe that a careful monitoring of pancreatic enzymes during treatment with pazopanib is advisable.

Pancreatitis with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

A trial-level meta-analysis was conducted to determine the relative risk (RR) of pancreatitis associated with multi-targeted vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Eligible studies included randomized phase 2 and 3 trials comparing arms with and without an FDA-approved VEGFR TKI (sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, axitinib, vandetanib, cabozantinib, ponatinib, regorafenib). Statistical analyses calculated the RR and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 10,578 patients from 16 phase III trials and 6 phase II trials were selected. The RR for all grade and high-grade pancreatitis for the TKI vs. no TKI- arms was 1.95 (p=0.042, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.70) and 1.89 (p=0.069, 95% CI: 0.95 to 373), respectively. No differential impact of malignancy type or specific TKI agent was seen on RR of all grade of high grade pancreatitis. Better patient selection and monitoring may mitigate the risk of severe pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis associated with molecular targeted therapies: a retrospective review of the clinico-radiological features, management and outcome

PURPOSE

To study the presentation, radiological features, management and outcome of acute pancreatitis detected on imaging in patients receiving molecular targeted therapy (MTT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, search of the radiology database from January 2005 through September 2012 revealed 91 cancer patients with radiologic evidence of acute pancreatitis. Of these, 15 patients receiving MTT (7 women, 8 men; mean age 59 years, range 25-84 years) and fulfilling the criteria of acute pancreatitis without any confounding factors were included. Imaging at initial diagnosis of pancreatitis and subsequently were reviewed by three radiologists in consensus; clinical presentation, management, and outcome were documented from the medical record.

RESULTS

Eleven patients had focal and four had diffuse pancreatitis. The tail of the pancreas (n = 6) was the most common site of focal pancreatitis. Of the 14/15 patients who underwent CT, modified CT severity index was 2 in 12 patients and 4 in 2 patients. One patient (1/15) who underwent only FDG-PET/CT showed focal pancreatitis. None of the patients had pancreatic necrosis or peripancreatic collections. Findings resolved in all the patients after discontinuation of MTT, except in one patient who died of progressive disease. No radiological or surgical interventions were required in any of the patients. Findings recurred in 4/9 patients (44%) in whom MTT was restarted.

CONCLUSION

MTT-associated pancreatitis is usually mild, focal, and managed conservatively with discontinuation of MTT. The imaging findings are subtle and in our study, pancreatitis recurred in 44% of patients after restarting MTT.