Evaluating the adverse effects of melphalan formulations

Investigating the effect of pre-transplant thrombocytopenia and anemia on the engraftment and long-term survival in multiple myeloma patients

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) following high-dose melphalan is the standard treatment for Multiple Myeloma (MM). Despite new treatments, further investigation is needed to identify prognostic factors of ASCT. This study evaluated the impact of thrombocytopenia and anemia on the engraftment of MM patients after ASCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved 123 MM patients who underwent ASCT with high-dose Melphalan. Successful engraftment is achieved when both platelets (Plt) and white blood cells (WBC) engraft successfully. We examined the statistically significant cut-offs for the prognostic factors on the admission day. Ultimately, the association of risk factors with the Plt and WBC engraftment and long-term survival were analyzed as the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Spearman's correlation coefficient between Plt and WBC engraftment was 0.396 (p < 0.001). The engraftment in the patients with Plt < 140,000/μL was 17.4% slower (p = 0.036) and the odds of long-term survival was 72% lower (p = 0.016) than in patients with higher Plt. Patients with Hb < 11 g/dL were 12.7% slower in engraftment. Age over 47 was a significant factor in slower engraftment (p = 0.036) which decelerated the engraftment by 15.2%.

CONCLUSION

Thrombocytopenia and anemia before transplantation are related to slower Plt/WBC engraftment and as prognostic factors might predict the long-term survival of MM patients following ASCT.

A novel pterostilbene compound DCZ0825 induces macrophage M1 differentiation and Th1 polarization to exert anti-myeloma and immunomodulatory

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable and recurrent malignancy characterized by abnormal plasma cell proliferation. There is an urgent need to develop effective drugs in MM. DCZ0825 is a small molecule compound derived from pterostilbene with direct anti-myeloma activity and indirect immune-killing effects though reversal of the immunosuppression. DCZ0825 inhibits the activity and proliferation of MM cells causing no significant toxicity to normal cells. Using flow cytometry, this study found that DCZ0825 induced caspase-dependent apoptosis in MM cells and arrested the cell cycle in the G2/M phase by down-regulating CyclinB1, CDK1 and CDC25. Moreover, DCZ0825 up-regulated IRF3 and IRF7 to increase IFN-γ, promoting M2 macrophages to transform into M1 macrophages, releasing the immunosuppression of CD4T cells and stimulated M1 macrophages and Th1 cells to secrete more INF-γ to form immune killing effect on MM cells. Treatment with DCZ0825 resulted in an increased proportion of positive regulatory cells such as CD4T, memory T cells, CD8T, and NK cells, with downregulation of the proportion of negative regulatory cells such as Treg cells and MDSCs. In conclusion, DCZ0825 is a novel compound with both antitumor and immunomodulatory activity.

Comparison of Patient Outcomes With Two Different Formulations of Melphalan as Conditioning Chemotherapy for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

High-dose melphalan (HDM) with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) after induction chemotherapy is considered standard of care in transplant-eligible patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Alkeran melphalan has propylene glycol as a solvent (PG-mel) while Evomela utilizes a propylene glyclol-free formulation (PGF-mel). We evaluated the differences in efficacy and safety of the 2 formulations as there are no prospective head-to-head trials.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all 259 consecutive MM patients who received PGF-mel as part of HDM-AHCT at The Ohio State University (OSU). The comparator group was the preceding 255 patients who received PG-mel.

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Post-AHCT rates of relapse were comparable in the PG-mel and PGF-mel groups. Some adverse events were observed at a higher frequency in the PG-mel group compared to the PGF-mel group (grade ≥ 2 mucositis, febrile neutropenia, other infectious complications, and acute renal insufficiency). Time to neutrophil engraftment was slightly longer in the PG-mel group while time to platelet engraftment was longer in PGF-mel group. Red cell transfusion requirement was higher with the use of PG-mel but not platelet transfusion. Duration of hospitalization was slightly shorter with PGF-mel but readmission rates within 30 days of discharge were higher.

CONCLUSION

Considering possible confounding factors could possibly account for observed differences in some adverse events, the comparable treatment responses, and difference in cost of the 2 formulation, The OSU reverted to PG-mel as the preferred formulation for HDM-AHCT in MM.

β-Cyclodextrin-Based Nanosponges Inclusion Compounds Associated with Gold Nanorods for Potential NIR-II Drug Delivery

This article describes the synthesis and characterization of two nanocarriers consisting of β-cyclodextrin-based nanosponges (NSs) inclusion compounds (ICs) and gold nanorods (AuNRs) for potential near-infrared II (NIR-II) drug-delivery systems. These nanosystems sought to improve the stability of two drugs, namely melphalan (MPH) and curcumin (CUR), and to trigger their photothermal release after a laser irradiation stimulus (1064 nm). The inclusion of MPH and CUR inside each NS was confirmed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, (FT-IR) differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR). Furthermore, the association of AuNRs with both ICs was confirmed by FE-SEM, energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), TEM, dynamic light scattering (DLS), ζ-potential, and UV–Vis. Moreover, the irradiation assays demonstrated the feasibility of the controlled-photothermal drug release of both MPH and CUR in the second biological window (1000–1300 nm). Finally, MTS assays depicted that the inclusion of MPH and CUR inside the cavities of NSs reduces the effects on mitochondrial activity, as compared to that observed in the free drugs. Overall, these results suggest the use of NSs associated with AuNRs as a potential technology of controlled drug delivery in tumor therapy, since they are efficient and non-toxic materials.

A Review of Propylene Glycol-free Melphalan Conditioning for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma and Light Chain Amyloidosis

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) remains a standard therapeutic option for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Outcomes have improved for this patient group after first AHCT, with the use of novel agents in induction, as well as post-transplantation maintenance. High-dose melphalan remains the gold standard as the conditioning regimen for MM. Traditional melphalan is a lyophilized formulation that after reconstitution has insufficient chemical stability and water solubility, thus requiring the addition of propylene glycol to act as a cosolvent to improve these characteristics. After the reconstitution of melphalan with propylene glycol-containing solution, impurities can develop within 30 minutes, and if further dilution occurs, the potency of melphalan diminishes. Propylene glycol is associated with a spectrum of toxicities that can be dose limiting. Evomela is a propylene glycol-free melphalan (PGF-Mel) that at a high dose of 200 mg/² (100 mg/m²/d for 2 days) is approved for conditioning before AHCT in MM patients. Once reconstituted by directly dissolving in saline solution, PGF-Mel solution can be stored in the vial for up to 1 hour at room temperature or for up to 24 hours at refrigerated temperature (2° to 8°C) with no significant degradation. The demonstrated stability, up to 24 hours at room temperature, results in reduced handling requirements and increased convenience and flexibility of administration. Since its approval, Evomela has been the subject of several retrospective and investigator-initiated studies. This review summarizes the prospective and real-world evidence on practical aspects of PGF-Mel and critically appraises the available data and its clinical implications.

Efficacy, Toxicity, and Pharmacokinetics of Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy Versus Intravenous Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma in Animal Models and Patients

Purpose

Through controlled comparative rabbit experiments and parallel patient studies, our purpose was to understand mechanisms underlying differences in efficacy and toxicity between intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) and intravenous chemotherapy (IVC).

Methods

In rabbits, ocular tissue drug levels were measured following IAC and IVC. Retinal toxicity was assessed using electroretinography, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography. Efficacy to eradicate retinoblastoma orthotopic xenografts was compared. In IAC and IVC patients, we measured blood carboplatin pharmacokinetics and compared efficacy and toxicity.

Results

In rabbits receiving IAC, maximum carboplatin levels were 134 times greater in retina (P = 0.01) and 411 times greater in vitreous (P < 0.001), and total carboplatin (area under the curve) was 123 times greater in retina (P = 0.005) and 131 times greater in vitreous (P = 0.02) compared with IVC. Melphalan levels were 12 times greater (P = 0.003) in retina and 26 times greater in vitreous (P < 0.001) for IAC. Blood levels were not different. IAC melphalan (but not IV melphalan or IV carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine) caused widespread apoptosis in retinoblastoma xenografts but no functional retinal toxicity or cytopenias. In patients, blood levels following IVC were greater (P < 0.001) but, when adjusted for treatment dose, were not statistically different. Per treatment cycle in patients, IVC caused higher rates of anemia (0.32 ± 0.29 vs. 0.01 ± 0.04; P = 0.0086), thrombocytopenia (0.5 ± 0.42 vs. 0.0 ± 0.0; P = 0.0042), and neutropenia (0.58 ± 0.3 vs. 0.31 ± 0.25; P = 0.032) but lower treatment success rates (P = 0.0017).

Conclusions

The greater efficacy and lower systemic toxicity with IAC appear to be attributable to the greater ocular-to-systemic drug concentration ratio compared with IVC.

Translational Relevance

Provides an overarching hypothesis for a mechanism of efficacy/toxicity to guide future drug development.

Intravitreal melphalan hydrochloride vs propylene glycol-free melphalan for retinoblastoma vitreous seeds: Efficacy, toxicity and stability in rabbits models and patients

The use of intravitreal chemotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced intraocular retinoblastoma, as intravitreal melphalan has enabled difficult-to-treat vitreous tumor seeds to be controlled, leading to many more eyes being saved. However, melphalan hydrochloride (MH) degrades rapidly in solution, increasing logistical complexity with respect to time between medication preparation and administration for intravitreal administration under anesthesia for retinoblastoma. A new propylene glycol-free melphalan (PGFM) formulation has greater stability and could therefore improve access and adoption of intravitreal chemotherapy, allowing more children to retain their eye(s). We compared the efficacy and toxicity of both formulations, using our rabbit xenograft model and clinical patient experience. Three weekly 12.5 μg intravitreal injections of MH or PGFM (right eye), and saline (left eye), were administered to immunosuppressed rabbits harboring human WERI-Rb1 vitreous seed xenografts. Residual live cells were quantified directly, and viability determined by TUNEL staining. Vitreous seeds were reduced 91% by PGFM (p = 0.009), and 88% by MH (p = 0.004; PGFM vs. MH: p = 0.68). All residual cells were TUNEL-positive (non-viable). In separate experiments to assess toxicity, three weekly 12.5 μg injections of MH, PGFM, or saline were administered to non-tumor-bearing rabbits. Serial electroretinography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-angiography were performed. PGFM and MH both caused equivalent reductions in electroretinography amplitudes, and loss of retinal microvasculature on OCT-angiography. The pattern of retinal degeneration observed on histopathology suggested that segmental retinal toxicity associated with all melphalan formulations was due to a vitreous concentration gradient-effect. Efficacy and toxicity were assessed for PGFM given immediately (within 1 h of reconstitution) vs. 4 h after reconstitution. Immediate- and delayed-administration of PGFM showed equivalent efficacy and toxicity. In addition, we evaluated efficacy and toxicity in patients (205 eyes) with retinoblastoma vitreous seeds, who were treated with a total of 833 intravitreal injections of either MH or PGFM as standard of care. Of these, we analyzed 118 MH and 131 PGFM monotherapy injections in whom serial ERG measurements were available to model retinal toxicity. Both MH and PGFM caused reductions in electroretinography amplitudes, but with no statistical difference between formulations. Comparing those patient eyes treated exclusively with PGFM versus those treated exclusively with MH, efficacy for tumor control and globe salvage was equivalent (PGFM vs. MH: 96.2% vs. 93.8%, p = 0.56), but PGFM-treated eyes received fewer injections than MH-treated eyes (average 3.2 ± 1.9 vs. 6.4 ± 2.1 injections, p < 0.0001). Taken together, these rabbit experiments and our clinical experience in retinoblastoma patients demonstrate that MH and PGFM have equivalent efficacy and toxicity. PGFM was more stable, with no decreased efficacy or increased toxicity even 4 h after reconstitution. We therefore now use PGFM over traditional MH for our patients for intravitreal treatment of retinoblastoma.

Evaluating the incidence of engraftment syndrome with different melphalan formulations in adult multiple myeloma and immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Engraftment syndrome (ES) is a common complication of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The difference in incidence of ES between melphalan formulations has not been widely reported throughout the literature and would allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of both melphalan formulations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, observational study evaluated 83 adult multiple myeloma and immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis patients who received either propylene glycol-containing (PG) or propylene glycol-free (PG-free) melphalan 140 mg/m² as single-agent conditioning chemotherapy for autologous HCT from May 31, 2015 to May 31, 2019. The primary outcome was to assess the incidence of ES, as defined using the Maiolino criteria, with both melphalan formulations. Secondary outcomes included an analysis of potential risk factors for the development of ES, as well as an evaluation of overall length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

The incidence of ES for PG and PG-free melphalan did not differ significantly, 14/39 (35.9%) and 12/44 (27.3%) (P = 0.4), respectively. No potential risk factors for ES were identified on multivariate logistic regression analysis. A statistically significant difference in number of days to engraftment was identified for PG and PG-free melphalan, 15.56 vs. 13.82 days (P = 0.01), respectively; although, this did not translate to a decrease in LOS, 19.9 vs. 18.59 days (P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ES did not differ significantly between melphalan formulations. Future research is needed to determine whether the faster time to engraftment seen with PG-free melphalan may translate to a decrease in LOS.

Propylene Glycol-Free Melphalan versus PG-Melphalan as Conditioning for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myeloma

High-dose melphalan (Mel) conditioning before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) is standard of care for patients with transplantation-eligible multiple myeloma. The traditional lyophilized Mel formulation has inadequate solubility and stability after reconstitution, leading to the use of propylene glycol (PG) as a solubilizing agent. A newer PG-free Mel preparation (Evomela) uses beta cyclodextrin captisol as a solubilizing agent and was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a conditioning agent based on a single-phase IIb study showing bioequivalence. We compared the outcomes of consecutive patients with myeloma undergoing autoHCT using the 2 formulations of Mel for conditioning as our center switched from using the older formulation (PG-Mel) to the newer one (PGF-Mel). Of 294 autoHCT recipients, 162 received PG-Mel conditioning and 132 received PGF-Mel conditioning. The PGF-Mel group was older and had a lower average Karnofsky Performance Status score. PGF-Mel was associated with faster neutrophil recovery (median, 12 days versus 13 days; P < .001), fewer grade 3-4 infections within 30 days of autoHCT (1.5% versus 8.0%; P = .048), and a lower 30-day rehospitalization rate (6.8% versus 17.9%; P = .04), as confirmed by propensity-weighted analysis. No significant between-group differences were detected in mucositis, organ toxicity, myeloma response, or 100-day mortality.