Successful switch to oral tacrolimus in a patient with hypersensitivity reaction to parenteral vitamin K, cyclosporine, and tacrolimus: A case report

Immunosuppressive Drugs

Immunosuppressant is a class of medicines that inhibit or decrease the intensity of the immune response in the body. Most of these medications are used to allow the body less likely to resist a transplanted organ. In solid organ transplantation, immunosuppressive agents are needed for the activation of early-stage immunosuppression, the management of late-stage immunosuppression or for the maintenance of organ rejection. The emergence of novel agents and improvements in immunosuppression regimens after transplantation are significant factors leading to this progress. However, these drugs also increase the risk of infection, cancers and specific adverse side effects specific to each agent in patients particularly in pregnant women and fertility issues. Corona virus disease being hot topic of debate is has given positive outcome to immunosuppressive drugs however need more attention in future. Transplant centers across the world utilize multiple immunosuppression protocols; nevertheless, each patient can require an individually formulated immunosuppression regimen to manage the advantages and possible damage of treatment thus eliminating the likelihood of their primary disease recurrence.

Hidden Dangers: Recognizing Excipients as Potential Causes of Drug and Vaccine Hypersensitivity Reactions

Excipients are necessary as a support to the active ingredients in drugs, vaccines, and other products, and they contribute to their stability, preservation, pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, appearance, and acceptability. For both drugs and vaccines, these are rare reactions; however, for vaccines, they are the primary cause of immediate hypersensitivity. Suspicion for these "hidden dangers" should be high, in particular, when anaphylaxis has occurred in association with multiple chemically distinct drugs. Common excipients implicated include gelatin, carboxymethylcellulose, polyethylene glycols, and products related to polyethylene glycols in immediate hypersensitivity reactions and propylene glycol in delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Complete evaluation of a suspected excipient reaction requires detailed information from the product monograph and package insert to identify all ingredients that are present and to understand the function and structure for these chemicals. This knowledge helps develop a management plan that may include allergy testing to identify the implicated component and to give patients detailed information for future avoidance of relevant foods, drugs, and vaccines. Excipient reactions should be particularly considered for specific classes of drugs where they have been commonly found to be the culprit (eg, corticosteroids, injectable hormones, immunotherapies, monoclonal antibodies, and vaccines). We provide a review of the evidence-based literature outlining epidemiology and mechanisms of excipient reactions and provide strategies for heightened recognition and allergy testing.

Tacrolimus Immunosuppression Causes Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions in Liver-Transplant Patients: A 3-Case Report

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions attributed to the immunosuppressive agent tacrolimus after an organ transplant are rare in the literature. We present 3 cases of male adult patients grafted with a cadaveric liver who developed delayed hypersensitivity reactions to tacrolimus in the form of the prolonged-release capsules (Advagraf). Furthermore, the appropriate drug concentration solutions used for allergy testing are proposed.

METHODS

All patients received a liver transplant (LT) because of cirrhosis of various etiologies. They were immunosuppressed with tacrolimus once daily. Several months after they had been placed on an immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus in the form of prolonged-release capsules (Advagraf), the patients presented with delayed hypersensitivity reactions and torturous pruritic rash that affected the whole body and was unresponsive to treatment with oral ursodeoxycholic acid, cholestyramine, or levocetirizine. Allergy testing that was performed by skin prick testing was negative. Nevertheless, intradermal testing yielded positive results in all 3 patients. Management was by interruption of the culprit agent, which was followed by symptom resolution. The immunosuppressive treatment was continued with alternative drugs.

RESULTS

Appropriate nonirritating drug concentration solutions of the drug used for intradermal testing were highly sensitive and confirmed the clinical diagnosis of tacrolimus allergy in all the affected patients.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppressive treatment with tacrolimus in the form of prolonged-release capsules may cause a drug hypersensitivity reaction. A suspicion of allergy warrants a referral for allergy testing. Pruritic rash refractory to treatment in liver transplanted patients should be evaluated by an allergist for possible drug allergy when bile stasis and graft disease have been excluded. Intradermal testing has proven a highly sensitive method for confirming a drug allergy diagnosis, whereas skin prick testing did not.

Anaphylaxis Induced by Intravenous Tacrolimus Administration During Kidney Transplant Surgery: A Case Report

A 35-year-old male patient with end-stage renal disease due to vesicoureteral reflux preemptively received a renal graft from his father. The patient had a history of allergy to contrast-enhancing media. He received oral tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil without any problems for 2 days before kidney transplantation. During the induction period of the surgery, his systolic blood pressure (sBP) decreased to 60 mmHg approximately 1 hour after initiating intravenous tacrolimus (TAC-IV) and intravenous piperacillin (PIPC), and the anesthesiologist suspected drug-induced anaphylaxis and stopped administration of the medications. Because TAC had been administered preoperatively without any adverse events, PIPC was suspected as the causative agent of the anaphylaxis. After the patient's hemodynamics returned to baseline, TAC-IV was restarted. However, his sBP rapidly decreased to 40 mmHg and the patient developed wheezing. He was diagnosed with drug-induced anaphylaxis due to castor oil derivatives in the TAC-IV formulation. The patient's sBP was restored with the administration of some vasopressors, and kidney transplantation was then performed without difficulty. Two days after kidney transplantation, oral TAC was administered without anaphylaxis. Clinicians should consider that not only the drug itself but also its additives or metabolites could induce anaphylaxis.