Clinical and economic impact of clinical oncology pharmacy in cancer patients receiving injectable anticancer treatments: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Clinical pharmacy can reduce drug-related iatrogenesis by improving the management of adverse effects of drugs, limiting drug-drug interactions, and improving patient adherence. Given the vulnerability of cancer patients and the toxicity of injectable anticancer drugs, clinical pharmacy service (CPS) could provide a significant clinical benefit in cancer care. This review aims to synthesize existing evidence on clinical pharmacy's impact on patients treated with intravenous anticancer drugs.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed/Medline database from January 2000 to December 2021, associating the keywords: clinical pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, pharmacist, oncology, and chemotherapy. To be eligible for inclusion, studies have to report clinical pharmaceutical services for patients treated with intravenous chemotherapy with a clinical and/or economic impact.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies met the selection criteria. Various CPS were reported: medication reconciliation, medication review, and pharmaceutical interview with patient. There was a lack of randomized study (n = 3; 7.3%). In one randomized controlled trial, pharmaceutical intervention significantly improved quality of life of patients receiving pharmaceutical care during injectable anticancer drugs courses. Economical results appear to show positive impact of clinical pharmacy with cost savings reported from 3112.87$ to 249 844€. Although most studies were non-comparative, they highlighted that clinical pharmacy tend to limit chemotherapy side effects and drug-related problems, improve quality of life and satisfaction of patients and healthcare professional, and a positive economic impact.

CONCLUSION

Clinical pharmacy can reduce adverse drug events in cancer patients. More robust and economic evaluations are still required to support its development in everyday practice.

The influence of pharmaceutical care in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving combination cytotoxic chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined chemotherapy (ICIC) are widely used for various types of lung cancer in the past decade. However, ICIC related adverse events (AEs) are more serious than immune-related adverse events (irAE) or cytotoxic chemotherapy alone.

Objective: This prospective interventional study aimed to evaluate the impact of the pharmaceutical care program in reducing adverse events and analyze pharmacy interventions in patients with NSCLC who receive ICIC therapies.

Method: NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study, the pharmaceutical care program was introduced after patients received the second cycle ICIC therapies, and were followed by the pharmacist for 6 months after hospital discharge. The percentages of adverse events between patients in and after the first two cycles were analyzed and compared.

Results: After the first two treatment cycles, the clinical pharmacist proposed 67 interventions in 30 patients. The most frequent types of intervention were drug discontinuation (40.3%, 27/67) followed by drug modification (14.9%, 10/67). There were significant decreases in AEs after the second cycle with respect to nausea (≥grade-2, 14% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.039), constipation (≥grade-2, 8.8% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.039), diarrhea (≥grade-2, 6% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.031), and myelosuppression (≥grade-2, 15.8% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.022).

Conclusion: Provision of pharmaceutical care for NSCLC patients receiving ICIC therapies can optimize drug therapy and reduce adverse events.

Pharmacist Involvement in Cancer Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This review aimed to critically evaluate the impact of pharmacist involvement in managing pain in cancer patients. Databases (including MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL) were searched with a broad search strategy for studies involving pharmacists and cancer pain management until February 10, 2021. The quality of studies and evidence were assessed using standardized tools and GRADE, respectively. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Sixty-four studies were included. Common interventions delivered by the pharmacists were medication review, patient education, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) detection and management, pharmacological recommendations (in dosing and pharmacotherapy choice), and pain assessment. A pooled analysis of 3 randomized control trials showed a significant reduction in pain intensity with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.35 [95% confidence intervals (CI): -0.55, -0.16]. Pooled analyses from nonrandomized studies of interventions also showed significant results in reduction of ADRs with an odds ratio of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.79) and improvement in quality of life with SMD of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.29, 1.32). Thus, pharmacists significantly improve the clinical outcomes of cancer patients related to pain. This indicates the involvement of pharmacists directly or in collaboration with healthcare professionals in the oncology team is highly beneficial for the patients. PERSPECTIVES: This systematic review presents a comprehensive evaluation of pharmacist involvement in cancer pain management. This shows the importance of direct involvement of the pharmacist or as an important member of the multidisciplinary oncology team.

Clinical pharmaceutical screening in critical situations in a radioiodine therapy management service

Radioiodine therapy can be used in differentiated thyroid carcinoma and requires extensive evaluation to ensure effectiveness and safety. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate all health problems and medications used in the pre-radioiodine therapy period and comprehensive medication managementservices can serve as a screening tool in this context. The present study aims to describe critical clinical situations identified during the initial assessments of a comprehensive medication management service offered to differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients pre-radioiodine therapy, and the pharmaceutical interventions performed to solve them. A descriptive study with regard to the initial ten months of a comprehensive medication management service was carried out in a large oncology hospital (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Descriptive analysis was used to describe the critical clinical situations identified, as well as the correspondent drug therapy problems and the type, acceptability, and outcomes of the pharmaceutical interventions performed to solve them. Thirty patients with an average of 45.8 years and 5.1 medications were evaluated. Five critical clinical situations were identified; corresponding to drug therapy problems two(needs additional drug therapy - n = 4) and drug therapy problems four (dosage too low - n = 1). All pharmaceutical interventions were accepted. The comprehensive medication management service provision pre-radioiodine therapy is feasible and represents an important screening strategy.

International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) position statement: Role of the oncology pharmacy team in cancer care

The Oncology Pharmacy Team (OPT), consisting of specialty-trained pharmacists and/or pharmacy technicians, is an integral component of the multidisciplinary healthcare team (MHT) involved with all aspects of cancer patient care. The OPT fosters quality patient care, safety, and local regulatory compliance. The International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) developed this position statement to provide guidance on five key areas: 1) oncology pharmacy practice as a pharmacy specialty; 2) contributions to patient care; 3) oncology pharmacy practice management; 4) education and training; and 5) contributions to oncology research and quality initiatives to involve the OPT. This position statement advocates that: 1) the OPT be fully incorporated into the MHT to optimize patient care; 2) educational and healthcare institutions develop programs to continually educate OPT members; and 3) regulatory authorities develop certification programs to recognize the unique contributions of the OPT in cancer patient care.