The Problem of Drug Interactions Between Rosuvastatin and Ticagrelor in the Aspect of the Risk of Rhabdomyolysis: Discussion of the Problem and Description of the Clinical Case

Background. Combination therapy with two antiplatelet agents (ticagrelor or clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid) and a high dose statin is recommended in accordance with clinical guidelines for patients undergoing acute coronary syndrome and coronary intervention. Combined therapeutic regimens have drug-drug interaction potential. Rhabdomyolysis is a known side effect of statin therapy, and there is evidence that co-therapy with ticagrelor increases the risk of this complication.Case description. A 72-year-old female patient was hospitalized with typical signs of rhabdomyolysis: muscle pain, oliguria, weakness, significant increases in creatine kinase (CK), myoglobin and creatinine. One month before that, she was urgently hospitalized with acute recurrent ST-elevation myocardial infarction and underwent endovascular intervention on a critical stenosis of the left anterior descending artery with stent implantation. After that, rosuvastatin 40 mg per day and ticagrelor 90mg 2 times a day were added to her therapy. During the current hospitalization, rosuvastatin, ACE inhibitors and spirolactone were canceled, infusion therapy was carried out, which led to a rapid regression of symptoms, restoration of adequate diuresis, and normalization of CK, myoglobin and creatinine levels. Conclusions. The combined use of ticagrelor with rosuvastatin (especially at a high dose) increases the risk of rhabdomyolysis in elderly patients. Patients taking ticagrelor may require changes in statin therapy, dose adjustments, and possible drug changes to avoid pharmacological interactions and an increased risk of side effects.

Hospitalization for adverse events under abiraterone or enzalutamide exposure in real-world setting: A French population-based study on prostate cancer patients

AIMS

Safety profiles of abiraterone and enzalutamide rely mainly on Phase III clinical trials. Our objective was to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for certain adverse events leading in real life to hospitalization (atrial fibrillation, acute heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, acute kidney injury [AKI], ischaemic stroke, torsade de pointe/QT interval prolongation, hepatitis and seizure), comparing abiraterone to enzalutamide. We also set out to discuss previously identified safety signals.

METHOD

Using the French National Health Insurance System database, all patients newly exposed to abiraterone or enzalutamide between 2013 and 2017 and followed until 31 December 2018 were targeted. IRRs for each event were estimated using a Poisson model in a sub-population of patients without contraindications or precautions for use for either treatment.

RESULTS

Among 11 534 new users of abiraterone and enzalutamide, AKI (IRR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.01-2.00), liver monitoring suggestive of hepatic damage (IRR 3.06, 95% CI: 2.66-3.53) and atrial fibrillation (IRR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.19) were significantly more often observed with abiraterone than with enzalutamide.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides knowledge on abiraterone and enzalutamide real-life safety profiles, especially for events leading to hospitalization. Despite several limitations, including the lack of clinical data, the safety signal for AKI under abiraterone is in line with results of an analysis of the French pharmacovigilance database, which requires further specific investigations. Enlightening the clinicians' therapeutic choices for patients treated for prostate cancer, our study should lead to clinicians being cautious in the use of abiraterone.