Real-world evidence of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian cancer: A systematic literature review

A Real World Perspective of PARP Inhibitor Use in Gynecological Cancer Patients

Introduction: Over the last few years, targeted therapy has become the mainstay maintenance treatment of patients with ovarian cancer including patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in the treatment of patients who are in complete or partial remission. PARPi are known to cause hematological adverse events (AEs), but have not been compared directly to each other. Objective: Primary objective was to compare the incidence of hematological and non-hematological AEs associated with the use of PARPi. Methods: This was a single institution, retrospective study evaluating patients who were treated with PARPi for ovarian cancer from January 2017 to October 2020. Patients were stratified according to which PARP inhibitor they received. Results: Ninety-two patients were included in final analysis. Thirty-one (33.7%) patients received niraparib and 61 (66.3%) patients received olaparib. Median age of patients were 64.3 (range, 33.8 to 92.3) years, 66 (71.7%) were white, and 84 (91.3%) had an ECOG PS of 0/1. Patients in the niraparib group experienced a higher rate of hematologic AEs, with 11 (35.5%), 20 (64.5%), and 18 (58.1%) experiencing neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Eight (13.1%), 24 (39.3%), and 16 (26.2%) patients in the olaparib group experienced neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Conclusion: This single institution retrospective study outlines the hematological toxicities observed between two PARPi. Our results suggested that niraparib tended to be associated with a higher risk for hematologic toxicities than olaparib. Anemia was the most common hematologic toxicity which was consistent with what has been widely documented in the literature.

Managing Adverse Effects Associated With Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: A Synthesis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data

The use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy is standard care in the management of patients with various malignancies including ovarian, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. PARP inhibitors have been approved in different settings for patients with specific hereditary pathogenic variants, most notably homologous recombination repair pathways such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The vast experience with PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib) has been in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer. There have not been any head-to-head comparisons of PARP inhibitors in randomized trials, and we can only perform cross-comparison on the basis of the reported literature. The three approved PARP inhibitors share several common adverse effects because of a class effect including nausea, fatigue, and anemia, but there are notable differences likely because of variations in their poly-pharmacology and off-target effects. Finally, patients included in clinical trials are often younger with a good performance status and less comorbidities than the real-world population, and hence, the potential benefits and adverse effects may not be superimposable. In this review, we describe these differences and discuss strategies to mitigate and manage adverse side effects effectively.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of maintenance niraparib for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: A GEICO retrospective observational study within the Spanish expanded-access programme

AIM

To describe patient characteristics, effectiveness and safety in a real-world population treated with niraparib in the Spanish expanded-access programme.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study included women with platinum-sensitive recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer who received maintenance niraparib within the Spanish niraparib expanded-access programme. Eligible patients had received ≥2 previous lines of platinum-containing therapy, remained platinum-sensitive after the penultimate line of platinum and had responded to the most recent platinum-containing therapy. Niraparib dosing was at the treating physician's discretion (300 mg/day fixed starting dose or individualised starting dose [ISD] according to baseline body weight and platelet count). Safety, impact of dose adjustments, patient characteristics and effectiveness were analysed using data extracted from medical records.

RESULTS

Among 316 eligible patients, 80% had BRCA wild-type tumours and 66% received an ISD. Median niraparib duration was 7.8 months. The most common adverse events typically occurred within 3 months of starting niraparib. Median progression-free survival was 8.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.6-10.0) months. One- and 2-year overall survival rates were 86% (95% CI 81-89%) and 65% (95% CI 59-70%), respectively. Dose interruptions, dose reductions, haematological toxicities and asthenia/fatigue were less common with ISD than fixed starting dose niraparib, but progression-free survival was similar irrespective of dosing strategy. Subsequent therapy included platinum in 71% of patients who received further treatment.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes in this large real-world dataset of niraparib-treated patients are consistent with phase III trials, providing reassuring evidence of the tolerability and activity of niraparib maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT04546373.

Current status and progress in using radiolabelled PARP-1 inhibitors for imaging PARP-1 expression in tumours

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is a key enzyme in the DNA repair process, and the overexpression of PARP-1 in several tumours makes this enzyme a promising molecular target. Recently, several PARP-1 inhibitors, such as olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib and talazoparib, have been clinically approved as anticancer drugs. Several of these inhibitors have been radiolabelled for noninvasive imaging of PARP-1 expression in several types of tumours. In this review, the background and progress for using various radiolabelled PARP-1 inhibitors for cancer diagnosis are discussed and future development directions are proposed.

Utilization of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study of US Healthcare Claims Data

Introduction

We aimed to characterize real-world utilization of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) in women with ovarian cancer (OC).

Methods

This retrospective observational study of claims data from US MarketScan^® Commercial/Medicare Supplemental databases included women with OC initiating olaparib, niraparib, or rucaparib from January 1, 2017, to May 31, 2019. Patients were observed from first outpatient prescription until at least 30 days’ follow-up. Clinical events of interest (CEIs), based on adverse reactions in PARPi prescribing information, were identified from claims using ICD-9/10 codes. Other outcomes included dose modification, persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost.

Results

Overall, 303, 348, and 162 women with OC received olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib, respectively. During follow-up, risk of any CEI was higher with niraparib versus olaparib (odds ratio 3.36 [95% confidence interval 2.00–5.65]) and niraparib versus rucaparib (2.09 [1.10–3.95]), with no significant difference between rucaparib and olaparib (1.61 [0.93–2.79]). PARPi dose decreases were observed in 21.1%, 35.1%, and 30.2% of olaparib-, niraparib-, and rucaparib-treated patients, respectively. Persistence (no treatment gaps of more than 90 days) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) with olaparib (62.2%) versus niraparib (35.9%) and rucaparib (48.7%); adherence (medication possession ratio, MPR ≥ 80%) was 80.2% versus 38.6% and 63.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). Inpatient admissions and outpatient service use were higher with niraparib and rucaparib versus olaparib, reflected in mean (± standard deviation) total medical costs (excluding pharmacy) of $5393 ± 8828 for olaparib, $7732 ± 14,054 for niraparib, and $6868 ± 7929 for rucaparib.

Conclusion

Differences between the licensed PARPi were observed in the risk of experiencing a CEI, likelihood of dose modifications, ability to receive continuous PARPi therapy, HCRU, and costs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01959-5.