An overview of the role of selpercatinib and pralsetinib in RET-fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Adverse event profiles of selpercatinib: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on FAERS database

BACKGROUND

Selpercatinib, a highly selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has emerged as an excellent treatment option for patients with rearranged during transfection-altered cancer. However, there is limited comprehensive safety information available for selpercatinib through large-scale post-marketing monitoring.

METHODS

This study conducted a comprehensive analysis of selpercatinib-related adverse events (AEs) using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Four disproportionality methods were employed to identify potential AEs associated with selpercatinib. Specifically, this study investigated the differences in AEs of selpercatinib with respect to reporter continent, indication, sex, age, weight, dose, frequency, and onset time.

RESULTS

A total of 464 reports and 1,007 selpercatinib-related AEs were identified. Three new significant AEs were discovered, including dysphagia, pericardial effusion, and hemiparesis. Notably, Asia reported hepatic function abnormal more frequently, especially in patient administered doses exceeding 160 mg. Furthermore, hypersensitivity was reported more frequently by Asia and in individuals weighing less than 50 kg.

CONCLUSIONS

It is paramount to stay vigilant concerning the potential emergence of three newly identified AEs. Significant differences were found in selpercatinib-related AEs concerning reporter continent, sex, weight, dose, frequency, and onset time, which deserved clinical attention. These findings contribute to a broader understanding of the AE profiles of selpercatinib.

Adverse event profile differences between pralsetinib and selpercatinib: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse events reporting system

Aims

The objective of this study is to compare the adverse events (AEs) associated with pralsetinib and selpercatinib.

Methods

To evaluate the imbalance of AEs linked to pralsetinib and selpercatinib in real-world data, the reporting odds ratio (ROR) was utilized to detect potential signals of AEs. Stratified analysis was conducted to examine the differences in AEs occurring among different genders and age groups taking pralsetinib and selpercatinib.

Results

FAERS received 891 reports for pralsetinib and 569 reports for selpercatinib. Our analysis confirmed expected AEs like hypertension, fatigue, and elevated transaminase levels. Unexpected AEs such as rhabdomyolysis, myocardial injury and cognitive disorder were associated with pralsetinib, while selpercatinib was linked with pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and pericardial effusion. The risk of AEs such as decreased platelet count, anemia, decreased white blood cell count, pneumonitis, asthenia, and edema caused by pralsetinib is significantly higher than that of selpercatinib. In contrast, the risk of AEs such as ascites, elevated alanine aminotransferase, and elevated aspartate aminotransferase caused by selpercatinib is significantly higher than that of pralsetinib. Women treated with pralsetinib experience higher rates of hypertension, pulmonary embolism, and blurred vision than men, who are more susceptible to rhabdomyolysis. Adults between 18 and 65 years are more likely to experience taste disorder, edema, and pulmonary embolism than individuals older than 65, who are particularly vulnerable to hypertension. For patients treated with selpercatinib, males demonstrate a significantly higher incidence of QT prolongation, urinary tract infection, and dysphagia. Individuals aged 18 to 65 are more likely to experience pyrexia and pleural effusion than those older than 65, who are more prone to hypersensitivity.

Conclusion

In the clinical administration of pralsetinib and selpercatinib, it is crucial to monitor the effects of gender and age on AEs and to be vigilant for unlisted AEs.

Cardiovascular toxicities of selective ret-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance study based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database

BACKGROUND

Selective RET-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RET-TKIs) treat RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but studies on their cardiovascular toxicities are limited. This study aimed to characterize the cardiovascular toxicities associated with selective RET-TKI in real-world settings.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database from 1 January 2020 to 30 June 2023, were analyzed. Two disproportionality methods, information component and reporting odds ratio (ROR) were used.

RESULTS

Both pralsetinib and selpercatinib showed positive signals for hypertension (pralsetinib: ROR: 5.25, 95% CI: 4.40-6.26; selpercatinib: ROR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.87-3.82). Additionally, pralsetinib showed a positive signal for ischemic heart disease (ROR: 3.92, 95% CI: 2.94-5.23), and selpercatinib for torsade de pointes/QT prolongation (ROR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.74-4.04). The median time to onset(TTO) of cardiovascular toxicities was 33 days (IQR: 9-73 days) for pralsetinib and 15 days (IQR: 10-50 days) for selpercatinib. The proportion of deaths, life-threatening events, and hospitalizations due to cardiovascular toxicities were 8.57%, 1.19%, and 31.43%, respectively, for total selective RET-TKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective RET-TKIs are related to multiple cardiovascular toxicities. Pralsetinib was linked to ischemic heart disease, and selpercatinib to torsade de pointes/QT prolongation and thrombotic events.

Advancements in NSCLC: From Pathophysiological Insights to Targeted Treatments

With the global incidence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on the rise, the development of innovative treatment strategies is increasingly vital. This review underscores the pivotal role of precision medicine in transforming NSCLC management, particularly through the integration of genomic and epigenomic insights to enhance treatment outcomes for patients. We focus on the identification of key gene mutations and examine the evolution and impact of targeted therapies. These therapies have shown encouraging results in improving survival rates and quality of life. Despite numerous gene mutations being identified in association with NSCLC, targeted treatments are available for only a select few. This paper offers an exhaustive analysis of the pathogenesis of NSCLC and reviews the latest advancements in targeted therapeutic approaches. It emphasizes the ongoing necessity for research and development in this domain. In addition, we discuss the current challenges faced in the clinical application of these therapies and the potential directions for future research, including the identification of novel targets and the development of new treatment modalities.

Epigenetic regulation in lung cancer

Lung cancer is indeed a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The development of tumors involves a complex interplay of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation (DNAm), histone modifications, and microRNA expression, play a crucial role in this process. Changes in DNAm patterns can lead to the silencing of important genes involved in cellular functions, contributing to the development and progression of lung cancer. MicroRNAs and exosomes have also emerged as reliable biomarkers for lung cancer. They can provide valuable information about early diagnosis and treatment assessment. In particular, abnormal hypermethylation of gene promoters and its effects on tumorigenesis, as well as its roles in the Wnt signaling pathway, have been extensively studied. Epigenetic drugs have shown promise in the treatment of lung cancer. These drugs target the aberrant epigenetic modifications that are involved in the development and progression of the disease. Several factors have been identified as drug targets in non-small cell lung cancer. Recently, combination therapy has been discussed as a successful strategy for overcoming drug resistance. Overall, understanding the role of epigenetic mechanisms and their targeting through drugs is an important area of research in lung cancer treatment.

Analysis of rare fusions in NSCLC: Genomic architecture and clinical implications

OBJECTIVES

Molecular diagnosis for targeted therapies has been improved significantly in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in recent years. Here we report on the prevalence of rare fusions in NSCLC and dissect their genomic architecture and potential clinical implications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, n = 5554 NSCLC patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) for combined detection of oncogenic mutations and fusions either at primary diagnosis (n = 5246) or after therapy resistance (n = 308). Panels of different sizes were employed with closed amplicon-based, or open assays, i.e. anchored multiplex PCR (AMP) and hybrid capture-based, for detection of translocations, including "rare" fusions, defined as those beyond ALK, ROS1, RET and <0.5 % frequency in NSCLC.

RESULTS

Rare fusions involving EGFR, MET, HER2, BRAF and other potentially actionable oncogenes were detected in 0.5% (n = 26) of therapy-naive and 2% (n = 6) TKI-treated tumors. Detection was increased using open assays and/or larger panels, especially those covering >25 genes, by approximately 1-2% (p = 0.001 for both). Patient characteristics (age, gender, smoking, TP53 co-mutations (56%), or mean tumor mutational burden (TMB) (4.8 mut/Mb)) showed no association with presence of rare fusions. Non-functional alterations, i.e. out-of-frame or lacking kinase domains, comprised one-third of detected rare fusions and were significantly associated with simultaneous presence of classical oncogenic drivers, e.g. EGFR or KRAS mutations (p < 0.001), or use of larger panels (frequency of non-functional among the detected rare fusions 57% for 25+ gene- vs. 12% for smaller panels, p < 0.001). As many rare fusions were identified before availability of targeted therapy, mean survival for therapy-naïve patients was 23.8 months, comparable with wild-type tumors.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1-2% of advanced NSCLC harbor rare fusions, which are potentially actionable and may support diagnosis. Routine adoption of broad NGS assays capable to identify exact fusion points and potentially retained protein domains can increase the yield of therapeutically relevant molecular information in advanced NSCLC.