Effect of frozen storage on some characteristics of kefir samples made from cow's and goat's milk

Evaluation of Spreadable Kefir Produced from Different Milks in Terms of Some Quality Criteria

Kefir, which has many beneficial effects on health, is one of the most consumed fermented milk products worldwide. It is important to increase consumption of the fermented product for public health. In this study, it was aimed to increase the beneficial effects of kefir on public health. Therefore, kefirs produced from different types of milk (cow, buffalo, sheep, and goat) were concentrated, and obtained spreadable kefir samples were investigated in terms of their microbiological characteristic (lactic bacilli, lactic cocci, yeasts and moulds, total bacteria, and coliform bacteria), benzoic acid content, physicochemical properties (fat, total solid, ash content, acidity, pH, syneresis, viscosity, colour, and rheological properties), and sensory characteristic. It was determined that APC, lactic bacilli, lactic cocci, and yeast counts of the concentrated kefir samples changed between 6.90 and 8.64, 6.89 and 8.61, 7.42 and 8.72, and 2.17 and 5.39 log CFU/g, respectively, during storage. Mould and coliform bacteria were not detected in the samples. The concentrated kefir samples contained benzoic acid in the range of 18.30-119.58 mg/L. Results from this study showed that type of milk caused differences on APC, lactic bacilli, lactic cocci and yeast count, total solids, ash, fat, acidity, pH, syneresis, colour, viscosity and rheological parameters, and benzoic acid content. In addition, milk type affected sensory properties of the kefirs. Concentrated kefirs produced from cow and buffalo milk were the most liked by panellists. Finally, it was determined that concentrated kefir was favoured as a new product by most of the panellists.

Water Kefir Grains vs. Milk Kefir Grains: Physical, Microbial and Chemical Comparison

AIMS

Even though kefir has been known for centuries, there is confusion between the two types of kefir grains, e.g., milk kefir grain and water kefir grain. This study aimed to unravel the differences and similarities between water kefir grain and milk kefir grain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Microbiological analyses, identification of grains microbiota and enumeration of microbiological content of the grains as well as Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) imaging, dry matter, protein, ash, and mineral content, and color analyses were carried out for the two types of grains. As a result, significant differences were found in microbiological content, chemical properties, and colors (p<0.05). Additionally, SEM images revealed the different intrinsic structures for the microbiota and the structure of the two types of grains.

CONCLUSIONS

MK grain has more nutritional content compared to WK grain. Despite not as widely known and used as MK grain, WK grain is a good source for minerals and health-friendly microorganisms like lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and yeasts. WK grain is possibly suitable for vegans and allergic individuals to fulfill nutritional requirements. Moreover, in this study, the variety of WK grain microbial consortia was wider than that of MK grains, and this significantly affected the resultant WK products.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This is the first study that comprehensively compares two different kefir grains in microbial, chemical, and physical properties.