Management of Established Small-for-size Syndrome in Post Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Medical, Radiological, and Surgical Interventions: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) following living donor liver transplantation is a complication that can lead to devastating outcomes such as prolonged poor graft function and possibly graft loss. Because of the concern about the syndrome, some transplants of mismatched grafts may not be performed. Portal hyperperfusion of a small graft and hyperdynamic splanchnic circulation are recognized as main pathogenic factors for the syndrome. Management of established SFSS is guided by the severity of the presentation with the initial focus on pharmacological therapy to modulate portal flow and provide supportive care to the patient with the goal of facilitating graft regeneration and recovery. When medical management fails or condition progresses with impending dysfunction or even liver failure, interventional radiology (IR) and/or surgical interventions to reduce portal overperfusion should be considered. Although most patients have good outcomes with medical, IR, and/or surgical management that allow graft regeneration, the risk of graft loss increases dramatically in the setting of bilirubin >10 mg/dL and INR>1.6 on postoperative day 7 or isolated bilirubin >20 mg/dL on postoperative day 14. Retransplantation should be considered based on the overall clinical situation and the above postoperative laboratory parameters. The following recommendations focus on medical and IR/surgical management of SFSS as well as considerations and timing of retransplantation when other therapies fail.

Anesthesia and Critical Care for the Prediction and Prevention for Small-for-size Syndrome: Guidelines from the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

BACKGROUND

During the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation, anesthesiologists and intensivists may encounter patients in receipt of small grafts that puts them at risk of developing small for size syndrome (SFSS).

METHODS

A scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on aspects of SFSS with proposed recommendations. Recommendations underwent a blinded review by an independent expert panel and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at a consensus conference organized by the International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplantation Society of India.

RESULTS

It was determined that centers with experience in living donor liver transplantation should utilize potential small for size grafts. Higher risk recipients with sarcopenia, cardiopulmonary, and renal dysfunction should receive small for size grafts with caution. In the intraoperative phase, a restrictive fluid strategy should be considered along with routine use of cardiac output monitoring, as well as use of pharmacologic portal flow modulation when appropriate. Postoperatively, these patients can be considered for enhanced recovery and should receive proactive monitoring for SFSS, nutrition optimization, infection prevention, and consideration for early renal replacement therapy for avoidance of graft congestion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our recommendations provide a framework for the optimal anesthetic and critical care management in the perioperative period for patients with grafts that put them at risk of developing SFSS. There is a significant limitation in the level of evidence for most recommendations. This statement aims to provide guidance for future research in the perioperative management of SFSS.

Mesenchymal stem cells prolong survival and prevent lethal complications in a porcine model of fulminant liver failure

BACKGROUND

Fulminant liver failure (FLF) is a life-threatening disease.

METHODS

Lethal FLF was induced by ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury in mini-pigs, and MSCs were infused via splenic vein after reperfusion.

RESULTS

Accumulated survival within 28 days was significantly improved by MSCs (P = 0.0348). Notably, MSCs maintained blood-gas homeostasis in the first 24 hours and prevented FLF-induced elevation of prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and creatinine and ammonia levels in the first 3 days. With MSCs, serum levels of liver enzymes gradually decreased after 3 days, and platelet count was back to normal at 1 week of FLF. MSCs promoted liver regeneration within 2 weeks and differentiated into functional hepatocytes at 2-4 weeks after transplantation, evidenced by increase in Ki67-positive cells, detectable human hepatocyte growth factor, human vascular endothelial growth factor, human hepatocyte-specific antigen, and human albumin-expressing cells in the liver at different time points. Reactive oxidative species (ROS) were accumulated after FLF and eliminated at 4 weeks after MSC transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, MSCs prolong the survival and prevent lethal sequelae of I-R injury-induced FLF by maintenance of liver-function homeostasis and rescue of ROS in the acute stage and by homing and differentiation into hepatocytes in the subacute stage.

Quantitative study of liver hemodynamic changes in rats with small-for-size syndrome by the 4D-CT perfusion technique

OBJECTIVE

The microcirculatory hemodynamic changes of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) are still unclear. In this study, they were investigated by four-dimensional CT perfusion (4D-CTP) technique.

METHODS

The sham group, 50, 60, 70 and 80 % partial hepatectomy (PH) rat groups were established. At 1 hour (1 h), 1 day (1 d), 3 days (3 d) and 7 days (7 d) post-operation, serological examination, 4D-CTP scan and histopathological examination were performed. One-way analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for the comparison.

RESULTS

Based on the diagnostic criteria of SFSS, the 80 % group was considered to be a successful model. In all the PH groups, portal vein perfusion and total liver perfusion peaked at 1 h and declined at 1d and 3d. Both portal vein perfusion and total liver perfusion were significantly higher in the 80 % group than the sham group, 50 and 60% groups at 1 h (p < 0.05), and 80 % group at 3d and 7d (p < 0.05). In the 50 and 60 % groups, hepatic artery perfusion decreased at 1 h and maintained at a lower level until at 7 d; whereas, in the 70 and 80% groups, it increased at 1 h, then decreased and reached the lowest level at 7 d. No significant difference appeared in hepatic artery perfusion between any two groups at any time points. At all time points, hepatic perfusion index was lower in all the PH groups than the sham group. Significant differences in hepatic perfusion index appeared between the 80% group and the sham group at 1 h and 1 d (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The CTP parameters quantitatively revealed the microcirculatory hemodynamic changes in SFSS, which were further confirmed to be associated with histopathological injury. It is suggested that the hemodynamic changes in SFSS remnant liver can provide useful information for further revealing the mechanism of SFSS and may help for guiding the treatments.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

By using the 4D-CTP technique, the hepatic microcirculatory hemodynamic changes could be quantitatively measured in vivo for small animal research.

Predictors of Radiation-Induced Liver Disease in Eastern and Western Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Proton Beam Therapy

PURPOSE

To identify predictors of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with proton beam therapy (PBT).

METHODS

This multicenter study included 136 patients with HCC (eastern, n = 102; western, n = 34) without evidence of intrahepatic tumor progression after PBT. The RILD was defined as ascites with alkaline-phosphatase abnormality, grade ≥3 hepatic toxicity, or Child-Pugh score worsening by ≥2 within 4 months after PBT completion. The proton doses were converted to equivalent doses in 2-GyE fractions. The unirradiated liver volume (ULV) was defined as the absolute liver volume (LV) receiving <1 GyE; the standard liver volume (SLV) was calculated using body surface area. Possible correlations of clinicodosimetric parameters with RILD were examined.

RESULTS

The mean pretreatment LV was 85% of SLV, and patients with a history of hepatectomy (P < .001) or hepatitis B virus infection (P = .035) had significantly smaller LV/SLV. Nineteen (14%) patients developed RILD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified ULV/SLV (P = .001), gross tumor volume (P = .001), and Child-Pugh classification (P = .002) as independent RILD predictors, and mean liver dose and target-delivered dose were not associated with RILD occurrence. A "volume-response" relationship between ULV/SLV and RILD was consistently observed in both eastern and western cohorts. In Child-Pugh class-A patients whose ULV/SLV were ≥50%, 49.9%-40%, 39.9%-30% and <30%, the RILD incidences were 0%, 6%, 16%, and 39% (P < .001), respectively. For the Child-Pugh class-B group, the RILD incidences in patients with ≥60%, 59.9%-40%, and <40% of ULV/SLV were 0%, 14%, and 83% (P = .006), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ULV/SLV, not mean liver dose, independently predicts RILD in patients with HCC undergoing PBT. The relative and absolute contraindications for Child-Pugh class-A patient's ULV/SLV are <50% and <30%, and <60% and <40% for Child-Pugh class-B patients, respectively. Our results indicate that the likelihood of hepatic complications for PBT is dictated by similar metrics as that for surgery.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Technical Innovations

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has found a place to serve the end-stage liver disease community as the donor safety and recipient suitability has been elucidated. Donor safety is of paramount importance and transplant programs must continue endeavors to maintain the highest possible standards. At the same time, adequacy of grafts based on recipient clinical status via their model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and volumetric studies to achieve a GRBWR >0.8, along with special attention to anatomic tailoring and portal venous flow optimization are necessary for successful transplantation. Technical innovations have improved sequentially the utility and availability of LDLT.