Characterization of fetal microchimeric immune cells in mouse maternal hearts during physiologic and pathologic pregnancies

Introduction: During pregnancy, fetal cells can be incorporated into maternal tissues (fetal microchimerism), where they can persist postpartum. Whether these fetal cells are beneficial or detrimental to maternal health is unknown. This study aimed to characterize fetal microchimeric immune cells in the maternal heart during pregnancy and postpartum, and to identify differences in these fetal microchimeric subpopulations between normal and pregnancies complicated by spontaneous preterm induced by ascending infection. Methods: A Cre reporter mouse model, which when mated with wild-type C57BL/6J females resulted in cells and tissues of progeny expressing red fluorescent protein tandem dimer Tomato (mT+), was used to detect fetal microchimeric cells. On embryonic day (E)15, 104 colony-forming units (CFU) E. coli was administered intravaginally to mimic ascending infection, with delivery on or before E18.5 considered as preterm delivery. A subset of pregnant mice was sacrificed at E16 and postpartum day 28 to harvest maternal hearts. Heart tissues were processed for immunofluorescence microscopy and high-dimensional mass cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) using an antibody panel of immune cell markers. Changes in cardiac physiologic parameters were measured up to 60 days postpartum via two-dimensional echocardiography. Results: Intravaginal E. coli administration resulted in preterm delivery of live pups in 70% of the cases. mT + expressing cells were detected in maternal uterus and heart, implying that fetal cells can migrate to different maternal compartments. During ascending infection, more fetal antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and less fetal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and fetal double-positive (DP) thymocytes were observed in maternal hearts at E16 compared to normal pregnancy. These HSCs were cleared while DP thymocytes persisted 28 days postpartum following an ascending infection. No significant changes in cardiac physiologic parameters were observed postpartum except a trend in lowering the ejection fraction rate in preterm delivered mothers. Conclusion: Both normal pregnancy and ascending infection revealed distinct compositions of fetal microchimeric immune cells within the maternal heart, which could potentially influence the maternal cardiac microenvironment via (1) modulation of cardiac reverse modeling processes by fetal stem cells, and (2) differential responses to recognition of fetal APCs by maternal T cells.

Allogeneic murine pregnancy models for assessing the developmental effects of immune-stimulating antibodies: Challenges in reproducibility

Literature suggests that murine allogeneic pregnancy models are an alternative approach for evaluating the developmental toxicity of immune-stimulating agents. In this study, multiple syngeneic and allogeneic murine pregnancy models were used to assess the potential embryo-fetal effects of four different murine antibodies (IgG₁ or IgG₂ ) that activate the immune system by binding to T-cell receptors (PD-L1, LAG-3, and GITR). The pregnancy models were generated by within and between matings of five different inbred strains of mice (CBA/CaJ, DBA/2J, BALB/c, C57BL/6, and CBA/J). The antibodies were administered every 2-3 days by intraperitoneal injection (n = 12-29/group) during gestation days 6 to 14. There were no differences in embryo-fetal endpoints between the allogeneic and syngeneic pregnancies. Additionally, treatment with the antibodies had no effect on mean postimplantation loss in either the syngeneic or allogeneic pregnancies despite confirmation of pharmacologically-relevant systemic exposures. These results suggest that allogeneic murine pregnancy models need further validation and testing before they can be reliably used as an alternative approach for assessing the developmental effects of agents that stimulate the immune system.

Applying a weight of evidence approach to the evaluation of developmental toxicity of biopharmaceuticals

Toxicity studies in pregnant animals are not always necessary for assessing the human risk of developmental toxicity of biopharmaceuticals. The growing experience and information on target biology and molecule-specific pharmacokinetics present a powerful approach to accurately anticipate effects of target engagement by biopharmaceuticals using a weight of evidence approach. The weight of evidence assessment should include all available data including target biology, pharmacokinetics, class effects, genetically modified animals, human mutations, and a thorough literature review. When assimilated, this weight of evidence evaluation may be sufficient to inform risk for specific clinical indications and patient populations. While under current guidance this approach is only applicable for drugs and biologics for oncology, the authors would like to suggest that this approach may also be appropriate for other disease indications. When there is an unacceptable level of uncertainty and a toxicity study in pregnant animals could impact human risk assessment, then such studies should be considered. Determination of appropriate nonclinical species for developmental toxicity studies to inform human risk should consider species-specific limitations, reproductive physiology, and pharmacology of the biopharmaceutical. This paper will provide considerations and examples of the weight of evidence approach to evaluating the human risk of developmental toxicity of biopharmaceuticals.

Report on the FDA-AACR Immuno-oncology Drug Development Workshop

The FDA-AACR Immuno-oncology Drug Development Workshop was held in Washington, DC, from October 13 to 14, 2016. This interdisciplinary forum included government, industry, and academic leaders in pharmacology and oncology. The aim of the meeting was to discuss methodologies in nonclinical and clinical research, safety monitoring, efficacy endpoints, and statistical evaluation of cancer immunotherapy products. This summary highlights topics and viewpoints raised by the presenters and discussants and should not be viewed as the conclusions or recommendations of the workshop as a whole. Cancer Immunol Res; 5(4); 282-5. ©2017 AACR.