Coxiellosis/Q fever in cats: ABCD guidelines on prevention and management

First Insight into the Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii Infection among Veterinary Medicine Students in Bulgaria

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of Coxiella burnetii infection among veterinary medicine students from two Bulgarian Universities, located in Sofia and Stara Zagora. Blood samples were collected from a total of 185 veterinary students for the detection of C. burnetii phase II antibodies and presence of DNA using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and end-point PCR test. Out of all samples, 29.7% were positive for at least one C. burnetii phase II antibody marker or by the result of the PCR test. Veterinary students from Stara Zagora showed a significantly high seropositivity for Q fever (33.6%), as compared to the students in Sofia (23%; p < 0.05). Evidence of recent exposure with detection of anti-C. burnetii phase II IgM (+) antibodies was observed in 14.6% of the students under study. Seroprevalence among students in Stara Zagora was higher (15.3%). Anti-C. burnetii phase II IgG antibodies were detected in 21.6% of examined samples. Our study revealed a higher seropositivity among the male students (32.8%) as compared to females (16.0%; p < 0.05). The end-point PCR assay detected 5.9% blood samples as positive. The relative risk (RR) of Q fever exposure for male students was 40.7%, whereas it was 24.6% in females (p < 0.05). The findings from this study indicate that the C. burnetii infection is widely distributed amongst veterinary students in Bulgaria. This study emphasizes the need for improved safety protocols and infection control measures in veterinary training programs.

Domestic cats are potential reservoirs of multidrug-resistant human enteropathogenic E. coli strains in Bangladesh

Companion animals serve as our best friends, confidants, and family members. Thus, disease and antibiotic resistance gene transmission in pets and humans must be sought out. The study aimed to identify the common pathogenic Escherichia coli (E.coli) in pet cats and the antibiotic resistance patterns and resistant gene distribution. Samples (n = 210) were collected from different veterinary clinics in Bangladesh's cities of Mymensingh and Dhaka. Pathogenic E. coli was identified using conventional and molecular approaches. The disc diffusion method assessed the resistance profile against 12 antibiotics, and PCR was used to identify the beta-lactam resistance genes. The prevalence of the stx-1 gene was found to be 2.86%, whereas the rfbO157 prevalence was found to be 1.90% in cats. The stx-1 gene (n = 6) was 100% resistant to erythromycin and imipenem, whereas 100% sensitive to chloramphenicol. In turn, the rfbO157 gene (n = 4) exhibited 100% resistance to erythromycin, imipenem, cefixime, and azithromycin. In addtion, we identified genes that exhibit resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics (100% blaTEM, 40% blaCTX-M, 40% blaSHV2). This study found shiga-toxin producing and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing E. coli for the first time in pet cats of Bangladesh. Furthermore, the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profile of the isolated strains refers to the occurrence of multidrug, which concerns cats and their owners. The existence of these genes in non-diarrheic pet animal isolates indicates that domestic pets may serve as a reservoir for human infection. Thus, one health strategy comprising animal and human health sectors, governments, together with stakeholders is needed to confront multidrug-resistant E. coli infections in Bangladesh.

Coxiella burnetii in Dogs and Cats from Portugal: Serological and Molecular Analysis

Dogs and cats are potential sources of infection for some zoonotic diseases such as Q fever, caused by Coxiella burnetii, a multiple host pathogen. Q fever outbreaks in dogs and cats have been related with parturition and abortion events, and ticks have a potential role in the transmission of this pathogen. This study aimed to screen for C. burnetii in dogs and cats, and in ticks collected from infested animals. An observational descriptive study was conducted in Portugal at two time points nine years apart, 2012 and 2021. Sera obtained from dogs and cats (total n = 294) were tested for C. burnetii antibodies using a commercial ELISA adapted for multi-species detection. C. burnetii DNA was screened by qPCR assay targeting IS1111 in uterine samples and in ticks. A decrease in the exposure to C. burnetii was observed in cats from 17.2% (95% CI: 5.8−35.8%) in 2012 to 0.0% in 2021, and in dogs from 12.6% (95% CI: 7.7−19.0%) in 2012 to 1.7% (95% CI: 0.3−9.1%) in 2021 (p < 0.05). Overall, and despite differences in the samples, rural habitat seems to favour the exposure to C. burnetii. The DNA of C. burnetii was not detected in ticks. The low seropositivity observed in 2021 and the absence of C. burnetii DNA in the tested samples, suggest that dogs and cats from Portugal are not often exposed to the pathogen. Nevertheless, the monitoring of C. burnetii infection in companion animals is an important tool to prevent human outbreaks, considering the zoonotic potential for owners and veterinarians contacting infected animals, mainly dogs and cats from rural areas which often come into contact with livestock.

Vector-borne and other pathogens of potential relevance disseminated by relocated cats

Large populations of unowned cats constitute an animal welfare, ecological, societal and public health issue worldwide. Their relocation and homing are currently carried out in many parts of the world with the intention of relieving suffering and social problems, while contributing to ethical and humane population control in these cat populations. An understanding of an individual cat’s lifestyle and disease status by veterinary team professionals and those working with cat charities can help to prevent severe cat stress and the spread of feline pathogens, especially vector-borne pathogens, which can be overlooked in cats. In this article, we discuss the issue of relocation and homing of unowned cats from a global perspective. We also review zoonotic and non-zoonotic infectious agents of cats and give a list of practical recommendations for veterinary team professionals dealing with homing cats. Finally, we present a consensus statement consolidated at the 15th Symposium of the Companion Vector-Borne Diseases (CVBD) World Forum in 2020, ultimately to help veterinary team professionals understand the problem and the role they have in helping to prevent and manage vector-borne and other pathogens in relocated cats.

Graphical Abstract

Urban landscape and infection risk in free-roaming cats

Despite public concern on the role of free‐roaming cats as reservoirs of zoonotic agents, little is known about the influence of urban and peri‐urban landscapes on the exposure risk. We evaluated the seroprevalence of three zoonotic agents (Chlamydia felis, Coxiella burnetii and Toxoplasma gondii) in domestic cats (Felis catus). Two hundred and ninety‐one free‐roaming cats were trapped in Murcia municipality (Southeast Spain), and their sera were tested for specific antibodies against T. gondii using a modified agglutination test (MAT), and for C. felis, C. burnetii and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) antibodies with ELISA technique. Pathogen seroprevalence at 95% CI was calculated for each sex and age category (up to and over 12 months) and compared with a chi‐squared test. The role of human population density and urban landscape characteristics on the risk of pathogen exposure in the cat population was explored using generalized linear models. Seropositivity against a single pathogen was found in 60% of the cats, while 19% was seropositive for two or three pathogens. Seroprevalence of C. felis was 8% (CI_95%: 5–11), 37% (CI_95%: 31–42) for C. burnetii and 42% (CI_95%: 36–47) for T. gondii. In addition to these three pathogens, FIV seropositivity was low (1%, CI_95%: −0.1 to 2) and adult cats were more likely to be seropositive to C. burnetii than young individuals (OR: 2.3, CI_95%: 1.2–4.2). No sex or age class differences in seroprevalence were observed for the rest of the pathogens. Seropositivity was correlated with water surface areas for C. felis, and not with crop areas. Coxiella burnetii seropositivity was correlated with the percentage of urban areas (continuous with only buildings and discontinuous, that include buildings, parks, and pedestrian and urban green areas), human population size and peri‐urban areas with shrubs, and not correlated with other agricultural landscapes (orchards and crop areas). However, the seroprevalence of T. gondii was only associated with agricultural landscapes such as orchards. The detection of hotspot areas of high pathogen exposure risk is the basis for municipal services to implement surveillance and risk factor control campaigns in specific‐risk areas, including (a) efficient health management of urban cat colonies by geographical location, population census and health status monitoring of the components of each cat colony, (b) improvement of hygiene and sanitary conditions at the feeding points of the cat colony and (c) free‐roaming cat trapping for health monitoring and, in the long term, to know the evolution of the health status of their populations.

Evaluation of three immunological assays to mitigate the risk of transboundary spread of Coxiella burnetii by alpacas

Coxiella burnetii causes coxiellosis in animals and Q fever in humans, a potentially debilitating zoonotic disease commonly transmitted through domestic ruminants. To prevent transboundary spread of C. burnetii, animals may be tested prior to export. In alpacas, this process is complicated by the lack of scientific evidence for C. burnetii infection in the species, and the unique composition of camelid antibodies, which may cause false-positive results in assays developed for ruminants. We evaluated a complement fixation test (CFT; currently recommended for alpacas in New Zealand), an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and an immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Positive analytical control samples were generated through vaccination of alpacas with a human Q fever vaccine, whereas negative analytical control samples were sourced from New Zealand (deemed free of C. burnetii). Immunological assays were conducted on 131 alpaca sera submitted for export testing. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) for CFT, ELISA and IFA were determined using Bayesian latent class analysis. Due to anticomplementary activity, 37 (28.2%) of the CFT results were inconclusive, making CFT unsuitable for routine use. Of the remaining 94 samples, 10.6%, 0% and 7.4% were positive for C. burnetii antibodies based on CFT, ELISA and IFA, respectively, yielding estimated sensitivities of 58%, 26% and 78%, and estimated specificities of 95%, 98% and 95%, with the estimates for sensitivity being imprecise, as evidenced by wide 95% credible intervals. Positive predictive values were similar across assays, albeit very low at the estimated seroprevalence of 5%. Our results indicate that, of the tests available, IFA appears to be the most appropriate for use in alpacas. Higher sensitivity of antibody detection, use of antigen detection assays and availability of samples from individuals with evidence of infection could provide additional insight into the risk of transboundary spread of C. burnetii by alpacas.

Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in raw meat intended for pet consumption

The discovery of antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in cattery-confined breeding cats indicating prior or current exposure (Shapiro et al., 2015) prompted an investigation into possible sources of infection. One hypothesis was that raw meat diets containing reservoir species may provide a source of C. burnetii transmission. The aim of this pilot study was to determine whether C. burnetii DNA was present in raw meat sold exclusively for companion animal consumption. The sample population consisted of raw meat packages (n = 58) of primarily kangaroo origin, with three to four aliquots (50-120 mg) randomly selected from each package. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole tissue in each of these aliquots using a modified protocol. Three quantitative PCR assays were used for the detection of C. burnetii targeting the IS1111 gene, the heat shock operon htpAB and the C. burnetii outer membrane protein-coding gene, com1. Coxiella burnetii DNA was detected in 25/58 samples (43%) using the IS1111, htpAB and/or com1 PCR assays and confirmed by DNA sequencing. All samples amplifying a product in the com1 assay also amplified a product in the htpAB and IS1111 assays. A total of 17/58 (29%) packets were positive with all three genes, 4/58 (7%) were positive with two genes (IS1111 and htpAB) and 4/58 (7%) were positive with the IS1111 gene only. Coxiella burnetii DNA was five times more likely to be found in offal than skeletal muscle meat samples. All meat samples in which C. burnetii DNA was found were from kangaroo tissues, while samples labelled as non-kangaroo meat (n = 4) were negative. Multi-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) identified three different genotypes of C. burnetii that have all been identified previously from Australian human clinical Q fever cases. Further investigations are required to determine the potential role of certain raw meats in the transmission of C. burnetii to cats and humans.

Management of Coxiella burnetii infection in livestock populations and the associated zoonotic risk: A consensus statement

Infections caused by Coxiella burnetii, commonly referred to as coxiellosis when occurring in animals and Query fever when occurring in humans, are an important cause of abortions, decreased reproductive efficiency, and subclinical infections in ruminants. The organism also represents an important zoonotic concern associated with its ability to aerosolize easily and its low infectious dose. Available diagnostic tests have limited sensitivity, which combined with the absence of treatment options in animals and limited approaches to prevention, result in difficulty managing this agent for optimal animal health and zoonotic disease outcomes. The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide veterinarians and public health officials with a summary of the available information regarding management of C. burnetii infection in livestock populations. A discussion of currently available testing options and their interpretation is provided, along with recommendations on management practices that can be implemented on‐farm in the face of an outbreak to mitigate losses. Emphasis is placed on biosecurity measures that can be considered for minimizing the zoonotic transmission risk in both field and veterinary facilities.

Something old, something new: Update of the 2009 and 2013 ABCD guidelines on prevention and management of feline infectious diseases

OVERVIEW

The ABCD has published 34 guidelines in two Special Issues of the Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery (JFMS): the first in July 2009 (Volume 11, Issue 7, pages 527-620) and the second in July 2013 (Volume 15, Issue 7, pages 528-652). The present article contains updates and new information on 18 of these (17 disease guidelines and one special article 'Prevention of infectious diseases in cat shelters'). For detailed information, readers are referred to the guidelines published in the above-mentioned JFMS Special Issues.