Repeatability of Online Circular Contrast Perimetry Compared to Standard Automated Perimetry

PRCIS

Online circular contrast perimetry provides visual field assessment on any computer or tablet with no extra hardware. It has good test repeatability and reliability that is comparable with standard automated perimetry. It holds promise for use in disease screening and surveillance to expand the provision of glaucoma care.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repeatability of online circular contrast perimetry (OCCP) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in normal participants and patients with stable glaucoma over 18 weeks.

METHODS

Thirty-six participants (13 normal controls and 23 patients with open angle glaucoma) were recruited. OCCP and SAP perimetry tests were performed twice at baseline, then at 6, 12, and 18 weeks. Global perimetric indices were compared between perimetry types and analyzed for short-term and intermediate-term repeatability.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant changes over time for both OCCP and SAP across all groups for mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation, and visual index/visual field index ( P >0.05). Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for OCCP MD were excellent at baseline (0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-0.99) and good at 18 weeks (0.88, 95% CI: 0.51-0.98). SAP test-retest ICCs were excellent at baseline (0.94, 95% CI: 0.70-0.99) and 18 weeks (0.97, 95% CI: 0.84-0.99). Inter-test ICCs were good, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87. OCCP testing time was shorter than SAP (5:29 ± 1:24 vs. 6:00 ± 1:05, P <0.001). OCCP had similar false-positive (3.84 ± 3.32 vs. 3.66 ± 4.53, P =0.48) but lower false-negative (0.73 ± 1.52 vs. 4.48 ± 5.00, P <0.001) and fixation loss responses (0.91 ± 1.32 vs. 2.02 ± 2.17, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

OCCP allows visual field assessment on any computer screen with no additional hardware. It demonstrated good repeatability and reliability with similar performance indices to SAP in both the short term and intermediate term. OCCP has the potential to be utilized as a glaucoma screening and surveillance tool for in-clinic and at-home testing, expanding the provision of care.

Degree of loss in the tissue thickness, microvascular density, specific perimetry and standard perimetry in early glaucoma

Objective

To identify the degree of loss of the circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (cpRNFL), the layer from the macular RNFL to the inner plexiform layer (mGCL++), circumpapillary (cpVD) and macular vascular density (mVD), Pulsar perimetry and standard perimetry in early glaucoma.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, one eye from each of 96 healthy controls and 90 eyes with open-angle glaucoma were measured with cpRNFL, mGCL++, cpVD, mVD, Pulsar perimetry with Octopus P32 test (Pulsar) and standard perimetry with Humphrey field analyser 24-2 test (HFA). For direct comparison, all parameters were converted to relative change values adjusted in both their dynamic range and age-corrected normal value.

Results

The degree of loss in mGCL++ (−24.7%) and cpRNFL (−25.8%) was greater than that in mVD (−17.3%), cpVD (−14.9%), Pulsar (−10.1%) and HFA (−5.9%) (each p<0.01); the degree of loss in mVD and cpVD was greater than that in Pulsar and HFA (each p<0.01); and the degree of loss in Pulsar was greater than that in HFA (p<0.01). The discrimination ability between glaucomatous and healthy eyes (area under the curve) was higher for mGCL++ (0.90) and cpRNFL (0.93) than for mVD (0.78), cpVD (0.78), Pulsar (0.78) and HFA (0.79).

Conclusion

The degree of loss of cpRNFL and mGCL++ thickness preceded by approximately 7%–10% and 15%–20% compared with the micro-VD and visual fields in early glaucoma, respectively.

Trial registration number

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/; R000046076 UMIN000040372).

Online Circular Contrast Perimetry: A Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry

PURPOSE

The aim was to validate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of a novel 24-degree, 52-loci online circular contrast perimetry (OCCP) application to standard automated perimetry (SAP).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty participants (125 normal controls, 95 open angle glaucoma patients) were included. Agreement, correlation, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating curves (AUC) were compared for parameters of OCCP, SAP, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the retinal nerve fiber layer and macular ganglion cell complex inner plexiform layer.

RESULTS

Pointwise sensitivity for OCCP was greater than SAP by 1.02 log units (95% CI: 0.95-1.08); 95% limits of agreement 0.860 to 1.17. Correlation and agreement for global indices and regional zones between OCCP and SAP were strong. OCCP mean deviation (MD) AUC was 0.885±0.08, similar to other instruments' parameters with the highest AUC: SAP MD (0.851±0.08), OCT retinal nerve fiber layer inferior thickness (0.908±0.07), OCT ganglion cell complex inner plexiform layer inferior thickness (0.849±0.08), P>0.05. At best cutoff, OCCP MD sensitivity/specificity were comparable to SAP MD (90/74 vs 94/65%).

CONCLUSIONS

OCCP demonstrates similar perimetric sensitivities to SAP and similar AUC to SAP and OCT in distinguishing glaucoma patients from controls. OCCP holds promise as a glaucoma surveillance and screening tool, with the potential to be utilized for in-clinic and at-home perimetry and expand community testing.

Online circular contrast perimetry via a web-application: optimising parameters and establishing a normative database

PURPOSE

To establish a normative database and optimise parameters for personal-computer based perimetry via a web-application using circular contrast targets.

METHODS

Online 24-degree 52-loci perimetry was delivered through a web-application using circular flickering contrast targets. Embedding contrast differentials within targets allows calculation of relative decibel (rdB) per 256-bit greyscale level differential. Target light-band maximum brightness colour was fixed, while the dark-band varied to achieve the desired rdB level. A staircase system was used with two reversals ranging from 0 to 36 rdB levels. Blind spot localisation at the start of the test was used to optimise viewing distance and subsequently count fixation losses. Gaze was maintained on a spinning golden star which moves mid-test to maximise sampling area. Patients performed the test to each eye separately using a computer in a darkened room at 40-45 cm.

RESULTS

158 eyes of 101 patients completed the Online Circular Contrast Perimetry (OCCP) test. Mean age was 62.9 ± 14.3 years old. Mean sensitivity reduced with age, at 1.0 relative decibel per decade. Mean sensitivity per locus correlated with standard automated perimetry (SAP) in a physiological hill of vision, with an average difference of 4.02 decibels (95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.77-4.27, p < 0.001) and good agreement between tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Online circular contract perimetry provides accurate perimetric testing with comparable results to standard automated perimetry.

The Diagnostic Value of Pulsar Perimetry, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Pre-Perimetric and Perimetric Glaucoma

The purpose of this article is to investigate the diagnostic value of Pulsar perimetry (PP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in pre-perimetric glaucoma (PPG) and perimetric glaucoma (PG). This retrospective cross-sectional study included 202 eyes (145 eyes in the control group, 40 eyes in the PPG group, and 17 eyes in the PG group) from 105 subjects. The results were analyzed by paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. Pearson correlation was used to investigate the relationships of each parameter. The most sensitive parameters for differentiating the control group from the PPG group by using Pulsar, OCT, and OCTA were square loss variance of PP (AUC = 0.673, p < 0.001), superior ganglion cell complex thickness (AUC = 0.860, p < 0.001), and superior-hemi retina thickness (AUC = 0.817, p < 0.001). In the PG group, the most sensitive parameters were mean defect of PP (AUC = 0.885, p < 0.001), whole image of ganglion cell complex thickness (AUC = 0.847, p < 0.001), and perifoveal retina thickness (AUC = 0.833, p < 0.001). The mean defect of PP was significantly correlated with vascular parameters (radial peripapillary capillary (RPC), p = 0.008; vessel density of macular superficial vascular complex (VDms), p = 0.001; vessel density of macular deep vascular complex (VDmd), p = 0.002). In conclusion, structural measurements using OCT were more sensitive than vascular measurements of OCTA and functional measurements of PP for PPG, while PP was more sensitive than the structural and vascular measurements for PG. The mean defect of PP was also shown to be highly correlated with the reduction of vessel density.

Influence of ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis on visual field testing in patients with arterial hypertension: A comparative cross-sectional study

Purpose

To evaluate a possible influence of anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide autoantibodies (ACPA) ‐ positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on visual field (VF) testing in patients with arterial hypertension (aHT).

Methods

We conducted an observational cross‐sectional study comparing patients with ACPA‐positive RA and aHT, patients with aHT and healthy subjects. Further inclusion criteria were visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 or better and age between 40 and 60 years. VF testing was performed with standard automated achromatic perimetry (SAP), short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) (Octopus 300^®) and flicker perimetry (Pulsar^®). Results were analysed for a possible correlation with blood pressure or RA‐activity.

Results

Twenty subjects with RA and aHT, 26 patients with aHT and 22 healthy participants were examined. Significant differences were found for mean sensitivity (MS) in SWAP comparing RA‐patients with healthy participants (ΔMS −3.06, p = 0.001) and with hypertensive patients (ΔMS −2.32, p = 0.007). In SAP we observed a significant difference between patients with RA and healthy subjects regarding loss variance (LV) (ΔLV = +9.77, p = 0.004). Flicker perimetry did not demonstrate significant differences between groups. A correlation of VF changes with blood pressure level or RA‐activity was not observed.

Conclusion

Patients with ACPA‐positive RA and aHT showed significant impairment of VF performance in SWAP compared to patients with aHT alone and healthy subjects. SAP also revealed a significant difference of LV between RA‐patients and healthy subjects. aHT does not seem to induce functional changes in VF testing alone.

New visual field indices of disharmony for early diagnosis of glaucoma, alone or associated with conventional parameters

PURPOSE

To evaluate the specificity of new perimetric indices based on harmony, alone and in combination with structural data, for glaucoma detection.

METHODS

In this prospective observational cross-sectional study, one eye of 105 healthy subjects and 97 early and suspect glaucomas were sequentially included and examined with Cirrus optical coherence tomography, twice with OCULUS Smartfield perimeter (SPARK strategy) and twice with Humphrey Analyzer (24-2 SITA-Fast) at the Ophthalmology Department from the University Hospital La Candelaria. Disharmony in the visual field was evaluated including vertical threshold symmetry, threshold rank), and homogeneity (threshold standard deviation from its maximum) using the patient himself/herself as a reference. We also evaluated disharmony in combination with the mean deviation and the pattern standard deviation in a single index (mismatch) and various combinations of morphological and functional indices. Combinations used a new score based on values above certain critical cut-off levels of each index.

RESULTS

For 95% specificity, the highest sensitivities were as follows: vertical cup/disc ratio: 28.9%; SPARK threshold rank: 29.9%; and SITA-Fast threshold standard deviation: 28.9%. For the combined indices and 100% specificity, they were 5 SPARK indices mismatch: 10.3%; 5 SITA-Fast indices mismatch: 11.3%; 8 optical coherence tomography indices: 21.9%; 13 SPARK and optical coherence tomography indices: 27.8%; and 13 SITA-Fast and optical coherence tomography indices: 32.0%.

CONCLUSION

Disharmony combined with normative value-based indices and/or optical coherence tomography indices is useful for very specific early diagnosis of glaucoma.

Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry

Purpose

To compare the structure-function relationships between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and visual field defects measured either by standard automated perimetry (SAP) or by Pulsar perimetry (PP).

Materials and Methods

263 eyes of 143 patients were prospectively included. Depending on the RNFLT, patients were assigned to the glaucoma group (group A: RNFL score 3-6) or the control group (group B: RNFL score 0-2). Structure-function relationships between RNFLT and mean sensitivity (MS) measured by SAP and PP were analyzed.

Results

Throughout the entire group, the MS assessed by PP and SAP correlated significantly with RNFLT in all sectors. In the glaucoma group, there was no significant difference between the correlations RNFL-SAP and RNFL-PP, whereas a significant difference was found in the control group.

Conclusions

In the control group, the correlation between structure and function based on the PP data was significantly stronger than that based on SAP.

Diagnostic capability of Pulsar perimetry in pre-perimetric and early glaucoma

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capability of Pulsar perimetry (Pulsar) in pre-perimetric glaucoma (PPG) and early glaucoma (EG) with that of Flicker perimetry (Flicker) and spectral-domain optical conference tomography (SD-OCT). This prospective cross-sectional study included 25 eyes of 25 PPG patients, 35 eyes of 35 EG patients, and 42 eyes of 42 healthy participants. The diagnostic capability using the area under the curve (AUC) of the best parameter and agreement of detectability between structural and functional measurements were compared. For PPG patients, the AUC of Pulsar, Flicker, OCT-disc, and OCT-macular was 0.733, 0.663, 0.842, and 0.780, respectively. The AUC of Flicker was significantly lower than that of OCT-disc (p = 0.016). For EG patients, the AUC of Pulsar, Flicker, OCT-disc, and OCT-macular were 0.851, 0.869, 0.907, and 0.861, respectively. There was no significant difference in AUC among these methods. The agreement between structural and functional measurements expressed by kappa value ranged from -0.16 to 0.07 for PPG and from 0.01 to 0.25 for EG. Although the diagnostic capability of Pulsar in the PPG and EG groups was equal to that of Flicker and SD-OCT, the agreements between structural and functional measurements for both PPG and EG were poor.

Comparison of Size Modulation Standard Automated Perimetry and Conventional Standard Automated Perimetry with a 10-2 Test Program in Glaucoma Patients

PURPOSE

This prospective observational study compared the performance of size modulation standard automated perimetry with the Octopus 600 10-2 test program, with stimulus size modulation during testing, based on stimulus intensity and conventional standard automated perimetry, with that of the Humphrey 10-2 test program in glaucoma patients.

METHODS

Eighty-seven eyes of 87 glaucoma patients underwent size modulation standard automated perimetry with Dynamic strategy and conventional standard automated perimetry using the SITA standard strategy. The main outcome measures were global indices, point-wise threshold, visual defect size and depth, reliability indices, and test duration; these were compared between size modulation standard automated perimetry and conventional standard automated perimetry.

RESULTS

Global indices and point-wise threshold values between size modulation standard automated perimetry and conventional standard automated perimetry were moderately to strongly correlated (p < 0.01). However, the correlation coefficient of point-wise threshold value for the central zone was significantly lower than that for the peripheral zone (χ2 > 33.40, p < 0.01). Better mean defect and point-wise threshold values were obtained with size modulation standard automated perimetry than with conventional standard automated perimetry, but the visual-field defect size was smaller (p < 0.01) and depth shallower (p < 0.01) on size modulation-standard automated perimetry than on conventional standard automated perimetry. The reliability indices, particularly the false-negative response, of size modulation standard automated perimetry were worse than those of conventional standard automated perimetry (p < 0.01). The test duration was 6.5% shorter with size modulation standard automated perimetry than with conventional standard automated perimetry (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Global indices and the point-wise threshold value of the two testing modalities correlated well. However, the potential of a large stimulus presented at an area with a decreased sensitivity with size modulation standard automated perimetry could underestimate the actual threshold in the 10-2 test protocol, as compared with conventional standard automated perimetry.

Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients

This prospective randomized study compared test results of size modulation standard automated perimetry (SM-SAP) performed with the Octopus 600 and conventional SAP (C-SAP) performed with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in glaucoma patients. Eighty-eight eyes of 88 glaucoma patients underwent SM-SAP and C-SAP tests with the Octopus 600 24-2 Dynamic and HFA 24-2 SITA-Standard, respectively. Fovea threshold, mean defect, and square loss variance of SM-SAP were significantly correlated with the corresponding C-SAP indices (P < 0.001). The false-positive rate was slightly lower, and false-negative rate slightly higher, with SM-SAP than C-SAP (P = 0.002). Point-wise threshold values obtained with SM-SAP were moderately to strongly correlated with those obtained with C-SAP (P < 0.001). The correlation coefficients of the central zone were significantly lower than those of the middle to peripheral zone (P = 0.031). The size and depth of the visual field (VF) defect were smaller (P = 0.039) and greater (P = 0.043), respectively, on SM-SAP than on C-SAP. Although small differences were observed in VF sensitivity in the central zone, the defect size and depth and the reliability indices between SM-SAP and C-SAP, global indices of the two testing modalities were well correlated.

Modeling the relative influence of fixation and sampling errors on retest variability in perimetry

BACKGROUND

Our previous studies have shown that in standard automated perimetry (SAP) undersampling occurs if sensitivity varies across a visual field faster than the Nyquist rate (Nq) for the standard sampling interval of 6°. This undersampling was shown to be a major source of test-retest variability. This study first tests some of the assumptions of the undersampling idea, and then determines the relative contributions to test-retest variability of normal eye movements and undersampling.

METHODS

In all models fixational jitter was at normal levels. The first part investigates the effects of the jitter on the Fourier spectra of fields, and stimulus size effects. In the second part fields are smoothed in six gradations up to and beyond the point where no undersampling could occur. The spatial smoothing gradations covered nil to < Nq/4. For each smoothing level the resulting retest variability was determined for each of 11 bands of scotoma depth (0 to -28.5 dB).

RESULTS

As is commonly reported, and as undersampling predicts, retest variability was largest for deeper scotoma depths. When smoothing suppressed all undersampling effects, the inter-quartile range of the residual retest variability averaged only 2.3 ± 0.33 dB, much smaller than for unsmoothed fields (p < 0.003). For the five deepest scotoma depth bands (range, -16.5 to -28.5 dB) retest variability was smaller by 6.0 ± 0.5 dB (p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Retest variability appears in large part to be driven by undersampling. In real fields, the remaining variance would come from fixation errors and physiological sources.

[Sensitivity and specificity of flicker perimetry with Pulsar. Comparison with achromatic (white-on-white) perimetry in glaucoma patients]

The early detection of functional glaucoma damage plays an increasingly more central role in the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma disease. Using selective perimetry detection of early glaucomatous defects is more likely and one of these methods is flicker perimetry with Pulsar. Flicker perimetry is used to analyze the temporal visual function in combination with spatial resolution and contrast sensitivity as opposed to standard automated perimetry which measures the differential light sensitivity with a non-specific stimulus. This study showed a higher sensitivity and specificity of Pulsar perimetry in comparison to achromatic perimetry in glaucoma patients.

[Pulsar perimetry. A review and new results]

We present a review and update on Pulsar perimetry, which combines temporal frequency, contrast and spatial frequency stimuli. The effects of age, visual acuity, and learning on results are described. Data on threshold fluctuation, signal-to-noise ratio, and the possibility of reducing noise with filtering techniques are provided. We describe its dynamic range and the possibility of compensating for profound defects. Finally, we show the results obtained in normal patients and in those with ocular hypertension or initial glaucoma, as well as an analysis of glaucoma progression.

[Importance of flicker contrast tests in functional glaucoma diagnostics]

One of the many unsolved problems concerning glaucoma is early detection and many different methodologies have been developed. This article concentrates on methodologies belonging to the class of flicker contrast tests which present dynamic stimuli (with temporal frequencies generally above 10 Hz) and assess the perceptual thresholds for contrast, be it global or locally resolved. The tests include global flicker sensitivity, flicker perimetry (current embodiment: Pulsar), Rauschfeld campimetry, frequency doubling perimetry and flicker-defined edge perimetry. These different approaches are placed into historical perspective and are critically assessed.

Learning effect and test-retest variability of pulsar perimetry

PURPOSE

To assess Pulsar Perimetry learning effect and test-retest variability (TRV) in normal (NORM), ocular hypertension (OHT), glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON), and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective study included 43 NORM, 38 OHT, 33 GON, and 36 POAG patients. All patients underwent standard automated perimetry and Pulsar Contrast Perimetry using white stimuli modulated in phase and counterphase at 30 Hz (CP-T30W test). The learning effect and TRV for Pulsar Perimetry were assessed for 3 consecutive visual fields (VFs). The learning effect were evaluated by comparing results from the first session with the other 2. TRV was assessed by calculating the mean of the differences (in absolute value) between retests for each combination of single tests. TRV was calculated for Mean Sensitivity, Mean Defect, and single Mean Sensitivity for each 66 test locations. Influence of age, VF eccentricity, and loss severity on TRV were assessed using linear regression analysis and analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The learning effect was not significant in any group (analysis of variance, P>0.05). TRV for Mean Sensitivity and Mean Defect was significantly lower in NORM and OHT (0.6 ± 0.5 spatial resolution contrast units) than in GON and POAG (0.9 ± 0.5 and 1.0 ± 0.8 spatial resolution contrast units, respectively) (Kruskal-Wallis test, P=0.04); however, the differences in NORM among age groups was not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, P>0.05). Slight significant differences were found for the single Mean Sensitivity TRV among single locations (Duncan test, P<0.05). For POAG, TRV significantly increased with decreasing Mean Sensitivity and increasing Mean Defect (linear regression analysis, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The Pulsar Perimetry CP-T30W test did not show significant learning effect in patients with standard automated perimetry experience. TRV for global indices was generally low, and was not related to patient age; it was only slightly affected by VF defect eccentricity, and significantly influenced by VF loss severity.

[Comparing the ranges of defect measured with standard white on white and Pulsar perimetries]

OBJECTIVES

Normal thresholds on Pulsar perimetry fall faster than those of standard perimetry in the peripheral visual field. Two related studies were performed. Firstly, the frequency distributions of glaucoma defects on standard automated perimetry (SAP) and the relationship of the centre and periphery (Study A) were studied first, followed by an attempt to establish the limits of pulsar perimetry (Study B).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A: frequency of defects was calculated in 78.663 SAP perimetries (G1-TOP, Octopus 1-2-3, Haag-Streit). Study B: 204 eyes with mean defect (MD-SAP) lower than 9 dB were examined 8.92 ± 4.19 times with SAP (TOP-32, Octopus 311) and temporal modulation perimetry (T30W, Pulsar Perimeter, Haag-Streit).

RESULTS

Study A: 50.7% of the SAP examinations showed MD values lower than 9 dB and 32.7% bellow 6 dB. The MD correlation of the central 20° with the MD of the most peripheral points was r=0.933. Study B: in cases with MD-TOP-32 lower than 6 dB, SAP had the maximum possibility of detecting defect in 0.02% of points and Pulsar in 0.29%. In subjects with MD-TOP-32 between 6 and 9 dB frequencies were 0.38% in SAP and 3.5% in Pulsar (5.1% for eccentricities higher than 20°).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulsar allows detecting defects, without range limitations, in the initial half of SAP frequencies expected on glaucoma patients. In order to study the progression of deeper defects the examination should focus on the central points, where the dynamic range of both systems is more equivalent.

Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of Pulsar perimetry (Pulsar) in detecting early glaucomatous visual field (VF) damage in comparison with Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT), Scanning Laser Polarimetry (SLP, GDx VCC), and Heidelberg Retina Tomography (HRT).

DESIGN

Prospective observational cross-sectional case study.

METHODS

This multicenter study included: 87 ocular hypertensives (OHT); 67 glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) patients; 75 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients; and 90 normals. All patients underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP) HFA 30-2, Pulsar T30W, FDT N-30, HRT II, and GDx VCC. Area under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves (AROCs) for discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes and agreement among instruments were determined.

RESULTS

The best parameters for Pulsar, FDT, HRT, and GDx were, respectively: loss variance square root; no. of areas with P< 5%; Cup-Shape-Measure; and Nerve Fiber Indicator (NFI). In detecting POAG eyes, Pulsar (AROC, 0.90) appeared comparable with FDT (0.89) and significantly better than HRT (0.82) and GDx (0.79). For GON, Pulsar ability (0.74) was higher than GDx (0.69) and lower than FDT (0.80) and HRT (0.83). The agreement among instruments ranged from 0.12 to 0.56. Pulsar test duration was significantly shorter than SAP and FDT (P< .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulsar T30W test is a rapid and easy perimetric method, showing higher sensitivity than SAP in detecting early glaucomatous VF loss. Its diagnostic ability is good for detecting early perimetric POAG eyes and fair for GON eyes. Pulsar performance was comparable with FDT, HRT, and GDx, even if the agreement between instruments was poor to fair.

[Functional glaucoma diagnosis]

Achromatic perimetry is the gold standard in glaucoma diagnosis for detecting functional defects from glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Because achromatic perimetry is only able to detect scotomas after loss of up to 30-40% of retinal ganglion cells, early diagnosis using this method is rarely possible. Therefore, a lot of new perimetric procedures have been developed in recent years to detect new scotomas at a very early stage. This review summarizes the theoretical background of retinal ganglion cells in order to better understand the theoretical approaches of new perimetric methods. In addition, the most important commercial perimetric devices currently available are presented.