Cautery selection for oculofacial plastic surgery in patients with implantable electronic devices

Implantable Electronic Cardiovascular Device Complications Related to Electrocautery During Ophthalmology Surgery: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Implantable electronic cardiovascular device such as cardiac pacemakers and implantable defibrillators are common life-saving devices. Device-related complications can arise when undergoing surgical interventions with electrosurgical tools due to electromagnetic interference, based on electrocautery type, implantable electronic cardiovascular device type, electrocautery location, and a number of other factors. The risk of device-related complications due to electrocautery in oculoplastic surgery has not been established. This systematic literature review assesses prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of electrocautery-related device complications in oculoplastic surgery.

METHODS

Systematic literature review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis guidelines and used the search terms "pacemaker," "implantable cardioverter defibrillator," "electrocautery," "cautery," and "electrosurgery" through June 2022. Inclusion criteria were full-text articles, discussing ocular, oculoplastic, or other facial surgery. Exclusion criteria were non-English language or surgery focused on other parts of the body. Full-text manuscripts of identified articles were reviewed and relevant data were extracted.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met inclusion criteria. Two studies were level I and II evidence, while 10 studies were level III or IV. There were no reports of electromagnetic interference with bipolar cautery use. With monopolar cautery use, cases of electromagnetic interference were reported, but without related significant morbidity or mortality. Safety recommendations to minimize electrical flow through the implantable electronic cardiovascular device are described.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no reports of implantable electronic cardiovascular device-related complications from bipolar or thermocautery use in ophthalmic or oculoplastic surgeries. Monopolar have been associated with electromagnetic interference, but additional preoperative and perioperative measures can be taken to mitigate this risk.

Endodiathermal Tautening of Floppy or Irregular Iris in Endothelial Keratoplasty (Iridodiathermy)

ABSTRACT

Floppy or irregular irides may be seen during endothelial keratoplasty in complex cases or in eyes with damaged irides and may cause uneven air fill, retro-pupillary air escape, anterior bowing of iris, forward movement of lens-iris diaphragm, shallowing of anterior chamber (AC), bellowing and floppiness of iris, uneven AC depth, difficulty in inserting and opening graft, iris trauma, intraoperative bleeding, and iridodialysis. We present a technique of iridodiathermy for tautening and flattening such irides. With continuous irrigation using AC maintainer, the bipolar endodiathermy probe tip is applied in localized spots to midperipheral iris in the affected area with power and duration adjusted to induce mild localized shrinkage and tightening of iris stroma. Such iris tautening decreases its floppiness and prevents anterior bowing, excessive mobility, irido-corneal touch, and peripheral anterior synechiae formation. It provides a stable AC with regular depth and improved, uniform, and nonmigratory air fill, thus decreasing intraoperative challenges.

Gram-Negative Endogenous Endophthalmitis: A Systematic Review

Background: Gram-negative bacteria are causative agents of endogenous endophthalmitis (EBE). We aim to systematically review the current literature to assess the aetiologies, risk factors, and early ocular lesions in cases of Gram-negative EBE. Methods: All peer-reviewed articles between January 2002 and August 2022 regarding Gram-negative EBE were included. We conducted a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trials. Results: A total of 115 studies and 591 patients were included, prevalently Asian (98; 81.7%) and male (302; 62.9%). The most common comorbidity was diabetes (231; 55%). The main aetiologies were Klebsiella pneumoniae (510; 66.1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (111; 14.4%), and Escherichia coli (60; 7.8%). Liver abscesses (266; 54.5%) were the predominant source of infection. The most frequent ocular lesions were vitreal opacity (134; 49.6%) and hypopyon (95; 35.2%). Ceftriaxone (76; 30.9%), fluoroquinolones (14; 14.4%), and ceftazidime (213; 78.0%) were the most widely used as systemic, topical, and intravitreal anti-Gram-negative agents, respectively. The most reported surgical approaches were vitrectomy (130; 24.1%) and evisceration/exenteration (60; 11.1%). Frequently, visual acuity at discharge was no light perception (301; 55.2%). Conclusions: Gram-negative EBEs are associated with poor outcomes. Our systematic review is mainly based on case reports and case series with significant heterogeneity. The main strength is the large sample spanning over 20 years. Our findings underscore the importance of considering ocular involvement in Gram-negative infections.