1
|
Prinz J, Kuerten D, Walter P, Fuest M. [Endothermal pupilloplasty : A minimally traumatic technique for centering the pupil in patients with corectopia. Video article]. DIE OPHTHALMOLOGIE 2024:10.1007/s00347-024-02143-0. [PMID: 39641823 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-024-02143-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE OF SURGERY The aim of endothermal pupilloplasty (EP) is to optimize centering of the pupil, contour, or size. INDICATIONS The EP is performed in patients with congenital or acquired corectopia or an irregular pupil shape. In individual cases the technique has also been used to tighten the iris in floppy iris syndrome and to adapt iris tissue edges in patients with sectoral iris defects or iridodialysis. CONTRAINDICATIONS In patients with pronounced iris stromal atrophy or major iris tissue defects, e.g., congenital or posttraumatic, EP could be indicated after careful consideration. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE Viscoelastic substances are injected into the anterior chamber via a 23-gauge paracentesis. Using the blunt tip of a bipolar endodiathermy probe, the iris tissue is selectively cauterized at several points, stretching the pupil in the direction to which cauterization is applied. The higher the energy level applied and the closer the cauterization is to the pupil margin, the more effect is achieved. The viscoelastic agents are suctioned off and the paracentesis is sealed by hydration (and additionally sewn in children). A video of the operation, which is available online, shows the surgical technique in detail. FOLLOW-UP Control examinations are recommended after 1 day, 1 week and 1-3 months post-EP. A combination of topical steroids and antibiotics, e.g., dexamethasone and gentamicin eye drops, should be applied 5 times daily for 1 week and 3 times daily for another week. EVIDENCE To date, isolated positive retrospective case reports on EP have been published. There is a lack of prospective studies, reviews or meta-analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Prinz
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - David Kuerten
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Peter Walter
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Fuest
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Truong WH, Matsumoto H, Brooks JT, Guillaume TJ, Andras LM, Cahill PJ, Fitzgerald RE, Li Y, Ramo BA, Soumekh B, Blakemore LC, Carter C, Christie MR, Cortez D, Dimas VV, Hardesty CK, Javia LR, Kennedy BC, Kim PD, Murphy RF, Perra JH, Polly DW, Sawyer JR, Snyder B, Sponseller PD, Sturm PF, Yaszay B, Feyma T, Morgan SJ. Development of Consensus-Based Best Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative and Postoperative Care of Pediatric Patients With Spinal Deformity and Programmable Implanted Devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:1636-1644. [PMID: 38857373 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000005061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Modified Delphi consensus study. OBJECTIVE To develop consensus-based best practices for the care of pediatric patients who have implanted programmable devices (IPDs) and require spinal deformity surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Implanted programmable devices (IPDs) are often present in patients with neuromuscular or syndromic scoliosis who require spine surgery. Guidelines for monitoring and interrogating these devices during the perioperative period are not available. METHODS A panel was assembled consisting of 25 experts (i.e., spinal deformity surgeons, neurosurgeons, neuroelectrophysiologists, cardiologists, and otolaryngologists). Initial postulates were based on a literature review and results from a prior survey. Postulates addressed the following IPDs: vagal nerve stimulators (VNS), programmable ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS), intrathecal baclofen pumps (ITBP), cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), deep brain stimulators (DBS), and cochlear implants. Cardiologist and otolaryngologist participants responded only to postulates on cardiac pacemakers or cochlear implants, respectively. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement, items that did not reach consensus were revised and included in subsequent rounds. A total of 3 survey rounds and 1 virtual meeting were conducted. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 39 total postulates across 6 IPD types. Postulates addressed general spine surgery considerations, the use of intraoperative monitoring and cautery, the use of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), and the use of an external remote controller to lengthen MCGRs. Across IPD types, consensus for the final postulates ranged from 94.4% to 100%. Overall, experts agreed that MCGRs can be surgically inserted and lengthened in patients with a variety of IPDs and provided guidance for the use of intraoperative monitoring and cautery, which varied between IPD types. CONCLUSION Spinal deformity correction surgery often benefits from the use of intraoperative monitoring, monopolar and bipolar cautery, and MCGRs. The final postulates from this study can inform the perioperative and postoperative practices of spinal deformity surgeons who treat patients with both scoliosis and IPDs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V-Expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter H Truong
- Department of Orthopedics-Spine, Gillette Children's, Saint Paul, MN
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Hiroko Matsumoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jaysson T Brooks
- Department of Orthopaedics, Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, TX
- University of Texas-Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Lindsay M Andras
- Jackie and Gene Autry Orthopedic Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Patrick J Cahill
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ryan E Fitzgerald
- Children's Orthopedic and Scoliosis Surgery Associates, St Petersburg, FL
- Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, FL
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Brandon A Ramo
- Department of Orthopaedics, Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, TX
- University of Texas-Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Laurel C Blakemore
- Pediatric Specialists of Virginia, Merrifield, VA
- Orthopedic Surgery and Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | | | - Michelle R Christie
- Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, TX
| | - Daniel Cortez
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA
| | - V Vivian Dimas
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical City Childrens Hospital, Dallas, TX
- Department of Pediatrics, Burnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX
| | - Christina K Hardesty
- Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Luv R Javia
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Benjamin C Kennedy
- Division of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter D Kim
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Gillette Children's, Saint Paul, MN
| | - Robert F Murphy
- Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Joseph H Perra
- Department of Orthopedics-Spine, Gillette Children's, Saint Paul, MN
- Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | - David W Polly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Jeffrey R Sawyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, Germantown, TN
| | - Brian Snyder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Cerebral Palsy Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Paul D Sponseller
- Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Peter F Sturm
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Burt Yaszay
- Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA
| | - Tim Feyma
- Department of Neurology, Gillette Children's, Saint Paul, MN
| | - Sara J Morgan
- Department of Research, Gillette Children's, Saint Paul, MN
- Division of Rehabilitation Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tauber J, Tingley JP, Barmettler A. Implantable Electronic Cardiovascular Device Complications Related to Electrocautery During Ophthalmology Surgery: A Systematic Review. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 39:108-116. [PMID: 36136730 DOI: 10.1097/iop.0000000000002271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Implantable electronic cardiovascular device such as cardiac pacemakers and implantable defibrillators are common life-saving devices. Device-related complications can arise when undergoing surgical interventions with electrosurgical tools due to electromagnetic interference, based on electrocautery type, implantable electronic cardiovascular device type, electrocautery location, and a number of other factors. The risk of device-related complications due to electrocautery in oculoplastic surgery has not been established. This systematic literature review assesses prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of electrocautery-related device complications in oculoplastic surgery. METHODS Systematic literature review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis guidelines and used the search terms "pacemaker," "implantable cardioverter defibrillator," "electrocautery," "cautery," and "electrosurgery" through June 2022. Inclusion criteria were full-text articles, discussing ocular, oculoplastic, or other facial surgery. Exclusion criteria were non-English language or surgery focused on other parts of the body. Full-text manuscripts of identified articles were reviewed and relevant data were extracted. RESULTS Twelve studies met inclusion criteria. Two studies were level I and II evidence, while 10 studies were level III or IV. There were no reports of electromagnetic interference with bipolar cautery use. With monopolar cautery use, cases of electromagnetic interference were reported, but without related significant morbidity or mortality. Safety recommendations to minimize electrical flow through the implantable electronic cardiovascular device are described. CONCLUSIONS There were no reports of implantable electronic cardiovascular device-related complications from bipolar or thermocautery use in ophthalmic or oculoplastic surgeries. Monopolar have been associated with electromagnetic interference, but additional preoperative and perioperative measures can be taken to mitigate this risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Tauber
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, U.S.A
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Endodiathermal Tautening of Floppy or Irregular Iris in Endothelial Keratoplasty (Iridodiathermy). Cornea 2023; 42:243-246. [PMID: 36582036 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000003153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Floppy or irregular irides may be seen during endothelial keratoplasty in complex cases or in eyes with damaged irides and may cause uneven air fill, retro-pupillary air escape, anterior bowing of iris, forward movement of lens-iris diaphragm, shallowing of anterior chamber (AC), bellowing and floppiness of iris, uneven AC depth, difficulty in inserting and opening graft, iris trauma, intraoperative bleeding, and iridodialysis. We present a technique of iridodiathermy for tautening and flattening such irides. With continuous irrigation using AC maintainer, the bipolar endodiathermy probe tip is applied in localized spots to midperipheral iris in the affected area with power and duration adjusted to induce mild localized shrinkage and tightening of iris stroma. Such iris tautening decreases its floppiness and prevents anterior bowing, excessive mobility, irido-corneal touch, and peripheral anterior synechiae formation. It provides a stable AC with regular depth and improved, uniform, and nonmigratory air fill, thus decreasing intraoperative challenges.
Collapse
|