Ocular involvement in pediatric Behçet's disease: is it different than in adults? (a short case series and mini review)

BACKGROUND

Pediatric Behçet's disease (PBD) is rarer than BD and can be a challenging diagnosis as clinical picture may be incomplete. As in adult patients, sight-threatening ocular manifestations may lead to diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to report a series of cases of PBD with ocular manifestations and provide a review of the literature.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of PBD patients with ocular manifestations. Demographic, ophthalmological and systemic data at presentation and during follow-up were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Four patients, aged 13.0 ± 2.9 years (9-16) were included. Posterior uveitis with retinal vasculitis, papillitis and macular edema was present in all patients, with associated anterior uveitis in 2 cases. Other features included occlusive vasculitis (2/4) and necrotizing retinitis (2/4). All patients were improved by systemic treatments except one patient with severe bilateral optic neuropathy. Ocular manifestations were the presenting symptoms in 3/4 cases.

CONCLUSION

Ocular manifestations and systemic associations of PBD are comparable to those encountered in adult patients. The lack of complains in pediatric patients may lead to a longer diagnosis delay, especially in unilateral uveitis. Aggressive and long-term treatment is mandatory to prevent vision loss and recurrences.

[Behçet's disease : Description and analysis of a French single-center retrospective study of 51 patients]

PURPOSE

To evaluate if the presence of uveitis in Behçet's disease (BD) is associated with a particular clinical phenotype and to analyze the prognostic impact of a missed diagnosis of BD at the time the uveitis is diagnosed.

MATERIEL AND METHODS

Ophthalmologic and systemic clinical features of 51 patients with BD were recorded retrospectively. We compared the clinical phenotype of patients with ocular manifestations with those without ocular manifestations. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the progression of their visual acuity: "decreased visual acuity" versus "stable or improved visual acuity."

RESULTS

In the group of patients with ocular involvement, there was a mean 2.3 systemic manifestations, vs. 3.2 in the group without ocular manifestations (P=0.004). When BD was diagnosed prior to the onset of uveitis, we counted fewer patients in the "decreased visual acuity" group in comparison with the patients who had no prior diagnosis of BD at the onset of the uveitis (91.3% in the "decreased visual acuity" group, P=0.04). The time before initiation of immunosuppressive treatment or a biological agent was shorter for these patients (4.4 vs. 39.3 months, P=0.007).

CONCLUSION

It appears that different phenotypes exist according to whether or not the BD patient has ocular involvement. Moreover, the visual prognosis is better if the uveitis occurs in patients who have already been diagnosed with BD, due to earlier initiation of immunosuppressive therapy.