Change of cytokines after intravitreal ranibizumab in patients with recurrent branch retinal vein occlusion and macular edema

Comparing ranibizumab, dexamethasone implant, and combined therapy for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: a clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Macular edema (ME) is a common complication following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and is also the main reason for visual impairment. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or dexamethasone implant (IDI) monotherapy, as well as the combination of IVR and IDI injections, in patients with ME secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, and comparative study included 292 patients with unilateral ME involvement (total of 292 eyes) secondary to BRVO. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups and followed up for 12 months. Patients in group 1 (n = 96) were treated with 3-dose loading IVR injections followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen. Patients in group 2 (n = 98) received IVR combined with IDI injection, followed by IVR PRN regimen. Patients in group 3 (n = 98) were treated with IDI injection, followed by repeated IDI injection based on clinical necessity. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), complications, and frequency of injections were recorded and compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

At baseline, the three groups did not differ in age, gender, duration of ME, BCVA, IOP, and CRT (P > 0.05). Mean number of total injections per eye within 12 months were 7.1 ± 2.3 (range 4-9) in group 1, 3.7 ± 1.5 (range 2-6) in group 2, and 1.8 ± 0.4 (range 1-3) in group 3. There was a statistical difference in the number of injections between group 1 and group 2 (P = 0.037). Eyes in group 3 received fewer injections than those in group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.052). BCVA improvement and CRT reduction were achieved in all groups and there was no significant difference between the three groups at the end of the 12th month. However, IOP elevation and cataract progression were more frequent in group 3, especially in those patients who received repeated IDI injections.

CONCLUSION

Three therapeutic regimens had comparable efficacy in treating ME secondary to BRVO. Combination therapy had an advantage in maintaining good effect with fewer re-injections and complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

The study complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Xi'an Aier Ancient City Eye Hospital, Xi'an Aier Eye Hospital, and Xianyang Aier Eye Hospital ethics committees (2022SF-367).

Development of high-performance point-of-care aqueous VEGF detection system and proof-of-concept validation in RVO patients

OBJECTIVES

To develop a sensitive point-of-care testing (POCT) aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) detection system, and assess its role for predicting the response to anti-VEGF treatment in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME) patients.

METHODS

An automatic point-of-care aqueous humor Magnetic Particle Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immuno-Assay (MPCLEIA) VEGF detection system was developed. The predictive values of aqueous cytokine levels, in combination with imaging parameters, on anatomical treatment response (ATR, the relative central macular thickness change [ΔCMT/bl-CMT]) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The automatic MPCLEIA system was able to provide results in 45 min with only 20 μL sample. Among the 57 eyes with available pre- and post-treatment evaluation, ATR significantly correlated with levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and VEGF measured by Luminex xMAP platform, and VEGF measured by MPCLEIA. Optimal cut-off values for these biomarkers were 13.26 ng/L, 23.57 ng/L, 1,110.12 ng/L, 105.52 ng/L, and 85.39 ng/L, respectively. Univariate analysis showed significant associations between ATR category (good response if ATR≤-25 % or poor response otherwise) and IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, VEGF-xMAP, and VEGF-MPCLEIA (p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that ATR category was significantly associated with aqueous VEGF-MPCLEIA (p=0.006) and baseline(bl)-CMT (p=0.008). Receiver operating characteristics analysis yielded an AUC of 0.959 for the regression model combining VEGF-MPCLEIA and bl-CMT, for predicting ATR category.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel MPCLEIA-based automatic VEGF detection system enables accurate POCT of aqueous VEGF, which shows promise in predicting the treatment response of RVO-ME to anti-VEGF agents when combined with bl-CMT.

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy with or Without Initial Steroid Therapy for Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose

In branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), administering steroid injections to inhibit expression of inflammatory factors in the first phase of macular edema may reduce recurrence of the edema. The purpose of our study was to investigate the functional and morphological prognosis and frequency of recurrence after injection of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with and without initial steroid therapy to treat macular edema with BRVO.

Patients and Methods

Patients with BRVO and macular edema (41 eyes) received intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI) alone (IRI group, 21 eyes) or subtenon triamcinolone (STTA) injection and IRI (combination group, 20 eyes). Patients in both groups with recurrent macular edema received further IRI as appropriate. A laser flare meter was used to assess aqueous flare values, and an optical coherence tomography device was used to measure central macular thickness (CMT). Before the first treatment, we obtained samples of aqueous humor and analyzed them by the suspension array method to evaluate VEGF, placental growth factor (PlGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and interferon-inducible 10-kDa protein (IP-10).

Results

The two groups were not significantly different with regard to levels of VEGF, PlGF, PDGF-AA, sICAM-1, MCP-1, IL-6, IL-8, or IP-10. Best-corrected visual acuity, CMT, and aqueous flare value (IRI group, baseline 8.69 ± 4.55 photon counts/ms; combination group, baseline 9.21 ± 3.72 photon counts/ms) improved significantly in both groups without significant intergroup differences. Analyses showed no significant intergroup differences in the mean number of IRIs during the 12-month follow-up, but the proportion of patients without recurrence (ie, who received only one IRI) was significantly higher in the combination group than in the IRI group (P = 0.032). Furthermore, the time to initial recurrence was significantly longer in the combination group than in the IRI group (P = 0.003).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that initial STTA injection and IRI may have a synergistic effect in patients with BRVO and macular edema in that they increase the time between anti-VEGF treatments.

Effects of Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection on Peripheral Retinal Microcirculation and Cytokines in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema

Background and Objectives: To investigate peripheral blood flow in retinal vessels and vessel diameters after intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI) and the relationship between these parameters and cytokines in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with macular edema. Materials and Methods: We assessed relative flow volume (RFV) and the width of the main and branch retinal arteries and veins in the occluded and non-occluded regions before and after IRI in 37 patients with BRVO and macular edema. Measurements were made using laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG). When performing IRI, we obtained samples of aqueous humor and analyzed them using the suspension array method to evaluate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), placental growth factor (PlGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and interferon-inducible 10-kDa protein (IP-10). Results: In both retinal regions, before and after IRI, the RFV in the main artery and vein showed a significant correlation with the summed RFV in the respective branch vessels 1 and 2. In the occluded region, the RFV in the main vein was significantly negatively correlated with MCP-1, PDGF-AA, IL-6, and IL-8; the RFV in branch vein 1 was significantly negatively correlated with PlGF, MCP-1, IL-6, and IL-8; PDGF-AA was significantly negatively correlated with the width of the main and branch veins; and the RFVs of the main artery and vein decreased significantly from before to 1 month after IRI. Conclusions: Contrary to expectations, the study found that anti-VEGF therapy does not affect RFV in arteries and veins in patients with BRVO and macular edema. Furthermore, retinal blood flow is poor in patients with high MCP-1, IL-6, and IL-8. Finally, high PDGF-AA may result in smaller venous diameters and reduced retinal blood flow.

Laser-Induced Porcine Model of Experimental Retinal Vein Occlusion: An Optimized Reproducible Approach

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a frequent visually disabling condition. The management of RVO continues to challenge clinicians. Macular edema secondary to RVO is often recurrent, and patients typically require intravitreal injections for several years. Understanding molecular mechanisms in RVO is a key element in improving the treatment of the condition. Studying the molecular mechanisms in RVO at the retinal level is possible using animal models of experimental RVO. Most studies of experimental RVO have been sporadic, using only a few animals per experiment. Here, we report on 10 years of experience of the use of argon laser-induced experimental RVO in 108 porcine eyes from 65 animals, including 65 eyes with experimental branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and 43 eyes with experimental central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Reproducibility and methods for evaluating and controlling ischemia in experimental RVO are reviewed. Methods for studying protein changes in RVO are discussed in detail, including proteomic analysis, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry. Experimental RVO has brought significant insights into molecular changes in RVO. Testing intravitreal interventions in experimental RVO may be a significant step in developing personalized therapeutic approaches for patients with RVO.

A Review of Intraocular Biomolecules in Retinal Vein Occlusion: Toward Potential Biomarkers for Companion Diagnostics

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is one of the most common retinal vascular diseases. The pathogenesis of RVO is multifactorial and involves a complex interplay among a variety of vascular and inflammatory mediators. Many cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and cell adhesion molecules have been reported to be implicated. Treatments for RVO are directed at the management of underlying risk factors and vision-threatening complications, including macula edema (ME) and neovascularization. Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents are currently considered as the first-line treatment for ME secondary to RVO (RVO-ME), but a substantial proportion of patients responded insufficiently to anti-VEGF agents. Since RVO-ME refractory to anti-VEGF agents generally responds to corticosteroids and its visual outcome is negatively correlated to disease duration, prediction of treatment response at baseline in RVO-ME may significantly improve both cost-effectiveness and visual prognosis. Several bioactive molecules in the aqueous humor were found to be associated with disease status in RVO. This review aims to present a comprehensive review of intraocular biomolecules reported in RVO, including VEGF, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, sICAM-1, IL-12, IL-13, sVEGFR-1, sVEGFR-2, PDGF-AA, etc., highlighting their association with disease severity and/or phenotype, and their potential roles in prognostic prediction and treatment selection. Some of these molecules may serve as biomarkers for aqueous humor-based companion diagnostics for the treatment of RVO in the future.

Optical coherence tomographic patterns in patients with retinal vein occlusion and macular edema treated by ranibizumab: a predictive and personalized approach

Purpose

To establish the morphological and functional parameters to predict the effectiveness of intravitreal injections (IVI) of ranibizumab in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion and to develop a mathematical model for personalized treatment algorithms.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective study of 98 patients (98 eyes) with macular edema, who received IVI of ranibizumab and were followed up for 12 months. Spectral optical coherence tomography scans and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessments were conducted every 3 months. Treatment outcome predictors were calculated based on logistic regression analysis.

Results

The most significant prognostic factors for the long-term BCVA were baseline BCVA (OR 11.1, p = 0.001), foveal volume (OR 10.8, p = 0.001), destruction of external limiting membrane (OR 15.8, p = 0.001), photoreceptor inner/outer segments (OR 11.1, p = 0.001) and retinal pigment epithelium (OR 9.1, p = 0.001). It has also been discovered that post-treatment BCVA correlated with the height of serous retinal detachment (SRD) (r = -0.4, p = 0.001), ganglion cell complex thickness (r =  + 0.3, p = 0.01) and focal loss of ganglion cells (r =-0.3, p = 0.005). Patients without SRD required fewer ranibizumab injections (3.8 ± 1.1) for macular edema fluid resorption compared to those with SRD (5.7 ± 1.2, p = 0.03). A mathematical model for predicting and personalized approach therapy of ranibizumab has been obtained (accuracy of 89%).

Conclusion

The effectiveness of IVI of ranibizumab depends on baseline morphological and functional changes. The obtained mathematical model allows for predicting the outcomes of therapy, determining individualized algorithms to increase the treatment effectiveness and to prevent low vision that corresponds to the principles of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.

Retinal Microcirculation and Cytokines as Predictors for Recurrence of Macular Edema after Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between retinal blood flow, presence or absence of recurrence of macular edema, and levels of cytokines, after intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI) in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods: In 47 patients with BRVO and macular edema, we used laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) to measure the relative flow volume (RFV) of the retinal arteries and veins passing through the optic disc in the occluded and non-occluded regions of the retina before and after IRI. Aqueous humor samples were obtained at the time of IRI. Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), soluble VEGF receptor (sVEGFR)-1, sVEGFR-2, placental growth factor (PlGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-12 (p70), IL-13 and interferon-inducible 10-kDa protein (IP-10) were measured by the suspension array method. Patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of whether or not macular edema recurred at 2 months after IRI: the nonrecurrent group, n = 24; and the recurrent group, n = 23. Results: In the veins of the occluded region, RFV showed a significant difference between baseline and 1 month after IRI (p < 0.001) in the recurrent group and the percent change of RFV showed a significant difference between the recurrent and nonrecurrent groups (p = 0.005). Furthermore, we found a significant negative correlation between RFV in the veins of the occluded region and aqueous levels of MCP-1, IL-8 and IP-10 at baseline (p = 0.029, p = 0.035, and p = 0.039, respectively). In the recurrent group, the arteries and veins of the non-occluded and occluded regions showed no significant association between RFV and the aqueous levels of any factors. Conclusions: These findings suggested that a decrease in RFV in the veins of the occluded region might be associated with the recurrence of macular edema and that the recurrence might depend on the change in RFV in the veins of the occluded region rather than the levels of cytokines.

Higher Aqueous Levels of Resistin and Lipocalin-2 Indicated Worse Visual Improvement following anti-VEGF Therapy in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the aqueous humor levels of elastase-2, lactoferrin, lipocalin-2 (LCN-2), resistin, and thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and their relationship with visual prognosis following intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

52 RVO patients (23 cases of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and 29 cases of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)) and 20 cases of senile cataract were enrolled in this study. All RVO patients underwent fundus examinations before and 6-8 months after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. Five milliliters of blood were collected from RVO patients before treatment for the measurement of lipids and coagulation factors. Sixty microliters of aqueous humor were collected during intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF or during cataract surgery. The levels of elastase-2, lactoferrin, LCN-2, resistin, and TSP-1 in aqueous humor were determined by Luminex xMAP multiple analysis.

RESULTS

The aqueous levels of resistin and LCN-2 were significantly higher but the level of TSP-1 was significantly lower in RVO patients compared to controls. Further, sub-group analysis showed that CRVO patients had significantly higher levels of resistin and LCN-2 than controls. The aqueous levels of resistin and LCN-2 were negatively correlated with visual improvement following anti-VEGF therapy in CRVO but not in BRVO patients. Visual improvement in RVO patients was not associated with blood lipid levels or any of the coagulation factors.

CONCLUSION

CRVO patients had significantly higher aqueous levels of resistin and LCN-2, which negatively impacted on visual improvement after anti-VEGF therapy.