Outcomes of sequential intracorneal ring segment and phakic intraocular lens insertion for visual rehabilitation in keratoconus

Keratometric Outcomes after Simultaneous versus Sequential Intracorneal Ring Segment Implantation with Femtosecond Laser and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Egyptian Patients with Keratoconus and Ectasia

Background

Keratoconus (KC) is degenerative corneal disorder, with central and paracentral thinning and corneal ectasia. For KC progressive cases, primary treatment included corneal collagen cross linking (CXL) to stabilize coning and intracorneal rings segment (ICRS) to correct visual acuity.

Aim

The aim of the study is to assess efficacy and safety of ICRS and CXL on one session (Simultaneous) or two sessions (sequential) with maximum of 1 month apart.

Patients and Methods

This Prospective Intervention Comparative research made at Armed forces hospital, Cairo, Egypt from January 2017 to December 2019. Forty patients (60 eyes) with mild to moderate KC were enrolled. Patients sorted into Simultaneous group includes 21 patients (30 eyes) undergo two procedures (ICRS then CXL) at the same session and Sequential group included 19 patients (30 eyes) undergo ICRS then CXL on two sessions with month apart. Patients followed up at end of 1st, 3rd, and 6th months. Assessment included changes in corrected corneal surface irregularities as minimum keratometric 1 (K1), maximum keratometric readings (K2), and mean keratometric (Km) readings.

Results

Improvement of K1, K2, and Km in Simulations and Sequential groups achieved at end of 1st-, 3rd-, and 6th-month postoperative versus preoperative. Maximum improvement in Simulations and Sequential groups in K1 achieved at end of 6th and 1st months, in K2 at end of 3rd and 6th months and in Km at end of 1st and 3rd months.

Conclusions

Combined ICRS and CXL act safely in one or two sessions and there are no statistically significant variations between results on both methods in keratometric readings.

Indications for keratoplasty in management of corneal ectasia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review aims to describe recent advancements in treatment of corneal ectasias and its effect on indications for corneal transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The majority of patients affected by ectatic corneal disease use contact lenses to correct resulting astigmatism. Patients who are intolerant of contact lenses or cannot achieve acceptable vision through conservative measures could consider keratoplasty. However, continuing advancements in both nonsurgical and surgical treatments are either reducing or delaying the need for keratoplasty in patients affected by ectatic corneal disease.

SUMMARY

Corneal transplantation has been the mainstay of treatment for patients with advanced ectatic corneal disease. In the past decade, numerous improvements have been occurred to make contact lenses not only more effective for visual correction, but also more comfortable. Although corneal cross-linking is the only proven treatment known to prevent progression of disease, several other therapies show early potential for those in which cross-linking is contraindicated. Patients now have access to a wider range of therapies before considering keratoplasty.