Burden of disease assessment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Spain: Results of the AMD-MANAGE study

Outcomes of Treatment-Resistant Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Switched from Aflibercept to Faricimab

PURPOSE

Although previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of faricimab in treatment-naive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), its outcomes in patients switched from aflibercept are less understood. This study aimed to assess clinical anatomical and functional outcomes of switching to faricimab in patients undergoing aflibercept intravitreal injections (IVIs) for nAMD with suboptimal response.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SUBJECTS

Patients with nAMD at a single tertiary care center who were switched from aflibercept to faricimab due to persistent suboptimal response.

METHODS

Patients had received a minimum of 6 consecutive IVIs of aflibercept and showed persistent presence of intraretinal (IRF) or subretinal fluid (SRF) on OCT despite receiving aflibercept at 4 or 6-weekly intervals at the time of the switch. Patients receiving 4-weekly aflibercept were switched with either 2 or 3 loading doses of 4-weekly faricimab injections. Regression models were used to identify predictors of clinical outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity, central macular thickness (CMT), and OCT parameters were assessed preswitch and postswitch.

RESULTS

Eighty-one eyes of 68 patients were included. The mean age was 79.1 years (standard deviation: 8.9), and females constituted 53% of cases. A statistically significant reduction in CMT was observed postswitch (P < 0.0001). The proportion of cases with IRF (P = 0.0219) and SRF (P < 0.000) decreased significantly. Overall clinical improvement on OCT was noted in 80% of patients. No significant improvement in ETDRS vision was observed. There was no evidence that switching regimen (2 vs. 3 loading doses) had an independent effect on clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with treatment-resistant nAMD, switching from aflibercept to faricimab may serve as a safe and effective option. Significant anatomical improvements were observed, with a trend toward visual stability. The loading regimen with 2 faricimab injections appeared to be sufficient for nonnaive patients. However, a longer follow-up and larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Technological Perception with Rural and Urban Differentiation and Its Influence on the Quality of Life of Older People with Age-Related Macular Degeneration

The past decade has seen a global increase in population age, especially in developed countries, where aging involves visual diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which severely affect quality of life (QoL) and mental health, as well as increase isolation and care costs. This study investigated how persons with AMD perceive the impact of technology use on their QoL, focusing on potential disparities between urban and rural contexts in Spain. Using a cross-sectional observational design, data from the 2020 National Statistics Institute's Disability, Personal Autonomy, and Dependency Situations Survey were analyzed, focusing on QoL aspects based on the WHO items of the WHOQOL-100 scale. The results revealed a generally positive perception of technology among participants, with urban residents perceiving technology's positive impact more favorably. Sex discrepancies in technology perception were also observed, as women exhibited a more positive outlook on technology's influence on QoL. The analysis of QoL aspects, such as 'Visibility', 'Learning', 'Mobility', and 'Domestic life', highlighted distinct challenges faced by rural and urban populations, underscoring the importance of context-specific approaches in technology interventions. However, these perceptions were intertwined with comorbidities, which can exacerbate AMD-related issues. Furthermore, this study explored the role of technology in enhancing QoL among older adults with AMD, examining how it influences daily activities and independence, particularly in the context of AMD management. This study concluded that developing more-inclusive policies tailored to the specific needs of persons with AMD, with special attention to environmental and sex differences, is imperative to enhance the positive impact of technology on their QoL.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration: disease pathogenesis and current state of molecular biomarkers predicting treatment response-a scoping review

Age-related macular degeneration is a major cause of blindness, and the development of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal treatments has revolutionised the management of the disease. At the same time, new challenges and unmet needs arose due to the limitations of the current therapeutic options. Neovascularisation development during the course of the disease has a complex pathogenetic mechanism, and several biomarkers and their association with treatment outcomes have been investigated. We reviewed the relevant literature about neovascularisation development and biomarkers related to response to treatment. Improving our knowledge on the field can improve patient outcomes and offer personalised care.

[Topical treatment for age-related macular degeneration: Where are we now?]

The therapeutic management of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a major public health issue. One of its two late forms, neovascular AMD, is currently treated by intravitreal injections of pharmaceutical active ingredients. Although it is very effective in treating pathologies of the posterior segment of the eye, the intravitreal route is not an ideal option for the long-term management of a chronic disease such as AMD. Indeed, in the literature, some authors even call it a "burden" for the practitioners, the patients and the healthcare system. Thus, consideration should be given to less invasive routes. Among the possible administration routes to reach the posterior segment of the eye, the most suitable for the patient with the least risk of systemic adverse effects is the topical route. Several research teams have attempted to formulate molecules for topical administration in the treatment of atrophic or neovascular AMD. In this review, we emphasize the importance of the pharmaceutical formulation to meet the challenge of targeting the posterior segment of the eye by a topical route.

Reasons for Delayed Anti-VEGF Treatment During COVID-19 Lockdown and Clinical Impact in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

INTRODUCTION

Timely anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment is crucial for visual function in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The aim of this study was to assess the reasons for anti-VEGF treatment delay during the COVID-19 lockdown and its clinical impact in patients with nAMD.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, multicentre study in patients with nAMD treated with anti-VEGF therapy was performed in 16 centres nationwide. Data were retrieved from the FRB Spain registry, patient medical records and administrative databases. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received or missed intravitreal injections during the COVID-19 lockdown.

RESULTS

A total of 302 eyes from 245 patients were included (timely treated group [TTG] 126 eyes; delayed treatment group [DTG] 176 eyes). Visual acuity (VA; ETDRS letters) decreased from baseline to post-lockdown visit in the DTG (mean [standard deviation] 59.1 (20.8) vs. 57.1 (19.7); p = 0.020) and was maintained in the TTG (64.2 [16.5] vs. 63.6 [17.5]; p = 0.806). VA worsened by an average of - 2.0 letters in the DTG and by - 0.6 in the TTG (p = 0.016). A higher proportion of visits were cancelled due to hospital overload in the TTG (76.5%) than in the DTG (47%), and a higher proportion of patients missed visits in the DTG (53%) than in the TTG (23.5%, p = 0.021), with fear of COVID-19 infection being the main reason for missed visits (60%/50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment delays were caused by both hospital saturation and patients' decision; the latter being mainly driven by fear of COVID-19 infection. These delays had a detrimental effect on the visual outcomes in nAMD patients.

Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration within 48 h from diagnosis improves long-term functional outcome

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term visual and anatomical outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents depending on the time delay from confirmed diagnosis to treatment initiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-three nAMD patients (73 eyes) treated with anti-VEGF agents for 12 months using the pro re nata regimen were included in this retrospective longitudinal study. Patients were split into 3 groups according to the time from diagnosis to first anti-VEGF injection: < 48 h (group 1); 48 h-7 days (group 2); > 7 days (group 3). Decimal best-corrected visual acuity (VA) and macular thickness (MT) were recorded at baseline and 1-2-, 3-4-, 6- and 12-month later. Furthermore, age, gender as well as the applied treatment and number of injections after 12 months of treatment were also registered and compared.

RESULTS

Long-term effect of the treatment demonstrated enhanced VA in group 1 patients compared with the rest of groups after 1-2-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up (P < 0.05). Positive effects of early treatment were additionally corroborated by the augmented percentage of patients with normal VA in the group 1 respect to the rest of groups over studied time points (P < 0.05). Moreover, the VA gain in nAMD at group 1 was obtained with a mean of 3.7 intravitreal injections over 1-year follow-up period. Regarding MT, non-significant difference was observed among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An early initial treatment with VEGF inhibitors is critical to achieve the best functional benefits of this therapy in new-onset nAMD patients.

Cost minimization analysis of brolucizumab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

INTRODUCTION

Brolucizumab is a novel anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drug administered in a fixed regimen of 8 or 12 weeks which, in the HAWK and HARRIER studies, was shown not to be inferior to aflibercept with respect to the best corrected visual acuity, with a less burdensome treatment regimen. The aim of the analysis was to compare the direct healthcare costs of both anti-VEGF as a treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cost minimization analysis was performed under a 25-year time horizon and considering the drug costs, administration, follow-up tests, and management of adverse events. Resource use was obtained from the related literature and validated by clinical experts. Various scenario analysis were carried out to check the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

Brolucizumab resulted in a lower cost per patient compared with aflibercept, considering the number of injections derived from the HAWK and HARRIER studies. This result was maintained in the different scenarios analysed, except for the number of injections of the flexible aflibercept regimen of the ARIES study, since the lower discontinuation of treatment with brolucizumab implies maintaining the treatment of more patients. Considering the same discontinuation, brolucizumab maintained the results observed in the base case of the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows how the fixed administration regimen of brolucizumab can help reduce both healthcare and patients' burden.

Baseline characteristics and treatment response predictive of nAMD outcomes with ranibizumab therapy in treatment-naive patients: the RACER subgroup analysis

BACKGROUND

The Ranibizumab AMD Clinical Efficacy Study (RACER) conducted in treatment-naive adult Taiwanese patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) suggested the importance of early and intensive dosing of ranibizumab for optimal treatment outcomes. This subgroup analysis aims to provide clinical information on treatment response that can potentially guide on maintaining the treatment or switching anti-VEGF agents in the real-world setting.

METHODS

Visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed in the RACER subgroup population. Subgroup analysis sets were categorised based on: (1) baseline best-corrected VA (BCVA; ≤ 48 and > 48 letters); (2) baseline CRT (≤ 325 or > 325 μm); and (3) treatment response after three monthly initial injections: < or ≥ 5-letter gain in BCVA and reduction of < or ≥ 50 μm in CRT.

RESULTS

Patient age, sex, nAMD duration and number of ranibizumab injections did not differ significantly between the treatment subgroups. Poor baseline BCVA (≤ 48 letters) and baseline CRT severity (> 325 µm) were predictors of maximum BCVA gains (9.6 ± 12.9 letters [95%CI: 6.3 to 12.9] and 5.1 ± 18.3 letters [95%CI: - 0.5 to 10.8] at Months 3 and 12, respectively) and better CRT reductions (- 127.6 ± 104.2 µm and - 104.2 ± 107.4 µm at Months 3 and 12, respectively; both P < 0.001). For the subgroup showing favourable treatment improvement with BCVA gains ≥ 5 letters after three monthly initial injections, 75.6% of patients maintained follow-up at Month 12 with a mean of 6.5 ± 14.3 letter gains (95% CI: 1.2 to 11.7). The BCVA gains < 5-letter subgroup nevertheless had stable BCVA (0.4 ± 12.1 letter gains) and CRT (- 41.9 ± 61.2 µm) at Month 12, respectively. In the subgroup with ≥ 50 µm CRT reduction after three monthly initial injections, there are significantly higher BCVA improvements vs. the < 50 µm CRT reduction subgroup at Month 3 (5.0 ± 8.6 letter gains vs. 1.5 ± 11.6 letter gains, respectively; intergroup P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Lower baseline BCVA and higher baseline CRT were associated with BCVA gains and CRT reductions throughout the 12-month study period. Early CRT improvements after three monthly initial injections were associated with BCVA gains as early as Month 3.

Early Canadian Real-World Experience with Brolucizumab in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Experienced Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Retrospective Chart Review

Purpose

To assess early real-world outcomes with brolucizumab in Canadian patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) for which they previously received ≥1 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent(s).

Patients and Methods

This multisite, real-world, retrospective chart review included data from a consecutive sample of 73 patients who received brolucizumab for nAMD after treatment with ≥1 other anti-VEGF agents. The principal reasons for switching to brolucizumab were to extend the treatment interval (51.6% of patients) and to treat persistent macular fluid (34.2%). The primary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the incidence rates of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis (RV), and retinal vascular occlusion (RVO). Secondary outcomes included central retinal thickness (CRT), injection interval, and presence of intraretinal and subretinal fluid (IRF and SRF). All parameters were measured at baseline until the last treatment visit between April 27, 2020, and August 31, 2021.

Results

Over a mean follow-up of 28 weeks, a nonsignificant mean improvement in BCVA was identified (4.3 [standard deviation (SD) 8.3] letters; P=0.057), with 47.9% experiencing a gain of ≥5 letters. IOI was detected in 3 patients (4.1%), one of whom also developed RV and RVO (1.4%), which is consistent with existing brolucizumab data. Significant reductions were observed in mean CRT (−36.6 μm [SD 56.1 μm]; P=0.0002) and presence of any macular fluid (56.1% [SD 5.6%]; P<0.001), IRF (66.6% [SD 6.3%]; P<0.001), and SRF (62.7% [SD 6.3%]; P<0.001). The mean injection interval increased significantly by 2.1 weeks (SD 2.7; P<0.001).

Conclusion

In the first real-world Canadian analysis, brolucizumab was associated with improvements in functional outcomes in treatment-experienced patients, consistent with other real-world studies. The incidence of IOI, RV, and RVO were in line with the post hoc safety analysis of HAWK and HARRIER data.

Patient Preference and Treatment Satisfaction With a Port Delivery System for Ranibizumab vs Intravitreal Injections in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Do patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with a surgically implanted port delivery system (PDS) with ranibizumab prefer the PDS over intravitreal injections of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor agents?

Findings

This phase 3 randomized clinical trial found that treatment satisfaction was high with both PDS and intravitreal treatment, but almost all patients in the PDS arm preferred treatment delivered via the PDS at week 40 vs previous intravitreal injections.

Meaning

Although PDS treatment was preferred by most patients assigned to PDS over previous intravitreal injections, both delivery methods have high treatment satisfaction.

Importance

The port delivery system (PDS) with ranibizumab has demonstrated noninferior and equivalent efficacy compared with monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab, an anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), but evaluating patient preference is important to help inform clinical decision-making.

Objective

Evaluate treatment satisfaction for ranibizumab delivered via PDS vs intravitreal injections as well as patient preference among those assigned to PDS.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Archway was a phase 3 randomized active-comparator open-label clinical trial conducted at 78 sites in the US. Patients 50 years and older with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months of screening with a documented response to anti-VEGF therapy were included. Of 619 patients screened, 418 were enrolled; 415 were included in the primary analysis and 234 were included in the secondary exploratory analysis. The Archway study ran from September 12, 2019, through primary readout on May 22, 2020.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 3:2 to PDS with ranibizumab, 100 mg/mL, with fixed refill exchanges every 24 weeks or intravitreal ranibizumab injections, 0.5 mg, every 4 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Treatment satisfaction was measured using the Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in the PDS and intravitreal injection arms at week 40. Patient preference was assessed using the content-validated PDS Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPPQ), which measured the proportion of patients in the PDS arm with monthly monitoring who preferred treatment with the PDS at week 40 over previous intravitreal injections or concurrent fellow-eye injections. Both outcomes were exploratory end points.

Results

The mean (SD) age of participants at baseline was 75.0 (7.9) years; 234 participants (59%) were women and 162 (41%) were men. At week 40, differences in overall treatment satisfaction scores were minimal for the PDS and intravitreal injection arms (mean, 68.0; 95% CI, 67.4-68.6; n = 237 and mean, 66.1; 95% CI, 64.9-67.3; n = 159, respectively; difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.7-3.1). A total of 234 of 248 patients (94.4%) in the PDS arm were included in the PPPQ analysis. At week 40, almost all patients in the PDS arm preferred treatment via PDS (218 of 234 [93.2%]) vs previous intravitreal injections (3 of 234 [1.3%]), including 172 of 234 (73.5%) with a very strong preference for the PDS. In patients who received concurrent fellow-eye injections (n = 78), 72 (92.3%) preferred the PDS.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although PDS treatment was preferred by almost all patients assigned to PDS over previous intravitreal injections, both delivery methods have high treatment satisfaction. These findings provide further evidence for the PDS as a meaningful alternative treatment option for patients with nAMD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03677934

Patient and retina specialists' preferences in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatment. A discrete choice experiment

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) leads to severe and permanent visual impairment, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and functional independence. Although treatment with anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) prevents and, in some cases, reverses visual damage, the need for frequent monitoring visits and intravitreal injections represents a significant burden on patients, caregivers and retina specialists.

OBJECTIVE

To elicit preferences for nAMD treatment characteristics from the perspectives of patients and retina specialists.

METHOD

A discrete choice experiment was conducted. Participants (patients > 50 years with nAMD receiving anti-VEGF drugs for at least 2 years and without previous experience with anti-VEGF and retina specialists working in the Spanish National Healthcare System) were asked to select one of two hypothetical treatments resulting from the combination of five attributes (effects on visual function, effects on retinal fluid, treatment regimen, monitoring frequency, and cost); their levels were identified by reviewing the literature and two focus groups. The relative importance (RI) given to each attribute was estimated using a mixed logit model. The marginal rates of substitution (MRS) were calculated taking cost as the risk attribute.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients (P) [aged 79.0 (SD:7.4) years; 57.3% women; 2.3 (SD:0.7) years with nAMD; 2.1 years (SD:0.1) in treatment] and 66 retina specialists (RS) participated in the study. Participants gave greater RI to improvements in their visual function [60.0% (P); 52.7% (RS)], lower monitoring frequency [20.2% (P); 27.1% (RS)] and reduction in retinal fluid [9.8% (P); 13.0%(RS)]. Patients and retina specialists would agree to an increase in cost by 65.0% and 56.5%, respectively, in exchange for improvements of visual function; and 25.5% and 43.3% on delaying monitoring frequency by one month.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy of treatment, in terms of visual function improvements, is the main driver for treatment election for both patients and retina specialists. Treatment monitoring requirements are also considered, mainly from the retina specialist's perspective. These results suggest that the use of more efficacious anti-VEGF agents with a longer duration of action may contribute to aligning treatment characteristics with patients/specialists' preferences. A better alignment would facilitate better disease management, fulfilling the unmet needs of patients and retina specialists.