1
|
Hrbacek J, Kacperek A, Beenakker JWM, Mortimer L, Denker A, Mazal A, Shih HA, Dendale R, Slopsema R, Heufelder J, Mishra KK. PTCOG Ocular Statement: Expert Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in Ocular Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00748-X. [PMID: 38971383 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
Although rare cancers, ocular tumors are a threat to vision, quality of life, and potentially life expectancy of a patient. Ocular proton therapy (OPT) is a powerful tool for successfully treating this disease. The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Ocular Group) formulated an Evidence and Expert-Based Executive Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in OPT: comparative dosimetric and clinical analysis with the different OPT systems is essential to set up planning guidelines, implement best practices, and establish benchmarks for eye preservation, vision, and quality of life measures. Contemporary prospective trials in select subsets of patients (eg, tumors near the optic disc and/or macula) may allow for dosimetric and clinical analysis between different radiation modalities and beamline systems to evaluate differences in radiation delivery and penumbra, and resultant tumor control, normal tissue complication rates, and overall clinical cost-effectiveness. To date, the combination of multimodal imaging (fundus photography, ultrasound, etc), ophthalmologist assessment, and clip surgery with radiation planning have been keys to successful treatment. Increased use of three-dimensional imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) is anticipated although its spatial resolution might be a limiting factor (eg, detection of flat diffuse tumor parts). Commercially produced ocular treatment-planning systems are under development and their future use is expected to expand across OPT centers. Future continuity of OPT will depend on the following: (1) maintaining and upgrading existing older dedicated low-energy facilities, (2) maintaining shared, degraded beamlines at large proton therapy centers, and (3) developing adapted gantry beams of sufficient quality to maintain the clinical benefits of sharp beam conformity. Option (1) potentially offers the sharpest beams, minimizing impact on healthy tissues, whereas (2) and (3) potentially offer the advantage of substantial long-term technical support and development as well as the introduction of new approaches. Significant patient throughputs and close cooperation between medical physics, ophthalmology, and radiation therapy, underpinned by mutual understanding, is crucial for a successful OPT service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hrbacek
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
| | | | - Jan-Willem M Beenakker
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Linda Mortimer
- Medical Physics Department, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Birkenhead, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Denker
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Proton Therapy (BE-APT), Berlin, Germany
| | - Alejandro Mazal
- Medical Physics Service, Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Helen A Shih
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie Protontherapy Center, Orsay, France
| | - Roelf Slopsema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory Proton Therapy Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jens Heufelder
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BerlinProtonen am HZB, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kavita K Mishra
- Proton Ocular Radiation Therapy Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Osher Center for Integrative Health, Osher Foundation Endowed Chair in Clinical Programs in Integrative Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thariat J, Martel A, Matet A, Loria O, Kodjikian L, Nguyen AM, Rosier L, Herault J, Nahon-Estève S, Mathis T. Non-Cancer Effects following Ionizing Irradiation Involving the Eye and Orbit. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051194. [PMID: 35267502 PMCID: PMC8909862 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The irradiation of tumors involving the eye or orbit represents a complex therapeutic challenge due to the proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation. The challenges include tumor control, as it is often a surrogate for survival; organ (usually the eyeball) preservation; and the minimization of damage of sensitive tissues surrounding the tumor in order to preserve vision. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. The aim of the present review is to report the non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality. The pros and cons of conventional and advanced forms of radiation techniques and their clinical implementation are provided with a clinical perspective. Abstract The eye is an exemplarily challenging organ to treat when considering ocular tumors. It is at the crossroads of several major aims in oncology: tumor control, organ preservation, and functional outcomes including vision and quality of life. The proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation damage explain these challenges. Given a high enough dose of radiation, virtually any cancer will be destroyed with radiotherapy. Yet, the doses inevitably absorbed by normal tissues may lead to complications, the likelihood of which increases with the radiation dose and volume of normal tissues irradiated. Precision radiotherapy allows personalized decision-making algorithms based on patient and tumor characteristics by exploiting the full knowledge of the physics, radiobiology, and the modifications made to the radiotherapy equipment to adapt to the various ocular tumors. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. Radiation can damage the lacrimal gland, eyelashes/eyelids, cornea, lens, macula/retina, optic nerves and chiasma, each having specific dose–response characteristics. The present review is a report of non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire/IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534—ARCHADE, Unicaen—Université de Normandie, 14000 Caen, France
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (T.M.)
| | - Arnaud Martel
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (A.M.); (S.N.-E.)
- Laboratoire de Pathologie Clinique et Expérimentale, Biobank BB-0033-00025, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Alexandre Matet
- Service d’Oncologie Oculaire, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Olivier Loria
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
| | - Laurent Kodjikian
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
- UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Anh-Minh Nguyen
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
| | - Laurence Rosier
- Centre Rétine Galien, Centre d’Exploration et de Traitement de la Rétine et de la Macula, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Joël Herault
- Service de Radiothérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Sacha Nahon-Estève
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (A.M.); (S.N.-E.)
- INSERM, Biology and Pathologies of Melanocytes, Team1, Equipe labellisée Ligue 2020 and Equipe labellisée ARC 2019, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, 06200 Nice, France
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
- UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (T.M.)
| |
Collapse
|