Primary Vitrectomy for Bullous Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachments Due to Complex Breaks

Prognostic Factors after Primary Vitrectomy and Perfluorocarbon Liquids for Bullous Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Purpose

To identify prognostic factors for visual acuity and anatomic outcomes associated with bullous rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) management using primary pars plana vitrectomy, intraoperative perfluorocarbon liquids (PFCLs), and internal gas tamponade.

Methods

The authors studied a consecutive series of 115 eyes (115 patients) with a bullous RRD not complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) associated with large, multiple, and/or posterior breaks in 58 (50.4%) eyes. All eyes underwent vitrectomy, injection of PFCL, and gas tamponade as the primary procedure. Encircling scleral bands were placed in all cases. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 60 months (mean 16.6±14.1 months).

Results

Retinal reattachment was achieved in 92.2% of eyes (106/115) with one operation and in all eyes after a second procedure. PVR was observed in 1 (0.87%) eye and pre-retinal membranes in 3 (2.6%) eyes. Progression of pre-existing cataract and development of new cataract occurred in 45 (58.4%) of the 77 phakic eyes. The presence of inferior retinal breaks was significantly associated with redetachment after the first procedure (p=0.0156). On univariate analysis, better preoperative visual acuity (p<0.001), macular sparing retinal detachment (p<0.001), and fewer quadrants involved by the detachment (p=0.0015) were significant positive prognostic factors for final visual acuity. Logistic regression analysis highlighted that macular sparing retinal detachment and absence of trauma were associated with better final visual acuity.

Conclusions

Redetachment was associated with the presence of inferior retinal breaks. Visual recovery was dependent on preoperative visual acuity, macular involvement, extent of retinal detachment, and trauma.

Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment as accessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a retrospective observational case series

BACKGROUND

Scleral buckling surgery and pars plana vitrectomy are competing methods in the treatment of retinal detachment. The recent development of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) has dramatically improved the visualization of the photoreceptor layer relative to conventional OCT, and offers new opportunities to investigate the discordances between anatomic and functional outcomes after retinal detachment surgery. Hence, the study aim was to use SD-OCT to compare the postoperative macular recovery between scleral buckling and vitrectomy for macular-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational case series, we observed 32 patients who underwent scleral buckling surgery (group 1) and 26 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (group 2) as the primary surgery for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. OCT was used to examine microstructural changes in the macular area.

RESULTS

The mean visual acuity improvement was 0.4 ± 0.8 logMAR in group 1 and 0.7 ± 0.9 logMAR in group 2. As detected by SD-OCT, subretinal fluid was present in 26 of the group 1 eyes (81.3%) and 5 of the group 2 eyes (19.2%) at 8 weeks postoperatively.This difference was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.05). Moreover, detection by SD-OCT revealed epiretinal membranes in 5 of the group 1 eyes (15.6%) and 11 of the group 2 eyes (42.3%), a difference that was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Macular recovery and the mean visual acuity differed between the 2 groups of patients. With the help of SD-OCT, we observed that subretinal fluids could persist for a relatively longer period after scleral buckling. Based on our results, we conclude that primary vitrectomy surgery is a better choice for macular recovery of the macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2

BACKGROUND

Accompanying the patient recruitment within the "Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment multicentre trial (SPR)", all patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) had to be documented in a detailed recruitment list. The main goal of this analysis was to estimate the prevalence of "medium-severe" RRD (SPR Study eligible) as defined by the SPR Study inclusion criteria. In addition, the detailed anatomical situation of medium-severe RRD is investigated.

METHODS

SPR Study recruitment was evaluated via a standardised questionnaire, which contained a coloured fundus drawing and information regarding possible reasons for exclusion from the SPR Study in each case. A team of three experienced vitreoretinal surgeons evaluated all fundus drawings from a 1-year period. The review led to a decision on SPR Study eligibility on the pure basis of anatomical assessment. The main outcome measures were assessment of feasible inclusion into the SPR Study by the evaluation team based on the fundus drawing and anatomical details.

RESULTS

A total of 1,115 patients with RRD from 13 European centres were prospectively enrolled in the year 2000. The quality of the drawings sufficed for assessment in 1,107 cases (99.3%). Three hundred and twelve fundus drawings (28.2%) met the anatomic inclusion criteria of the SPR Study. RRD of medium severity is characterised by an average number of 2.6 (SD 2.4) retinal breaks, 5.8 (SD 2.8) clock hours of detached retina, unclear hole situation in 15.1% of cases (n=47), attached macula in 42.9% (n=134), bullous detachment in 15.1% (n=47) and vitreous haemorrhage/opacity in 7.7% (n=24).

CONCLUSIONS

In the recruitment lists of the SPR Study of the year 2000, RRD of medium severity was present in nearly one third of the patients with primary RRD. These findings emphasise the clinical relevance of the SPR Study.

Perfluorocarbon liquid utilization in primary vitrectomy repair of retinal detachment with multiple breaks

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy in conjunction with intraoperative perfluoro-n-octane (PFO) use as initial treatment of retinal detachment (RD) with multiple breaks located at various distances from the ora serrata.

METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive eyes (15 phakic, 2 aphakic, and 5 pseudophakic) presenting with RD with multiple breaks and tears underwent primary pars plana vitrectomy, PFO retinal reattachment, transcleral cryopexy or endolaser treatment of breaks, PFO/air exchange, and final injection of 18% perfluoropropane (C3F8). Scleral buckles were not used. The mean follow-up period was 29 months.

RESULTS

Temporary PFO utilization attached the posterior retina and facilitated the safe removal of vitreous at its base and around the retinal tears. Intraoperative complications included new breaks (3 eyes), enlargement of breaks (2 eyes), and a small bubble of subretinal PFO (1 eye). Postoperatively, the retina remained attached during follow-up in 19 eyes. Cataract developed or progressed in 13 phakic eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Pars plana vitrectomy in conjunction with intraoperative PFO utilization is effective as initial treatment of RDs with multiple breaks. The main limitation of this technique is the postoperative progressive cataract formation in phakic eyes.

The expanding role of primary pars plana vitrectomy in the treatment of rhegmatogenous noncomplicated retinal detachment

The surgical management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment has evolved dramatically during the past 2 decades. Investigators have introduced and refined alternative techniques to scleral buckling surgery including pneumatic retinopexy and primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Rapid parallel developments in instrumentation, including wide-angle viewing systems, perfluorocarbon liquids, novel vitrectomy machines, intraocular tamponades, and endolaser photocoagulators have led to increasing sophistication in primary PPV surgical techniques for the treatment of rhegmatogenous uncomplicated retinal detachment. However, the precise role of primary PPV in new uncomplicated retinal detachment remains debatable owing to the lack of controlled randomized trials. This article examines primary vitrectomy treatment for rhegmatogenous uncomplicated retinal detachment and presents the specific types of retinal detachments for which primary PPV may be optimal, according to personal and reported results, the surgical instrumentation and technique, as well as the complications and limitations of this surgical method.