Effects of corrosion and cleaning method on taper dimensions: an in vitro investigation

Adverse Local Tissue Reaction Secondary to Corrosion at Multiple Junctions in a Modular, Segmental, Distal Femoral Replacement

While adverse local tissue reactions are well described in the total hip arthroplasty literature, there have only been case reports and case series in the total knee arthroplasty literature. There have been no cases described in the setting of a distal femoral replacement. In this case, we describe a 69-year-old female with a complex history of left knee revision arthroplasty with a distal femoral and proximal tibial replacement who presented with left knee pain and was found to have extensive adverse local tissue reaction with corrosion at the femoral stem-extension piece junction and the extension piece-distal femoral component junction. The femoral taper was then manually cleaned and modular components replaced. Corrosion at the stem-distal femoral component junction can result in adverse local tissue reaction in patients with distal femoral replacements. It is important to consider this diagnosis when evaluating patients with knee pain following distal femoral replacement.

It's worth cleaning - The examination of the female taper could identify a particular cause of trunnionosis at revision 16 years after total hip arthroplasty

Adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) is an issue in metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THR). It mainly affects large-head MoM THR, whereas 28-32 mm MoM pairings are associated with low long-term revision rates. However, the bearing surface is not necessarily the only cause of metal debris. This report documents with advanced analysis of the retrievals a particular cause of trunnionosis in late failure of a small diameter MoM THR and illustrates the importance of cleaning of the taper when seating the head in THR. A 65-year-old patient was revised due to ARMD 16 years after small diameter MoM THR. Debridement and exchange of the inlay and the head had been performed through an anterior approach. While the cup and the outer surface of the head were accessible to direct analysis by an optical coordinate measuring machine, the female taper had to be analysed indirectly by measuring an imprint. Wear from the cup and the head was within expected low ranges. The analysis of the female taper identified bone fragments, which contributed to trunnionosis. Failure due to ARMD after MoM THR is not necessarily caused by the bearing, but can be due to trunnionosis. Bone fragments within the taper contact in this case highlight the importance of meticulous cleaning of the taper before seating the head, to avoid trunnionosis.

What the Surgeon Can Do to Reduce the Risk of Trunnionosis in Hip Arthroplasty: Recommendations from the Literature

Trunnionosis, defined as wear and corrosion at the head–neck taper connection, is a cause of failure in hip arthroplasty. Trunnionosis is linked to a synergistic combination of factors related to the prosthesis, the patient, and the surgeon. This review presents analytical models that allow for the quantification of the impact of these factors, with the aim of providing practical recommendations to help surgeons minimize the occurrence of this failure mode. A tighter fit reduces micromotion and, consequently, fretting of the taper connection. The paramount parameters controlling the fixation force are the coefficient of friction and the impaction force. The influence of the head diameter, as well as of the diameter and angle of the taper, is comparatively small, but varus alignment of the taper and heads with longer necks are unfavourable under physiologic loads. The trunnion should be rinsed, cleaned, and dried carefully, while avoiding any contamination of the bore—the female counterpart within the head—prior to assembly. Biological debris, and even residual water, might critically reduce the fixation of the taper connection between the head and the neck. The impaction force applied to the components should correspond to at least two strong blows with a 500 g hammer, striking the head with an ad hoc impactor aligned with the axis of the taper. These strong blows should correspond to a minimum impaction force of 4000 N.