Mid-term outcomes of a partial 2-stage approach in late chronic periprosthetic hip infections

TREATMENT OF HIP AND KNEE PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION REQUIRES EXTENSIVE ADMINISTRATIVE WORK

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) typically requires more resource utilization than primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study quantifies the amount of time spent in the electronic medical record (EMR) for patients who have PJI requiring surgical intervention.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of EMR activity for 165 hip and knee PJI was performed to capture work during the preoperative and postoperative time periods. Independent sample t tests were conducted to compare total time based on procedure, age, insurance, health literacy, sex, race, and ethnicity.

RESULTS

The EMR work performed by the orthopaedic team was 338.4 minutes (min) (SD [standard deviation] 130.3), with 119.4 minutes (SD 62.8) occurring preoperatively and 219.0 minutes (SD 112.9) postoperatively. Preoperatively, the surgeon's work accounted for 35.7 minutes (SD 25.4), mid-level providers 21.3 minutes (SD 15.9), nurses 38.6 minutes (SD 36.8), and office staff 32.7 minutes (SD 29.9). Infectious Disease (ID) colleagues independently performed 158.9 minutes (SD 108.5) of postoperative work. Overall, PJI of the knees required more postoperative work. Secondary analysis revealed that patients who have hip PJI and a BMI < 30 and patients < 65 years required more work when compared to the PJI of heavier and older individuals. There was no difference in total work based on insurance, health literacy, race, or ethnicity.

CONCLUSION

Over 8 hours of administrative work is required for surgical management of PJI. Surgeons alone performed 451% more work for PJI during the preoperative period (7.9 versus 35.7min) compared to primary TJA. In efforts to provide best care for our sickest patients, much work is required perioperatively. This work is necessary to consider when assigning value and physician reimbursement.

Partial Two-Stage Exchange for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Treatment to Take into Account

INTRODUCTION

Two-stage revision is the gold standard for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The removal of well-fixed implants, especially the femoral component, can be extremely difficult and additional osteotomies may be needed, which is time-consuming and results in bone stock loss. When the femoral stem is osseointegrated, there is no clear indication for the use of partial two-stage revision. The primary objective was to assess infection eradication after surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective study of specific case series. A total of eight patients with a chronic uncemented PJI, in the setting of complex revision surgeries, were treated with partial two-stage revision, which included selective retention of the well-fixed femoral component and complete acetabular removal. Stem retention was carried out regardless of the bacteria or associated comorbidities.

RESULTS

All patients were re-revision cases with at least two previous surgeries (range, 2-4). Complex revisions were performed in five cases (non-articulated spacer) and simple revisions in three cases (articulated spacer). The minimum follow-up time was 24 months (range, 24-132 months). The infection eradication rate at final follow-up was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Partial two-stage reconstruction is a promising technique for the treatment of chronic PJI in patients with a well-fixed stem and complex re-revision acetabular procedures. Further prospective studies and prolonged follow-ups are required to confirm our results.

Preoperative and postoperative risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection in primary total hip arthroplasty: A 1-year experience

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most important threats in orthopedic surgery, so one important surgeon’s target is to avoid or early diagnose a PJI. Although the incidence of PJI is very low (0.69%) in our department, with an average follow-up of 595 d, this infection poses a serious threat due to the difficulties of treatment and the lower functional outcomes after healing.

AIM

To study the incidence of PJI in all operations occurring in the year 2016 in our department to look for predictive signs of potential infection.

METHODS

We counted 583 THR for 578 patients and observed only 4 cases of infection (0.69%) with a mean follow-up of 596 d (min 30, max 1451). We reviewed all medical records to collect the data: duration and time of the surgery, presence, type and duration of the antibiotic therapy, preoperative diagnosis, blood values before and after surgery, transfusions, presence of preoperative drugs (in particularly anticoagulants and antiaggregant, corticosteroids and immunosuppressants), presence of some comorbidities (high body mass index, blood hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiac ischemia, diabetes, rheumatological conditions, previous local infections).

RESULTS

No preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative analysis showed a higher incidence of PJI. We did not find any class with evident major odds of PJI. In our study, we did not find any border value to predict PJI and all patients had similar values in both groups (non-PJI and PJI). Only some categories, such as female patients, showed more frequency of PJI, but this difference related to sex was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

We did not find any category with a higher risk of PJI in THR, probably due to the lack of few cases of infection.