Anterior approach to hip replacement and associated complications: an independent review

Learning curve comparison between switching approach and switching implant in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Implementing new approaches or new implants is always related with a certain learning curve in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently, many surgeons are switching to minimally invasive approaches combined with short stems for performing THA. Therefore, we aimed to asses and compare the learning curve of switching from an anterolateral Watson Jones approach (ALA) to a direct anterior approach (DAA) with the learning curve of switching from a neck-resecting to a partially neck-sparing short stem in cementless THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The first 150 consecutive THA performed through a DAA (Group A) and the first 150 consecutive THA using a partially neck-sparing short stem (Group B) performed by a single surgeon were evaluated within this retrospective cohort study. All cases were screened for surgery related adverse events (AE). Furthermore, the operative time of each surgery was evaluated and the learning curve assessed performing a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, significantly more AE occurred in Group A compared to Group B (18.0% vs. 10.0%; p = 0.046). The sub-analysis of the AE revealed higher rates of periprosthetic joint infections (2.7% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.176), periprosthetic fractures (4.0% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.310) and overall revisions (4.7% vs. 1.3% p = 0.091) within Group A without statistical significance. The CUSUM analysis revealed a consistent reduction of operative time after 97 cases in Group A and 79 cases in Group B.

CONCLUSION

A significantly higher overall rate of AE was detected while switching approach compared to switching implant for performing THA. However, according to the results of this study, surgeons should be aware of the learning curve of the adoption to a new implant with different fixation philosophy as well.

Piriformis preserving posterior approach STAR for primary and primary complex total hip arthroplasty: Excellent safety and efficacy in a single blinded prospective single surgeon cohort of 522 patients with a mean follow-up of 2 years

INTRODUCTION

STAR (Superior Transverse Anatomic Reconstruction), a piriformis-preserving posterior approach, has not been extensively studied. Our study aimed to assess the STAR approach's safety and efficacy by recording postoperative complication rates and measuring implantation accuracy in a single surgeon prospective cohort with a mean follow-up of two years.

METHODS

The study involved 522 patients with elective primary or complex primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed by a senior surgeon using the STAR approach between 2019 and 2023. 63.6% of the patients were female. The mean patients' age was 65.6 years. 19.5% of the procedures were primary complex THAs. The mean follow-up and length of stay were 2.13 years and 1.50 days. The ratio of uncemented to hybrid and standard to dual mobility liner THAs were 3:2 and 4:1. Fifty-eight patients received blood transfusions. All patients followed the same postoperative protocol. Two physicians not involved in surgery collected clinical and radiological data. Efficacy was defined as measuring the cup inclination and anteversion, stem alignment, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) using the one-month postoperative standardised supine anteroposterior pelvic X-rays. The postoperative complication rate, including dislocation and infection, defined safety.

RESULTS

The mean cup inclination and anteversion were 42.80 (±4.9) and 19.90 (±8.9), respectively. 97.5% of the stems were placed in neutral and 2.5% in varus position. The mean LLD was 3.3 ± 6.3 mm. A single deep infection was managed with two-stage revision with no recurrence, and an early traumatic dislocation in an 80-year-old woman was managed successfully with closed reduction and hip spica. Three superficial wound infections were treated with oral antibiotics.

DISCUSSION

The STAR approach is safe and has demonstrated excellent early-to-mid-term efficacy profile outcomes. The unobstructed acetabular and femoral intraoperative view facilitated optimal implant positioning and contributed to excellent dislocation outcomes in combination with piriformis preservation.

Superior Transverse Atraumatic Reconstruction (STAR) approach provides a better-compared outcome to standard Direct Superior Approach (DSA): a matched, prospective comparative single-surgeon study

INTRODUCTION

The Direct Superior Approach (DSA) is a muscle-sparing hip approach that does not protect the piriformis and the other short external rotators. We present a DSA modification we named STAR (Superior Transverse Atraumatic Reconstruction), which has DSA advantages but always preserves piriformis. Our study compared the early postoperative, radiological, and functional results of patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the STAR approach with a matched DSA group performed by a senior surgeon.

METHODS

Each group, DSA, and STAR included 200 elective primary unilateral THAs performed by the surgeon between 2016-2017 and 2020-2021, respectively. Patients were included in both groups using the same inclusion criteria. Both groups were matched for age and sex. The same postoperative pain management, chemoprophylaxis, and physiotherapy protocols were followed in both groups. Two independent orthopaedic surgeons performed the clinical and radiological follow-up.

RESULTS

The STAR group had significantly lower mean incision length (p = 0.042) and hospital stay (p = 0.002) than the DSA group. The mean intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.085) and the need for blood transfusion (p = 0.228) were less for the STAR than the DSA group. The mean postoperative functional scores improvement was significantly higher for the STAR than the DSA group at the end of the first and third postoperative months.

CONCLUSIONS

The STAR approach offers earlier functional improvement, shorter hospital stay and less transfusion need than DSA for patients undergoing primary THA. Both approaches showed a limited complication risk and an outstanding acetabular and femoral access enabling the procedure.

Increased Risk of Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Injury in Patients With Previous Hip Arthroscopy Who Underwent a Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

Purpose

To evaluate the rates of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury in patients who underwent a direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) with and without previous hip arthroscopy.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated consecutive DAA THAs performed by a single surgeon. These cases were grouped into patients with and without a history of previous ipsilateral hip arthroscopy. LFCN sensation was assessed during the initial follow-up (6 weeks) and 1-year (or most recent) follow-up visits. The incidence and character of LFCN injury was compared between the 2 groups.

Results

In total, 166 patients underwent a DAA THA with no previous hip arthroscopy, and 13 had a history of previous arthroscopy. Of the 179 total patients who underwent THA, 77 experienced some form of LFCN injury at initial follow-up (43%). The rate of injury for the cohort with no previous arthroscopy was 39% (n = 65/166) on initial follow-up, whereas the rate of injury for the cohort with a history of previous ipsilateral arthroscopy was 92% (n =12/13) on initial follow-up (P < .001). In addition, although the difference was not significant, 28% (n = 46/166) of the group without history of previous arthroscopy and 69% (n = 9/13) of the group with a history of previous arthroscopy had continued symptoms of LFCN injury at most recent follow-up.

Conclusions

In this study, patients who underwent hip arthroscopy before an ipsilateral DAA THA were at increased risk of LFCN injury compared with patients who underwent a DAA THA without a previous hip arthroscopy. At final follow-up of patients with initial LFCN injury, symptoms resolved in 29% (n = 19/65) of patients with no previous hip arthroscopy and 25% (n = 3/12) of patients with previous hip arthroscopy.

Level of Evidence

Level III, case-control study.

Earlier functional recovery and discharge from hospital for THA patients operated on via direct superior compared to standard posterior approach: a retrospective frequency-matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

The direct superior hip approach (DSA) has been less researched than other approaches in the literature. We retrospectively compared the early postoperative and functional outcomes of patients with hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) via DSA with a matched control group using a standard posterior approach (SPA).

METHODS

The DSA group comprised 100 THAs performed via DSA by a senior surgeon between January 2018 and May 2019. Patients with primary osteoarthritis and ASA score ⩽3 who were eligible for surgery were included. The DSA group was compared to a matched cohort of 100 patients operated on with a SPA in the same period by another chief surgeon. Patients were matched for age, sex, and ASA score. All patients received the same postoperative chemoprophylaxis, pain management and physiotherapy. 2 independent attending arthroplasty surgeons assessed the incision length, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications. VAS, HHS, and HOOS scores were also evaluated for a year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean incision length and hospital stay were significantly lower in the DSA group. DSA patients had non-significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, transfusion needs, and postoperative pain than SPA patients. Mean operation time and complication rate did not differ between groups. The DSA group demonstrated significantly greater functional scores than the SPA group at the first postoperative month. No differences in scores were recorded following the third month.

CONCLUSIONS

The DSA approach may provide earlier functional recovery and hospital discharge for THA patients compared with SPA. DSA was equivalent to SPA concerning pain and blood loss, showing minimal complication rates.

Iliopsoas Hematoma After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Minimally Invasive Modified Direct Anterior Approach: A Case Report

CASE

The modified direct anterior approach (MDAA) is a recently popular surgical technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA), with well-documented challenges. Characterized as acute hip and back pain, we present the case of a 78-year-old woman who developed an iliopsoas hematoma after an MDAA THA and discuss the management of this incident.

CONCLUSIONS

Iliopsoas hematoma after THA poses a unique challenge and should be considered in patients with acute hip and back pain, with loss of strength on the affected limb after an MDAA THA.

Preoperative ultrasound to map the three-dimensional anatomical distribution of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty

Background

The postoperative complaints of hypoesthesia or a burning sensation due to lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury in patients are not yet solved. The present study aimed to identify the three-dimensional (3D) distribution of LFCN using preoperative ultrasound and evaluate the rate of injury in direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

A total of 59 patients (28 males and 31 females, age 69.0 ± 4.6 years, BMI 24.7 ± 3.0 kg/m²) were randomly allocated to the ultrasound group and 58 patients (28 males and 30 females, age 68.5 ± 4.5 years, BMI 24.8 ± 2.8 kg/m²) were in the control group. Surgeons received the data of 3D distribution of LFCN only in the ultrasound group before surgery with respect to the direction, the depth on the skin, and the length to tensor fasciae latae (TFL). The anatomical characteristics of LFCN in the surgical region were summarized. At 1 and 3 months of post surgery, the rate of LFCN injury and abnormal sensitive area was evaluated in both groups.

Results

There was a significant consistency in gender, age and BMI of these two groups (P > 0.05). Based on the data from the ultrasound group, over 90% of patients had one or two branches of LFCN. LFCN always courses in the fascia layer, the depth ranged from 6.8 ± 2.6 (3.0–12.0) mm to 11.1 ± 3.4 (4.0–17.0) mm and depended on the thickness of the subcutaneous fat, and length was 3.3 ± 4.6 (− 5.0–10.0) mm at proximal part and − 2.7 ± 4.7 (− 10.0–8.0) at distal end to the medial edge of TFL. Both the rate of LFCN injury and abnormal sensory area in the ultrasound group was significantly lower than those in the control group (3.4% vs. 25.9%, P = 0.001, at 1 month; 3.4% vs. 22.4%, P = 0.005, at 3 months).

Conclusions

LFCN mostly courses along the medial border of TFL in the fascia layer. The 3D distribution of LFCN using preoperative ultrasound mapping could help the surgeons to evaluate the risk of injury preoperatively and decrease the rate of injury during the operation. However, some branch injuries, especially for the fan type LFCN, could not be avoided.