Satisfaction, functional outcomes and predictors in hip arthroscopy: a cohort study

Predicting Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) continues to rise in incidence, and thus there is an increased focus on factors that predict patient outcomes. The factors that impact the outcomes of arthroscopic FAIS treatment are complex. The purpose of this review is to outline the current literature concerning predictors of patient outcomes for arthroscopic treatment of FAIS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple studies have shown that various patient demographics, joint parameters, and surgical techniques are all correlated with postoperative outcomes after arthroscopic FAIS surgery, as measured by both validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores and rates of revision surgery including hip arthroplasty. To accurately predict patient outcomes for arthroscopic FAIS surgery, consideration should be directed toward preoperative patient-specific factors and intraoperative technical factors. The future of accurately selecting patient predictors for outcomes will only improve with increased data, improved techniques, and technological advancement.

Sex-Based Differences in Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

While sex-based differences in outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are often recorded, no studies have been dedicated to analyzing the literature as a whole.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether sex is a predictor of outcomes in studies evaluating hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid, and PubMed Central databases for English-language studies that evaluated sex-specific outcomes in human populations. The search terms used were as follows: ("Hip Arthroscopy") AND ("Femoroacetabular Impingement" OR "FAI") AND ("Sex" OR "Gender" OR "Male" OR "Female"). Studies with evidence levels 2 through 4 were included. The studies were then screened, followed by data extraction. Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) outcomes and return-to-sport (RTS) rates were recorded. These were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was calculated using the I ² statistic.

RESULTS

Of 256 full-text articles screened, 48 articles were included in this analysis; of these, 14 studies (29%) concluded that female sex was a negative predictor of postoperative outcomes, while 6 studies (13%) found female sex to be positive predictor. The remaining 28 studies (58%) found no sex-based differences in postoperative outcomes. Of 7 studies (416 male and 519 female) included in the mHHS analysis, 2 studies concluded that male patients had significantly higher postoperative mHHS scores. Of 6 studies (502 male and 396 female) included in the RTS analysis, 1 study concluded that male patients had a significantly higher RTS rate.

CONCLUSION

Almost one-third of the included studies determined that female sex was a negative predictor of postoperative outcomes, 13% found female sex to be a positive predictor, and 58% found no sex-based differences. Our study illustrates an insufficiency of high-level evidence supporting sex-specific differences in outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery, but findings indicated that the postoperative mHHS score and RTS rate may be influenced by sex.

The influence of prior arthroscopy on outcomes of primary total lower extremity arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of prior arthroscopy on postoperative revisions, complications, and other clinical outcomes after conversion total lower extremity arthroplasty.

METHODS

Two individual researchers conducted the platform searches on the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar electronic databases from inception to June 02, 2021. We identified cohort trials that compared the outcomes of patients who underwent primary THA or TKA in the prior arthroscopy or control groups. The primary outcome was revision, and secondary outcomes included reoperation, patient-reported outcomes, and postoperative complications. A modified version of the Downs and Black tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the non-randomized cohort studies.

RESULTS

Of the 23 included studies with 319946 cases, 18 were matched retrospectively and five were non-matched retrospectively. Methodological quality was high in ten studies and moderate in thirteen studies. Our analysis demonstrated that TKA or THA patients with prior arthroscopy were associated with an increased risk of revision, reoperation, infection, and aseptic loosening. THA patients with prior arthroscopy were also associated with an increased risk of dislocation. Furthermore, there were no significant intergroup differences in periprosthetic fracture, range of motion, Harris Hip Score, or Knee Society Score.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopy performed before total lower extremity arthroplasty substantially increased the revision, reoperation, infection, and aseptic loosening rates. THA patients with prior arthroscopy were also associated with an increased risk of dislocation. Patients should be counseled on the potential increased risks associated with conversion total lower extremity arthroplasty after prior arthroscopy. Further research is needed to better characterize these findings.