Late fracture of Groshong ports: A report of the three cases

Intraoperative evaluation of tunneled dialysis catheter mobility and function with arm movement

OBJECTIVE

The main objectives of the present study were to analyze the right internal jugular vein tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) tip displacements, functional changes, pathway deformities, and angulations associated with different arm positions.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 21 patients who had undergone TDC implantation for hemodialysis via the right internal jugular vein at a single center from February to September 2020. After implantation, a baseline resting fluoroscopy image was taken, and three movement-mimicking images of the ipsilateral arm were obtained for comparison, with the arm in maximum abduction, maximum flexion, and maximum adduction. Device function was analyzed for each movement-mimicking position and correlated with catheter tip displacement, catheter deformity, and catheter pathway angulation.

RESULTS

TDC pathway deformity occurred in 16 patients (69.5%). Deformities were more frequent in the movement-mimicking positions than in to the control resting baseline images (P = .004). The different arm positions did not lead to significant tip displacement (either horizontal or vertical; P > .05), nor did they result in significant pathway angulation between the subcutaneous and intravenous regions (P = .114). However, in the maximum abduction position, a positive relationship was present between the catheter pathway angle and impairment of catheter function (P = .028).

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter deformity was more frequent and more severe with maximum adduction and flexion of the arm. Although no significant changes were observed in the tip of the catheter with the movements, a positive relationship was found between the catheter pathway angle and impairment of catheter function with the arm in the maximum abduction position.

Detachment and embolization of totally implantable central venous access devices: diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

Detachment and embolization (DE) is a rare complication of totally implantable central venous access devices (TIVADs). This study aimed to analyze clinical findings, etiology, and treatment options in DE of TIVADs.

METHODS

Patients who experienced DE between 2010-2019 were included. Indications, implantation techniques, time to diagnosis, patient complaints, diagnostic methods, rupture site, location of embolization, treatment methods, and chest X-rays prior to detachment were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

DE of TIVAD was detected in 12(1.2%) patients. Eleven patients had breast cancer and one had colon cancer. Mean age at implantation was 45.3 ± 9.6(31-61.3) years. Seven (58%) patients were asymptomatic, four (33.3%) had TIVAD malfunction, and one (8.3%) had pain and swelling at port site after injection. Mean time from implantation to diagnosis was 1149.92(16-2795) days. The etiologies comprised Pinch-off Syndrome (POS) in eight (66%) patients, detachment directly adjacent to the lock mechanism in three (25%) patients, and probable iatrogenic injury during explantation in one (9%) patient. The most common site of embolism was the superior vena cava (25%). While the embolized fragment was removed percutaneously in 11 patients, medical follow-up was treatment choice for one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

DE is a rare complication with an incidence rate of 1.2% in this study. Since most patients were asymptomatic, chest radiography plays an important role in diagnosis. The most common cause was POS, and it can be prevented by inserting the catheter from lateral third of the clavicle during subclavian vein catheterization. The first-choice treatment was percutaneous femoral retrieval. However, if not technically possible, alternative treatment options are thoracotomy or follow-up with anticoagulant therapy.

Femoral placement of a totally implantable venous access port with spontaneous catheter fracture: case report

Background

The incidence of catheter fracture after standard positioning of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) is reported to be 1.1%–5.0%; however, the incidence of catheter fracture after TIVAP implantation at a femoral site remains unclear.

Case presentation

In a 30-year-old man with angiosarcoma of the right atrium, tumor embolism was observed from the left brachiocephalic vein to the superior vena cava. A TIVAP was implanted in the right femur. A catheter fracture was spontaneously observed after 7 months.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of catheter fracture in a TIVAP implantation at a femoral site.

Arm mobilization provokes deformity of long-term indwelling ports implanted via the jugular vein

BACKGROUND

The incidence of totally implantable catheter fracture ranges from 0.48% to 5.00%, and these fractures represent a potentially fatal complication. The fracture mechanism of catheters implanted via the jugular vein is unclear, and whether extreme arm movements represent an additional risk factor for repetitive stress of the material remains unknown. The aim of this study was to demonstrate and classify catheter deformations caused by extreme arm mobilization and associations with changes in catheter function and displacement.

METHODS

We analyzed the fluoroscopy images of 60 consecutive patients undergoing long-term indwelling port implantation via the jugular vein. Three images were taken: arm in maximal abduction, maximal frontal elevation, and maximal adduction. The images were compared with an image of the remainder of the arm. We analyzed three catheter regions to classify the deformity: A, connection between catheter and reservoir; B, the catheter's subcutaneous tunnel; and C, the catheter's entrance in the jugular vein. The deformations were classified in comparative manner as follows: 0 (no changes), 1 (minor changes, new slightly curvatures with an angle of >90°), and 2 (major changes, new severe curvatures with angles of ≤90°). In each position, catheter function (injection and aspiration) and displacement of the reservoir and tip were analyzed.

RESULTS

Only 15% of patients did not show a deformity; 33.3% had a deformity in only one position, 47.7% in two positions, and 10% in three positions. Minor deformities were observed in 70% of patients and major deformities in 40%. Moreover, 25% of patients presented both major and minor deformities. Major deformities were observed in 25.0% of patients on maximal frontal elevation, in 23.3% on maximal adduction and in none on maximal abduction. Region B was the most affected, with 57.8% of all minor deformities and 78.1% of all major deformities. No change in function was noted in 91.7% of the catheters. Maximal arm adduction resulted in greater vertical and horizontal displacement of the catheter tip and horizontal displacement of the reservoir. Higher body mass index values were associated with major deformities.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximal frontal elevation and maximal adduction were associated with major catheter deformities, and the subcutaneous tunnel region was the most deformed catheter region. An association between major catheter deformity and high body mass index was noted; in contrast, no association between the severity of catheter deformity, tip or reservoir displacement, or worsened functioning was observed.