Evaluation of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) training on arteriovenous access assessment and cannula placement for haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Haemodialysis requires a permanent vascular access and relies on cannulation with two large bore needles. Point Of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is a tool that may assist nursing staff with visualising cannula placement and prevent miscannulation. This can be particularly useful in regional hospitals with limited access to vascular access specialists.

AIMS

To examine the impact of POCUS provision and education for nursing staff on confidence in cannulation and to understand the patient experience at three regional hospital haemodialysis units in South Australia.

METHODS

A POCUS machine and dedicated nursing education were provided at each of the three sites. A pre-test post-test model was used to assess the individual nurses perceived competency before and after the delivery of a series of online ultrasound education modules and face to face training. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected to understand the use of POCUS from the client perspective.

RESULTS

There was a shift towards 'agree' or 'strongly agree' for all nursing surveys in regard to perceived competency (n = 15). This was statistically significant (p ⩽ 0.05) for all questions other than question 1 'I am confident in my ability to physically assess vascular access' (p = 0.06). The patients that completed the PROMs (n = 17) overall supported the ease and use of POCUS for haemodialysis cannulation and felt that it contributed to the nursing staff competency in cannulation.

CONCLUSION

POCUS has the potential to be a valuable tool in regional haemodialysis units to support vascular access cannulation and potentially avoid metropolitan transfer due to cannulation difficulties. The non-significant change post intervention for question 1 likely reflects the haemodialysis nurses inherent pre-existing capacity to assess vascular access without the use of POCUS using the standard process of visual inspection, the use of a stethoscope and palpation ('look, listen and feel').

Impact of arteriovenous fistula aneurysms on a UK dialysis populations' perception of vascular access

BACKGROUND

Clinically-oriented outcome measures are increasingly being recognized as lacking in consideration of factors important to patients. There is an emerging move of guideline bodies advocating a more patient-centred approach. Aneurysms in autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) can be considered unsightly and a constant reminder for patients of their dependence on dialysis. However, their impact on patient's perception has not previously been reported.

METHODS

Between April 2017-18, the Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) was administered to prevalent haemodialysis patients across ten dialysis units via structured interviews, as part of a quality improvement project. Data for the subgroup of patients with aneurysmal AVF (categorised as per classification by Valenti et al.), were retrospectively evaluated and compared to the wider cohort.

RESULTS

Data were collected for 539 patients (median age: 66 years; 59% male), of whom 195 (36%) had aneurysmal AVF, with Type 2 morphology (cannulation site) being the most common (75%). Duration of AVF was found to be significantly associated with aneurysmal development, with estimated likelihoods of 11%, 43% and 61% after one, five and ten years, respectively. Interestingly, patients with diabetes had a significantly lower prevalence of aneurysmal development than those that were non-diabetic (25% vs. 43%, p < 0.001). Overall VAQ scores were not found to differ significantly by aneurysm status (p = 0.816) or across morphology types (p = 0.277). However, patients with aneurysmal AVF were significantly more concerned with the appearance of their AVF (p < 0.001) than the wider cohort. Despite this, patients with aneurysmal AVF gave significantly higher scores for satisfaction and ease of use and lower scores for bruising and clotting (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysmal AVF are often cited as an important factor by patients for not proceeding with fistula formation. In this evaluation of patient reported experiences, those with aneurysmal AVF reported high satisfaction levels. This may help clinicians highlight positive patient reported outcomes of aneurysmal AVF during preprocedural consent processes.

A decade of arteriovenous fistula creations in the ⩾75 years population: Equal opportunity or sub-optimal use of resources

BACKGROUND

The optimal vascular access in the elderly remains contentious in the context of increasingly limited resources and anticipated survival on hemodialysis. Research focus has shifted to include the impact of vascular access on quality of life. This study explored clinical outcomes in individuals aged ⩾75 years who had an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) created in a single center over a 10-year period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographic and clinical data concerning AVFs created January 2009-December 2019 were identified from a prospective database for retrospective analysis. Outcome measures were AVF patency and failure to mature rates plus overall patient and vascular access survival. The Vascular Access Specific Quality of life measure (VASQoL) was completed in a contemporary cohort aged ⩾75 years established on HD in October 2021.

RESULTS

AVF outcomes were available for 272 patients (93%). The failure to mature (FTM) rate was 36% with the significant predictors of AVF FTM being the creation of a radiocephalic AVF (OR 8.13, 95% CI 8.02-8.52, p < 0.01), female gender (OR 4.84, 95% CI 4.70-5.41, p < 0.01), and a history of peripheral vascular disease (OR 5.25, 95% CI 5.22-6.00, p value = 0.02). Functional patency was associated with a median 12-month survival benefit compared to those whose fistula FTM (p < 0.01). The median patency duration for a functionally patent AVF was 3 years. Elderly patients with a fistula reported a lower quality of life in VASQoL scoring than those with central venous catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, AVF creation in individuals aged ⩾75 years AVFs was associated with comparable AVF patency rates to younger patients. AVF functional patency was associated with superior patient survival compared to those with AVF FTM. A multi-disciplinary surveillance program may help reduce AVF loss. Further work on how vascular access choice impacts quality of life in elderly patients is required.

Vascular Access Perception and Quality of Life of Haemodialysis Patients

Background: Patient quality of life is widely used as a non-clinical determinant of care. For patients undergoing hemodialysis, vascular access is vital to the delivery of hemodialysis and its function may affect not only the clinical outcome of treatment but also the overall quality of life of the patient, highlighting the need for increased efforts to improve the quality of hemodialysis vascular access care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between vascular access perception and quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Methods: A total of 202 patients with active hemodialysis vascular access were included in the study. Quality of life was assessed using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Instrument (KDQOL™) questionnaire, while vascular access perception was evaluated using the Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ). Results: The study presented evidence on the influence of vascular access for hemodialysis patients on their quality of life. This impact is related to factors directly associated with vascular access, such as the type of access and the patient's subjective evaluation of the access. Conclusions: The perception of vascular access is one of the factors that determines the quality of life of hemodialysis patients. The quality of life of hemodialysis patients decreases as the number of vascular access-related problems increases.

Patient Perspectives of Center-Specific Reporting in Kidney Failure Care: An Australian Qualitative Study

Introduction

Public reporting of quality of care indicators in healthcare is intended to inform consumer decision-making; however, people may be unaware that such information exists, or it may not capture their priorities. The aim of this study was to understand the views of people with kidney disease about public reporting of dialysis and transplant center outcomes.

Methods

This qualitative study involved 27 patients with lived experience of kidney disease in Australia who participated in 11 online focus groups between August and December 2022. Transcripts were analyzed thematically.

Results

Patients from all Australian states and territories participated, with 22 (81%) having a functioning kidney transplant and 22 (81%) having current or previous experience of dialysis. Five themes were identified as follows: (i) surrendering to the health system, (ii) the complexity of quality, (iii) benefits for patient care and experience, (iv) concerned about risks and unintended consequences, and (v) optimizing the impact of data.

Conclusion

Patients desire choice among kidney services but perceive this as rarely possible in the Australian context. Health professionals are trusted to make decisions about appropriate centers. Public reporting of center outcomes may induce fear and a loss of balanced perspective; however, it was supported by all participants and represents an opportunity for self-advocacy and informed decision-making. Strategies to mitigate potential risks include availability of trusted clinicians and community members to aid in data interpretation, providing context about centers and patients, and framing statistics to promote positivity and hope.

Friction injury of the central vein caused by catheter for hemodialysis: an in vitro study

Vascular injury such as central venous stenosis (CVS) is a common complication in hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters (CVCs), yet the impact of the microstructure and partial physic characteristics of catheter surface on the chronic injury of central vein has not been elucidated. In this study, the microscopic morphology of tips and bodies of six different brands of polyurethane CVCs was observed and their roughness was assessed. Subsequently, an in vitro model was established to measure the coefficients of friction (COF) between CVCs (tips and bodies) and the vena cava intima of Japanese rabbits under the same condition in a linear reciprocating mode, and changes in the intima of vessels after friction were observed. The study found that there was a significant variation in surface roughness among different brands of CVCs (tips P < 0.001, bodies P = 0.02), and the COF was positively correlated with the catheter surface roughness (tips P = 0.005, R = 0.945, bodies P = 0.01, R = 0.909). Besides, the endovascular roughness increased after friction. These findings suggest that the high roughness surface of CVCs may cause chronic mechanical friction injury to the central venous intima, which is one of the potential factors leading to CVS or occlusion. This provides a breakthrough for reducing complications, improving patient prognosis, and advancing catheter surface lubrication technology.

Predicting recurrent interventions after radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula creation with machine learning and the PREDICT-AVF web app

OBJECTIVE

Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines discourage ongoing access salvage attempts after two interventions prior to successful use or more than three interventions per year overall. The goal was to develop a tool for prediction of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) intervention requirements to help guide shared decision-making about access appropriateness.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of 914 adult patients in the United States and Canada undergoing radiocephalic AVF creation at one of the 39 centers participating in the PATENCY-1 or -2 trials. Clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, access history, anatomic features, and post-operative ultrasound measurements at 4-6 and 12 weeks were used to predict recurrent interventions required at 1 year postoperatively. Cox proportional hazards, random survival forest, pooled logistic, and elastic net recurrent event survival prediction models were built using a combination of baseline characteristics and post-operative ultrasound measurements. A web application was created, which generates patient-specific predictions contextualized with the KDOQI guidelines.

RESULTS

Patients underwent an estimated 1.04 (95% CI 0.94-1.13) interventions in the first year. Mean (SD) age was 57 (13) years; 22% were female. Radiocephalic AVFs were created at the snuffbox (2%), wrist (74%), or proximal forearm (24%). Using baseline characteristics, the random survival forest model performed best, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.82) at 1 year. The addition of ultrasound information to baseline characteristics did not substantially improve performance; however, Cox models using either 4-6- or 12-week post-operative ultrasound information alone had the best discrimination performance, with AUROCs of 0.77 (0.70-0.85) and 0.76 (0.70-0.83) at 1 year. The interactive web application is deployed at https://predict-avf.com.

CONCLUSIONS

The PREDICT-AVF web application can guide patient counseling and guideline-concordant shared decision-making as part of a patient-centered end-stage kidney disease life plan.

Validation of a vascular access specific quality of life measure (VASQoL)

BACKGROUND

A self-administered 11 item vascular access specific quality of life measure (VASQoL) was previously derived from detailed qualitative interviews with adult patients with kidney failure who have experienced vascular access using the Capabilities Approach as a theoretical base. This study reports the psychometric validation of the VASQoL measure including its reliability, content validity and responsiveness to change.

METHODS

Cognitive interviews were conducted with 23 adult patients with kidney failure after completion of the VASQoL measure. Focus group discussion with a vascular access professional multidisciplinary team was undertaken (n = 8) and subsequently a further 101 adult kidney failure patients with vascular access (TCVC, AVF or AVG) completed the digital VASQoL measure, EQ-5D and SF-36 questionnaires in a longitudinal study with prospectively recorded vascular access events.

RESULTS

Transcript analysis of cognitive interviews after VASQoL completion indicated that the content was comprehensive and well understood by participants. Assessment of Internal reliability for the VASQoL measure was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.858). Test-retest reliability of the overall VASQoL measure was high (intra class correlation coefficient 0.916). In those patients who experienced a vascular access event, significant differences were observed in paired analysis of the VASQoL physical domain questions and vascular access function domain questions and in the EQ-5D usual activities, pain and anxiety domains. In those with no vascular access event, variation was observed in longitudinal analysis in VASQoL questions relating to worry about VA function and capability domains, whilst no variation was observed in the EQ5D measure.

CONCLUSION

The VASQoL measure has good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and responsiveness to change for clinically relevant vascular access outcomes. This provides a validated, vascular access specific quality of life measure that can be used in future trials of vascular access, evaluation of new technologies and routine use as a patient reported outcome measure (PROM).

Differential Impact of Central Venous Catheters versus Arteriovenous Fistulae on Quality of Life among Irish Haemodialysis Patients

Background

Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) have superior clinical outcomes compared with central venous catheters (CVC) among patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Yet, there is increasing recognition that health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may be more important to patients than survival and that differences may exist between AVF and CVCs in this regard. This study compared HRQoL between AVF and CVC in an Irish cohort.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey among prevalent patients undergoing hemodialysis (N=119) dialyzing with either an AVF or CVC at a regional program. The Short Form 36 (SF-36) and a validated Vascular Access Questionnaire (SF-VAQ) compared QoL between AVF and CVC in domains of physical functioning, social functioning, and dialysis complications. Multivariable logistic regression compared differences between groups for outcomes of physical functioning, social functioning, and dialysis complications expressed as adjusted odds ratios and 95% CI.

Results

Mean age was 66.6 years; 52% were using an AVF and 48% had a CVC. Patients dialyzing with an AVF were more satisfied with their access when asked directly (6.2 versus 5.0; P<0.01). Physical functioning scores for bleeding, swelling, and bruising were significantly higher for AVF than CVC (P=0.001, P=0.001, and P<0.001, respectively). In contrast, patients with a CVC reported greater difficulties in bathing and showering than those using an AVF (4.4 versus 2.0; P<0.001), whereas patients with an AVF expressed greater concerns with physical appearances. Compared with AVF, CVC users were less likely to report difficulties in physical functioning (OR=0.35; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.94; P=0.04) but more likely to report dialysis complications (OR=1.94; 95% CI, 0.69 to 5.87; P=0.22).

Conclusions

Vascular access contributes to HRQoL in hemodialysis. CVCs are associated with fewer difficulties from bleeding and bruising but greater negative effect on social activities, including bathing and showering. Overall, patients with a CVC had lower dissatisfaction scores than patients with an AVF when all three domains were added. Innovation in vascular access design and engineering may confer benefits and improve patient comfort on HD.

A family-centred perspective on the arteriovenous fistula in end-stage renal disease: Findings from dyadic interviews

INTRODUCTION

The preservation of a well-functioning arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is crucial for successful dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD); nonetheless, complications are frequent which leads to lower quality of life, hospitalisations and death. Self-care behaviours help to reduce the risk of complications and family caregivers can play an important role as partners for behaviour change. However, the patient and family caregiver's experiences with such an invasive intervention are largely unknown.

AIMS

This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients with ESRD and their family caregivers with the AVF through joint interviews.

METHODS

A qualitative exploratory study was conducted with a purposive sample. Semi-structured joint interviews were conducted with 14 dyads (28 participants) composed of patients on haemodialysis with AVF and their respective family caregivers. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and submitted to thematic analysis.

FINDINGS

Four major themes were identified: (i) AVF negative impacts; (ii) (un)presence of self-care behaviours; (iii) AVF self-management facilitators and (iv) AVF self-management barriers.

DISCUSSION

The findings suggested that more attention needs to be paid to patients' and their family caregivers' support needs (e.g. fears, concerns, knowledge, adherence barriers and facilitators) regarding AVF self-management. The dyads seem to be aware of how to take care of the AVF; however, self-care behaviours still need to be improved.

CONCLUSION

Innovative interventions need to follow an interdisciplinary approach with an educational and support component. The integration of family caregivers should also be considered, since this study evidenced their lack of knowledge and skills, and willingness to participate in these initiatives.

Shared decision-making in hemodialysis vascular access practice

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process of collaborative deliberation in the dyadic patient-physician interaction whereby physicians inform the patients about the pros and cons of all available treatment options and reach an agreement with the patients on their preferred treatment plan. In hemodialysis vascular access practice, SDM advocates a deliberative approach based on the existence of reasonable alternatives-that is, arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, and central venous catheter-so that patients are able to form and share preferences about access options. In spite of its ethical imperative, SDM is not broadly applied in hemodialysis vascular access planning. Physicians and surgeons commonly deliver prescriptive fistula-centered recommendations concerning the approach to vascular access care. This paternalistic approach has been shaped by directions from long-held clinical practice guidelines and is reinforced by financial payment models linked with the prevalence of arteriovenous fistula in patients on hemodialysis. Awareness is growing that what may have initially seemed a medically and surgically appropriate approach might not always be focused on each individual's goals of care. Clinician's recommendations for vascular access often do not sufficiently consider the uncertainty surrounding the potential benefits of the decision or the cumulative impact of the decision on patient's quality of life. In the evolving health care landscape, it is time for the practice of hemodialysis vascular access to shift from a hierarchical doctor-patient approach to patient-centered care. In this article we review the current state of vascular access practice, present arguments why SDM is necessary in vascular access planning, review barriers and potential solutions to SDM implementation, and discuss future research contingent on an effective system of physician-patient participative decision-making in hemodialysis vascular access practice.

“Más que dolor”: experiencia de pacientes dializados respecto a su punción en hemodiálisis

Introducción: El dolor a la punción de la fístula arterio-venosa es una constante en todos los pacientes en hemo-diálisis.Objetivo: El propósito del estudio fue explorar la per-cepción del dolor a la punción en los pacientes en hemo-diálisis, analizando tanto emociones como ideas sobre su calidad de vida.Material y Método: Se realizó un estudio cualitativo, de carácter fenomenológico, en el Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía de Córdoba, en la Unidad de Nefrología y en el Servicio de Consultas Externas “El Perpetuo Socorro” (que también pertenece al mismo hospital). Se realiza-ron entrevistas semiestructuradas a diez pacientes, hom-bres y mujeres, que sufrían de Insuficiencia Renal Cróni-ca bajo tratamiento de hemodiálisis.Resultados: Se llevó a cabo un análisis de contenido del que emergieron tres categorías principales asociadas a distintas subcategorías: 1) Doler, duele ¿eh? Pero... (Mejora con el tiempo; Cuando duele lo hace de verdad; ¿Duele? Ni te enteras); 2) Ansiedad y miedos relaciona-dos con la intervención (Cuestión de mentalizarse; Ansie-dad anticipatoria; Desesperación e inseguridad ante com-plicaciones y desinformación; ¡Por Dios, que no se rompa la fístula!; Las manos de la enfermera); 3) Una calidad de vida comprometida (Muchas limitaciones; Pero no tie-ne tanto impacto; ¿Catéter o fístula?).Conclusiones: El estudio permitió describir las percep-ciones de los pacientes en hemodiálisis en torno a la pun-ción, su contexto y consecuencias, posibilitando, primero, una mayor comprensión y empatía en los profesionales de la salud y, después, una base para otras aproximaciones indagatorias al fenómeno en cuestión

Vascular access-specific health-related quality of life impacts among hemodialysis patients: qualitative development of the hemodialysis access-related quality of life (HARQ) instrument

BACKGROUND

End stage kidney disease and hemodialysis dependence are associated with impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), which may be related to vascular access (VA). Few HRQOL measures are VA-specific and none differentiate HRQOL impact by VA type. We developed a VA-targeted HRQOL measure to distinguish the impact of fistulas, grafts and catheters.

METHODS

We created an initial item pool based on literature review and then conducted focus groups at 4 US sites with 37 adults and interviews with nine dialysis clinicians about VA's impact on HRQOL. We then drafted the Hemodialysis Access-Related Quality of Life (HARQ) measure and cognitively tested it with 17 hemodialysis patients. Focus group and cognitive interview participants were diverse in age, gender, years on dialysis, and VA.

RESULTS

We identified six domains for the HARQ: symptoms, physical functioning, emotional impacts, social and role functioning, sleep, and care-related burdens. Cognitive interviews indicated that items were easily understood and supported content validity. Attributing HRQOL impact to VA as opposed to other hemodialysis burden was challenging for some items. Some items were dropped that were considered redundant by patients, limitations while dressing was added, and reference to VA-specific impact was included for each item. The average Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level for the revised 47-item HARQ was 5.3.

CONCLUSIONS

The HARQ features VA-specific content not addressed in other HRQOL measures, making it ideal for comparisons of different VA types and new VA technologies. The psychometric properties of the HARQ will be evaluated in future research.