Patient selection, education, and cannulation of percutaneous arteriovenous fistulae: An ASDIN White Paper

Hemodialysis Access: US for Preprocedural Mapping and Evaluation of Maturity and Access Dysfunction

Patients with kidney failure require kidney replacement therapy. While renal transplantation remains the treatment of choice for kidney failure, renal replacement therapy with hemodialysis may be required owing to the limited availability and length of time patients may wait for allografts or for patients ineligible for transplant owing to advanced age or comorbidities. The ideal hemodialysis access should provide complication-free dialysis by creating a direct connection between an artery and vein with adequate blood flow that can be reliably and easily accessed percutaneously several times a week. Surgical arteriovenous fistulas and grafts are commonly created for hemodialysis access, with newer techniques that involve the use of minimally invasive endovascular approaches. The emphasis on proactive planning for the placement, protection, and preservation of the next vascular access before the current one fails has increased the use of US for preoperative mapping and monitoring of complications for potential interventions. Preoperative US of the extremity vasculature helps assess anatomic suitability before vascular access creation, increasing the rates of successful maturation. A US mapping protocol ensures reliable measurements and clear communication of anatomic variants that may alter surgical planning. Postoperative imaging helps assess fistula maturation before cannulation for dialysis and evaluates for early and late complications associated with arteriovenous access. Clinical and US findings can suggest developing stenosis that may progress to thrombosis and loss of access function, which can be treated with percutaneous vascular interventions to preserve access patency. Vascular access steal, aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms, and fluid collections are other complications amenable to US evaluation. ©RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Imaging Patients with Kidney Failure

The approach to imaging a patient with kidney failure continues to evolve. Overstatement of the risk of iodinated contrast material-induced (ie, contrast-induced) acute kidney injury and new guidelines for administration of gadolinium-based contrast media affect screening and the choice of contrast material. Treatment of kidney failure requires dialysis or a kidney transplant. Pretransplant imaging includes assessment for the feasibility of performing a transplant and evaluation for underlying malignancy and peripheral vascular disease. Patients with kidney failure are at high risk for renal cell carcinoma. Subtypes that occur exclusively or more commonly in patients with kidney failure, such as acquired cystic kidney disease, renal cell carcinoma, and clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma, have specific clinical-pathologic characteristics, with indolent behavior. Performing US for dialysis planning increases the success of placement of an arteriovenous fistula, while postoperative US evaluation is essential in assessment of access dysfunction. Systemic manifestations in patients with kidney failure are multifactorial and may relate to the underlying cause of renal failure or may be secondary to treatment effects. Disturbances in mineral and bone metabolism and soft-tissue and vascular calcifications are seen in patients with chronic kidney disease and mineral bone disorder. Neurologic and cardiothoracic complications are also common. The authors provide a comprehensive overview of imaging considerations for patients with kidney failure, including the appropriate use of CT, MRI, and US with their respective contrast agents; the use of imaging in transplant workup and dialysis assessment; and the common renal and extrarenal manifestations of kidney failure. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Adapting a Dialysis Service for Delivery of Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistulas

The percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) is an exciting and novel addition to the vascular access options available to patients with end-stage kidney disease who require dialysis. Early clinical results have been promising, with high rates of maturation and low rates of reintervention. To successfully adapt an existing hemodialysis service to include the provision of pAVF formation, it is essential to identify and align the interests of key clinical and nonclinical stakeholders. Only through strong collaboration can the service be supported. The authors provide a comprehensive overview of the planning fundamentals required, including the referral pathway, screening and clinical assessment, and practical procedural elements and considerations, as well as follow-up requirements such as cannulation, fistula surveillance, and maintenance. Key staffing requirements are highlighted, including those pertaining to vascular US screening and dialysis nurse training. A broad and structured planning approach ensures that the entire network of key stakeholder interests is included and provides a strong foundation for a compelling business plan to attract the necessary funding and managerial support for the service. The authors present a systematic framework of the essential considerations necessary to facilitate the planning, funding, and ultimately delivery of a successful pAVF service. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Long Term Results from The Pivotal Multicenter Trial of Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistula Creation for Hemodialysis Access

PURPOSE

To report the five-year results from the Pivotal Multicenter Trial of Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistula (pAVF) Creation for Hemodialysis Access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 107 intent-to-treat (ITT) patients from the pivotal trial provided a long-term follow-up population (LTP) of 85 patients followed a median 50 months (range 12-60). Data evaluated in the LTP group were fistula maturation and use, secondary procedures, and complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis of primary, primary assisted, cumulative patency, and functional patency (time from two-needle to abandonment) were performed for the ITT population.

RESULTS

In the LTP 99% (84/85) of fistulas were mature with 99% (78/79) of patients requiring hemodialysis using their pAVF. Sustained fistula use (two-needle cannulation at prescribed rate, 2/3 sessions) was achieved in 92% (78/85) of patients, with seven patients never using their pAVF because not on dialysis (n=4), peritoneal dialysis (n=2), and refusing to use fistula (n=1). Fistula maintenance was required in 31.8% (27/85) of patients and included fistula dysfunction (21.2%), thrombosis (5.9%), cannulation injury (12.9%), and arm swelling (4.7%). The number of procedures performed per patient per year (PPPY) to maintain function and patency was 0.32 (91/288) for years 2-5. The cumulative patency was 89.5%, 88.4%, 88.4%, 85.6%, and 82.0% years 1-5, respectively. The functional patency was 91.8% at the end of the study. There were no major complications related to pAVF during long-term follow-up CONCLUSION: Percutaneous fistulae have provided clinically effective and durable access for hemodialysis with low complications. Continued use and evaluation of pAVF is warranted.

Venous outflow banding for maturation of a percutaneous arteriovenous fistula

In the present report, we have described venous outflow banding as a technique to assist with maturation of a percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) without sacrificing potential target veins for future access. A 47-year-old obese man had undergone pAVF creation between the right ulnar vessels with coil embolization of the brachial vein. Follow-up imaging demonstrated the median cubital vein briskly filling the cephalic and basilic veins. The basilic vein was banded with the patient under local anesthesia successfully. Banding of the superficial veins provides an alternative after creation of a pAVF to preserve veins that could be used as conduits for future access.

Devices and Techniques for Percutaneous Creation of Dialysis Arteriovenous Fistulas

Dialysis treatment for chronic kidney disease was first developed by Dr. Willem Kolff in 1943, and its availability began to grow in 1962 after which it has become a mainstay treatment for patients with chronic kidney disease. It is estimated that, in 2021, 15% of adults in the United States (∼37 million people) have chronic kidney disease, of which 661,000 individuals have renal failure, and 468,000 individuals require dialysis. There have been several advancements in dialysis treatment since its advent, most notably the creation of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for venous access in 1966. In recent years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved two new devices for AVF creation using a percutaneous approach. These are the WavelinQ (Becton Dickinson, New Jersey) and the Ellipsys (Avenu Medical, California) endovascular AVF (endoAVF) devices that use radiofrequency and thermal technologies, respectively, to create the AVF. Since the introduction of these technologies, several studies have shown that they are safe and effective, with favorable durability and low rate of serious adverse events. In this article, we will discuss these two devices and the techniques used for percutaneous creation of dialysis AVF as an alternative to traditional open surgical techniques.

Percutaneous arteriovenous fistula creation

The first percutaneous systems used to create an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018 and included the Ellipsys and WavelinQ devices. Early results and longer-term studies of these catheter-based devices suggest that they offer important benefits and potentially improved outcomes in patients with appropriate anatomy. The deep communicating vein in the cubital fossa and its relationship to the proximal radial artery or proximal ulnar artery are key vascular elements of both systems. The devices differ significantly in technical design, energy source, imaging requirements, procedure times, catheters, access vessel sites, and techniques. We review the two approved percutaneous arteriovenous fistula devices, including technical considerations, selecting the appropriate patient, postoperative evaluation, interventions, outcomes, potential complications, and cannulation issues.

New Devices and Technologies for Hemodialysis Vascular Access: A Review

In the United States, hemodialysis remains the most common treatment modality for kidney failure, chosen by almost 90% of incident patients. A functioning vascular access is key to providing adequate hemodialysis therapy. Recently, major innovations in devices and technology for hemodialysis vascular access care have rapidly changed the landscape. Novel endovascular devices for creation of arteriovenous fistulas may offer a solution to the barriers encountered in initiating maintenance hemodialysis with a permanent vascular access rather than a central venous catheter (CVC). Furthermore, in the prevalent hemodialysis population, the minimally invasive endovascular arteriovenous fistula procedure should help improve long wait times for vascular access creation, which remains a major barrier to reducing CVC dependence. Bioengineered grafts are being developed and may offer another option to polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Early studies with these biocompatible grafts are promising, as additional studies continue to evaluate their clinical outcomes in comparison to cryopreserved or synthetic options. Prolonging the vascular access patency with appropriate use of devices such as drug-coated balloons and stent grafts may complement the novel techniques of creating arteriovenous access. Finally, innovative solutions to treat stenosed and occluded thoracic central veins can provide an approach to creating a vascular access and allow patients with exhausted vasculature to remain on hemodialysis. The robust developments in hemodialysis vascular access are likely to change practice patterns in the near future.

Endovascular arteriovenous fistulas- are they the answer we haven't been looking for?

INTRODUCTION

Surgically created arteriovenous fistulas are the accepted gold standard for the establishment of hemodialysis access in patients requiring dialysis. However, primary and maturation failures may limit their usage. Recent advances in endovascular technology have resulted in the creation of devices for endovascular arteriovenous fistula formation. These devices may offer an additional or alternative approach to fistula formation in patients with end-stage kidney disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the limitations of surgical arteriovenous fistulas and the endovascular devices currently available. The review covers initial trial data and subsequent studies examining their use.

EXPERT OPINION

Early results achieved with endovascular fistula formation are encouraging. Current limitations of this technology include anatomic suitability and a high rate of re-interventions required to establish maturity. Greater uptake of the technology will also require a review of long-term outcomes in larger patient cohorts.

Initial Outcomes Following Introduction of Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistula Program with Comparison to Historical Surgically Created Fistulas

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been an abundance of encouraging data regarding the creation of percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas. Despite promising data regarding their clinical maturation, a paucity of data exists which provides direct comparison between percutaneously created AVFs (pAVF) and open surgically created AVFs (sAVF). This study has 2 primary objectives: First, to compare clinical outcomes of pAVFs to sAVFs, with emphasis on clinical maturation and frequency of postoperative interventions to facilitate maturation. Second, to contribute toward the evidence-based incorporation of the pAVF procedure into the hemodialysis access algorithm.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was performed on all consecutive patients undergoing surgically created brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (BC-AVF, sAVF group) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 and Ellipsys-created percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF group) from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Comparative analysis between groups was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients underwent Ellipsys-created pAVF with mean age of 56.7 ± 22.6 years (12 males [50%], 12 females [50%]) and 62 patients underwent surgically created BC-AVF with mean age of 62.5 ± 13.2 years (32 males [52%], 30 females [48%]). Both the pAVF and sAVF groups had comparable mean operating times (60 ± 40 vs. 56 ± 25 min, P = 0.67) and frequency of procedural technical success (23 [96%] vs. 62 [100%], P = 0.28), respectively. The pAVF group had a lower clinical maturation rate (12 [52%] vs. 54 [87%], P = 0.003) and a higher primary failure rate (9 [39%] vs. 6 [10%], P = 0.003) when compared to the sAVF group. The pAVF group had an increased overall rate of undergoing a postoperative intervention (18 [78%] vs. 13 [21%], P< 0.001), as well as an increased number of total postoperative interventions (1.1 ± 0.9 vs. 0.3 ± 0.6 interventions, P< 0.001) compared to the sAVF group. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the juxta anastomotic segment was the most prevalent postoperative intervention performed in the pAVF group and occurred at a significantly increased frequency when compared to the sAVF group rate (13 [57%] vs. 5 [8%], P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our single-center retrospective review, patients undergoing Ellipsys-created pAVF in the first year following introduction of percutaneous endovascular had inferior rates of clinical maturation and underwent more postoperative interventions when compared to historical patients undergoing surgically created BC-AVF. Outcome discrepancies compared to previously reported Ellipsys data demonstrate a need for further studies examining the practical translatability of the pAVF.

Initial 6-month quality review of a percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula program

Background:

Percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas have recently proven successful alternatives to surgical arteriovenous fistulas with encouraging initial results. The Ellipsys Endovascular Arteriovenous Fistula System utilizing ultrasound and thermal energy has recently received approval for use in the United States. At the University of New Mexico, we developed an integrated service between Vascular Surgery, Interventional Radiology, and Interventional Nephrology for percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas utilizing Ellipsys.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective chart review of the initial 6 months (January 1st 2019 to July 1st 2019) of 18 percutaneous arteriovenous fistula placements to evaluate our initial technical success rate, the number of arteriovenous fistulas meeting maturation characteristics or use in dialysis, and to identify areas for quality improvement.

Results:

Initial technical success was achieved in 17 out of 18 arteriovenous fistulas (94.4%). Three patients did not report for any follow-up at the end of the initial 6 months. Of the remaining patients, 7 out of 15 were using their arteriovenous fistulas or meeting maturation characteristics at the end of the study (46.7%). Patient loss to follow-up/no-show (16.7%), patient not yet requiring hemodialysis (27.8%), and poor post-surgical maturation and/or need for additional maturation procedures (55.6%) were the predominate reasons for non-use. We identified improved coordination of care, early intervention, and outpatient dialysis center education as the primary areas of focus for quality improvement.

Conclusion:

Initial technical success rate of percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas placement was comparable to published studies. Early and aggressive secondary angiographic interventions of arteriovenous fistulas failing to meet cannulation requirements, improved coordination of post-operative care, and outpatient dialysis center education appear to be the primary targets for quality improvement.

Interventional Nephrology: Opportunities and Challenges

The nephrologist has a pivotal role as the leader of multidisciplinary teams to optimize vascular access care of the patient on dialysis and to promote multidisciplinary collaboration in research, training, and education. The continued success of interventional nephrology as an independent discipline depends on harnessing these efforts to advance knowledge and encourage innovation. A comprehensive curriculum that encompasses research from bench to bedside coupled with standardized clinical training protocols are fundamental to this expansion. As we find ourselves on the threshold of a much-awaited revolution in nephrology, there is great opportunity but also formidable challenges in the field - it is up to us to work together to realize the enormous potential of our discipline.