Comparing Outcomes of Upper Extremity Brachiobasilic Arteriovenous Fistulas and Arteriovenous Grafts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Outcomes of prosthetic upper arm arteriovenous graft vs brachiobasilic fistula for hemodialysis access

OBJECTIVE

Primary arteriovenous access such as radiocephalic and brachiocephalic fistulas are initial choices for creating vascular access in dialysis patients. When neither of these choices is an option, upper arm arteriovenous graft or brachiobasilic transposition is recommended. Although primary fistula is better than prosthetic graft for suitable patients, there is little data to guide the best treatment strategy in the absence of suitable vein for primary access creation. This study identifies factors that influence patency rates and compares outcomes of patients treated with brachiobasilic fistula vs upper arm graft in patients who have failed forearm access or are not candidates for primary access.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database of patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure from 2010 to 2022 was analyzed. Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were calculated. Incidence rates of complications and reinterventions were compared.

RESULTS

There were 148 patients with brachiobasilic fistulas and 157 patients with upper arm grafts. The graft group was older (70.1 ± 14.7 vs 62.5 ± 14.6 years; P = .003) and had a higher incidence of pacemakers (11.9% vs 4.1%; P = .005). Brachiobasilic fistulas had higher 6-month (77.0% vs 64.3%; P = .02) and 1-year (68.2% vs 55.4%; P = .03) primary-assisted patency. Secondary patency rates were better for upper arm grafts at 1-year (82.2% vs 72.3%; P = .05). Access complications of non-maturation and aneurysm were higher in basilic vein transposition (21.6% vs 1.3%; P < .0001; 15.5% vs 6.4%; P = .017). Grafts had higher rates of occlusion (58.0% vs 25.7%; P < .0001). In terms of interventions, upper arm grafts had higher rates of thrombectomy (50.3% vs 18.9%; P < .0001), but there was no difference seen in angioplasty, stent, surgical revision, or steal procedures. Basilic vein transpositions had longer time to cannulation (104.6 ± 81.1 vs 32.5 ± 22.4 days; P < .0001), longer total catheter days (251.1 ± 181.7 vs 72.9 ± 56.3 days; P < .0001), and higher number of procedures to aid maturity (0.7 ± 0.7 vs 0.1 ± 0.3; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, when forearm access or primary arteriovenous access is not an option, basilic vein transposition and upper arm grafts have fairly equivalent primary patency. Primary assisted patency is slightly better in basilic vein fistulas, but secondary patency is better in upper arm grafts at 1 year. Basilic fistulas also had longer time to cannulation, longer total catheter days, and more procedures to aid maturity.

Comparison between transposed arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous graft for the hemodialysis patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review

It is challenging for a surgeon to determine the appropriate vascular access for hemodialysis patients whose cephalic vein is usually inaccessible. The purpose of the study is to compare the complications and patency rates between transposed arteriovenous fistulas (tAVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) for the hemodialysis patients. Studies were recruited from PubMed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, the web of science databases, and reviewing reference lists of related studies from the inception dates to September 2, 2021. Statistical analyses were conducted using the statistical tool Review Manager version5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). I2 > 50% was defined as a high degree of heterogeneity, and then a random-effects model was used. Otherwise, the fixed-effects model was used. Odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used. Thirty-three trials (26 retrospective studies, four randomized controlled trials, two prospective trials, and one controlled-comparative study) with 6430 enrolled participants were identified in our analysis. The results showed that tAVF was accompanied with lower thrombosis rate (103/1184 (8.69%) vs 257/1367 (18.80%); I2 = 45%; 95% CI, 0.34 (0.26, 0.45)) and infection rate (43/2031 (2.12%) vs 180/2147 (8.38%); I2 = 0%; 95% CI, 0.20 (0.14, 0.30)) than arteriovenous graft. The significantly better primary patency rates, secondary patency rates, and primary assisted patency rates during follow-up were found in tAVF. However, the failure rate and the prevalence of hematoma were significantly lower in AVG group. No evidence showed the rate of overall mortality, steal syndrome, and aneurysm reduced in tAVF. Our results showed that tAVF is a promising vascular access technique for hemodialysis patients whose cephalic vein is inaccessible. Our data showed that tAVF has less thrombosis, infection risk, and better patency rates when compared with AVG. However, more attentions need to be paid to transposed arteriovenous fistulas maturation and hematoma.

Assessment of the performance of vascular access for hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Life and quality of life on hemodialysis depends on adequate vascular access. An autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) has the best performance, while the use of a central venous catheter (CVC) may have a negative impact on fistula performance and may be associated with increased systemic inflammation. Our objective is to evaluate the performance of vascular accesses in patients undergoing a chronic hemodialysis program.

METHODS

This is an observational, cross-sectional, and descriptive study that included patients on chronic hemodialysis for more than 90 days. Patients with an acute systemic inflammatory disease and those with acute cardiovascular illness were excluded. Clinical data, dialysis session parameters, and serum levels of inflammatory markers were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were evaluated, 59 (65%) had an AVF and 32 patients (35%) had a CVC. The adequacy rate was 67%; being 67.8% with AVF and 65.6% with CVC. Among the causes of AVF inadequacy, the ones that presented the highest prevalence ratio (PR) were non-mature AVF (PR: 4.055; 95% CI: 2.017-8.151), pseudoaneurysm (PR: 6.580; 95% CI: 3.723-11.629) and presence of hematoma (PR: 4.360; 95% CI: 2.125-8.946), p < 0.001. Among the catheter group, the causes of inadequacy with the highest PR were the presence of access thrombosis, indicating the use of thrombolytics (PR: 11.103; 95% CI: 4.746-25.977; p < 0.001) and infection (PR: 2.984; 95% CI: 1.293-6.889; p = 0.010). Median primary AVF patency was 72 months compared to 7 months of catheters (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in serum inflammatory markers between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequacy rates of vascular accesses did not differ between the groups, but the primary and functional patency of AVF is 10 times higher than that of catheters. Infection in dialysis catheters is associated with worse access performance. There was no association between systemic inflammation and vascular access.

Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Access Stenosis Diagnosed by Duplex Doppler Ultrasonography: A Review

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is currently the hemodialysis access with the longest life expectations for the patients. However, even the AVF is at risk for many complications, especially the development of stenosis. The latter can not only lead to inadequate hemodialysis but also lead to AVF thrombosis. Duplex Doppler ultrasonography is a very precise method, in the hands of experienced professionals, for the diagnosis of AVF complications. In this review, we summarize the ultrasound diagnostic criteria of significant stenoses and their indication for procedural therapy.