Intervention with selution SLR™ Agent Balloon for Endovascular Latent Limus therapy for failing AV Fistulas (ISABELLA) Trial: Protocol for a pilot clinical study and pre-clinical results

Endovascular salvage of failing arterio-venous fistulas utilising sirolimus eluting balloons: Six months results from the ISABELLA trial

BACKGROUND

Aim of this pilot clinical study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Selution Sustained Limus Release (SLR)™ sirolimus-eluting balloon (SEB) for improving failing arterio-venous fistulas (AVF) patency in Asian haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Prospective single-centre, multi-investigator, non-consecutive, non-blinded single arm trial. Forty end-stage renal failure Asian patients with a dysfunctional AVF underwent SEB angioplasty between May and November 2020. All stenotic lesions were prepared with high pressure non-compliant balloon angioplasty prior to SEB angioplasty. Endpoints of interest included target lesion primary patency and circuit access patency and safety through 30 days. All patients received dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 month and were followed up with Duplex ultrasound at 6 months.

RESULTS

There was one subject dropout so final n = 39 patients (mean age 65.0 ± 11.9; males = 26 (66.7%)) and n = 43 target lesions treated. Main indication for intervention was dropping access flow (24/39; 61.5%) and most common target lesion was in the juxta-anastomosis (24/43; 54.5%). There was 100% technical and procedural success. There were no adverse events related to the SEB. Target lesion primary patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 39/41 (95.1%) and 28/39 (71.8%) respectively. Access circuit patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 35/37 (94.6%) and 22/35 (62.9%) respectively. There were 3 (7.7%) deaths all attributable to patients' underlying co-morbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Fistuloplasty using the novel Selution SLR™ SEB for dysfunctional AVF circuits seems a safe and effective modality in Asian haemodialysis patients at 6 months but larger randomised controlled studies are required now to determine its true efficacy against plain balloon angioplasty.

Ranger™ paclitaxel-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for treatment of failing arteriovenous fistulas and grafts in haemodialysis patients: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Aim was to compare the safety and patency efficacy outcomes between Ranger™ paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB)- versus conventional balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of haemodialysis access-related conduit stenosis.

METHODS

Retrospective single-centre, multi-investigator, consecutive, double-arm comparative cohort study. About 130 end-stage renal failure Asian patients with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft underwent PCB or POBA fistuloplasty between November 2018 and June 2020. All stenotic lesions were prepared with high pressure non-compliant balloon angioplasty prior to PCB angioplasty. All patients received at least one antiplatelet agent for 3 months duration post procedure.

RESULTS

Mean age was 66.0 ± 10 years and 79/130 (61%) were males. PCB arm (n = 65) versus POBA arm (n = 65). Majority were AVFs circuits (122/130, 94%). Main indication for intervention was dropping access flow (98/130, 76%). About 172 lesions were treated (56% POBA, 44% PCB), and the juxta-anastomosis (JAS) was the main target lesion (87/172, 51%). There were no significant differences in safety outcomes (30-day adverse events, access thrombosis, abandoned AVF and death) between treatment groups. Mean time to target lesion reintervention (TLR) was longer in PCB-treated lesions (7.1 ± 2.7 vs 5.8 ± 3.2 months, p = 0.03), especially amongst recurrent lesions (7.3 ± 2.4 vs 5.7 ± 3.2, p = 0.02). Mean time to circuit reintervention was also longer in PCB-treated circuits (6.9 ± 2.8 vs 5.8 ± 3.7months, p = 0.04). There were 16 deaths (12%), all attributed to patient's underlying comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Fistuloplasty with Ranger™ PCB for failing arteriovenous circuits in end-stage renal failure patients, is a safe and efficacious modality compared to POBA in terms of longer freedom from TLR.

Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease Using Injectable Biomaterials and Drug-Coated Balloons: Safety and Efficacy Perspective

The possibility of injectable biomaterials being used in the therapy of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is investigated in this article. We conducted a thorough review of the literature on the use and efficacy of biomaterials (BMs) and drug-coated balloons (DCBs). These BMs included hydrogels, collagen scaffolds, and nanoparticles. These BMs could be used alone or in combination with growth factors, stem cells, or gene therapy. The treatment of peripheral artery disease with DCBs is increasingly common in the field of interventional angiology. Studies have been carried out to examine the effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated balloons such as PaccocathTM in lowering the frequency with which further revascularization operations are required. PCB angioplasty and angioplasty without paclitaxel did not significantly vary in terms of mortality, according to the findings of a recent meta-analysis that included the results of four randomized controlled studies. On the other hand, age was found to be a factor that predicted mortality. There was a correlation between the routine utilization of scoring balloon angioplasty along with DCBs and improved clinical outcomes in de novo lesions. In both preclinical and clinical testing, the SelutionTM DCB has demonstrated efficacy and safety, but further research is required to determine whether or not it is effective and safe over the long term. In addition, we reviewed the difficulties involved in bringing injectable BMs-based medicines to clinical trials, including the approval processes required by regulatory bodies. Injectable BMs have a significant amount of therapeutic promise for PAD, which highlights the need for more research and clinical studies to be conducted in this field. In conclusion, this research focuses on the potential of injectable BMs and DCBs in the treatment of PAD as well as the hurdles that must be overcome in order to translate these treatments into clinical trials. In this particular field, there is a demand for further research as well as clinical trials.