Single Center "Snapshot" Experience With Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA After Lung Transplantation

Circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA as a marker for rejection after lung transplantation

Objective

Recently, circulating donor-derive cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has gained growing attention in the field of solid organ transplantation. The aim of the study was to analyze circulating dd-cfDNA levels in graft rejection, ACR and AMR separately for each rejection type compared with non-rejection, and assessed the diagnostic potential of dd-cfDNA levels in predicting graft rejection after lung transplantation.

Methods

A systematic search for relevant articles was conducted on Medline, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases without restriction of languages. The search date ended on June 1, 2023. STATA software was used to analyze the difference between graft rejection, ACR, AMR and stable controls, and evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating dd-cfDNA in detecting graft rejection.

Results

The results indicated that circulating dd-cfDNA levels in graft rejection, ACR, and AMR were significantly higher than non-rejection (graft rejection: SMD=1.78, 95% CI: 1.31-2.25, I2 = 88.6%, P< 0.001; ACR: SMD=1.03, 95% CI: 0.47-1.59, I2 = 89.0%, P < 0.001; AMR: SMD= 1.78, 95% CI: 1.20-2.35, I2 = 89.8%, P < 0.001). Circulating dd-cfDNA levels distinguished graft rejection from non-rejection with a pooled sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92) and a pooled specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86). The corresponding SROC yield an AUROC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93).

Conclusion

Circulating dd-cfDNA could be used as a non-invasive biomarker to distinguish the patients with graft rejection from normal stable controls.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023440467.

Clinical relevance of cell-free DNA quantification and qualification during the first month after lung transplantation

Background

Many studies have reported the relevance of donor-derived cfDNA (dd-cfDNA) after lung transplantation (LTx) to diagnose and monitor acute rejection (AR) or chronic rejection or infection (INF). However, the analysis of cfDNA fragment size has not been studied. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical relevance of dd-cfDNA and cfDNA size profiles in events (AR and INF) during the first month after LTx.

Methods

This prospective, single-center study includes 62 LTx recipients at the Marseille Nord Hospital, France. Total cfDNA quantification was performed by fluorimetry and digital PCR, dd-cfDNA by NGS (AlloSeq cfDNA-CareDX^®), and the size profile by BIABooster (Adelis^®). A bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsies at D30 established the following groups: not-injured and injured graft (AR, INF, or AR+INF).

Results

Quantification of total cfDNA was not correlated with the patient's status at D30. The percentage of dd-cfDNA was significantly higher for injured graft patients at D30 (p=0.0004). A threshold of 1.72% of dd-cfDNA correctly classified the not-injured graft patients (negative predictive value of 91.4%). Among recipients with dd-cfDNA >1.72%, the quantification of small sizes (80-120bp) >3.70% identified the INF with high performance (specificity and positive predictive value of 100%).

Conclusion

With the aim of considering cfDNA as a polyvalent non-invasive biomarker in transplantation, an algorithm combining the quantification of dd-cfDNA and small sizes of DNA may significantly classify the different types of allograft injuries.

Cell-free DNA in lung transplantation: research tool or clinical workhorse?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent evidence indicates that plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a sensitive biomarker for the detection of underlying allograft injury, including rejection and infection. In this review, we will cover the latest evidence revolving around dd-cfDNA in lung transplantation and its role in both advancing mechanistic insight into disease states in lung transplant recipients as well as its potential clinical utility.

RECENT FINDINGS

Plasma dd-cfDNA increases in the setting of allograft injury, including in primary graft dysfunction, acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and infection. Dd-cfDNA has demonstrated good performance characteristics for the detection of various allograft injury states, most notably with a high negative-predictive value for detection of acute rejection. Elevated levels of dd-cfDNA in the early posttransplant period, reflecting molecular evidence of lung allograft injury, are associated with increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and death.

SUMMARY

As a quantitative, molecular biomarker of lung allograft injury, dd-cfDNA holds great promise in clinical and research settings for advancing methods of posttransplant surveillance monitoring, diagnosis of allograft injury states, monitoring adequacy of immunosuppression, risk stratification and unlocking pathophysiological mechanisms of various disease.

Cell-free DNA as a solid-organ transplant biomarker: technologies and approaches

High-quality biomarkers that detect emergent graft damage and/or rejection after solid-organ transplantation offer new opportunities to improve post-transplant monitoring, allow early therapeutic intervention and facilitate personalized patient management. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (DD-cfDNA) is a particularly exciting minimally invasive biomarker because it has the potential to be quantitative, time-sensitive and cost-effective. Increased DD-cfDNA has been associated with graft damage and rejection episodes. Efforts are underway to further improve sensitivity and specificity. This review summarizes the procedures used to process and detect DD-cfDNA, measurement of DD-cfDNA in clinical transplantation, approaches for improving sensitivity and specificity and long-term prospects as a transplant biomarker to supplement traditional organ monitoring and invasive biopsies.

Novel biomarkers of chronic lung allograft dysfunction: is there anything reliable?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a major barrier preventing long-term survival following lung transplantation. As our clinical knowledge regarding its definition and presentation has significantly improved over the last years, adequate biomarkers to predict development of CLAD, phenotype of CLAD or prognosis post-CLAD diagnosis are definitely needed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Radiological and physiological markers are gradually entering routine clinical practice. In-depth investigation of biological samples including broncho-alveolar lavage, biopsy and serum has generated potential biomarkers involved in fibrogenesis, airway injury and inflammation but none of these are universally accepted or implemented although progress has been made, specifically regarding donor-derived cell-free DNA and donor-specific antibodies.

SUMMARY

Although a lot of promising biomarkers have been put forward, a very limited number has made it to routine clinical practice. Nevertheless, a biomarker that leads to earlier detection or more adequate disease phenotyping would advance the field enormously.

The NLRP3 Inflammasome: Relevance in Solid Organ Transplantation

The NOD, LRR, and pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) protein has been established as a central component of the inflammasome and regulates the inflammatory response to a myriad of environmental, microbial, and endogenous danger stimuli. Assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome results in the cleavage and activation of caspase-1, in turn causing release of the pro-inflammatory interleukins 1-beta and 18. This activation response, while crucial to coordinated innate immune defense, can be aberrantly activated by the likes of cell-free DNA, and cause significant autoimmune pathology. Complications of autoimmunity induced by aberrant NLRP3 inflammasome activation have a great degree of mechanistic crossover with alloimmune injury in solid organ transplant, and stratagems to neutralize NLRP3 inflammasome activation may prove beneficial in solid organ transplant management. This article reviews NLRP3 inflammasome biology and the pathology associated with its hyperactivation, as well as the connections between NLRP3 inflammasome activation and allograft homeostasis.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA to Diagnose Graft Rejection Post-Transplant: Past, Present and Future

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a non-invasive biomarker that is more sensitive and specific towards diagnosing any graft injury or rejection. Due to its applicability over all transplanted organs irrespective of age, sex, race, ethnicity, and the non-requirement of a donor sample, it emerges as a new gold standard for graft health and rejection monitoring. Published research articles describing the role and efficiency of dd-cfDNA were identified and scrutinized to acquire a brief understanding of the history, evolution, emergence, role, efficiency, and applicability of dd-cfDNA in the field of transplantation. The dd-cfDNA can be quantified using quantitative PCR, next-generation sequencing, and droplet digital PCR, and there is a commendatory outcome in terms of diagnosing graft injury and monitoring graft health. The increased levels of dd-cfDNA can diagnose the rejection prior to any other presently used biochemistry or immunological assay methods. Biopsies are performed when these tests show any signs of injury and/or rejection. Therefore, by the time these tests predict and show any unusual or improper activity of the graft, the graft is already damaged by almost 50%. This review elucidates the evolution, physiology, techniques, limitations, and prospects of dd-cfDNA as a biomarker for post-transplant graft damage and rejection.