1
|
Wang YF, Li JL, Lee CC, Wallace PK, Ko BS. Using Artificial Intelligence to Interpret Clinical Flow Cytometry Datasets for Automated Disease Diagnosis and/or Monitoring. Methods Mol Biol 2024; 2779:353-367. [PMID: 38526794 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3738-8_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Flow cytometry (FC) is routinely used for hematological disease diagnosis and monitoring. Advancement in this technology allows us to measure an increasing number of markers simultaneously, generating complex high-dimensional datasets. However, current analytic software and methods rely on experienced analysts to perform labor-intensive manual inspection and interpretation on a series of 2-dimensional plots via a complex, sequential gating process. With an aggravating shortage of professionals and growing demands, it is very challenging to provide the FC analysis results in a fast, accurate, and reproducible way. Artificial intelligence has been widely used in many sectors to develop automated detection or classification tools. Here we describe a type of machine learning method for developing automated disease classification and residual disease monitoring on clinical flow datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Fen Wang
- AHEAD Medicine Corporation, San Jose, CA, USA.
- AHEAD Intelligence Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Jeng-Lin Li
- Department of Electrical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Chun Lee
- Department of Electrical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Paul K Wallace
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Bor-Sheng Ko
- AHEAD Medicine Corporation, San Jose, CA, USA
- AHEAD Intelligence Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Hematological Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Montante S, Chen Y, Brinkman RR. flowSim: Near duplicate detection for flow cytometry data. Cytometry A 2023; 103:889-901. [PMID: 37530476 PMCID: PMC10834853 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
The analysis of large amounts of data is important for the development of machine learning (ML) models. flowSim is the first algorithm designed to visualize, detect and remove highly redundant information in flow cytometry (FCM) training sets to decrease the computational time for training and increase the performance of ML algorithms by reducing overfitting. flowSim performs near duplicate image detection by combining community detection algorithms with the density analysis of the marker expression values. flowSim clustering compared to consensus manual clustering on a dataset composed of 160 images of bivariate FCM data had a mean Adjusted Rand Index of 0.90, demonstrating its efficiency in identifying similar patterns. flowSim selectively discarded near duplicate files in datasets constructed with known redundancy, and removed 92.6% of FCM images in a dataset of over 500,000 drawn from public repositories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Montante
- Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yixuan Chen
- Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ryan R. Brinkman
- Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 675 West 10th Avenue
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jaimes MC, Leipold M, Kraker G, Amir E, Maecker H, Lannigan J. Full spectrum flow cytometry and mass cytometry: A 32-marker panel comparison. Cytometry A 2022; 101:942-959. [PMID: 35593221 PMCID: PMC9790709 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
High-dimensional single-cell data has become an important tool in unraveling the complexity of the immune system and its involvement in homeostasis and a large array of pathologies. As technological tools are developed, researchers are adopting them to answer increasingly complex biological questions. Up until recently, mass cytometry (MC) has been the main technology employed in cytometric assays requiring more than 29 markers. Recently, however, with the introduction of full spectrum flow cytometry (FSFC), it has become possible to break the fluorescence barrier and go beyond 29 fluorescent parameters. In this study, in collaboration with the Stanford Human Immune Monitoring Center (HIMC), we compared five patient samples using an established immune panel developed by the HIMC using their MC platform. Using split samples and the same antibody panel, we were able to demonstrate highly comparable results between the two technologies using multiple data analysis approaches. We report here a direct comparison of two technology platforms (MC and FSFC) using a 32-marker flow cytometric immune monitoring panel that can identify all the previously described and anticipated immune subpopulations defined by this panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Leipold
- Department of Microbiology/ImmunologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Geoffrey Kraker
- Technical Applications SupportCytek Biosciences Inc.FremontCaliforniaUSA
| | - El‐ad Amir
- Astrolabe DiagnosticsFort LeeNew JerseyUSA
| | - Holden Maecker
- Department of Microbiology/ImmunologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
The role of CD8 + Granzyme B + T cells in the pathogenesis of Takayasu's arteritis. Clin Rheumatol 2021; 41:167-176. [PMID: 34494213 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05903-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE T cell-mediated immune response plays a key role in Takayasu arteritis (TAK). Although previous studies have showed the roles of CD4+T cell and its subsets in TAK, the change of CD8+ T cell subsets remains unclear. This study investigated the role of CD8+ T cell subsets in TAK. METHODS The study consisted of 56 TA patients and 51 healthy controls. The percentages of CD8+T cells, CD8+GranzymeB+ T cells, CD8+Perforin+ T cells, and CD8+IFN-γ+ T cells in blood samples were analyzed by flow cytometry. RESULTS We found that the percentages of CD8+GranzymeB+ T cells (P = 0.030), CD8+Perforin+ T cells (P = 0.000), and CD8+IFN-γ+ T cells (P = 0.002) in CD8+T cells were higher in TAK patients compared to control group. After 6 months of treatment, the proportion of CD8+T cells in lymphocytes were significantly lower in TAK patients than the baseline assessment (P = 0.033). A lower ratio of CD8+GranzymeB+ T cells/CD8+ T cells were showed in TAK patents after treatment compared with TAK patients before treatments (P = 0.011). The change of CD8+GranzymeB+ T cells/CD8+ T cells ratio was positively correlated with the change of ITAS (r = 0.721, P = 0.002) and ITAS-A (r = 0.637, P = 0.008). Finally, the immunofluorescence staining showed the infiltration of CD8+ Granzyme B + cells in the aortic tissue of TAK patients. CONCLUSION Our results disclose that the CD8+ T lymphocytes may play a role in TAK pathogenesis. Targeting CD8+GranzymeB+ T lymphocytes or Granzyme B inhibitors could be a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of TAK. Key Points • Our study investigated role the of CD8+ T cell subsets in TAK. • We found the percentages of CD8+GranzymeB+ T cells, CD8+Perforin+ T cells, and CD8+IFN-γ+ T cells in CD3+CD8+T cells were higher in TAK patients. • The proportion of CD8+T cells in lymphocytes and the ratio of CD8+GranzymeB+ T cells/CD8+ T cells were significantly lower in TAK patients after treatment.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ross D. Automated analysis of bacterial flow cytometry data with FlowGateNIST. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250753. [PMID: 34407072 PMCID: PMC8372958 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Flow cytometry is commonly used to evaluate the performance of engineered bacteria. With increasing use of high-throughput experimental methods, there is a need for automated analysis methods for flow cytometry data. Here, we describe FlowGateNIST, a Python package for automated analysis of bacterial flow cytometry data. The main components of FlowGateNIST perform automatic gating to differentiate between cells and background events and then between singlet and multiplet events. FlowGateNIST also includes a method for automatic calibration of fluorescence signals using fluorescence calibration beads. FlowGateNIST is open source and freely available with tutorials and example data to facilitate adoption by users with minimal programming experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Ross
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hiza H, Hella J, Arbués A, Magani B, Sasamalo M, Gagneux S, Reither K, Portevin D. Case-control diagnostic accuracy study of a non-sputum CD38-based TAM-TB test from a single milliliter of blood. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13190. [PMID: 34162973 PMCID: PMC8222251 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92596-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
CD4 T cell phenotyping-based blood assays have the potential to meet WHO target product profiles (TPP) of non-sputum-biomarker-based tests to diagnose tuberculosis (TB). Yet, substantial refinements are required to allow their implementation in clinical settings. This study assessed the real time performance of a simplified T cell activation marker (TAM)-TB assay to detect TB in adults from one millilitre of blood with a 24 h turnaround time. We recruited 479 GeneXpert positive cases and 108 symptomatic but GeneXpert negative controls from presumptive adult TB patients in the Temeke District of Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. TAM-TB assay accuracy was assessed by comparison with a composite reference standard comprising GeneXpert and solid culture. A single millilitre of fresh blood was processed to measure expression of CD38 or CD27 by CD4 T cells producing IFN-γ and/or TNF-α in response to a synthetic peptide pool covering the sequences of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) ESAT-6, CFP-10 and TB10.4 antigens on a 4-color FACSCalibur apparatus. Significantly superior to CD27 in accurately diagnosing TB, the CD38-based TAM-TB assay specificity reached 93.4% for a sensitivity of 82.2% with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.91). The assay performance was not significantly affected by HIV status. To conclude, we successfully implemented TAM-TB immunoassay routine testing with a 24 h turnaround time at district level in a resource limited setting. Starting from one millilitre of fresh blood and being not influenced by HIV status, TAM-TB assay format and performance appears closely compatible with the optimal TPP accuracy criteria defined by WHO for a non-sputum confirmatory TB test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hellen Hiza
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jerry Hella
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ainhoa Arbués
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Beatrice Magani
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Sasamalo
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sebastien Gagneux
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Klaus Reither
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Damien Portevin
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaushik A, Dunham D, He Z, Manohar M, Desai M, Nadeau KC, Andorf S. CyAnno: A semi-automated approach for cell type annotation of mass cytometry datasets. Bioinformatics 2021; 37:4164-4171. [PMID: 34037686 PMCID: PMC9502137 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION For immune system monitoring in large-scale studies at the single-cell resolution using CyTOF, (semi-)automated computational methods are applied for annotating live cells of mixed cell types. Here, we show that the live cell pool can be highly enriched with undefined heterogeneous cells, i.e., 'ungated' cells, and that current semi-automated approaches ignore their modeling resulting in misclassified annotations. RESULT We introduce 'CyAnno', a novel semi-automated approach for deconvoluting the unlabeled cytometry dataset based on a machine learning framework utilizing manually gated training data that allows the integrative modeling of 'gated' cell types and the 'ungated' cells. By applying this framework on several CyTOF datasets, we demonstrated that including the 'ungated' cells can lead to a significant increase in the precision of the 'gated' cell types prediction. CyAnno can be used to identify even a single cell type, including rare cells, with higher efficacy than current state-of-the-art semi-automated approaches. AVAILABILITY The CyAnno is available as a python script with a user-manual and sample dataset at https://github.com/abbioinfo/CyAnno. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhinav Kaushik
- Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA
| | - Diane Dunham
- Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA
| | - Ziyuan He
- Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA
| | - Monali Manohar
- Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA
| | - Manisha Desai
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA
| | - Sandra Andorf
- Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Divisions of Biomedical Informatics and Allergy & Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park J, Archuleta S, Oh MLH, Shek LPC, Wang H, Bonaparte M, Frago C, Bouckenooghe A, Jantet-Blaudez F, Begue S, Gimenez-Fourage S, Pagnon A. Humoral and cellular immunogenicity and safety following a booster dose of a tetravalent dengue vaccine 5+ years after completion of the primary series in Singapore: 2-year follow-up of a randomized phase II, placebo-controlled trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:2107-2116. [PMID: 33626291 PMCID: PMC8189141 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1861875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) is approved for use as a 3-dose series for the prevention of dengue in seropositive individuals ≥9 years. A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study of a booster dose of CYD-TDV in individuals who completed the 3-dose schedule >5 years previously (NCT02824198), demonstrated that a booster restored neutralizing antibody titers to post-dose 3 levels. We present additional immunogenicity assessments up to 24 months post-booster, and B- and T-cell responses in a participant subset. Participants aged 9-45 years that had received all three doses of CYD-TDV were randomized 3:1 to receive a booster dose of CYD-TDV (n = 89) or placebo (n = 29). Neutralizing antibody levels at Months 1, 6, 12, and 24 post-booster were assessed by plaque reduction neutralization test. In a subset, B-cell responses were assessed by a fluorescent immunospot assay, and T-cells analyzed by flow cytometry at Days 0, 7, 12, Months 1 and 12. We observed an increase of antibody titers Month 1 post-booster, then a gradual decline to Month 24. In the CYD-TDV booster group, an increase in plasmablasts was seen at Day 7 declining by Day 14, an increase in memory B-cells was observed at Day 28 with no persistence at Month 12. CYD-TDV booster recalled a CD8+ T-cell response, dominated by IFN-γ secretion, which decreased 12 months post-booster. This study showed a short-term increase in antibody titers and then gradual decrease following CYD-TDV booster injection >5 years after primary immunization, and the presence of memory B-cells activated following the booster, but with low persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Park
- Global Clinical Sciences, Sanofi Pasteur, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sophia Archuleta
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - May-Lin Helen Oh
- Department of Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lynette Pei-Chi Shek
- Department of Pediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hao Wang
- Biostatistics, Sanofi, Beijing, China
| | | | - Carina Frago
- Global Clinical Sciences, Sanofi Pasteur, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Sarah Begue
- Research and External Innovation Department, Sanofi Pasteur, Marcy l'Etoile, France
| | | | - Anke Pagnon
- Research and External Innovation Department, Sanofi Pasteur, Marcy l'Etoile, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
2020 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: BAV Guidance, CLSI H62, Biotherapeutics Stability, Parallelism Testing, CyTOF and Regulatory Feedback ( Part 2A - Recommendations on Biotherapeutics Stability, PK LBA Regulated Bioanalysis, Biomarkers Assays, Cytometry Validation & Innovation Part 2B - Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine). Bioanalysis 2021; 13:295-361. [PMID: 33511867 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2021-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The 14th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (14th WRIB) was held virtually on June 15-29, 2020 with an attendance of over 1000 representatives from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, and regulatory agencies worldwide. The 14th WRIB included three Main Workshops, seven Specialized Workshops that together spanned 11 days in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy and vaccine. Moreover, a comprehensive vaccine assays track; an enhanced cytometry track and updated Industry/Regulators consensus on BMV of biotherapeutics by LCMS were special features in 2020. As in previous years, this year's WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2020 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the Global Bioanalytical Community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2020 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication covers the recommendations on (Part 2A) BAV, PK LBA, Flow Cytometry Validation and Cytometry Innovation and (Part 2B) Regulatory Input. Part 1 (Innovation in Small Molecules, Hybrid LBA/LCMS & Regulated Bioanalysis), Part 3 (Vaccine, Gene/Cell Therapy, NAb Harmonization and Immunogenicity) are published in volume 13 of Bioanalysis, issues 4, and 6 (2021), respectively.
Collapse
|
10
|
An Overview of Flow Cytometry: Its Principles and Applications in Allergic Disease Research. Methods Mol Biol 2021; 2223:169-182. [PMID: 33226595 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1001-5_13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Flow cytometry is a popular technique used for both clinical and research purposes. It involves laser-based technology to characterize cells based on size, shape, and complexity. Additionally, flow cytometers are equipped with the ability to take fluorescence measurements at multiple wavelengths. This capability makes the flow cytometer a practical resource in the utilization of fluorescently conjugated antibodies, fluorescent proteins, DNA binding dyes, viability dyes, and ion indicator dyes. As the technology advances, the number of parameters a flow cytometer can measure has increased tremendously, and now some has the capacity to analyze 30-50 or more parameters on a single cell. Here, we describe the basic principles involved in the mechanics and procedures of flow cytometry along with an insight into applications of flow cytometry techniques for biomedical and allergic disease research.
Collapse
|
11
|
Czechowska K, Lannigan J, Aghaeepour N, Back JB, Begum J, Behbehani G, Bispo C, Bitoun D, Fernández AB, Boova ST, Brinkman RR, Ciccolella CO, Cotleur B, Davies D, Dela Cruz GV, Del Rio-Guerra R, Des Lauriers-Cox AM, Douagi I, Dumrese C, Bonilla Escobar DL, Estevam J, Ewald C, Fossum A, Gaudillière B, Green C, Groves C, Hall C, Haque Y, Hedrick MN, Hogg K, Hsieh EWY, Irish J, Lederer J, Leipold M, Lewis-Tuffin LJ, Litwin V, Lopez P, Nasdala I, Nedbal J, Ohlsson-Wilhelm BM, Price KM, Rahman AH, Rayanki R, Rieger AM, Robinson JP, Shapiro H, Sun YS, Tang VA, Tesfa L, Telford WG, Walker R, Welsh JA, Wheeler P, Tárnok A. Cyt-Geist: Current and Future Challenges in Cytometry: Reports of the CYTO 2019 Conference Workshops. Cytometry A 2020; 95:1236-1274. [PMID: 31833655 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joanne Lannigan
- Flow Cytometry Support Services, LLC, Alexandria, Virginia.,Flow Cytometry Core, University of Virginia, School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Nima Aghaeepour
- Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jessica B Back
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Julfa Begum
- Flow Cytometry Facility, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Greg Behbehani
- Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Cláudia Bispo
- Parnassus Flow Cytometry Core, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,ISAC SRL Emerging Leader, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Daniel Bitoun
- EMA Regional Marketing, BD Lifesciences, International Office, Belgium
| | - Alfonso Blanco Fernández
- UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Samuel Tony Boova
- High Burden HIV Global Markets, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, Florida
| | - Ryan Remy Brinkman
- Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia and British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Cytapex Bioinformatics Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Derek Davies
- Science Technology Platform Training Lead, Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Gelo Victoriano Dela Cruz
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Biology - DanStem, Flow Cytometry Platform, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Roxana Del Rio-Guerra
- Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Facility, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | | | - Iyadh Douagi
- Flow Cytometry Section, Research Technologies Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Claudia Dumrese
- Cytometry Facility, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Jose Estevam
- Center of Biomarker Innovation and Development, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Christina Ewald
- Cytometry Facility Senior Scientist, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Anna Fossum
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Brice Gaudillière
- Anesthesiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Cherie Green
- Flow Cytometry Biomarkers Development Sciences, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, California
| | - Christopher Groves
- Cytometry/Dynamic Omics in R&D Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, Astra Zeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Christopher Hall
- ISAC SRL Emerging Leader, Arlington, Virginia.,Cytometry Core Facility, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Yasmin Haque
- Flow Cytometry Facility, Department of Immunobiology and Infectious Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Karen Hogg
- Imaging and Cytometry Laboratory, Bioscience Technology Facility, Department of Biology, University of York, York, UK
| | - Elena W Y Hsieh
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jonathan Irish
- Cancer & Immunology Core and Mass Cytometry Center of Excellence, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - James Lederer
- Department of Surgery (Immunology), Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Leipold
- Human Immune Monitoring Center (HIMC), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Laura J Lewis-Tuffin
- Microscopy and Flow Cytometry Shared Resource, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Virginia Litwin
- Caprion Biosciences, Inc., Immunology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Lopez
- Cytometry and Cell Sorting Laboratory, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Jakub Nedbal
- Physics Department, King's College London, London, UK.,ISAC Marylou Ingram Scholar, Arlington, Virginia
| | | | - Kylie M Price
- Hugh Green Cytometry Centre, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Adeeb H Rahman
- Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Dept. of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Radhika Rayanki
- Cytometry/Dynamic Omics in R&D Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, Astra Zeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Aja M Rieger
- ISAC SRL Emerging Leader, Arlington, Virginia.,University of Alberta, Flow Cytometry Facility, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Alberta, Canada
| | - J Paul Robinson
- College of Veterinary Medicine and Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | | | | | - Vera A Tang
- University of Ottawa, Flow Cytometry and Virometry Core Facility, Ottawa, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lydia Tesfa
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - William G Telford
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Center Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rachael Walker
- Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joshua A Welsh
- ISAC Marylou Ingram Scholar, Arlington, Virginia.,Laboratory of Pathology, Translational Nanobiology Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Paul Wheeler
- Flow Cytometry, Luminex Corporation, Peterborough, UK
| | - Attila Tárnok
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Department Therapy Validation, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Standardization procedure for flow cytometry data harmonization in prospective multicenter studies. Sci Rep 2020; 10:11567. [PMID: 32665668 PMCID: PMC7360585 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68468-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the most challenging objective for clinical cytometry in prospective multicenter immunomonitoring trials is to compare frequencies, absolute numbers of leukocyte populations and further the mean fluorescence intensities of cell markers, especially when the data are generated from different instruments. Here, we describe an innovative standardization workflow to compare all data to carry out any large-scale, prospective multicentric flow cytometry analysis whatever the duration, the number or type of instruments required for the realization of such projects.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ji D, Putzel P, Qian Y, Chang I, Mandava A, Scheuermann RH, Bui JD, Wang H, Smyth P. Machine Learning of Discriminative Gate Locations for Clinical Diagnosis. Cytometry A 2020; 97:296-307. [PMID: 31691488 PMCID: PMC7079150 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
High-throughput single-cell cytometry technologies have significantly improved our understanding of cellular phenotypes to support translational research and the clinical diagnosis of hematological and immunological diseases. However, subjective and ad hoc manual gating analysis does not adequately handle the increasing volume and heterogeneity of cytometry data for optimal diagnosis. Prior work has shown that machine learning can be applied to classify cytometry samples effectively. However, many of the machine learning classification results are either difficult to interpret without using characteristics of cell populations to make the classification, or suboptimal due to the use of inaccurate cell population characteristics derived from gating boundaries. To date, little has been done to optimize both the gating boundaries and the diagnostic accuracy simultaneously. In this work, we describe a fully discriminative machine learning approach that can simultaneously learn feature representations (e.g., combinations of coordinates of gating boundaries) and classifier parameters for optimizing clinical diagnosis from cytometry measurements. The approach starts from an initial gating position and then refines the position of the gating boundaries by gradient descent until a set of globally-optimized gates across different samples are achieved. The learning procedure is constrained by regularization terms encoding domain knowledge that encourage the algorithm to seek interpretable results. We evaluate the proposed approach using both simulated and real data, producing classification results on par with those generated via human expertise, in terms of both the positions of the gating boundaries and the diagnostic accuracy. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Disi Ji
- Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineCalifornia
| | - Preston Putzel
- Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineCalifornia
| | - Yu Qian
- InformaticsJ. Craig Venter InstituteLa JollaCalifornia
| | - Ivan Chang
- InformaticsJ. Craig Venter InstituteLa JollaCalifornia
| | | | - Richard H. Scheuermann
- InformaticsJ. Craig Venter InstituteLa JollaCalifornia
- Department of PathologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaCalifornia
| | - Jack D. Bui
- Department of PathologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaCalifornia
| | - Huan‐You Wang
- Department of PathologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaCalifornia
| | - Padhraic Smyth
- Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineCalifornia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Immunobiotic and Paraprobiotic Potential Effect of Lactobacillus casei in a Systemic Toxoplasmosis Murine Model. Microorganisms 2020; 8:microorganisms8010113. [PMID: 31947510 PMCID: PMC7023318 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8010113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the main characteristics of probiotics is their ability to stimulate and modulate the immune response regardless of their viability. Lactobacillus casei (Lc) can stimulate local and systemic immunity, in addition to the activation of macrophages at sites distant from the intestine. Activated macrophages limit the replication of intracellular protozoa, such as Toxoplasma gondii, through the production of nitric oxide. The present study aimed to evaluate the protection generated by treatment with viable and non-viable Lc in the murine systemic toxoplasmosis model. CD1 male mice were treated with viable Lc (immunobiotic) and non-viable Lc (paraprobiotic), infected with tachyzoites of Toxoplasma gondii RH strain. The reduction of the parasitic load, activation of peritoneal macrophages, inflammatory cytokines, and cell populations was evaluated at 7 days post-infection, in addition to the survival. The immunobiotic and paraprobiotic reduced the parasitic load, but only the immunobiotic increased the activation of peritoneal macrophages, and the production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) while the paraprobiotic increased the production of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and T CD4+CD44+ lymphocytes. Viable and non-viable Lc increases survival but does not prevent the death of animals. The results provide evidence about the remote immunological stimulation of viable and non-viable Lc in an in vivo parasitic model.
Collapse
|