Feasibility of the Atlas Unicompartmental Knee System Load Absorber in Improving Pain Relief and Function in Patients Needing Unloading of the Medial Compartment of the Knee: 1-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Pilot Study (PHANTOM High Flex Trial)

Osteotomies for genu varum: Should we always correct at the tibia? A multicenter analysis of practices in France

INTRODUCTION

Tibial correction is often performed during a valgus-producing osteotomy for genu varum. However, overcorrection and the creation of a joint line obliquity (JLO) have been associated with unfavorable functional outcomes after high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The aims of this study were to analyze: 1) the corrections obtained after HTO; 2) the rationale behind the indication per the European Society for Sports Traumatology Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) recommendations; and 3) the correlation between the postoperative corrections obtained and functional outcomes.

HYPOTHESIS

A significant number of patients who underwent an isolated HTO did not present an "ideal" theoretical indication based on the preoperative angles and correction targets to be performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter study included 289 isolated HTOs. Demographic and morphometric data were anonymized and compiled in a database. Preoperative radiographic parameters were compared with the ESSKA consensus recommendations on osteotomies for genu varum. The consensus defined the "ideal" indication for performing an HTO as medial tibiofemoral compartment pain with significant tibial varus deformity (medial proximal tibial angle [MPTA]<85°), no significant femoral varus deformity (lateral distal femoral angle [LDFA]<90°), an expected postoperative obliquity of less than 5°, and a correction resulting in moderate tibial valgus (postoperative MPTA<94°). The incidence of patients with an "ideal" theoretical indication for isolated HTO and those with a theoretical indication not perfectly justified by the radiographic data and preoperative planning were recorded.

RESULTS

Under the ESSKA consensus criteria, 25.3% (n=73) of isolated HTOs, 15.6% (n=45) of isolated femoral osteotomies, 9.3% (n=27) of double-level osteotomies, and 49.9% (n=144) of cases where no osteotomy was performed due to the lack of significant extra-articular tibial and/or femoral deformity were deemed justified. The presence of a preoperative femoral deformity and the absence of an "ideal" indication for HTO did not affect the postoperative Tegner Activity Scale or the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (p>0.05). A high preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and MPTA, which indicated less varus, were associated with a greater risk of there being no "ideal" theoretical indication for an HTO (coefficient of determination [R2]=0.19 and R2=1, respectively; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that isolated HTOs in current practice were not justified in a significant number of patients, even though they could lead to tibial overcorrection and excessive JLO. This did not impact the functional results of this series, but it might complicate the performance of a secondary knee arthroplasty. Nevertheless, some young patients in this series underwent a salvage osteotomy outside the "ideal" indications of the European recommendations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; case series.

Risk of Arthroplasty in Patients with Subchondral Insufficiency Fractures of the Knee: A Matched Study of the Implantable Shock Absorber using a Validated Predictive Model

Subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee (SIFK) can result in high rates of osteoarthritis and arthroplasty. The implantable shock absorber (ISA) implant is a titanium and polycarbonate urethane device which reduces the load on the medial compartment of the knee by acting as an extra-articular load absorber while preserving the joint itself. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether partially unloading the knee with the ISA altered the likelihood of progression to arthroplasty utilizing a validated predictive risk model (SIFK score). A retrospective case-control (2:1) study was performed on patients with SIFK without any previous surgery and on those implanted with the ISA with the primary outcome being progression to arthroplasty compared with nonoperative treatment at 2 years. Baseline and final radiographs, as well as magnetic resonance imagings, were reviewed for the evaluation of meniscus or ligament injuries, insufficiency fractures, and subchondral edema. Patients from a prospective study were matched using the exact SIFK Score, a validated predictive score for progression to arthroplasty in patients with SIFK, to those who received the ISA implant. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to assess survival. A total of 57 patients (38 controls:19 ISA) with a mean age of 60.6 years and 54% female were included. The SIFK score was matched exactly between cases and controls for all patients. The 2-year survival rate of 100% for the ISA group was significantly higher than the corresponding rate of 61% for the control group (p < 0.01). In ISA, 0% of the patients converted to arthroplasty at 2 years, and 5% (one patient) had hardware removal at 1 year. When stratified by risk, the ISA group did not have a significantly higher survival compared with low-risk (p = 0.3) or medium-risk (p = 0.2) controls, though it had a significantly higher survival for high-risk groups at 2 years (100 vs. 15%, p < 0.01). SIFK of the medial knee can lead to significant functional limitation and high rates of conversion to arthroplasty. Implants such as the ISA have the potential to alter the progression to arthroplasty in these patients, especially those at high risk.

Improved 2-Year Freedom from Arthroplasty in Patients with High-Risk SIFK Scores and Medial Knee Osteoarthritis Treated with an Implantable Shock Absorber versus Non-Operative Care

OBJECTIVE

Subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIFK) is associated with high rates of osteoarthritis (OA) and arthroplasty. The implantable shock absorber (ISA) is an extra-capsular implant that unloads the medial knee compartment. This study compared the 2-year freedom from arthroplasty rates in subjects with medial knee OA and SIFK when treated with an ISA versus a matched cohort of patients treated non-surgically.

DESIGN

This retrospective case-control study compared 2-year conversion rates to arthroplasty in SIFK score-, age-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched control subjects without prior surgical history with ISA-implanted subjects from an ongoing prospective study. Baseline and final radiographs, and MRIs were reviewed for evaluation of meniscus or ligament injuries, insufficiency fractures, and subchondral edema. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed survival.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (21 Control: 21 ISA), mean age = 52.3 ± 8.7 years, BMI = 29.5 ± 3.9 kg/m2, 40% female were evaluated. Both ISA and Control arms had the same numbers of low (n = 4), medium (n = 11), and high-risk (n = 6) SIFK scores. One- and 2-year freedom-from-arthroplasty rates were both 100% for ISA subjects, and 76% and 55%, respectively, for Controls (P = 0.001 for cross-group comparison). Control knees with low, medium, and high-risk SIFK scores had respective 1- and 2-year survival rates of 100% and 100%, 90% and 68% (P = 0.07 vs. ISA), and 33% and 0% (P = 0.002 vs. ISA).

CONCLUSIONS

ISA intervention was strongly associated with avoidance of arthroplasty at a minimum 2 years, especially in patients with high-risk SIFK scores. SIFK severity scoring predicted relative risk of conversion to arthroplasty through at least 2 years in non-surgically treated subjects.

Implantable Shock Absorber Provides Superior Pain Relief and Functional Improvement Compared With High Tibial Osteotomy in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A 2-Year Report

OBJECTIVE

Up to 10 million Americans below the age of 65 years have symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) and may not yet be candidates for arthroplasty. In response, a subcutaneous implantable shock absorber (ISA) that unloads the knee has been developed. The safety and effectiveness of ISA treatment were compared against a surgical unloading control, high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

DESIGN

This was a prospective open-label cohort study with a historical control arm. Subjects underwent ISA placement or HTO. The primary endpoint was a composite variable combining pain, function, specific adverse events, integrity of implant or hardware, and conversion to subsequent surgery. Pain and function outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores) were assessed through 24 months. Adverse events were tracked.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint demonstrated superiority of the ISA arm versus the HTO arm, with 85.6% of ISA subjects meeting all criteria compared with 65.5% of HTO subjects. In addition, all 5 secondary endpoints showed superiority of ISA over HTO. At 24 months, the proportions of subjects considered responders were 95.8% (ISA) versus 87.9% (HTO) for pain and 91.7% (ISA) versus 81.3% (HTO) for function. The ISA procedure was well tolerated, with 13.4 days to full weightbearing status versus 58.0 days for the HTO arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with an ISA demonstrated noninferiority and superiority versus treatment with HTO in subjects aged 25-65 years who had OA of the medial knee. Treatment with ISA has high clinical benefit and is durable through at least 24 months.

An implantable shock absorber yields an 85% survival-from-arthroplasty rate through 5 years in working-age patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the 5-year rate of survival without undergoing arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in subjects with mild-to-moderate medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) who were treated with an implantable shock absorber (ISA) system.

METHODS

Three prospective, sequential, multicenter, international, single-arm clinical trials were conducted comprising subjects who received an ISA for symptomatic medial knee OA after failing ≥ 6 months of conservative therapy. Study outcomes were analyzed cumulatively and by enrollment group when all subjects' follow-up data exceeded the 2-year threshold after ISA implantation. Primary outcome was survival rate without conversion to arthroplasty/HTO. Secondary outcomes were changes in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function scores after ISA implantation.

RESULTS

All 171 enrolled subjects (age 51 ± 9 years, body-mass index 28.5 ± 3.5 kg/m², 38% female; study knee Kellgren-Lawrence score 2.7 ± 0.9 points) were followed for a minimum of 2, and up to 5, years after device implantation. Overall, 90.6% (155/171) of subjects survived without requiring arthroplasty/HTO at last follow-up (mean 3.2 ± 1.6 years). The Kaplan-Meyer median 3- and 5-year survival-without-arthroplasty point estimates were 89.8% (95% CI 86.5‒95.7%) and 84.9% (95% CI 75.1‒91.1%), respectively. The median 3-year estimated survival rate for the most recent study (n = 81) was 97.3%. The mean WOMAC Pain score decreased 71% from baseline to last follow-up after ISA implantation, from 58 ± 13 to 16 ± 17 points (p < 0.0001). The Function score improved 69%, decreasing from 56 ± 18 to 17 ± 17 points (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In younger patients with mild-to-moderate symptomatic medial compartment knee OA, implantation of the ISA device resulted in a 5-year survival rate of 85% from undergoing arthroplasty or HTO. The ISA system may be an effective treatment option for working-age patients with medial knee OA who are not candidates for or do not desire more invasive surgical approaches.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Discharging the medial knee compartment: comparison of pressure distribution and kinematic shifting after implantation of an extra-capsular absorber system (ATLAS) and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy-a biomechanical in vitro analysis

PURPOSE

Young and active patients suffering early degenerative changes of the medial compartment with an underlying straight-leg axis do face a therapeutical gap as unloading of the medial compartment cannot be achieved by high tibial osteotomy. Extracapsular absorbing implants were developed to close this existing therapeutical gap. Purpose of the present cadaveric biomechanical study was to compare the unloading effect of the knee joint after implantation of an extra-articular absorber system (ATLAS) in comparison to open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OW-HTO) under physiological conditions. The hypothesis of the study was that implantation of an extra-capsular absorber results in an unloading effect comparable to the one achievable with OW-HTO.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested under isokinetic flexion-extension motions and physiological loading using a biomechanical knee simulator. Tibiofemoral area contact and peak contact pressures were measured using pressure-sensitive film in the untreated medial compartment. The tibiofemoral superior-inferior, latero-medial translation and varus/valgus rotation were measured with a 3D tracking system Polaris. Pressures and kinematics changes were measured after native testing, ATLAS System implantation and OW-HTO (5° and 10° correction angles) performed with an angular stable internal fixator (TomoFix).

RESULTS

The absorber device decreased the pressure in the medial compartment near full extension moments. Implantation of the ATLAS absorbing system according to the manufacturers' instruction did not result in a significant unloading effect. Deviating from the surgery manual provided by the manufacturer the implantation of a larger spring size while applying varus stress before releasing the absorber resulted in a significant pressure diminution. Contact pressure decreased significantly Δ0.20 ± 0.04 MPa p = 0.044. Performing the OW-HTO in 5° correction angle resulted in significant decreased contact pressure (Δ0.25 ± 0.10 MPa, p = 0.0036) and peak contact pressure (Δ0.39 ± 0.38 MPa, p = 0.029) compared with the native test cycle. With a 10° correction angle, OW-HTO significantly decreased area contact pressure by Δ0.32 ± 0.09 MPa, p = 0.006 and peak contact pressure by Δ0.48 ± 0.12 MPa, p = 0.0654 compared to OW-HTO 5°. Surgical treatment did not result in kinematic changes regarding the superior-inferior translation of the medial joint section. A significant difference was observed for the translation towards the lateral compartment for the ATLAS system Δ1.31 ± 0.54 MPa p = 0.022 and the osteotomy Δ3.51 ± 0.92 MPa p = 0.001. Furthermore, significant shifting varus to valgus rotation of the treated knee joint was verified for HTO 5° about Δ2.97-3.69° and for HTO 10° Δ4.11-5.23° (pHTO 5 = 0.0012; pHTO 10 = 0.0007) over the entire extension cycle.

CONCLUSION

OW-HTO results in a significant unloading of the medial compartment. Implantation of an extra-capsular absorbing device did not result in a significant unloading until the implantation technique was applied against the manufacturer's recommendation. While the clinical difficulty for young and active patients with straight-leg axis and early degenerative changes of the medial compartment persists further biomechanical research to develop sufficient unloading devices is required.

Joint distraction for osteoarthritis: clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms

Joint distraction, the prolonged mechanical separation of the bones at a joint, has emerged as a joint-preserving treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis, with the gradually growing promise of implementation in regular clinical practice. Joint distraction of the knee has been most extensively studied, with these studies showing prolonged symptomatic improvement in combination with repair of cartilage tissue in degenerated knee joints, supporting the concept that cartilage repair can translate into real clinical benefit. The reversal of tissue degeneration observed with joint distraction could be the result of one or a combination of various proposed mechanisms, including partial unloading, synovial fluid pressure oscillation, mechanical and biochemical changes in subchondral bone, adhesion and chondrogenic commitment of joint-derived mesenchymal stem cells or a change in the molecular milieu of the joint. The overall picture that emerges from the combined evidence is relevant for future research and treatment-related improvements of joint distraction and for translation of the insights gained about tissue repair to other joint-preserving techniques. It remains to be elucidated whether optimizing the biomechanical conditions during joint distraction can actually cure osteoarthritis rather than only providing temporary symptomatic relief, but even temporary relief might be relevant for society and patients, as it will delay joint replacement with a prosthesis at an early age and thereby avert revision surgery later in life. Most importantly, improved insights into the underlying mechanisms of joint repair might provide new leads for more targeted treatment options.

Preliminary biomechanical cadaver study investigating a new load-sharing knee implant

Purpose

One of the major contributors to the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the condition of loading in the knee joint. Innovatively designed load-sharing implants may be effective in terms of reducing joint load. The effects of these implants on contact joint mechanics can be evaluated through cadaver experiments. In this work, a case study is carried out with cadaver knee specimens to carry out a preliminary investigation into a novel load-sharing knee implant, in particular to study the surgical procedures required for attachment, and to determine the contact pressures in the joint with and without the implant.

Methods

Contact pressure in the tibiofemoral joint was measured using pressure mapping sensors, with and without the implant, and radiographs were conducted to investigate the influence of the implant on joint space. The implant was designed from a 3D model of the specimen reconstructed by segmenting MR images of the knee, and it was manufactured by CNC machining.

Results

It was observed that attachment of the implant does not affect the geometry of the hard/soft tissues. Radiographs showed that the implant led to an increase in the joint space on the medial side. Contact pressure measurements showed that the implant reduced the load on the medial side by approximately 18% under all tested loading conditions. By increasing the load from 800 to 1600 N, the percentage of load reduction in the lateral side was decreased by 8%. After applying 800, 1200, and 1600 N load it was observed that the peak contact pressures were 3.7, 4.6, and 5.5 MPa, respectively.

Conclusions

This new knee implant shows some promise as a treatment for OA, through its creation of a conducive loading environment in the knee joint, without sacrificing or damaging any of the hard or soft tissues. This device could be as effective as, for example, the Atlas® system, but without some complications seen with other devices; this would need to be validated through similar results being observed in an appropriate in vivo study.

Two-Year Results of the PHANTOM High Flex Trial: A Single-Arm Study on the Atlas Unicompartmental Knee System Load Absorber in Patients With Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee

The Atlas Knee System was designed to fill the gap between no longer effective conservative treatments and more invasive surgery for young patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). This article reports on the 2-year results of a single-arm study of 26 subjects who previously reported favorable clinical outcomes 1 year post implantation. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and function scores improved by a clinically meaningful amount relative to baseline, and subjects had a return to normal range of motion. This study confirmed that the benefit of a joint unloading device in the management of young patients with medial knee OA is maintained over 2 years. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02711254).

Effects of a Medial Knee Unloading Implant on Tibiofemoral Joint Mechanics During Walking

The Atlas™ unicompartmental knee system is a second-generation extra-articular unloading implant for patients with mild to moderate medial knee osteoarthritis. The technology acts to reduce a portion of the weight-bearing load exerted on the medial knee during physical activity thereby, reducing the mechanical stress imposed on a degenerative joint. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of the Atlas™ on tibiofemoral joint mechanics during walking. A computer-aided design assembly of the Atlas™ was virtually implanted on the medial aspect of a previously validated finite element tibiofemoral joint model. Data for knee joint forces and moments from an anthropometrically matched male were applied to the model to quasi-statically simulate the stance phase of gait. Predictions of tibiofemoral joint mechanics were computed pre- and post-virtual implantation of the Atlas™. Compressive force in the medial tibiofemoral compartment was reduced by a mean of 53%, resulting in the decrement of mean cartilage-cartilage and cartilage-meniscus von Mises stress by 31% and 32%, respectively. The Atlas™ was not predicted to transfer net loading to the lateral compartment. The tibiofemoral joint model exhibited less internal-external rotation and anterior-posterior translation post-Atlas™, indicating a change in the kinematic environment of the knee. From a biomechanical perspective, extra-articular joint unloading may serve as a treatment option for patients recalcitrant to conservative care. Evaluation of mechanical changes in the tibiofemoral joint demonstrate the potential treatment mechanism of the Atlas™, in accordance with the available clinical data. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2149-2156, 2019.