1
|
Kirtschig G, Kinberger M, Kreuter A, Simpson R, Günthert A, van Hees C, Becker K, Ramakers MJ, Corazza M, Müller S, von Seitzberg S, Boffa MJ, Stein R, Barbagli G, Chi CC, Dauendorffer JN, Fischer B, Gaskins M, Hiltunen-Back E, Höfinger A, Köllmann NH, Kühn H, Larsen HK, Lazzeri M, Mendling W, Nikkels AF, Promm M, Rall KK, Regauer S, Sárdy M, Sepp N, Thune T, Tsiogka A, Vassileva S, Voswinkel L, Wölber L, Werner RN. EuroGuiderm guideline on lichen sclerosus-Treatment of lichen sclerosus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024. [PMID: 38822598 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lichen sclerosus (LS) is an inflammatory skin disease affecting all ages. LS typically involves the anogenital site where it causes itching and soreness; it may lead to sexual and urinary dysfunction in females and males; however, it may be asymptomatic. First signs of LS are usually a whitening of the genital skin, sometimes preceded by redness and oedema; fissuring, scarring, shrinkage and fusion of structures may follow in its course. LS is associated with an increased risk of genital cancer. LS has a huge impact on the quality of life of affected patients, and it is important to raise more awareness of this not uncommon disease in order to diagnose and treat it early. OBJECTIVES The guideline intends to provide guidance on the diagnostic of LS (part 1), highlight important aspects in the care of LS patients, generate recommendations and treatment algorithms (part 2) on topical, interventional and surgical therapy, based on the latest evidence, provide guidance in the management of LS patients during pregnancy, provide guidance for the follow-up of patients with LS and inform about new developments and potential research aspects. MATERIALS AND METHODS The guideline was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Methods Manual v1.3 https://www.edf.one/de/home/Guidelines/EDF-EuroGuiDerm.html. The wording of the recommendations was standardized (as suggested by the GRADE Working Group). The guideline development group is comprised of 34 experts from 16 countries, including 5 patient representatives. RESULTS Ultrapotent or potent topical corticosteroids in females and males, adults and children remain gold standard of care for genital LS; co-treatment with emollients is recommended. If standard treatment fails in males, a surgical intervention is recommended, complete circumcision may cure LS in males. UV light treatment is recommended for extragenital LS; however, there is limited scientific evidence. Topical calcineurin inhibitors are second line treatment. Laser treatment, using various wave lengths, is under investigation, and it can currently not be recommended for the treatment of LS. Treatment with biologics is only reported in single cases. CONCLUSIONS LS has to be diagnosed and treated as early as possible in order to minimize sequelae like scarring and cancer development. Topical potent and ultrapotent corticosteroids are the gold standard of care; genital LS is often a lifelong disease and needs to be treated long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Kirtschig
- Medbase Health Centre, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - M Kinberger
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Kreuter
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, HELIOS St. Elisabeth Hospital Oberhausen, Oberhausen, Germany
| | - R Simpson
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - A Günthert
- Gynäkologisches Tumorzentrum St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - C van Hees
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Becker
- Office for Paediatric Surgery, Bonn, Germany
| | - M J Ramakers
- CenSeRe (Centre for Psychological, Relational, Sexual Health), Voorschoten, The Netherlands
| | - M Corazza
- Section of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - S Müller
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - M J Boffa
- Department of Dermatology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - R Stein
- Center for Pediatric, Adolescent and Reconstructive Urology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - G Barbagli
- Centro Chirurgico Toscano, Arezzo, Italy
| | - C C Chi
- Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - J N Dauendorffer
- Department of Dermatology, Centre for Genital and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, University Hospital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - B Fischer
- The Swiss Lichen Sclerosus Association, Switzerland/Verein Lichen Sclerosus e.V., Dottikon, Switzerland
| | - M Gaskins
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - E Hiltunen-Back
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - A Höfinger
- The Swiss Lichen Sclerosus Association, Switzerland/Verein Lichen Sclerosus e.V., Dottikon, Switzerland
| | - N H Köllmann
- The Swiss Lichen Sclerosus Association, Switzerland/Verein Lichen Sclerosus e.V., Dottikon, Switzerland
| | - H Kühn
- The German Lichen Sclerosus Association, Hamburg, Germany
| | - H K Larsen
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Lazzeri
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - W Mendling
- German Center for Infections in Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal-University Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - A F Nikkels
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - M Promm
- Department of Paediatric Urology and Clinic St. Hedwig, University Medical Centre of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - K K Rall
- Department of Women's Health, Women's University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - S Regauer
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - M Sárdy
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - N Sepp
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria
| | - T Thune
- Department of Dermatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - A Tsiogka
- 1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S Vassileva
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital "Alexandrovska", Medical University - Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - L Voswinkel
- The German Lichen Sclerosus Association, Hamburg, Germany
| | - L Wölber
- Department of Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf and Centre for Colposcopy and Vulvovaginal Disease Jersualem Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - R N Werner
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Skoner DP, Golant AK, Norton AE, Stukus DR. Is This Medication Safe for My Child? How to Discuss Safety of Commonly Used Medications With Parents. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:3064-3072. [PMID: 35963511 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.07.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
All drugs have potential side effects, but thoughtful use can maximize benefits while minimizing risks. Children should not be considered just small adults regarding drug safety because their growth and development are discordant with their ability to sense and self-report drug side effects. Detecting side effects requires vigilance and education from prescribers to parents, who are tasked with monitoring their child over time. A drug's safety profile is published in the package label after pivotal trials are conducted in relatively small and sometimes narrow segments of the population during the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval process. Drug safety profiles can change as data from postmarketing reports and long-term monitoring during phase IV trials emerge. As such, prescribers are obligated to maintain current understanding of any changes to drug labels. Discussing potential side effects, monitoring, and when to report concerns can be a time-consuming process during patient encounters. This review offers current information regarding potential side effects of some of the most commonly used medications for allergic conditions, asthma, and atopic dermatitis. This information and discussion will hopefully assist clinicians in their conversations with parents, including advice surrounding prescribing medication to minimize adverse effects, parental monitoring, and documentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Skoner
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, West Virginia University Children's Hospital, Morgantown, WVa
| | - Alexandra K Golant
- Department of Dermatology and Laboratory of Inflammatory Skin Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Allison E Norton
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Pulmonology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tenn
| | - David R Stukus
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lam M, Zhu JW, Tadrous M, Drucker AM. Association Between Topical Calcineurin Inhibitor Use and Risk of Cancer, Including Lymphoma, Keratinocyte Carcinoma, and Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:549-558. [PMID: 33787818 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) are commonly used as second-line treatment for atopic dermatitis. In 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a black box warning against TCI use, citing data from case reports and animal studies indicating a potential risk of cancer. Objective To evaluate the association between TCI use and risk of malignant neoplasms compared with nonactive and active comparator groups. Data Sources Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, and Web of Science from database inception to August 21, 2020. Study Selection Observational studies investigating the association between treatment with TCIs (ie, tacrolimus and pimecrolimus) and the development of cancer with nonactive or active comparators were included. The population of interest was not limited to any specific disease state, age, or sex. All articles were assessed independently and in duplicate by 2 reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Of 2464 nonduplicate records retrieved from the search, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data extraction was conducted independently by 2 reviewers according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to derive pooled relative risk (RR) estimates. Data were analyzed from July 25 to October 25, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures Risk of cancer overall and risk of specific cancer types (lymphoma, melanoma, and keratinocyte carcinoma). Results Eight unique cohort studies (408 366 treated participants [55.1% female], 1 764 313 nonactive comparator controls, and 1 067 280 controls using topical corticosteroids) and 3 unique case-control studies (3898 cases [55.0% male] and 14 026 cancer-free controls [52.4% male]) were included. There was no association between TCI use and cancer overall compared with nonactive comparators (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.16). Lymphoma risk was elevated with TCI use with both nonactive (RR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.39-2.49) and topical corticosteroid comparators (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.61). No significant association was found between TCI use and increased skin cancer (melanoma and keratinocyte carcinoma). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest an association between TCI use and risk of lymphoma but not other cancers. Combined with the low absolute risk of lymphoma, the potential increased risk attributable to TCI use for any individual patient is likely very small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Lam
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Wei Zhu
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mina Tadrous
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron M Drucker
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hong CH, Gooderham M, Bissonnette R. Evidence Review of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors for the Treatment of Adult Atopic Dermatitis. J Cutan Med Surg 2019; 23:5S-10S. [DOI: 10.1177/1203475419857669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) were approved in the early 2000s for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), and despite the recent introduction of newer topical and systemic therapies for AD, TCIs such as tacrolimus ointment (0.03% and 0.1%) and pimecrolimus cream (1%), remain recommended treatment options in contemporary management guidelines. The goal of this article is to review the evidence supporting the approved indications for TCIs in adults with AD, including short-term treatment of active disease and as intermittent or maintenance treatment for the prevention of flares. Other evidence reviewed in this article includes the treatment of specific body areas (such as the face and eyelids), combination or sequential use of TCIs with topical corticosteroids, and the comparative efficacy of the 2 commercially available TCIs. This review of the evidence confirms that TCIs remain an effective treatment option for the management of adult AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-ho Hong
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia and Probity Medical Research, Surrey, Canada
| | - Melinda Gooderham
- Queen’s University, SKiN Centre for Dermatology and Probity Medical Research, Peterborough, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|