Long-term therapy with glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: effect on T-cells

Fluid biomarker and electrophysiological outcome measures for progressive MS trials

Progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by insidious clinical worsening that is difficult to accurately quantify and predict. Biofluid markers and electrophysiological measures are potential candidate outcome measures in clinical trials, allowing the quantification of nervous damage occurring in the disease. Neurofilaments are highly specific neuronal proteins. They may have come closest to such applications by their higher concentrations repeatedly demonstrated in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in all stages of MS, during relapses, their responsiveness to disease-modifying treatments in relapsing and progressive MS and their associations with measures of inflammatory and degenerative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes. Digital single-molecule array (Simoa) technology improves accuracy of bioassays in the quantification of neurofilament light chain (NfL) in serum and plasma. NfL seems to mark a common final path of neuroaxonal injury independent of specific causal pathways. CSF and blood levels of NfL are highly correlated across various diseases including MS, suggesting that blood measurements may be useful in assessing response to treatment and predicting future disease activity. Other biomarkers like matrix metalloproteinases, chemokines, or neurotrophic factors have not been studied to a similar extent. Such measures, especially in blood, need further validation to enter the trial arena or clinical practice. The broadening armamentarium of highly sensitive assay technologies in the future may shed even more light on patient heterogeneity and mechanisms leading to disability in MS. Evoked potentials (EPs) are used in clinical practice to measure central conduction of central sensorimotor pathways. They correlate with and predict the severity of clinical involvement of their corresponding function. Their validation for use in multicenter studies is still lacking, with the exception of visual EPs. If further validated, EPs and fluid biomarkers would represent useful outcome measures for clinical trials, being related to specific mechanisms of the ongoing pathologic changes.

Multiple Sclerosis: Immunopathology and Treatment Update

The treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has changed over the last 20 years. All immunotherapeutic drugs target relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) and it still remains a medical challenge in MS to develop a treatment for progressive forms. The most common injectable disease-modifying therapies in RRMS include β-interferons 1a or 1b and glatiramer acetate. However, one of the major challenges of injectable disease-modifying therapies has been poor treatment adherence with approximately 50% of patients discontinuing the therapy within the first year. Herein, we go back to the basics to understand the immunopathophysiology of MS to gain insights in the development of new improved drug treatments. We present current disease-modifying therapies (interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, fingolimod, mitoxantrone), humanized monoclonal antibodies (natalizumab, ofatumumb, ocrelizumab, alentuzumab, daclizumab) and emerging immune modulating approaches (stem cells, DNA vaccines, nanoparticles, altered peptide ligands) for the treatment of MS.

A prospective open-label study of glatiramer acetate: over a decade of continuous use in multiple sclerosis patients

A decade of continuous glatiramer acetate (GA) use by relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients was evaluated in this ongoing, prospective study, and the neurological status of ‘Withdrawn’ patients was assessed at a 10-year long-term follow-up (LTFU) visit. Modified intention-to-treat (mITT, n=232) patients received ≥ 1 GA dose since 1991; ‘Ongoing’ patients ( n=108) continued in November 2003. Of 124 patients, 50 Withdrawn patients returned for LTFU. Patients were evaluated every six months (EDSS). Mean GA exposure was 6.99, 10.1 and 4.26 years for mITT, Ongoing, and Withdrawn/LTFU patients, respectively. While on GA, mITT relapse rates declined from 1.18/year prestudy to ∼1 relapse/5 years; median time to ≥ 1 EDSS point increase was 8.8 years; mean EDSS change was 0.739±1.66 points; 58% had stable/improved EDSS scores; and 24, 11 and 3% reached EDSS 4, 6 and 8, respectively. For Ongoing patients, EDSS increased 0.509±1.65; 62% were stable/improved; and 24, 8 and 1% reached EDSS 4, 6 and 8, respectively. For Withdrawn patients at 10-year LTFU, EDSS increased 2.249±1.86; 28% were stable/improved; and 68, 50 and 10% reached EDSS 4, 6 and 8, respectively. While on GA nearly all patients (mean disease duration 15 years) remained ambulatory. At LTFU, Withdrawn patients had greater disability than Ongoing patients.

[A place of first-line drugs in treatment of multiple sclerosis]

A rapidly changing set of drugs for treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) leads to the necessity of searching for predictors of their efficacy. Understanding of pathogenetic processes in MS and mechanisms of action of different drugs play an important role in the search for markers of potential responders. The author analyses the presently accumulated information on the original drug copaxone (glatiramer acetate) including current concepts on the mechanism of action, long-term safety and efficacy. Data on the frequency and significance of adverse effects during treatment with glatiramer acetate as well as on the influence of the drug on pregnancy, postpartum course of MS and development of the infant who received glatiramer acetate prenatally compared to other disease-modifying drugs are presented.

Glatiramer acetate treatment effects on gene expression in monocytes of multiple sclerosis patients

Background

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a mixture of synthetic peptides used in the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of GA therapy on the gene expression of monocytes.

Methods

Monocytes were isolated from the peripheral blood of eight RRMS patients. The blood was obtained longitudinally before the start of GA therapy as well as after one day, one week, one month and two months. Gene expression was measured at the mRNA level by microarrays.

Results

More than 400 genes were identified as up-regulated or down-regulated in the course of therapy, and we analyzed their biological functions and regulatory interactions. Many of those genes are known to regulate lymphocyte activation and proliferation, but only a subset of genes was repeatedly differentially expressed at different time points during treatment.

Conclusions

Overall, the observed gene regulatory effects of GA on monocytes were modest and not stable over time. However, our study revealed several genes that are worthy of investigation in future studies on the molecular mechanisms of GA therapy.

Complexity of trophic factor signaling in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: differential expression of neurotrophic and gliotrophic factors

Soluble factors that promote survival and differentiation of glia and neurons during development are likely to play key roles in neurodegeneration and demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and have the potential to be important therapeutic targets. We examined the effect of TrkB signaling and the expression patterns of neurotrophic and gliotrophic factors in the mouse brain in MOG-induced experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE). With induction of mild disease, TrkB heterozygous mice were more severely affected compared to their wild type littermates. However, with more potent disease induction, TrkB heterozygotes fared similar to their wild type littermates, suggesting complex modulatory roles for TrkB signaling. One possible explanation for this difference is that the expression patterns of neurotrophic factors correlate with disease severity in individual mice with mild disease, but not in more severe disease. With the less potent induction in C57BL/6 mice, we found that BDNF was consistently increased at EAE onset, while the soluble gliotrophic factor neuregulin (NRG1) was increased only in the chronic phase of the disease. Treatment of these animals with glatiramer acetate (GA) to decrease disease severity resulted in lower levels of both BDNF and NRG1 expression in some mice at 35days after immunization compared to those in untreated EAE mice, but had no direct effect on these factors in the absence of EAE. Our results suggest a complex interplay between neurotrophic and gliotrophic factors in EAE that is dependent on disease stage and severity. While signaling by BDNF through TrkB is protective in mild disease, this effect was not seen in more severe disease. The late induction of NRG1 in the chronic stage of disease could also worsen disease severity through its known ability to activate microglial, inflammatory pathways. While complex, these studies begin to define underlying axoglial trophic activities that are likely involved in both disease pathogenesis and repair.

Immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: new insights and therapeutic implications

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory, demyelinating, and neurodegenerative disorder of the CNS. The etiology of MS remains unknown. However, it is well established that immune dysregulation plays a critical role in the neuropathogenesis of this disorder. In this review, we discuss the current hypotheses concerning the complex cellular and molecular interactions involved in the immunopathogenesis of MS. Although CD4 T lymphocytes have long been considered the critical cellular factor in the immunopathology of MS, the role of other cell types has also recently been investigated. It appears that the spatial distribution of CD4 and CD8 cells in MS lesions is distinct. Yet another T-lymphocyte subset, γ/δ T cells, can be detected in very early MS lesions. The prevalent dogma suggests that CD4 helper T (TH) type 1 cells release cytokines and inflammatory mediators that cause tissue damage, while CD4 TH2 cells might be involved in modulation of these effects. However, a mounting body of evidence suggests that additional T-cell subsets, including TH17 cells, CD8 effector T cells, and CD4 CD25 regulatory T cells, also affect disease activity. In addition, clinical and paraclinical data are accumulating on the prominent role of B lymphocytes and other antigen-presenting cells in MS neuropathogenesis. Given these observations, new therapeutic interventions for MS will need to focus on resetting multiple components of the immune system.

The double-edged sword of autoimmunity: lessons from multiple sclerosis

The relationship between immune responses to self-antigens and autoimmune disease is unclear. In contrast to its animal model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), which is driven by T cell responses to myelin antigens, the target antigen of the intrathecal immune response in multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been identified. Although the immune response in MS contributes significantly to tissue destruction, the action of immunocompetent cells within the central nervous system (CNS) may also hold therapeutic potential. Thus, treatment of MS patients with glatiramer acetate triggers a protective immune response. Here we review the immunopathogenesis of MS and some recent findings on the mechanism of glatiramer acetate (GA).

Update on inflammation, neurodegeneration, and immunoregulation in multiple sclerosis: therapeutic implications

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory, demyelinating, and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system of uncertain etiology. There is consensus that a dysregulated immune system plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of MS; therefore, we aim to summarize current hypotheses concerning the complex cellular and molecular interactions involved in the immunopathology of MS. Although CD4+ T lymphocytes have long been implicated in the immunopathology of MS, the role of other T-cell subtypes has been recognized. CD4+ and CD8+ cells have been isolated from different locations within MS lesions and gamma/delta T cells have been isolated from early MS lesions. The prevalent dogma has been that CD4+ TH1 cells release cytokines and mediators of inflammation that may cause tissue damage, although CD4+ TH2 cells may be involved in modulation of these effects. Recent evidence, however, suggests that additional T-cell subsets play a prominent role in MS immunopathology: TH17 cells, CD8+ effector T cells, and CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. In addition, laboratory and clinical data are accumulating on the prominent role of B lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells in MS pathogenesis. On the basis of these observations, new therapeutic approaches for MS will need to focus on resetting multiple components of the immune system.

Multiple sclerosis: glatiramer acetate induces anti-inflammatory T cells in the cerebrospinal fluid

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is believed to induce GA-reactive T cells that secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines at the site of inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, GA-reactive T cells have not been established from the intrathecal compartment of MS patients, and intrathecal T cells may differ from T cells in blood. Here, we compared the phenotype of GA-reactive T cells from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood of five MS patients treated with GA for 3-36 months, and in three of these patients also before treatment. From the CSF of these patients, all 22 T cell lines generated before and all 38 T cell lines generated during treatment were GA-reactive. GA treatment induced a more pronounced anti-inflammatory profile of GA-reactive T cell lines from CSF than from blood. While GA-reactive T cell clones from CSF were restricted by either human leukocyte antigen (HLA) -DR or HLA-DP, only HLA-DR restricted GA-reactive T cell clones were detected in blood. No cross reactivity with myelin proteins was detected in GA-reactive T cell lines or clones from CSF. These results suggest that a selected subset of GA-reactive T cells are present in the intrathecal compartment, and support an anti-inflammatory mechanism of action for GA.

Glatiramer acetate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate is an immunomodulating drug used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. It consists of a copolymer of amino acid residues in the same stoichiometric proportions as in myelin basic protein. Its mechanism of action is not entirely known and is probably multifaceted, with deletion of some immune cell populations and stimulation of others in these patients. Some mechanisms involve neuroprotectant effects. There is ample evidence of its efficacy in relapsing-remitting disease, using both clinical and imaging measures of disease activity, and in this paper we review the clinical and basic studies of this drug. Finally we discuss how some of its neuroprotectant effects may be useful in neurodegeneration such as is seen in more advanced cases of multiple sclerosis and other diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinson's disease.

Glatiramer acetate: mechanisms of action in multiple sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a mixture of synthetic polypeptides composed of four amino acids resembling myelin basic protein (MBP). GA has been shown to be effective in preventing and suppressing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the animal model of multiple sclerosis. It was tested in several clinical studies and approved for the immunomodulatory treatment of relapsing-type MS in 1996. Glatiramer acetate demonstrates a strong promiscuous binding to major histocompatibility complex molecules and inhibits the T cell response to several myelin antigens. In addition, it was shown to act as a T cell receptor antagonist for the 82-100 MBP epitope. Glatiramer acetate treatment causes in vivo changes of the frequency, cytokine secretion pattern and effector function of GA-specific T cells. It was shown to induce GA-specific regulatory CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and a TH1-TH2 shift with consecutively increased secretion of antiinflammatory cytokines. GA-specific TH2 cells are able to migrate across the blood-brain barrier and cause in situ bystander suppression of autoaggressive TH1 T cells. In addition glatiramer acetate was demonstrated to influence antigen presenting cells (APC) such as monocytes and dendritic cells. Furthermore secretion of neurotrophic factors with potential neuroprotective effects was shown.

Clinical response to glatiramer acetate correlates with modulation of IFN-γ and IL-4 expression in multiple sclerosis

Objective To determine whether glatiramer acetate (GA)-induced lymphoproliferation and IFN-γ and IL-4 modulation correlate with the clinical response in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Background GA therapy involves the induction of anti-inflammatory cytokine shifts. However, it is not known whether this response correlates with the clinical outcome.

Methods Thirty-six relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients were treated with GA for at least two years, and classified clinically as GA-responders (GA-R=22) or hypo/non-responders (GA-HR/NR = 14). Proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to GA and Tetanus toxoid (TT), as well as IL-4 and IFN-γ ELISPOT, were performed.

Findings There was no difference in PBMC proliferation to GA or TT between GA-R and GA-HR/NR before and during treatment (P>0.05). The mean number of IFN-γ ELISPOTS in unstimulated, TT and anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated PBMC was lower among GA-R (unstimulated: GA-R =10.1±6.21 (n=22) versus GA-HR/NR=17.8±12.7 (n=14), P=0.04; TT-GA-R =12.2±4.06 (n=12) versus GA-HR/NR=26.8±21.0 (n=8), P=0.028; anti-CD-3/CD28 GA-R=217.3±140.4 (n=22) versus GA-HR/NR=368.5±170.1 (n=14), P=0.006). In contrast, the number of IL-4 ELISPOTS remained unchanged in the GA-R group, but was progressively reduced in the GA-HR/NR group during GA therapy (GA-HR/NR IL-4: pre-Rx: 59±34 versus 22±11 at 12 months (n =6), P=0.0429). The IL-4/ IFN-γ ratio in anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated PBMC was significantly higher among GA-R compared to GA-HR/NR (P=0.0474).

Interpretation Lymphoproliferation to GA did not differentiate GA-R from GA-HR/NR. However, reduced IFN-γ expression and stable IL-4 expression in anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated PBMC, and an increased IL-4/IFN-γ ratio was associated with favorable clinical response. More data are needed to validate the prospective use of IL-4/IFN-γ expression in PBMC as a biomarker of clinical response to GA for individual patients. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 754-762. http://msj.sagepub.com

Glatiramer Acetate: Mechanisms of Action in Multiple Sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate (GA), formerly known as copolymer 1, is a mixture of synthetic polypeptides composed of four amino acids resembling the myelin basic protein (MSP). GA has been shown to be highly effective in preventing and suppressing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Therefore, it was tested in several clinical studies and so approved for the immunomodulatory treatment of relapsing-type MS. In contrast to other immunomodulatory MS therapies, GA has a distinct mechanism of action: GA demonstrates an initial strong promiscuous binding to major histocompatibility complex molecules and consequent competition with various (myelin) antigens for their presentation to T cells. In addition, antigen-based therapy generating a GA-specific immune response seems to be the prerequisite for GA therapy. GA treatment induces an in vivo change of the frequency, cytokine secretion pattern and the effector function of GA-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, probably by affecting the properties of antigen-presenting cells such as monocytes and dendritic cells. As demonstrated extensively in animal experiments, GA-specific, mostly, T helper 2 cells migrate to the brain and lead to in situ bystander suppression of the inflammatory process in the brain. Furthermore, GA-specific cells in the brain express neurotrophic factors like the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in addition to anti-inflammatory T helper 2-like cytokines. This might help tip the balance in favor of more beneficial influences because there is a complex interplay between detrimental and beneficial factors and mediators in the inflammatory milieu of MS lesions.

Glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: update on potential mechanisms of action

Glatiramer acetate is a synthetic random copolymer approved for the immunomodulatory therapy of relapsing-type multiple sclerosis (MS). Previous work has focused on the effects of this drug on T cells, especially the glatiramer-acetate-induced shift of the cytokine profile towards those characteristic of T-helper-2 (Th2) cells. Glatiramer acetate was thought to bring about this Th2 shift by acting like an altered peptide ligand but more recent work has shown that the drug notably affects the properties of antigen-presenting cells, such as monocytes and dendritic cells. These new observations might offer an explanation for the previously observed Th2 shift. In this review, we focus on these new findings. We address several controversial issues, including the possible neurotrophic effects of glatiramer acetate, the potential role of neutralising antibodies to the drug, and attempts to develop biomarkers of the treatment response. Finally, we will think about how a better understanding of glatiramer acetate might help the development of new immunomodulatory agents for MS.

What do we know about the mechanism of action of disease-modifying treatments in MS?

Multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), 2 results in damage to axons and their surrounding myelin sheath. The exact cause of inflammation remains unclear, but an autoimmune response directed against CNS antigens is suspected. MS can affect the brain, optic nerve and spinal cord, thus causing many neurological symptoms. These can include limb numbness or weakness, sensory or motor changes, ataxia, blurry vision, painful eye movements, bladder and bowel dysfunction, decreased memory, fatigue and effective disorders. This article will include a concise overview of the pathogenesis of MS in order to set the stage for subsequent discussion of the mechanisms of action of disease-modifying treatments, and whether these should influence our treatment choices. Although the exact pathogenesis of MS is not fully understood, current knowledge has already led to the development of effective treatments, namely interferon (IFN) 3 and glatiramer acetate, both of which have been shown to reduce relapse rates, while IFN 3- 1 a also reduces confirmed disability progression. Further increases in our understanding of the pathogenesis of MS are likely to assist in the identification of new targets for disease-modifying therapies and in the optimisation of current treatments..

Glatiramer acetate-reactive T cells produce brain-derived neurotrophic factor

Experimental and MRI evidence suggest that glatiramer acetate's (Copaxone) therapeutic effect in multiple sclerosis (MS) could be mediated by anti-inflammatory GA-reactive Th2 cells that enter the brain, cross-react with myelin antigens, and produce bystander suppression. Furthermore, a neuroprotective effect, possibly mediated by neurotrophic factors such as BDNF, has been suggested based on experimental evidence in animal models, and the observation that inflammatory cells can elaborate BDNF. Therefore, we examined BDNF production in 73 GA, 13 MBP, and 22 TT-reactive short-term T-cell lines from 12 MS patients treated with GA. Ten of 73 GA-TCL (14%), 1 of the MBP-TCL (3%), and 2 of the TT-TCL (9%) produced BDNF levels two standard deviations above the mean levels produced by resting TCL. RT-PCR analysis confirmed BDNF expression in some GA- and MBP-reactive TCL. The mean BDNF level produced by GA-TCL was significantly higher than that for MBP-TCL, or TT-TCL when lines originating from the same patients were compared (P=0.033). All 10 high BDNF-producing GA-reactive TCL were Th2-biased as determined by the IL-5/IFN-gamma levels ratio. A positive correlation was observed between BDNF and IL-5 (Th2 indicator) (P=0.006) but not with IFN-gamma Th1 indicator) levels in GA-TCL derived from MS patients during but not pre-treatment. We conclude that while BDNF production by T cells is not antigen-specific, GA-reactive TCL are more likely to produce BDNF, and to be Th2-biased.

Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) therapy for multiple sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate (GA) (Copaxone(R)) is a worldwide-approved drug for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), an autoimmune disease of the CNS. The drug is a synthetic copolymer with an amino acid composition based on the structure of myelin basic protein, one of the autoantigens implicated in the pathogenesis of MS and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Developed initially as a "tool" to study EAE, the drug unexpectedly inhibited disease and was subsequently developed for the treatment of MS. The drug has been shown in controlled clinical trials to significantly reduce relapse rate and progression of disability in MS with long-term efficacy, remarkable safety, and tolerability. Efficacy as measured by magnetic resonance imaging parallels its clinical benefits as manifested by a reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions and brain atrophy. The mechanism of action of the drug in humans is believed to involve the induction of glatiramer-reactive regulatory cells, including CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. Glatiramer-reactive Th2 cells are believed to enter the brain and, through cross-reactivity with myelin antigens, produce bystander suppression, antiinflammatory effects, and neuroprotection.

In vitro evidence that subcutaneous administration of glatiramer acetate induces hyporesponsive T cells in patients with multiple sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone) is a random sequence polypeptide used in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RR MS). We have recently demonstrated that prior to treatment, GA induces proliferation of resting T cells and is not cross-reactive with myelin antigens. Daily GA injections induce a significant loss of this GA responsiveness, which is associated with the induction of highly cross-reactive Th2-type T cells potentially capable of suppressing inflammatory responses. The mechanism of action by which GA induces T cell nonresponsiveness leading to T cell receptor degeneracy in patients with RR MS is unknown. Here, we examined the effects of daily GA administration on the induction of T cell hyporesponsiveness. The frequency of GA-reactive T cells in peripheral blood of seven patients with RR MS was measured by limiting dilution analysis prior to and during 6 months of treatment. In addition, a model in which GA-reactive T cells were stimulated in vitro was developed to better characterize the selection of T cell populations over time. In vivo treatment with GA induced a decrease in GA-reactive T cell frequencies and hyporesponsiveness of CD4(+) T cell reactivity to GA in vitro that was only partially reversed by the addition of IL-2. These data suggest that T cell peripheral tolerance to GA was achieved in vivo during treatment. Thus, our in vitro data suggest that the underlying changes in GA-reactive CD4(+) T cell reactivity could be explained by the induction of T cell anergy and clonal elimination.

A comparison of the mechanisms of action of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The development of immunomodulatory agents has represented a major advance in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, immunomodulatory agents approved for the treatment of relapsing MS in the United States include 3 forms of recombinant interferon (IFN) beta (2 formulations of IFN beta-1a and 1 of IFN beta-1b) and synthetic glatiramer acetate (GA). Recognition of how these agents work to regulate the immune system may lead to a better understanding of disease mechanisms, as well as to development of more effective therapies or combinations of therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the potential mechanisms of action of IFN beta products and GA in the context of their regulatory effects on autoimmune components that may be of importance in MS.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Current Contents/Clinical Medicine were searched for articles published in English from 1993 to the present using the search terms interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, and multiple sclerosis.

RESULTS

IFN beta products affect the disease process in MS through multiple potential mechanisms of action, including antiviral, antiproliferative, and anti-inflammatory effects. The mechanisms of action of GA are less clear, but may involve immune regulation induced by a gradual shift of T-cell phenotype from proinflammatory (type 1 T-helper cells) to anti-inflammatory (type 2 T-helper cells) and interference with antigen presentation.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the mechanisms of action of IFN beta products and GA provides important insights into the disease processes involved in MS.

Sustained immunological effects of Glatiramer acetate in patients with multiple sclerosis treated for over 6 years

The availability of a group of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients at the University of Maryland, who had participated in the pivotal Copaxone trial in the early 1990s, provided an opportunity to examine the long-term immunologic effects of Glatiramer acetate (GA) treatment in MS. Forty-eight GA-reactive T-cell lines (TCL) were generated from 10 MS patients who have been receiving GA treatment for 6-9 years. Proliferative responses, cytokine production, and cross-reactivity with myelin basic protein (MBP) and the MBP immunodominant peptide 83-99 were compared to responses obtained from 10 MS patients who were tested pretreatment and after a shorter period of treatment ranging from 1 to 10 months. The results indicate that while long-term treatment with GA results in a 2.9-fold decrease in the estimated precursor frequency of GA-reactive T-cells, the sustained response to GA remains Th2-biased and in part cross-reactive with MBP and MBP (83-99) as measured by proliferation and cytokine release assays. The results indicate that despite a drop in the precursor frequency of GA-reactive T-cells with long-term treatment, the sustained response remains predominantly Th2-biased and cross-reactive with MBP, which is consistent with the anti-inflammatory effects of the drug and bystander suppression.