Stem cell therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis

Animal models of multiple sclerosis--potentials and limitations

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is still the most widely accepted animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Different types of EAE have been developed in order to investigate pathogenetic, clinical and therapeutic aspects of the heterogenic human disease. Generally, investigations in EAE are more suitable for the analysis of immunogenetic elements (major histocompatibility complex restriction and candidate risk genes) and for the study of histopathological features (inflammation, demyelination and degeneration) of the disease than for screening of new treatments. Recent studies in new EAE models, especially in transgenic ones, have in connection with new analytical techniques such as microarray assays provided a deeper insight into the pathogenic cellular and molecular mechanisms of EAE and potentially of MS. For example, it was possible to better delineate the role of soluble pro-inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ and interleukins 1, 12 and 23), anti-inflammatory (transforming growth factor-β and interleukins 4, 10, 27 and 35) and neurotrophic factors (ciliary neurotrophic factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor). Also, the regulatory and effector functions of distinct immune cell subpopulations such as CD4+ Th1, Th2, Th3 and Th17 cells, CD4+FoxP3+ Treg cells, CD8+ Tc1 and Tc2, B cells and γδ+ T cells have been disclosed in more detail. The new insights may help to identify novel targets for the treatment of MS. However, translation of the experimental results into the clinical practice requires prudence and great caution.

Disruption of a Quorum Sensing mechanism triggers tumorigenesis: a simple discrete model corroborated by experiments in mammary cancer stem cells

Background

The balance between self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells is expected to be tightly controlled in order to maintain tissue homeostasis throughout life, also in the face of environmental hazards. Theory, predicting that homeostasis is maintained by a negative feedback on stem cell proliferation, implies a Quorum Sensing mechanism in higher vertebrates.

Results

Application of this theory to a cellular automata model of stem cell development in disrupted environments shows a sharply dichotomous growth dynamics: maturation within 50-400 cell cycles, or immortalization. This dichotomy is mainly driven by intercellular communication, low intensity of which causes perpetual proliferation. Another driving force is the cells' kinetic parameters. Reduced tissue life span of differentiated cells results in uncontrolled proliferation. Model's analysis, showing that under the Quorum Sensing control, stem cell fraction within a steady state population is fixed, is corroborated by experiments in breast carcinoma cells. Experimental results show that the plating densities of CD44+ cells and of CD44+/24lo/ESA+ cells do not affect stem cell fraction near confluence.

Conclusions

This study suggests that stem cell immortalization may be triggered by reduced intercellular communication, rather than exclusively result from somatic evolution, and implies that stem cell proliferation can be attenuated by signal manipulation, or enhanced by cytotoxics targeted to differentiated cells. In vivo verification and identification of the Quorum Sensing mediating molecules will pave the way to a higher level control of stem cell proliferation in cancer and in tissue engineering.

Reviewers

This article was reviewed by Glenn Webb and Marek Kimmel.

Animal models of multiple sclerosis for the development and validation of novel therapies - potential and limitations

Various types of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) reflect some of the pathogenetic, clinical, and therapeutic features of the different forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), thereby, providing some, albeit limited, insight into the molecular and cellular basis of the human disease. Specific questions of MS therapy including the search for new therapeutic targets and strategies and their validation require investigations in different available EAE models. A survey is given of experimental therapeutic approaches that are currently under study with the most promising examples of monoclonal antibodies, gene therapy, stem cell transplantation and orally applied small molecular weight disease-modifying drugs. Reasons for therapy failure and adverse side-effects of some experimental trials are discussed. Precaution is advised, if results of new experimental approaches are translated into clinical practice.

Glial precursor cell transplantation therapy for neurotrauma and multiple sclerosis

Traumatic injury to the brain or spinal cord and multiple sclerosis (MS) share a common pathophysiology with regard to axonal demyelination. Despite advances in central nervous system (CNS) repair in experimental animal models, adequate functional recovery has yet to be achieved in patients in response to any of the current strategies. Functional recovery is dependent, in large part, upon remyelination of spared or regenerating axons. The mammalian CNS maintains an endogenous reservoir of glial precursor cells (GPCs), capable of generating new oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. These GPCs are upregulated following traumatic or demyelinating lesions, followed by their differentiation into oligodendrocytes. However, this innate response does not adequately promote remyelination. As a result, researchers have been focusing their efforts on harvesting, culturing, characterizing, and transplanting GPCs into injured regions of the adult mammalian CNS in a variety of animal models of CNS trauma or demyelinating disease. The technical and logistic considerations for transplanting GPCs are extensive and crucial for optimizing and maintaining cell survival before and after transplantation, promoting myelination, and tracking the fate of transplanted cells. This is especially true in trials of GPC transplantation in combination with other strategies such as neutralization of inhibitors to axonal regeneration or remyelination. Overall, such studies improve our understanding and approach to developing clinically relevant therapies for axonal remyelination following traumatic brain injury (TBI) or spinal cord injury (SCI) and demyelinating diseases such as MS.

[Immunoablation and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in multiple sclerosis]

Numerous pathophysiological arguments supporting immunosuppression for multiple sclerosis have been collected during recent years. The relevance of intense immunosuppression, in terms of clinical benefit and early or late risk, remains a matter of discussion. Immunoablation followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in multiple sclerosis uses intense immunosuppression, followed by reinjection of AHSC, a rescue procedure for the induced aplasia. This method targets disappearance of the immune disorder, and thus, in theory, the interruption of the disease course. Use of AHSCT to treat several types of autoimmune diseases has been performed with contrasted results. In multiple sclerosis, the experience has been gained over the past 10 years through short series of patients treated at a late stage of their disease. This article highlights the recent data of this particular treatment option in multiple sclerosis as well as the therapeutic aims that should be investigated in further trials.

Autologous mesenchymal bone marrow stem cells: practical considerations

A number of practical problems need to be addressed before any form of cell therapy can be widely applied in patients with multiple sclerosis. The choice of cell type is one considered elsewhere in this issue; others include the question of axon loss, that of continuing inflammatory disease activity, the mode of delivery of cells (bearing in mind the presence of innumerable lesions scattered throughout the CNS), the problem of measuring directly or indirectly the impact (if any) of an intervention, the timing of any treatment and perhaps above all the safety of the patient. All converge on the one increasingly relevant underlying question: when should stem cell treatments begin to be tested in patients? Here we review the progress in various of these practical problems in order to explain how we have arrived at the conclusion that the clinical science has progressed to a stage where the 'translation threshold' can be safely and appropriately crossed, and therefore why we have already commenced in Bristol a small pilot/feasibility study of autologous bone marrow cell treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis.