Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: 2019 revisions to the MENACTRIMS guidelines

With evolving diagnostic criteria and the advent of new oral and parenteral therapies for MS, most current diagnostic and treatment algorithms need revision and updating. The diagnosis of MS relies on incorporating clinical and paraclinical findings to prove dissemination in space and in time, and exclude alternative diseases that can explain the findings at hand. The differential diagnostic workup should be guided by clinical and laboratory red flags to avoid unnecessary tests. Appropriate selection of multiple sclerosis (MS) therapies is critical to maximize patient benefit. The current guidelines review the scientific evidence supporting treatment of acute relapses, radiologically isolated syndrome, clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing remitting MS, and progressive MS. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide practical recommendations and algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of MS based on current scientific evidence and clinical experience.

Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis: A clinical and MRI challenge

Over the last few decades, the improved diagnostic criteria, the wide use of MRI, and the growing availability of effective pharmacologic treatments have led to substantial advances in the management of multiple sclerosis (MS). The importance of early diagnosis and treatment is now well-established, but there is still no consensus on how to define and monitor response to MS treatments. In particular, the clinical relevance of the detection of minimal MRI activity is controversial and recommendations on how to define and monitor treatment response are warranted. An expert panel of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS Study Group analyzed and discussed published studies on treatment response in MS. The evolving concept of no evidence of disease activity and its effect on predicting long-term prognosis was examined, including the option of defining a more realistic target for daily clinical practice: minimal evidence of disease activity. Advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of MRI activity alone and quantitative scoring systems combining on-treatment clinical relapses and MRI active lesions to detect treatment response in the real-world setting were also discussed. While most published studies on this topic involved patients treated with interferon-β, special attention was given to more recent studies providing evidence based on treatment with other and more efficacious oral and injectable drugs. Finally, the panel identified future directions to pursue in this research field.

The Use of Natalizumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) has been increasingly recognized. In the absence of approved disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for pediatric patients, clinicians resort to data extrapolated from clinical trials conducted in adults with MS. The objective of this article was to study the effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in with pediatric MS.

METHODS

Patients with pediatric MS (aged less than 18 years) who had been treated with natalizumab were followed up prospectively as part of the national MS registry. Data of relapsing patients who had at least a one-year follow-up were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the annual relapse rate after natalizumab treatment. Secondary outcomes measures included the mean change in disease progression measured by the expanded disability status scale and the proportion of patients with radiologic activity (gadolinium-enhancing or new T2 lesions) at the last follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with pediatric MS had been treated with natalizumab for at least 12 months, of whom 72% were females. The mean age at onset and disease duration were 14.9 ± 2.6 and 5.1 ± 3.1 years, respectively. Most patients (n = 21, 66%) had breakthrough disease on first-line disease-modifying therapies. The mean number of natalizumab infusions was 34.5 ± 18. The annual relapse rate was significantly reduced (1.66 ± 0.5 vs 0.06 ± 0.25; P < 0.001), whereas the mean expanded disability status score improved (3.3 ± 1.3 vs 2.2 ± 1.0; P < 0.001) at the last follow-up visits. The proportion of patients with magnetic resonance imaging activity was significantly reduced (93.8% versus 12.5%; P < 0.001). No major adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

In our pediatric MS cohort with aggressive or breakthrough disease, treatment with natalizumab was effective in reducing clinical and radiologic disease activity. Natalizumab has a similar clinical efficacy and safety profile as in adult MS.

Optimization and stratification of multiple sclerosis treatment in fast developing economic countries: a perspective from Qatar

OBJECTIVE

The introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) - with varying degrees of efficacy for reducing annual relapse rate and disability progression - has considerably transformed the therapeutic landscape of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). We aim to develop rational evidence-based treatment recommendations and algorithms for the management of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and RRMS that conform to the healthcare system in a fast-developing economic country such as Qatar.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review using a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1 January 1990 through 30 September 2016). Additional searches of the American Academy of Neurology and European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis abstracts from 2012 through 2016 were performed, in addition to searches of the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency websites to obtain relevant safety information on these DMTs.

RESULTS

For each of the DMTs, the mode of action, efficacy, safety and tolerability are briefly discussed. To facilitate the interpretation, the efficacy data of the pivotal phase III trials are expressed by their most clinically useful measure of therapeutic efficacy, the number needed to treat (NNT). In addition, an overview of head-to-head trials in RRMS is provided as well as a summary of the several different RRMS management strategies (lateral switching, escalation, induction, maintenance and combination therapy) and the potential role of each DMT. Finally, algorithms were developed for CIS, active and highly active or rapidly evolving RRMS and subsequent breakthrough disease or suboptimal treatment response while on DMTs. The benefit-to-risk profiles of the DMTs, taking into account patient preference, allowed the provision of rational and safe patient-tailored treatment algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations and algorithms for the management of CIS and RRMS have been developed relevant to the healthcare system of this fast-developing economic country.

Study design of PANGAEA 2.0, a non-interventional study on RRMS patients to be switched to fingolimod

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic options for patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) have steadily increased due to the approval of new substances that now supplement traditional first-line agents, demanding a paradigm shift in the assessment of disease activity and treatment response in clinical routine. Here, we report the study design of PANGAEA 2.0 (Post-Authorization Non-interventional GermAn treatment benefit study of GilEnyA in MS patients), a non-interventional study in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) identify patients with disease activity and monitor their disease course after treatment switch to fingolimod (Gilenya®), an oral medication approved for patients with highly active RRMS.

METHOD/DESIGN

In the first phase of the PANGAEA 2.0 study the disease activity status of patients receiving a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) is evaluated in order to identify patients at risk of disease progression. This evaluation is based on outcome parameters for both clinical disease activity and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and subclinical measures, describing disease activity from the physician's and the patient's perspective. In the second phase of the study, 1500 RRMS patients identified as being non-responders and switched to fingolimod (oral, 0.5 mg/daily) are followed-up for 3 years. Data on relapse activity, disability progression, MRI lesions, and brain volume loss will be assessed in accordance to 'no evidence of disease activity-4' (NEDA-4). The modified Rio score, currently validated for the evaluation of treatment response to interferons, will be used to evaluate the treatment response to fingolimod. The MS management software MSDS3D will guide physicians through the complex processes of diagnosis and treatment. A sub-study further analyzes the benefits of a standardized quantitative evaluation of routine MRI scans by a central reading facility. PANGAEA 2.0 is being conducted between June 2015 and December 2019 in 350 neurological practices and centers in Germany, including 100 centers participating in the sub-study.

DISCUSSION

PANGAEA 2.0 will not only evaluate the long-term benefit of a treatment change to fingolimod but also the applicability of new concepts of data acquisition, assessment of MS disease activity and evaluation of treatment response for the in clinical routine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

BfArM6532; Trial Registration Date: 20/05/2015.

Decision making under uncertainty, therapeutic inertia, and physicians' risk preferences in the management of multiple sclerosis (DIScUTIR MS)

BACKGROUND

The management of multiple sclerosis (MS) is rapidly changing by the introduction of new and more effective disease-modifying agents. The importance of risk stratification was confirmed by results on disease progression predicted by different risk score systems. Despite these advances, we know very little about medical decisions under uncertainty in the management of MS. The goal of this study is to i) identify whether overconfidence, tolerance to risk/uncertainty, herding influence medical decisions, and ii) to evaluate the frequency of therapeutic inertia (defined as lack of treatment initiation or intensification in patients not at goals of care) and its predisposing factors in the management of MS.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a prospective study comprising a combination of case-vignettes and surveys and experiments from Neuroeconomics/behavioral economics to identify cognitive distortions associated with medical decisions and therapeutic inertia. Participants include MS fellows and MS experts from across Spain. Each participant will receive an individual link using Qualtrics platform(©) that includes 20 case-vignettes, 3 surveys, and 4 behavioral experiments. The total time for completing the study is approximately 30-35 min. Case vignettes were selected to be representative of common clinical encounters in MS practice. Surveys and experiments include standardized test to measure overconfidence, aversion to risk and ambiguity, herding (following colleague's suggestions even when not supported by the evidence), physicians' reactions to uncertainty, and questions from the Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) related to risk preferences in different domains. By applying three different MS score criteria (modified Rio, EMA, Prosperini's scheme) we take into account physicians' differences in escalating therapy when evaluating medical decisions across case-vignettes.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study applies an innovative approach by combining tools to assess medical decisions with experiments from Neuroeconomics that applies to common scenarios in MS care. Our results will help advance the field by providing a better understanding on the influence of cognitive factors (e.g., overconfidence, aversion to risk and uncertainty, herding) on medical decisions and therapeutic inertia in the management of MS which could lead to better outcomes.

Short-term suboptimal response criteria for predicting long-term non-response to first-line disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus about short-term suboptimal response to first-line treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

We searched studies with interferon beta or glatiramer acetate in which a long-term (≥ 2 years (y)) outcome could be predicted using short-term (≤ 1 y) suboptimal response criteria (EDSS-, imaging- and/or relapse-based). We obtained pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters for the 1-y criteria used to predict disability progression between 2-5 y.

RESULTS

We selected 45 articles. Eight studies allowed calculating pooled estimates of 16 criteria. The three criteria with best accuracy were: new or enlarging T2-weighted lesions (newT2) ≥ 1 (pooled sensitivity: 85.5%; specificity:70.2%; positive predictive value:48.0%; negative predictive value:93.8%), newT2 ≥ 2 (62.4%, 83.6%, 55.0% and 87.3%, respectively) and RIO score ≥ 2 (55.8%, 84.4%, 47.8% and 88.2%). Pooled percentages of suboptimal responders were 43.3%, 27.6% and 23.7%, respectively. Pooled diagnostic odds ratios were 14.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.4-155), 9.2 (1.4-59.0) and 8.2 (3.5-19.2).

CONCLUSIONS

All criteria had a limited predictive value. RIO score ≥ 2 at 1-y combined fair accuracy and consistency, limiting the probability of disability progression in the next years to 1 in 8 optimal responders. NewT2 ≥ 1 at 1-y had similar positive predictive value, but diminished the false negatives to 1 in 16 patients. More sensitive measures of treatment failure at short term are needed.

Alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis: an update

Since the introduction of IFN-β, disease-modifying treatments, acting through various immune mechanisms, have been shown to reduce disease activity and severity in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Nevertheless, there remain patients for whom these treatments are incompletely effective, poorly tolerated or contraindicated. Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that works by selectively depleting circulating lymphocytes. It is given as an intravenous infusion of 12 mg daily for 5 days, then a year later for 3 days. Effectiveness in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis has been demonstrated in two Phase III clinical trials, where it outperformed IFN-β-1a 44 mcg on clinical and radiographic efficacy measures. Its side effect profile, including infusion-associated reactions, infections and secondary autoimmunity, coupled with its long-lasting biological effect, requires patients to commit to close monitoring while on the drug and for 4 years after the final infusion. For select patients with active disease, alemtuzumab offers a powerful therapeutic option.

Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: the Middle East North Africa Committee for Treatment and Research In Multiple Sclerosis (MENACTRIMS)

With evolving diagnostic criteria and the advent of new oral and parenteral therapies for MS, most current diagnostic and treatment algorithms need re-evaluation and updating. The diagnosis of MS relies on incorporating clinical and paraclinical findings to prove dissemination in space and in time, and exclude alternative diseases that can explain the findings at hand. The differential diagnostic workup should be guided by clinical and laboratory red flags to avoid unnecessary tests. Appropriate multiple sclerosis (MS) therapy selection is critical to maximize patient benefit. The current guidelines review the scientific evidence supporting treatment of acute relapses, radiologically isolated syndrome, clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing remitting MS, secondary progressive MS, and primary progressive MS. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide practical recommendations and algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of MS based on current scientific evidence and clinical experience.

Utility of the Canadian Treatment Optimization Recommendations (TOR) in MS Care

Objectives:

Criteria for Treatment Optimization Recommendations (TOR) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) identify suboptimal response to disease-modifying treatment (DMT). The Canadian TOR (CanTOR) were used to indicate recommendations for treatment switches or treatment maintenance based on relapse, disease progression and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria in patients. We assessed concordance between the TOR and clinicians' decisions regarding treatment response and identified prevalence of patients with MS receiving DMT meeting medium/high levels of concern according to TOR.

Methods:

Prospective baseline and end-of-study assessments of patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or clinically isolated syndrome were conducted in this open-label, 12-month, Phase IV, observational Canadian study.

Results:

Data were reported for 184 patients (female 72%, mean age 39 years) of which 96% had RRMS. The TOR criteria identified 19 (10.3%) patients with suboptimal response to treatment. Twelve patients had ≥1 high level of concern. Two patients had ≥2 medium levels of concern. Concordance between TOR and clinician decision in maintaining treatment was 95.3%. Where treatment change was recommended by the TOR, concordance was 29.4%. Clinicians identified the TOR as the principal reason for changing treatment in 50.0% of cases where the TOR identified suboptimal response. The TOR were considered useful by 70.6% of clinicians when treatment optimization was recommended and by 55.3% when maintaining treatment was recommended.

Conclusions:

The TOR criteria can identify suboptimal response in this patient cohort. Concordance between TOR and clinician decision was high when maintaining treatment was recommended. Usefulness of the TOR was most apparent when treatment optimization was recommended.

Evaluating the response to glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients

BACKGROUND

In patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), a scoring system based on new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) active lesions, relapses and sustained disability progression after a 1-year treatment with IFNβ predicted patient disability progression over time; however, this score had not been tested in patients receiving glatiramer acetate (GA).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether this previous scoring system can also be applied to patients treated with GA.

METHODS

This was a prospective, longitudinal study of 151 RRMS patients treated with GA. Their scores were constructed, based on the clinical and MRI activity after 1 year of therapy. Regression analysis was performed, in order to identify the response variables.

RESULTS

The total possible score range was 0-3. Patients with a score of ≥ 2 and those with clinical activity (with or without MRI activity) during their first year of treatment were at increased risk of continuing with relapses and/or sustained disability in the next 2 years (odds ratio (OR): 38.8; p < 0.0001 and OR: 7.8; p < 0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In RRMS patients treated with GA, a combination of clinical activity measures may have prognostic value for identifying patients with disease activity in the next 2 years of therapy.

Treatment options for patients with multiple sclerosis who have a suboptimal response to interferon-β therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although the first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) interferon beta and glatiramer acetate have a favourable benefit-to-risk profile, they are only partially effective for treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The optimization of treatment in patients who do not show a maximum response to first-line therapy is critical for achieving the best long-term outcomes. Treatment strategies for patients with a suboptimal response include switching to another first-line DMT or a second-line DMT. Natalizumab and fingolimod are approved for RRMS with high disease activity in the European Union and Canada.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for articles published between 1990 and April 2012 was undertaken.

RESULTS

This review discusses key clinical and safety data for fingolimod and natalizumab, particularly in the patient subgroups for whom these treatments are approved. Benefit-to-risk profiles, including first-dose cardiovascular effects associated with fingolimod and the risk of progressive multifocal encephalopathy with natalizumab, are discussed.

CONCLUSION

A descriptive comparison of fingolimod and natalizumab is provided in the context of the decision-making process of how and when to switch patients who have a suboptimal response to first-line therapy.

Defining and scoring response to IFN-β in multiple sclerosis

The advent of a large number of new therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) warrants the development of tools that enable selection of the best treatment option for each new patient with MS. Evidence from clinical trials clearly supports the efficacy of IFN-β for the treatment of MS, but few factors that predict a response to this drug in individual patients have emerged. This deficit might be due, at least in part, to the lack of a standardized definition of the clinical outcomes that signify improvement or worsening of the disease. MRI markers and clinical relapses have been the most widely studied short-term factors to predict long-term response to IFN-β, although the results are conflicting. Recently, integrated strategies combining MRI and clinical markers in scoring systems have provided a potentially useful approach for the management of patients with MS. In this Review, we focus on the many definitions of clinical response to IFN-β and explore the markers that can be used to predict this response. We also highlight advantages and limitations of the existing scoring systems in light of future expansion of these models to biological markers and to other classes of emerging therapies for MS.

Risk-benefit considerations in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and mainly affects young adults. Its natural history has changed in recent years with the advent of disease-modifying drugs, which have been available since the early 1990s. The increasing number of first-line and second-line treatment options, together with the variable course of the disease and patient lifestyles and expectations, makes the therapeutic decision a real challenge. The aim of this review is to give a comprehensive overview of the main present and some future drugs for relapsing-remitting MS, including risk-benefit considerations, to enable readers to draw their own conclusions regarding the risk-benefit assessment of personalized treatment strategies, taking into account not only treatment-related but also disease-related risks. We performed a Medline literature search to identify studies on the treatment of MS with risk stratification and risk-benefit considerations. We focused our attention on studies of disease-modifying, immunomodulating, and immunosuppressive drugs, including monoclonal antibodies. Here we offer personal considerations, stemming from long-term experience in the treatment of MS and thorough discussions with other neurologists closely involved in the care of patients with the disease. MS specialists need to know not only the specific risks and benefits of single drugs, but also about drug interactions, either in simultaneous or serial combination therapy, and patient comorbidities, preferences, and fears. This has to be put into perspective, considering also the risks of untreated disease in patients with different clinical and radiological characteristics. There is no single best treatment strategy, but therapy has to be tailored to the patient. This is a time-consuming task, rich in complexity, and influenced by the attitude towards risk on the parts of both the patient and the clinical team. The broader the MS drug market becomes, the harder it will be for the clinician to help the patient decide which therapeutic strategy to opt for.

Efficacy and safety of beta-interferon in Thai patients with demyelinating diseases

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of beta-interferon (IFN-β) treatment in Thai patients with demyelinating diseases has not been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and any adverse drug reactions of IFN-β therapy in Thai patients, for each group of demyelinating diseases.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of Thai patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) who attended the MS Clinic at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand from March 2000 to October 2011. We reviewed those 73 patients who received IFN-β. We evaluated the drug's efficacy over 2 years and any adverse drug reactions among these patients.

RESULTS

Of the 40 MS patients who received IFN-β, 26 adhered to the medication for at least 2 years. In addition, 27 NMO/NMOSDs patients who had been diagnosed with MS were treated as such with IFN-β. In the true MS group, the pre- and post-treatment annualized relapse rates (ARR) were 1.25 and 0.59, respectively, so there was a reduction of 52.8% (p = 0.004). In addition, in 69.2% of the patients, IFN-β also showed beneficial effects by prolonging the time to first relapse to 15.9 months and stabilizing or decreasing progression of the disease. In contrast, no significant benefit was seen in the NMO/NMOSDs group. On the contrary, an increase in EDSS was seen in 53.3 % of them. The most common side effects seen were local skin reactions and flu-like symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with IFN-β was effective in reducing both ARR and disability progression in Thai patients with MS. In contrast, we observed that giving IFN-β treatment to NMO/NMOSDs patients may lead to a worsening of symptoms.

Managing relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis following first drug failure

SUMMARY IFN-β and glatiramer acetate are the usual first-line treatments for cases of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. As both of these agents are only partially effective in controlling disease activity, ‘breakthrough’ disease is common. Deciding how much breakthrough constitutes a treatment failure necessitating a switch in therapy is now a common problem that most clinicians will encounter in practice. In this article we will discuss the approach to deciding when treatment failure occurs and the strategies that can be used to tackle this problem.

Definitions of breakthrough disease and second-line agents

Conventional disease-modifying agents are only moderately effective, so breakthrough disease activity is commonly seen. The evidence from randomized clinical trials and real-world observational data supporting the use of the second-line agents natalizumab, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide are reviewed. Potential future treatment options are also discussed. Management algorithms for breakthrough disease are outlined.

Predicting the severity of relapsing-remitting MS: The contribution of cross-sectional and short-term follow-up MRI data

Background and objective: Predicting the long-term clinical course of multiple sclerosis (MS) is difficult on clinical grounds. Recent studies have suggested magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics to be helpful. We wanted to confirm this.

Methods: Contactable individuals ( N = 84) from an initial 99 patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) who had undergone careful baseline and 2-year follow-up examinations including MRI were reassessed after a mean of 10.8 ± 2.7 years. We investigated using multivariate linear regression analyses if clinical and MRI data obtained at the prior time-points and the rates of change in morphologic variables over a mean observational period of 2.5 years could have served to predict a patient’s MS severity score (MSSS) 11 years later. Conversion to secondary progressive MS (SPMS) was a further outcome variable.

Results: In univariate analyses, the ‘black hole ratio’ (BHR) at baseline ( p = 0.017, beta = 0.148) and at first follow-up ( p = 0.007, beta = −0.154) was the only MRI parameter showing a significant correlation with the MSSS. In a multiple regression model, the independent predictive value of imaging variables became statistically non-significant and the latest MSSS was predicted primarily by the baseline EDSS ( r2 = 0.28; p < 0.001). The BHR at baseline explained 9.4% of variance of conversion to SPMS ( p = 0.033). Over the observational period the MSSS remained stable in patients remaining RRMS, but increased in converters to SPMS from 4.0 to 6.4.

Conclusions: We failed to confirm a clear independent contribution of cross-sectional and short-term follow-up MRI data for the prediction of the long-term clinical course of MS. The MSSS is not a stable indicator of disease severity but may increase in converters to SPMS.

Neuroimaging in multiple sclerosis: neurotherapeutic implications

Imaging techniques, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), play an important role in the diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis (MS) and related demyelinating diseases. Findings on MRI studies of the brain and spinal cord are critical for MS diagnosis, are used to monitor treatment response and may aid in predicting disease progression in individual patients. In addition, results of imaging studies serve as essential biomarkers in clinical trials of putative MS therapies and have led to important insights into disease pathophysiology. Although they are useful tools and provide in vivo measures of disease-related activity, there are some important limitations of MRI findings in MS, including the non-specific nature of detectable white matter changes, the poor correlation with clinical disability, the limited sensitivity and ability of standard measures of gadolinium enhancing lesions and T2 lesions to predict future clinical course, and the lack of validated biomarkers of long term outcomes. Advancements that hold promise for the future include new techniques that are sensitive to diffuse changes, the increased use of higher field scanners, measures that capture disease related changes in gray matter, and the use of combined structural and functional imaging approaches to assess the complex and evolving disease process that occurs during the course of MS.

Relevance of cognitive deterioration in early relapsing-remitting MS: a 3-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

To assess longitudinally cognitive functioning in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients and its relationship with clinical and MRI variables.

METHODS

Early RRMS patients and matched healthy controls were assessed in parallel in three testing sessions over 3 years, using the Rao's Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests. Patients also underwent an MRI analysis of T2-weighted lesion volume (T2LV), number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions and whole brain atrophy. Forty-nine RRMS patients (mean age 36.9 ± 8.9 years; mean disease duration 2.9 ± 1.7 years, mean Expanded Disability Status Scale, 1.7 ± 0.7) and 56 healthy controls were recruited.

RESULTS

At baseline, cognitive impairment was detected in 15 patients (30.6%). After 3 years, cognitive functioning worsened in the 29.3% of patients, whereas Expanded Disability Status Scale progression was observed in only three patients. The most sensitive test to detect cognitive deterioration over time was the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Only the presence of moderate cognitive impairment at baseline predicted further cognitive deterioration (p = 0.03). Among MRI variables, T2LV showed a weak to moderate relationship with some cognitive tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a 3-year period cognitive deterioration can be expected in approximately one-third of MS patients with relatively short disease duration. The SDMT is particularly suitable for longitudinal assessment of MS-related cognitive changes.

Recognizing and treating suboptimally controlled multiple sclerosis: steps toward regaining command

OBJECTIVE

The therapies available today for multiple sclerosis (MS) reduce but do not fully control disease activity. The objective of this article is to review the definitions of and treatments for suboptimally controlled MS and highlight the challenges faced by clinicians to increase awareness of recognizing and managing patients with suboptimally controlled MS.

METHODS

Published literature describing treatment failure, treatment optimization paradigms or algorithms, clinical studies of therapies in patients with suboptimally controlled MS, or case reports of management of patients with suboptimally controlled MS were identified from searches of EMBASE and MEDLINE. This was supplemented with case reports and discussions from an expert panel meeting of MS specialists focused on the diagnosis and treatment of suboptimally controlled MS.

RESULTS

Several groups have created recommendations for evaluating suboptimal response to disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in MS. Currently no robust evidence-based data exist to guide treatment decisions in patients who have suboptimal response to a particular therapy. In the absence of data, several treatment paradigms for suboptimally controlled MS have been proposed using a step therapy or platform therapy approach. Therapy modifications require consideration of disease- and patient-specific factors while accounting for the risk-benefit profile of the agent(s). Unapproved drugs and combination therapies should be reserved as agents of last resort because of the experimental nature of these treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of evidence-based data, identifying and treating MS patients with suboptimal response to the available platform therapies remains challenging. Developing algorithms able to quantify breakthrough disease activity and suboptimal response to DMDs in individual MS patients remains an important target for the MS community. Consideration should be given for all reasons why a particular DMD may not be working for a given patient and for the use of an individualized step therapy.

Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon beta in MS

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Several criteria for treatment response to interferon beta (IFNbeta) have been proposed, although there is no consensus among different investigators. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical predictors of response during the first 12 months of therapy.

METHODS

This is a prospective and longitudinal study of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with IFNbeta. Patients were classified based on the presence of new lesions on MRI, relapses, confirmed disability increase, or combinations of all these variables after 1 year of therapy. Regression analysis was performed in order to identify variables of response after a follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

We included 222 RRMS patients. The logistic model demonstrated that only the combination of new active lesions on MRI with the presence of relapses (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.6-12.5) or disability progression (Odds Ratio (OR) 7.1; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.6-33.9), or both (OR 6.5; 95% CI 1.9-23.4) achieved significant values to identify those patients with a poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In RRMS patients treated with IFNbeta, the combination of measures of disease activity and the presence of new active lesions on MRI may have a prognostic value for identifying patients with disease activity in the second and third year of therapy.

Review: Treatment of early multiple sclerosis: the value of treatment initiation after a first clinical episode

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system. It is characterised by progressive neurological disability, which is likely to occur as a result of permanent axonal damage. Such damage may be reflected by brain atrophy, which can be identified early in the course of the disease. Patients who present with an initial episode of inflammatory demyelination, commonly referred to as a clinically isolated syndrome, are at high risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis, especially if their magnetic resonance imaging studies suggest the presence of multi-focal disease. Treatment with disease-modifying therapies at the initial episode of demyelination may postpone this development. In this review we present an overview of evidence supporting early treatment initiation. We focus on three large placebo-controlled trials of interferon beta therapy: Controlled High-Risk Avonex® Multiple Sclerosis Prevention Study, Early Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis and Betaferon ® in Newly Emerging Multiple Sclerosis for Initial Treatment. Results from these early treatment studies are presented, and the impact of using interferon beta treatment in the early stages of disease is discussed with the aim of considering optimal therapeutic strategies to improve long-term patient outcome.

Current approaches to the identification and management of breakthrough disease in patients with multiple sclerosis

Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are only partly effective -- breakthrough disease commonly occurs despite treatment. Breakthrough disease is predictive of continued disease activity and a poor prognosis. Availability of several DMDs offers the possibility of tailoring treatment to individual patients with RRMS and altering treatment in patients with breakthrough disease. However, no biological or imaging markers have been validated to guide initial treatment, markers of individual responsiveness to DMDs are scarce, and there is no class 1 evidence to guide alternative therapy in patients with breakthrough disease. In this Review, we discuss proposed strategies to monitor patients with RRMS being treated with DMDs, outline approaches to identifying therapeutic response in individual patients, review MRI and biological markers of treatment response, and summarise the role of antibodies in biological therapies. We also outline possible strategies for the management of patients with breakthrough disease and highlight areas in which research is needed.

Clinical trials of multiple sclerosis therapies: improvements to demonstrate long-term patient benefit

Background

The therapeutic goal for multiple sclerosis (MS) is to achieve a better long-term outcome. However, since available data come from short-term studies, it is important to review the evidence that current therapies provide long-term benefit.

Method and results

Long-term data from both registry studies and long-term follow-up studies, and efficacy treatment data were reviewed. Registry data show that the course of MS is predictable after a certain level of disability is reached, indicating that short-term efficacy data from randomized, controlled trials provide evidence of long-term benefit. Long-term studies of patients originally enrolled in pivotal randomized, controlled trials consistently show that delayed or discontinued treatment provides less benefit than continuous therapy. The 16-Year Long-Term Follow-Up Study of interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b; Betaferon®/Betaseron®) therapy had the highest ascertainment of long-term follow-up efforts of the pivotal trials, which led to the currently approved therapies. Disability scores at the start of treatment were predictive of their current disability scores. In addition, this 16-year study showed an excellent safety profile with no unexpected side effects to IFNβ-1b and a lower mortality rate after 16 years compared with those receiving placebo treatment during the pivotal study (6 deaths vs 20 deaths).

Conclusion

This article reviews the key data and provides recommendations for optimizing clinical studies in MS to demonstrate long-term patient benefit.