Factors affecting continuation of clean intermittent catheterisation in people with multiple sclerosis: Results of the COSMOS mixed-methods study

Etiology, presentation and management of urinary tract infections in multiple sclerosis patients: A review of the current literature

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) present a formidable challenge in the care of individuals affected by multiple sclerosis (MS). Lower urinary tract dysfunction is a prevalent issue among MS patients, predisposing them to an elevated risk of UTIs. When left untreated, UTIs can further exacerbate the already compromised quality of life in individuals with MS. The diagnosis and management of UTIs in MS patients necessitate a careful clinical evaluation. The objective of this review is to delineate preventive strategies and current and developing therapeutic approaches for preventing and treating UTIs associated with urinary dysfunction, catheterization, and upper urinary tract infections in patients with MS. Effectively addressing UTIs and urinary tract dysfunction in individuals with multiple sclerosis calls for a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach.

Improved emptying performance with a new micro-hole zone catheter in adult male intermittent catheter users: A comparative multi-center randomized controlled cross-over study

AIMS

To confirm the improved performance of the micro-hole zone catheter (MHZC) compared to a conventional eyelet catheter (CEC) in male users of clean intermittent catheterizations (CICs).

METHODS

Male self-catheterizing subjects, who used hydrophilic sleeved soft/flexible CIC as the only bladder emptying method, were enrolled into a multi-center, randomized, cross-over study performed across six European sites. Subjects tested the MHZC, featuring a drainage zone with 120 micro-holes and a CEC with two eyelets. The study consisted of four study visits (V0-V3), during which endpoints related to catheter performance (urinary flow-stops, bladder emptying, and intra-catheter pressure) were measured and two 4-week test periods at home (T1 and T2) where dipstick hematuria and user perception between catheters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-three male subjects with non-neurogenic and neurogenic bladder dysfunction (3:2) were enrolled. On average, catheterizations with the MHZC led to close to mean zero flow-stops compared to ≥1 flow-stops with the CEC, during both HCP- and self-led catheterizations (both p < 0.001). Residual urine at first flow-stop was significantly reduced for the MHZC compared to CEC (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, for HCP- and self-led catheterizations, respectively). This was substantiated by a significantly smaller pressure peak at first flow-stop, a proxy for minimized mucosal suction (both HCP- and self-led catheterizations, p < 0.001). After home-use catheterizations, dipstick hematuria was comparable between catheters, whereas catheterizations were associated with significantly improved perception in favor of MHZC regarding bladder emptying, less blocking sensation, and improved hygienic catheterization compared to the CEC.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the evidence of improved bladder emptying with the MHZC compared to a CEC without the need to reposition the catheter. The MHZC therefore offers an enhanced benefit for the dependent CIC user securing complete bladder emptying in an uninterrupted free flow and reducing the need to reposition the catheter during emptying.

In multiple sclerosis, a Functional Independence Measure ≥ 107 is the best predictor of outcome after clean intermittent catheterization training

BACKGROUND

Assessment of motor and cognitive functions is recommended before clean intermittent catheterization training. Two validated instruments, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Pencil and Paper Test (PP-Test), are associated with the ability to learn self-catheterization in people with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the performance of these tools in predicting the outcome of clean intermittent catheterization training in multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

All people with multiple sclerosis attending a tertiary neuro-urology department between 2011 and 2019 and eligible for clean intermittent catheterization were included in this retrospective study. The reference standard was the ability to perform at least 2 trials of self-catheterization at the end of the training session. The 2 index tests, the FIM and PP-Test, were administered before the teaching session. Their diagnostic performance was estimated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The AUC values were compared by a two-sided DeLong test.

RESULTS

We included 395 individuals (mean [SD] age 49.8 [12] years; 70% women). At the end of the session, 87% of the patients succeeded in learning self-catheterization. The optimal cut-offs for the FIM (107) and PP-Test (13) were estimated, resulting in sensitivity of 73% (95% confidence interval [68-77) and 73% (67-77) and specificity 73% (59-84) and 63% (49-76), respectively. The AUC values for the FIM and PP-Test were significantly different (0.79 vs 0.73, p = 0.049). The effect size was large for both the FIM (Cohen's d = 1.14) and PP-Test (Cohen's d = 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

An FIM value ≥107 has the best specificity to predict outcome after clean intermittent catheterization training for people with multiple sclerosis. The sensitivity of the FIM and PP-Test is similar, and both have a large effect size for the outcome of self-catheterization training in multiple sclerosis.

UTI assessment tool for intermittent catheter users: a way to include user perspectives and enhance quality of UTI management

BACKGROUND

Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) are among the most severe complications for users of intermittent catheterisation (IC), with numerous risk factors contributing to their occurrence. The aim of this study was to develop a tool to assess UTI risk factors among IC users in a systematic way that considers the perspective of the individual user.

METHODS

The Design Thinking Process was used to guide the development of the content and format of the tool. The UTI Risk Factors model by Kennelly et al. was used as a basis for developing the content. Insights on the appropriate content and format were collected via the Coloplast Nurse Advisory Boards and by conducting a qualitative evidence synthesis on user perspectives and practices in relation to UTIs.

RESULTS

The literature search identified a total of 3544 articles, out of which 22 met the inclusion criteria. Additionally, three rounds of meetings were conducted with approximately 90 nurses from the Nurse Advisory Boards across Europe. The qualitative evidence synthesis showed that users describe their UTI symptoms in different terms and that personal needs and priorities impact their adherence and catheter selection. Furthermore, some users lack relevant and updated knowledge about IC and UTIs. The nurses described that correct UTI diagnosis is essential. They pointed that they would assess the user's general condition, adherence, technique, and catheter type as potential areas of risk factors and emphasised the importance of adequate support for users. The study resulted in the development of the UTI assessment tool for intermittent catheter users, which comprises three elements: a guide for healthcare professionals, a dialogue board, and a notepad. The tool starts with a confirmation of the UTI incidence, and then assesses risk factors via questions on health, adherence, technique, and catheter, and concludes with a support section.

CONCLUSIONS

The UTI assessment tool for intermittent catheter users is designed to help healthcare professionals assess UTI risk factors in a systematic way, while engaging users and taking their perspective into account. By identifying the relevant risk factors, the use of this tool has the potential to reduce the occurrence of UTIs for the individual IC user.

A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention

BACKGROUND

For patients suffering from urinary retention due to neurogenic [e.g., spinal cord injury (SCI), spina bifida (SB), multiple sclerosis (MS)] or non-neurogenic [e.g., cancer, benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH)] causes, intermittent catheterization is the primary choice for bladder emptying. This scoping review compared hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters (HCICs) with non-hydrophilic (uncoated) catheters in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients with respect to satisfaction, preference, adverse events, urinary tract infection (UTI), quality of life (QoL), cost effectiveness, pain, and discomfort.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Embase, and available clinical practice guidelines and was limited to systematic reviews/meta-analysis and clinical studies (randomized trials, cohort and case-control studies) published in English between 2000 and 2020. A narrative synthesis was performed, comparing HCIC with non-hydrophilic catheters in each pathology. The articles where critically appraised and weighted according to their level of evidence based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence grading.

RESULTS

Thirty seven original articles and 40 reviews were included. The comparison of HCICs versus non-hydrophilic catheters was well-documented in patients with mixed pathology, SCI, and to some extent SB. The available evidence predominantly indicates better outcomes with HCICs as reported by study authors, particularly, greater UTI reduction and improved satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, and QoL. However, SB studies in children did not report reduction in UTIs. Children complained about slippery catheters, indicating possible touching of the surface during insertion, which may compromise cleanliness of the procedure and affect outcomes such as UTI. Limited studies were available exclusively on BPH and none on MS; however, most studies performed on mixed pathologies, including BPH and MS, indicated strong preference for HCICs compared to non-hydrophilic catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings generally support HCICs over non-hydrophilic catheters; however, most studies were fairly small, often used a mix of pathologies, and the conclusions were often based on studies with high drop-out rates that were therefore underpowered. Larger studies are needed to support the general finding that HCICs are the preferred choice in most populations. Additional training in children or redesigned catheters may be necessary for this age-group to fully benefit from the advantages of HCICs.

Functional independence measure predicts the outcome of clean intermittent catheterization training in patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is the reference treatment of urinary retention in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Predicting which patients could use this treatment, based on their motor and cognitive abilities, is crucial.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), used to assess degree of disability, can predict the outcome of CIC training in pwMS.

METHODS

All pwMS attending a tertiary neurourology department between 2011 and 2019 and eligible for CIC were included in this retrospective study. Level of disability was assessed with the FIM by an occupational therapist. Success for learning CIC, defined as the ability to perform at least 2 trials of the technique, was recorded at the end of the session by a continence nurse and a physiatrist. The association between the FIM and success for learning CIC was assessed by multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

We included 395 patients (mean [SD] age 49.8 [12.0] years; 70% women). More than half of patients had relapsing-remitting disease, and the Expanded Disability Status Scale score was ≥ 6. Mean FIM total, motor and cognitive scores were 108.0 (14.2), 75.9 (12.3) and 32.1 (3.7), respectively (maximal scores: 126, 91 and 35). At the end of the session, 87% of patients were successful in learning CIC. After adjustment of potential confounding variables including age, sex, obesity and EDSS score, FIM total, motor and cognitive subscores were significantly associated with success (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.06 [1.03-1.08], 1.05 [1.03-1.08], 1.21 [1.12-1.32], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

FIM was an independent predictor of successful CIC training in pwMS. A 1-point increase in FIM was associated with 6% increased odds of successfully mastering the CIC technique. A widespread use of the FIM could help determine the different cognitive and/or motor objectives that need to be improved before CIC teaching.

[Multiple sclerosis and intermittent self-catheterization]

INTRODUCTION

Lower urinary tract dysfunctions are frequent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). These disorders impair quality of life and can cause urological complications. In cases of urinary retention or incomplete bladder emptying, clean intermittent self-catheterization is the preferred option where possible.

OBJECTIVE

To identify data concerning the use of intermittent self-catheterization by patients with MS.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE

A review was done using Medline/Pubmed with selection of articles in either English or French. The key words were: « multiple sclerosis and intermittent catheterization, self-catheterization, neuro-urology/urinary guidelines, continent stoma, continent vesicostomy».

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected if they concerned either multiple sclerosis exclusively or with a majority of cases concerning MS.

RESULTS

Intermittent self-catheterization is recommended and commonly used in patients with MS. Studies are rare in this specific population. Questions still remain about indications and practicalities in this disease. Indications must be individually evaluated according to symptoms and complications. The use of self-catheterization can improve symptomatology or quality of life, however, global urinary management is necessary. Urinary infection is the most frequently reported side effect. The teaching of self-catheterization should take into account physical and cognitive impairment. Due to the developing nature of the pathology, indications and the patients' ability to carry out self-catheterization should be regularly assessed.

LIMITATIONS

The search was limited to a single bibliographic source and studies are rare.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are necessary to increase knowledge of self-catheterization specificities in MS patients compared to other neurogenic patients.

Adult Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction and Intermittent Catheterisation in a Community Setting: Risk Factors Model for Urinary Tract Infections

A risk factor model for urinary tract infections in patients with adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction performing clean intermittent catheterisation was developed; it consists of four domains, namely, (1) general (systemic) conditions in the patient, (2) individual urinary tract conditions in the patient, (3) routine aspects related to the patient, and (4) factors related to intermittent catheters per se. The conceptual model primarily concerns patients with spinal cord injury, spina bifida, multiple sclerosis, or cauda equina where intermittent catheterisation is a normal part of the bladder management. On basis of several literature searches and author consensus in case of lacking evidence, the model intends to provide an overview of the risk factors involved in urinary tract infections, with specific emphasis to describe those that in daily practice can be handled and modified by the clinician and so come to the benefit of the individual catheter user in terms of fewer urinary tract infections.