Primary optic neuropathy in Behçet’s syndrome

Clinical features and visual prognosis of very late-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis

BACKGROUND

Very late-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis is limited to a few case reports.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical features and visual prognosis of very late-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis.

METHODS

This study evaluated 22 patients with first-onset optic neuritis and fulfilled the 2015 diagnosis criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

RESULTS

The mean age at optic neuritis onset was 73.91 ± 4.71 (range: 70-82) years with a female predominance (81.8%; ratio: 4.5:1). Antinuclear antibody seropositivity and seronegativity were identified in 12 (55.5%) and 10 (45.5%) patients, respectively. Severe visual loss persisted in 19 (19/42, 45.3%) eyes at the last follow-up. Although patients with antinuclear antibody seropositivity had a significantly higher frequency of attacks (P = 0.015), but they had a longer median time to reach severe visual loss (37 vs. 26 months; log-rank test, P = 0.023). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed antinuclear antibody seropositivity (hazard ratio = 4.849, 95% confidence interval: 1.309-17.965, P = 0.018) as a good predictor of visual acuity improvement.

CONCLUSION

Patients with very late-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis may develop severe optic neuritis, and those with antinuclear antibody seronegativity have a similar clinical presentation but worse outcome than those with seropositivity.

Investigation of optic nerve function in Behçet's patients with optic disc hyperfluorescence in fundus fluorescein angiography

PURPOSE

The aim was to investigate the changes in optic nerve function that may help in the diagnosis of subclinical optic nerve involvement in patients with Behçet's disease (BD) and isolated optic disc (OD) hyperfluorescence in fluorescein angiography (FA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three groups were formed; BD patients with isolated OD hyperfluorescence in FA, BD patients without ocular involvement (normal FA) and control group. A total of 88 eyes of 45 patients were included. The groups were compared in terms of OCT-RNFL, contrast sensitivity and VEP latency.

RESULTS

When the OCT-RNFL values were compared, there was a significant difference between the control group and Behçet's patients with normal FA. Contrast sensitivity values differed significantly among the groups, and the lowest mean contrast sensitivity was observed in the group with OD hyperfluorescence (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

As far as we know, this is the first publication that investigates optic nerve function in BD patients with isolated OD hyperfluorescence in FA. Assessment with FA of asymptomatic BD patients with visual complaints and low contrast sensitivity may be helpful at early detection of inflammatory optic neuropathy by close follow-up in patients with OD hyperfluorescence.

Utility of the 2023 international MOGAD panel proposed criteria in clinical practice: An institutional cohort

BACKGROUND

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is a recently defined demyelinating disorder with a rapidly evolving clinical spectrum. Recently, consensus criteria have been proposed (Banwell et al., 2023) to help with disease diagnosis. However, validation of the proposed criteria in real-life MOGAD patients is lacking. In this study, we applied the proposed criteria to an institutional cohort of MOG antibody-positive patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary neuroimmunology clinic from 2018 to 2023. Patients who had at least one core clinical feature of MOGAD and positive serum MOG antibody by cell-based assay were included. Demographics and clinical data were recorded and analyzed. Cases were divided into definite MOGAD, questionable MOGAD, and false-positive MOG antibody as determined by the treating neuroimmunology and/or neuro-ophthalmology specialists prior to applying the new MOGAD criteria by an independent investigator. We then calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the new criteria compared to the treating physicians' assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients were included of which, 19 (70.4%) were female, the average age of the sample was 44 +/- 15 years. High titer MOG antibody (≥ 1:100) was found in 11 patients (40.7%); low titer (< 1: 100) in 13 (48.1%), and unreported titer in 3 patients. As determined by expert opinion; 18 (66.7%) were identified as definitive MOGAD, 6 (22.2%) as false-positive MOG antibody, and 3 (11.1%) as questionable MOGAD. All 18 patients identified by clinicians as definite MOGAD met the new 2023 criteria. Of the 9 patients with questionable MOGAD or false-positive MOG antibody, four patients met the 2023 MOGAD criteria. Those four patients had the following final diagnoses: CNS vasculitis, primary progressive MS with activity and progression, pseudotumor cerebri, and bevacizumab-induced anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in the setting of paraneoplastic retinopathy. Compared to clinician assessment, applying the 2023 MOGAD criteria to our institutional cohort yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 55.5%, a positive predictive value of 81.5% and a negative predictive value of 100%.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the 2023 MOGAD criteria are highly sensitive for detection of definite MOGAD but has modest specificity. A number of MOGAD mimickers can resemble the core clinical events of MOGAD and share similar supportive clinical and MRI features. Clinicians should practice caution when evaluating patients with low titer MOG antibody even if they meet the additional supportive features proposed by the 2023 criteria. Further studies are needed to evaluate the 2023 criteria in larger cohorts and in the pediatric population.

Neurological involvement by Behçet's syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and outcome

Neurological involvement in Behçet's syndrome arises predominately through an inflammatory meningoencephalitis characterised by perivenular inflammation due to activation of Th-17 immunological pathways. The brainstem is involved in 50% of cases, the diencephalon and other areas of the brain in 30%, and the spinal cord in 10%. Movement disorders and epilepsy may occur. Psychiatric syndromes may arise with brain and brainstem involvement, and cognitive disorders relate to the brain disease, to circulating inflammatory factors, and to fatigue and despondency. Eighty per cent of cases begin with a relapsing disease course, of whom 70% have only one attack, and 30% have a progressive disease course either from onset or following an initially relapsing course. Venous thrombosis leading to intracranial hypertension and cerebral venous infarction is less common and caused by inflammation in affected veins and a circulating prothrombotic state. Arterial involvement is rare and relates to an arteritis affecting large-sized and medium-sized vessels within the brain leading to infarction, subarachnoid and parenchymal haemorrhage, aneurysm formation and arterial dissection. There is a newly recognised disorder of cerebral cortical hypoperfusion. Cranial neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy and myositis are rare. There has been significant progress in understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of the systemic disease, leading to improved outcomes, but there has been no randomised trial of treatment in the neurological disorder.

Isolated optic neuritis with positive glial fibrillary acidic protein antibody

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy (GFAP-A) has been reported as a spectrum of autoimmune, inflammatory central nervous system disorders. Linear perivascular radial gadolinium enhancement patterns on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are a hallmark of these disorders. GFAP-A is associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) GFAP antibody (GFAP-Ab), while the association with serum GFAP-Ab is less clear. This study aimed to observe the clinical characteristic and MRI changes of GFAP-Ab-positive optic neuritis (ON).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, observational case study at the department of neurology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, from December 2020 to December 2021. The serum of 43 patients and CSF samples of 38 patients with ON were tested for GFAP-Ab by cell-based indirect immune-fluorescence test.

RESULTS

Four patients (9.3%) were detected GFAP-Ab positive, and in three out of the four patients, GFAP-Abs were detected only in serum. All of them demonstrated unilateral optic neuritis. Three patients (1, 2, and 4) experienced severe visual loss (best corrected visual acuity ≤ 0.1). Two patients (2 and 4) had experienced more than one episode of ON at the time of sampling. MRI showed optic nerve hyperintensity on T2 FLAIR images in all GFAP-Ab positive patients, and orbital section involvement was the most common. During follow-up (mean 4.5 ± 1 months), only Patient 1 had a recurrent ON, and no patient developed new other neurological events or systemic symptoms.

CONCLUSION

GFAP-Ab is rare in patients with ON and may manifest as isolated, relapsing ON. This supports the notion that the GFAP-A spectrum should comprise isolated ON.

Optic neuritis classification in 2021

Optic neuritis (ON) can be associated with inflammatory disease of the central nervous system or can be isolated, with or without relapse. It can also be associated with infectious or systemic disease. These multiple associations based on a variety of clinical, radiological, and biological criteria that have changed over time have led to overlapping phenotypes: a single ON case can be classified in several ways simultaneously or over time. As early, intensive treatment is often required, its diagnosis should be rapid and precise. In this review, we present the current state of knowledge about diagnostic criteria for ON aetiologies in adults and children, we discuss overlapping phenotypes, and we propose a homogeneous classification scheme. Even if distinctions between typical and atypical ON are relevant, their phenotypes are largely overlapping, and clinical criteria are neither sensitive enough, nor specific enough, to assure a diagnosis. For initial cases of ON, clinicians should perform contrast enhanced MRI of the brain and orbits, cerebral spinal fluid analysis, and biological analyses to exclude secondary infectious or inflammatory ON. Systematic screening for MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG IgG is recommended in children but is still a matter of debate in adults. Early recognition of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, MOG-IgG-associated disorder, and chronic relapsing idiopathic optic neuritis is required, as these diagnoses require therapies for relapse prevention that are different from those used to treat multiple sclerosis.

Magnetic resonance imaging of intraocular optic nerve disorders: review article

The optic nerve is morphologically classified as a peripheral nerve, but histologically it shares characteristics with the central nerves. Diseases that affect vision and the optic nerve are many and varied: optic neuritis, demyelination (multiple sclerosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-related disorders), drugs, collagen disease, vasculitis, infection, trauma, vascular abnormalities, tumours, and non-tumoural masses. In this review, we summarise the magnetic resonance imaging findings for various pathological conditions that cause deterioration in visual acuity.