Dalfampridine in the treatment of primary fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trail

INTRODUCTION

Fatigue is a highly prevalent debilitating symptom among patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), which markedly affects the quality of life. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of extended-release fampridine on fatigue in PwMS.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial on 77 PwMS with a complaint of fatigue, aged over 18 years old, randomized to extended-release fampridine (n = 44) or placebo (n = 35) for 12 weeks. Fatigue and motor function were assessed at baseline and end point.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients were recruited, of whom 77 were analyzed. 80.5% were female, with a median age of 38. 87% were diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) with a median disease duration of 96 months. Fingolimod (37.7%) was considered the most frequently used DMT, followed by ani-CD20s (32.5%). The total median MFIS score was 43.5 and 37 in the fampridine and placebo groups which were not significantly different (p > 0.05). After 12 weeks, the total MFIS improved in both groups compared to the baseline, which was significant in the active group (p = 0.04). However, the final end point total MFIS was still comparable between the two groups (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed a positive short-term effect of extended-release fampridine on MFIS in PwMS. However, this effect was not significantly superior to the placebo.

Effects of Physical Therapy and Dalfampridine on Function and Quality of Life in Nonambulatory Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Decreases in mobility, quality of life (QOL) and cognition are commonly seen in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Physical therapy (PT) and exercise have been shown to improve many symptoms in ambulatory individuals with MS; however, evidence in nonambulatory people with MS is lacking. Dalfampridine is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved medication for MS that treats impaired ambulation by enhancing nerve conduction. To our knowledge, no study has examined the combined effect of PT and dalfampridine and very few studies have examined dalfampridine's effect on function in individuals with more progressive disease. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of PT combined with dalfampridine or a placebo on function, QOL, and cognition in nonambulatory individuals with MS. In addition, we explored the benefits of PT in all participants to increase the extremely limited research in this population.

METHODS

Adults with MS were randomly assigned to receive dalfampridine (n = 13) or placebo (n = 14) for 12 weeks in conjunction with PT treatment 2 times a week. Function, QOL, and cognition were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

There was a significant time × group interaction for the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 favoring the placebo group. Both groups significantly improved on the 9-Hole Peg Test (left arm only), sitting lateral reach (right), transferring from wheelchair to mat, and repeated sit to stand.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of dalfampridine to physical therapy did not improve function, QOL, or cognitive processing speed. Importantly, this study demonstrated an overall benefit in function and QOL with physical therapy 2 times a week for 12 weeks for nonambulatory individuals with MS.

Fampridine for gait imbalance in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gait imbalance is one of the frequent complications in subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS). Fampridine (4-aminopyridine) is a potassium-channel blocker that is administered for gait imbalance in MS. Different studies showed the effects of fampridine on gait status based on various tests in subjects with MS. Some showed significant improvement after treatment, and others did not. So, we designed this systematic review, and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled effects of fampridine on gait status in patients with MS.

METHODS

The main goal is the evaluation of times of different gait test pre and post fampridine treatment. Two independent expert researchers conducted a systematic and comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar and also gray literature, including references of the references and conference abstracts. The search was done on September 16, 2022. Before-after studies trials reporting scores of the walking tests. We extracted data regarding the total number of participants, first author, publication year, country of origin, mean age, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and the results of walking tests.

RESULTS

The literature search revealed 1963 studies; after deleting duplicates, 1098 studies remained. Seventy-seven full texts were evaluated. Finally, 18 studies were included for meta-analysis, while most of them were not placebo-controlled trials. The most frequent country of origin was Germany, and the mean age and EDSS ranged between 44 and 56 years and 4 and 6, respectively. The studies were published between 2013 and 2019. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) (after-before) of the MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12) was - 1.97 (95%CI: - 1.7, - 1.03) (I2 = 93.1%, P < 0.001). The pooled SMD (after-before) of the six-minute walk test (6MWT) was 0.49 (95%CI: 0.22, - 0.76) (I2 = 0%, P = 0.7). The pooled SMD (after-before) of T Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) was - 0.99(95%CI: - 1.52, - 0.47) (I2 = 97.5%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis show that fampridine improves gait imbalance in patients with MS.

Current advances in the pharmacological prevention and management of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive impairment (CI) is a core feature of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), being detectable in up to 65% of subjects. Treatment of CI can be considered of paramount importance. However, no standardized strategies are available to date to define the best treatment approach, especially for the pharmacological management.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, the authors outline the latest advances in pharmacological management of CI in MS, including Disease Modifying Treatments (DMTs) which indirectly may or may not influence CI and symptomatic drugs. Selected publications were restricted to those written in English, reporting on an adult relapsing-remitting MS or progressive MS sample, assessing the effects of (at least) 1 DMT or treatment in a longitudinal design, reporting data on (at least) one standardized cognitive test performed at baseline and follow-up, and published between January 2018 and May 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent data can be considered encouraging and inspiring for future studies. Overall, there is preliminary evidence of a beneficial effect of DMTs on cognition, particularly for high-efficacy DMTs. As for symptomatic treatments, dalfampridine appears to be the only medication with robust evidence of a positive effect on cognition. However, the definition of clinically meaningful change/improvement in cognitive functions remains an unmet need. Future studies should assess the role of other patient-related factors that can be associated with a better cognitive response to treatments and investigate the possible positive effect of multimodal interventions on cognition.

Beneficial effects of a nano formulation of pomegranate seed oil, GranaGard, on the cognitive function of multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Though often neglected, cognitive impairment is a common feature of multiple sclerosis in 43-70% of patients. None of the novel MS treatment seems to substantially affect or restore cognitive disability in MS. GranaGard (Granalix Bio Technologies LTD) is a food supplement shown to prevent neuronal death in several animal models of neurological diseases. Capsules of GranaGard comprise a self-emulsion nano formulation of pomegranate seed oil (PSO). This oil contains 80-90% of Punicic Acid (PA), one of the strongest natural antioxidants. In animal experiments, administration of GranaGard results in conjugation with linoleic acid (CLA), the main metabolite of PA, which is a well-known neuroprotective agent.

AIMS

To investigate whether GranaGard administration has an effect on the cognitive state of MS patients.

METHODS

This is a single center, randomized double blind clinical trial that started in May 2018. The study included 30 MS patients; half of them (Group-A) were given GranaGard for the first three months and then placebo pills containing soybean oil for additional three months. Patients in Group-B received placebo for the first three months, and GranaGard for the following three months. GranaGard was administrated in addition to their immunomodulatory MS-treatments. Subsequently, all patients received GranaGard for additional six months. Patients were required to visit the neurologist at baseline (inclusion, visit 1) and at 3 months after treatment-initiation at each cycle of the trial (visits 2 and 3). During the follow up visits, clinical and cognitive examinations were performed, including Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC: 25 ft walking test, 9 PEG hole test & PASAT). Cognitive tests included The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) battery: 1) Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT); 2) California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition (CVLT-II); 3) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R). Cognitive outcomes were normalized to the healthy population and expressed as z-scores, depended on age, gender and education. Short quality of life and fatigue questionnaires (SF-12, MFIS-5) were also provided by the participants.

RESULTS

No serious adverse effects, related to the product, were observed during the study period. All patients receiving GranaGard reported a ''positive'' effect in their ADL while using the product. While there were no significant differences in the clinical parameters of disability (EDSS scores) between the treatment groups, there was a trend of beneficial effect of GranaGard, on the verbal testing during the first 3-month period of treatment. The z score for CVLT-II, significantly increased (from 0.891 to 1.415, p = 0.012, Wilcoxon rank test) at 3-months in the group of patients who were treated with GranaGard, as compared to baseline. A similar (but not statistically significant) trend was seen also in the BVMTr testing during the same 3 months-period, whereas there was no change in the SDMT. The overall average z-score of all three cognitive functions was significantly improved in the three months of Granagard treatment (-0.0077 at 3 months vs 0.462 at baseline, p = 0.034, Wilcoxon rank test). During the same 3-months period there were no significant changes in the placebo-treated group. For the patients receiving GranaGard in the initial 3 months, the value of z score of CVLT-II remained high (z = 1.415) also at the following three months (while they received placebo), suggesting a longer lasting effect for at least 3 months after discontinuation of the drug.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study in which GranaGard, a brain targeted nano-formulation of PSO, was tested in humans. Our results in this small pilot, controlled trial provide indications that GranaGard administration to MS patients might improve/stabilize cognitive disability. Larger studies with longer duration, are needed to confirm these initial observations.

A Prospective, Observational, Cohort Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Prolonged-Release Fampridine in Cognition, Fatigue, Depression, and Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: The FAMILY Study

Introduction

The efficacy of prolonged-release fampridine (PR-FAM) may extend in multiple sclerosis (MS) beyond walking ability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of PR-FAM treatment on cognition, fatigue, depression, and quality of life (QoL) in adult patients with MS in a real-world setting.

Methods

FAMILY was a multi-center, prospective, observational, real-world cohort study of MS patients receiving PR-FAM in the outpatient setting. Patients were treated as per PR-FAM’s local prescribing information for 6 months. Standardized protocols and questionnaires were used to evaluate changes in cognition (PASAT; Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test), fatigue (MFIS; Modified Fatigue Impact Scale), depression (BDI-II; Beck Depression Inventory-II) and QoL (MusiQoL; MS International Quality-of-Life questionnaire, MSIS-29; Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale: PHYS and PSYCH subscales) at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline.

Results

In total, 102 eligible patients from 8 sites in Greece were analysed, of whom 92 completed the study and 10 discontinued. At 6 months, PR-FAM treatment resulted in improvements from baseline in PASAT-3′′ (p = 0.044), MFIS (p < 0.001), BDI-II (p < 0.001), MusiQoL (p < 0.001) and MSIS-29-PHYS (p = 0.012) and MSIS-PSYCH (p < 0.001). A positive effect was evident already at 3 months in PASAT-3′′ (ns), MFIS (p = 0.020), BDI-II (p = 0.034), MusiQoL (p = 0.001), MSIS-29-PHYS (ns) and MSIS-29-PSYCH (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This observational study provides new data to the current literature in support of PR-FAM’s positive effects in cognition, fatigue, depression, and QoL in a large, heterogeneous group of Greek MS patients in the real-world setting.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03164018.

Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01606-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aminopiridines in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and other neurological disorders

Symptomatic treatment has a great relevance for the management of patients with neurologic diseases, since it reduces disease burden and improves quality of life. Aminopyridines (APs) are a group of potassium (K+) channel blocking agents that exert their activity both at central nervous system level and on neuromuscular junction. This review describes the use of APs for the symptomatic treatment of neurological conditions. We will describe trials leading to the approval of the extended-release 4-aminopyridine for MS and evidence in support of the use in other neurological diseases.

Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, demyelinating disease of the CNS. Cognitive impairment is a sometimes neglected, yet common, sign and symptom with a profound effect on instrumental activities of daily living. The prevalence of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis varies across the lifespan and might be difficult to distinguish from other causes in older age. MRI studies show that widespread changes to brain networks contribute to cognitive dysfunction, and grey matter atrophy is an early sign of potential future cognitive decline. Neuropsychological research suggests that cognitive processing speed and episodic memory are the most frequently affected cognitive domains. Narrowing evaluation to these core areas permits brief, routine assessment in the clinical setting. Owing to its brevity, reliability, and sensitivity, the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, or its computer-based analogues, can be used to monitor episodes of acute disease activity. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test can also be used in clinical trials, and data increasingly show that cognitive processing speed and memory are amenable to cognitive training interventions.

Pharmacotherapy in multiple sclerosis-induced cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) commonly complicated by cognitive impairment. Unfortunately, no medical therapy has been proved to improve cognitive problems in these patients. This meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of different categories of drugs on the minimal assessment of cognitive function in MS (MACFIMS)-related tasks outcome in MS patients. To this end, a systematic evaluation was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. Among a total of 128 publications, 31 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 22 included in the meta-analysis. We found that symbol digit modalities test (SDMT), paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT), controlled oral word association test (COWAT), and California verbal learning test (CVLT) were the most frequently reported tasks in included studies. The frequently reported drugs were classified into five main groups of acetylcholine esterase inhibitors, CNS stimulants, fampridine, herbal remedies, and miscellaneous. Overall heterogeneity of the studies was modest. The treatments did not affect cognitive function in any of the tasks (p>0.05). However, in subgroup analysis, we found significant improvement in SDMT task outecomes after treatment by fampridine (0.283 SMD, 95%CI, 0.015 to 0.550, p = 0.039, I2=11.7%). Our meta-analysis highlighted that the currently proposed therapeutic agents had no beneficial effects on the alleviation of MS-induced cognitive impairment.

Treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis

Cognitive impairment is a common and devastating manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS). Although disease-modifying therapies have been efficacious for reducing relapse rates in MS, such treatments are ineffective for treating cognitive dysfunction. Alternative treatment approaches for mitigating cognitive problems are greatly needed in this population. To date, cognitive rehabilitation and exercise training have been identified as possible candidates for treating MS-related cognitive impairment; however, cognitive dysfunction is still often considered to be poorly managed in patients with MS. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of recent developments in the treatment and management of cognitive impairment in people with MS. We describe the theoretical rationales, current states of the science, field-wide challenges and recent advances in cognitive rehabilitation and exercise training for treating MS-related cognitive impairment. We also discuss future directions for research into the treatment of cognitive impairment in MS that should set the stage for the inclusion of cognitive rehabilitation and exercise training into clinical practice within the next decade.

Cognitive Efficacy of Pharmacologic Treatments in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive impairment is prevalent and debilitating among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). While many pharmacologic treatments have shown good efficacy in reducing clinical relapses, brain lesions, and improving certain physical symptoms, their efficacy for improving cognitive function is not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

The current systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacologic treatments for improving cognitive function among persons with MS.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through the PubMed and PsycINFO databases. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper, and a third reviewer weighed in if the two reviewers could not reach a consensus. Classification of evidence was determined using the 2017 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria for therapeutic trials. Standardized effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated to compare across studies.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven journal articles published between 1990 and January 2020 were included in the current review. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of pharmacologic treatments to improve cognitive function in persons with MS. There were many contradictory findings observed in this review, which may be due to possible unidentified moderating treatment response variables and/or lack of standardization in assessment procedures. There was also an overreliance on statistical significance (most papers did not provide sizes of treatment effects), which may not be clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the cognitive efficacy of pharmacologic treatments for MS-related cognitive dysfunction, with cognition as the primary endpoint. Researchers are urged to use standardized criteria (such as the AAN criteria) to guide their research designs. Clinicians should consider effect sizes of studies before deciding whether to prescribe certain medications to ameliorate cognitive symptoms.

Effects of Fampridine in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prolonged-release (PR) fampridine is a potassium channel blocker used as a symptomatic treatment for walking disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Its clinical effects in such patients have not been systematically reviewed, and may be more wide-ranging than expected.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the evidence on the effects of PR fampridine in patients with MS.

METHODS

A systematic search of Pubmed, Scopus (including EMBASE), and PsycINFO (completed in 01/2019) was carried out to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared PR fampridine to placebo. When appropriate, data were pooled using a random-effects model, and standardized mean differences (SMD) were computed. Study quality was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. PRISMA guidelines were followed. All retrieved functional outcomes were categorized according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

RESULTS

A total of 706 articles were screened for inclusion. Twenty RCTs involving 2616 patients met the eligibility criteria. Most studies were of good-to-excellent quality. PR fampridine administration resulted in significant benefits in relation to walking short distances (SMD: 1.23 (95% IC 0.65-1.81)) and perceived walking capacity (0.64 (0.27-1.02)). Its effects on muscle strength and middle-distance walking were not significant (0.53 (- 0.04 to 1.10) and 0.31 (- 0.18 to 0.80), respectively). No effect on higher-level cognitive functions (- 0.07 (- 0.58 to 0.45)) or hand and arm use (0.16 (- 0.33 to 0.64)) was observed. Individual studies reported effects on other outcomes across the ICF domains.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence that PR fampridine exerts strong effects on the ability to walk short distances and on perceived walking capacity. Other effects of PR fampridine according to the ICF are possible but still unclear.

Study on Dalfampridine in the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Mobility Disability: A meta-analysis

Objective

Systematic Review was used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dalfampridine (DAP) in the treatment of Mobility Disability (MS) in patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Methods

Clinical randomized controlled studies about DAP and placebo in the treatment of Mobility Disability in patients with Multiple Sclerosis until March 2019 were explored by searching Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Literature screening, data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analysis were performed by using Stata 14.0.

Results

10 papers were included in the meta-analysis, and the number of patients was 2100. In conclusion, the application of DAP in clinical can significantly improve the Mobility Disability of patients [OR = 2.73, 95%CI (1.66, 4.50), P<0.001, I² = 74.1%] and boost the mobility speed of patients in Timing 24 Minute Walk Test (T24FW) [SMD = 3,08, 95%CI(1,58, 4.58), P<0.001, I² = 98.7%]. There are no significant differences of the incidence of adverse events [RR = 1.06, 95%CI (0.99, 1.14), P = 0.928, I² = 0.0%] and urinary tract infection [RR = 1.21, 95%CI(0.91, 1.60), P = 0.145, I² = 37.2%] between the DAP test group (Doses≤10 mg) and the placebo control group, and the incidence of adverse events [RR = 1.14, 95%CI(1.02, 1.28), P = 0.793, I² = 0.0%] and urinary tract infection[RR = 3.05, 95%CI(1.04, 8.99), P = 0.680, I² = 0.0%] for the DAP test group (Doses>10 mg) is a litter higher than the placebo control group.

Conclusion

DAP can effectively improve Mobility Disability in patients with Multiple Sclerosis, which is safe and reliable in specific DAP usage doses.

Evaluating dalfampridine for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: does it add to the treatment armamentarium?

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease, causing axonal damage and disability. Dalfampridine (DAL) is an extended-release formulation of 4-aminopyridine (4AP) and broad-spectrum voltage-dependent potassium channel blocker that is reported to improve motor, visual and cognitive functions. Furthermore, it is presently the only approved drug for walking impairment in MS. Areas covered: Herein, the authors evaluate DAL as a relapsing-remitting MS treatment, reporting and commenting on all aspects of the drug including its chemistry, safety, pharmacokinetics, and cost-effectiveness. A bibliographic search was performed on PubMed using the terms 'dalfampridine OR fampridine OR 4-aminopyridine'. Expert opinion: Evidence from post-marketing studies suggests that DAL, consistent with the effects of 4AP, may not only improve walking speed, but also arm function, fatigue, mood and cognition through restored nerve conduction in central nervous system demyelinated areas. Long-term safety data confirm that the approved dose of 10 mg twice daily is generally well tolerated. However, despite the reported efficacy, the extent of the benefits is limited in real life activities, although significant improvements have been demonstrated in the clinical setting. Patients often complain of side effects (such as cramps and painful paraesthesia) or lack of efficacy. Also, its considerably higher pricing in comparison to 4AP represents an important limitation.

Identifying risk factors for cognitive issues in multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive impairment (CI) in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has progressively regained clinical and research interest and is currently recognized as a debilitating and burdensome problem for these patients. Studying risk and protecting factors that may influence the development and course of CI is currently an area of increasing interest, due to the potential for preventive strategies. Areas covered: In this narrative review the authors briefly addressed the physiopathologic basis, assessment and management of CI in MS and then focused on identifying modifiable and not modifiable risk factors for CI in MS, providing an overview of the current knowledge in the field and indicating avenues for future research. Expert opinion: Improving our understanding of potentially modifiable environmental and lifestyle risk factors or protective factors for CI is important in order to prompt preventive strategies and orient patient counselling and clinical management. To this aim, we need to enhance the current level of evidence linking lifestyle factors to cognition and evaluate some factors that were only preliminary addressed in research. Moreover, we need to explore the role of each factor into the subject cognitive outcome, next to the possible interactions between different environmental factors as well as between environmental and genetic factors.