Repeated assessment of key clinical walking measures can induce confounding practice effects

Sensor-Based Gait and Balance Assessment in Healthy Adults: Analysis of Short-Term Training and Sensor Placement Effects

While the analysis of gait and balance can be an important indicator of age- or disease-related changes, it remains unclear if repeated performance of gait and balance tests in healthy adults leads to habituation effects, if short-term gait and balance training can improve gait and balance performance, and whether the placement of wearable sensors influences the measurement accuracy. Healthy adults were assessed before and after performing weekly gait and balance tests over three weeks by using a force plate, motion capturing system and smartphone. The intervention group (n = 25) additionally received a home-based gait and balance training plan. Another sample of healthy adults (n = 32) was assessed once to analyze the impact of sensor placement (lower back vs. lower abdomen) on gait and balance analysis. Both the control and intervention group exhibited improvements in gait/stance. However, the trends over time were similar for both groups, suggesting that targeted training and repeated task performance equally contributed to the improvement of the measured variables. Since no significant differences were found in sensor placement, we suggest that a smartphone used as a wearable sensor could be worn both on the lower abdomen and the lower back in gait and balance analyses.

Reliability of gait and dual-task measures in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Single-task (ST) and dual-task (DT) assessments are commonly used to evaluate motor and cognitive impairment in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Although variability can influence repeated DT testing measures, the reliability of several DT variables over time has not been adequately explored. For instance, a third testing session has never been included to observe whether DT has a learning effect. DT cognition rate reliability has not yet been examined and dual-task cost (DTC), a widely used calculation for DT interpretation, has not been proven reliable.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To evaluate the reliability of ST and DT measures of gait and cognition over three test sessions.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study involving 18 people with MS and 12 controls. Participants attended three test sessions, each one week apart. ST and DT (serial seven subtraction) gait variables, DTC, coefficient of variability (CV), and cognition rate were extracted and calculated using an instrumented walkway. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) or Kendall's coefficient of concordance (KCC; nonparametric test) and minimum detectable change (MDC); between-session learning effect was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

ICC/KCC values for ST and DT gait variables ranged from moderate to excellent (0.50-0.99). However, reliability for DT stride width and cognition rate was lower in controls. In general, DTC and CV variables had poor ICCs and high MDC values (49.19-1478.67 %), although some DTC variables had moderate or higher reliability in controls. Cognition rate was reliable in both MS (ICC 0.91) and controls (ICC 0.84). A learning effect between sessions was observed for DT velocity in both groups and for DTC cadence in people with MS.

SIGNIFICANCE

ST and DT gait measures as well as DT cognition rate are reliable outcomes for repeated testing, while DTC and CV variables may not be suitable for long-term monitoring.