Long-term clinical, MRI, and cognitive follow-up in a large cohort of pathologically confirmed, predominantly tumefactive multiple sclerosis

The diagnostic challenge of differentiating tumefactive multiple sclerosis (TMS) from other brain lesions: a case report and literature review on a rare subtype of MS

Introduction and importance

This case report is a clinical diagnosis walk through of a rare subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS). It gives an overview of how tumefactive multiple sclerosis (TMS) is systematically narrowed down as the definitive diagnosis.

Case presentation

This 29-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department. He collapsed after experiencing pain over his right frontotemporal region followed by a seizure witnessed by his family. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the brain displayed diffuse enlargement and abnormal T2 weighted and FLAIR hyperintense signals in the diagnostic impressions described by the radiologist of the right temporoparietal region.

Clinical discussion

Liquefactive multiple sclerosis, also known as tumefactive multiple sclerosis or Marburg-type multiple sclerosis, is a rare subtype of the neurological disorder that can be difficult to diagnose. Unlike the traditional form of MS, TMS can present as a brain tumor and must be diagnosed with a biopsy rather than via MRI and clinical findings alone. Patients can typically present with headache, cognitive abnormalities, mental confusion, aphasia, apraxia, seizures, and weakness. Here, the authors discuss the presentation, disease diagnosis process and patient management.

Conclusion

The patient was stabilized and discharged with a referral to the neurosurgery and neurology departments for outpatient consultation for future clinical management and treatment of their condition.

Disease modifying therapy in the treatment of tumefactive multiple sclerosis: A retrospective cohort study

Tumefactive multiple sclerosis (TMS) is characterized by large demyelinating brain lesions. This was a retrospective cohort study of 67 patients with TMS between January 2015-2023, examining different disease modifying therapy impact on expanded disability scale score change at follow-up. Median age was 36 with a female predominance. Mean EDSS was 3.3 ± 2.3 at TMS onset, 2.1 ± 1.9 at year one, and 2.1 ± 1.9 at last follow-up. A multilinear regression model found higher presentation EDSS and post-diagnosis non-B-cell high efficacy therapies were each independently associated with higher EDSS at last follow up. Further research is needed to determine the value of B-cell therapy in TMS.

Multiple Sclerosis Diagnostic Delay and Misdiagnosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) misdiagnosis in the form of an incorrect diagnosis of MS, as well as delayed diagnosis in patients who do have MS, both influence patient clinical outcomes. Contemporary studies have reported data on factors associated with these diagnostic challenges and their frequency. Expediting diagnosis in patients with MS and reducing MS misdiagnosis in patients who do not have MS may be aided by educational efforts surrounding early MS symptoms and proper application of MS diagnostic criteria. Emerging novel MS diagnostic biomarkers may aid early and accurate diagnosis of MS in the future.

Defining the natural history of tumefactive demyelination: A retrospective cohort of 257 patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe demographic, clinical, and radiographic features of tumefactive demyelination (TD) and identify factors associated with severe attacks and poor outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective review of TD cases seen at Mayo Clinic, 1990-2021.

RESULTS

Of 257 patients with TD, 183/257 (71%) fulfilled the 2017 multiple sclerosis (MS) McDonald criteria at the last follow-up, 12/257 (5%) had myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), 0 had aquaporin-4-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optic spectrum disorders (AQP4+ NMOSD), and 62/257 (24%) were cryptogenic. Onset before age 18 was present in 18/257 (7%). Female to male ratio was 1.3:1. Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal (CSF) bands were present in 95/153 (62%). TD was the first demyelinating attack in 176/257 (69%). At presentation, 59/126 (47%) fulfilled Barkhof criteria for dissemination in space, 59/100 (59%) had apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) restriction, and 57/126 (45%) had mass effect. Despite aggressive clinical presentation at onset, 181/257 (70%) of patients remained fully ambulatory (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] ≤4) after a 3.0-year median follow-up duration. Severe initial attack-related disability (EDSS ≥4) was more common in patients with motor symptoms (81/143 vs. 35/106, p < 0.0001), encephalopathy (20/143 vs. 2/106, p < 0.0001) and ADC restriction on initial MRI (42/63 vs. 15/33, p = 0.04). Poor long-term outcome (EDSS ≥4) was more common in patients with older onset age (41.9 ± 15 vs. 36.8 ± 15.6, p = 0.02) and motor symptoms at onset (49/76 vs. 66/171, p < 0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

Most TD patients should be considered part of the MS spectrum after excluding MOGAD and NMOSD. Motor symptoms and older age at presentation portend a poor outcome.

Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: an updated consensus approach

Accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis requires careful attention to its differential diagnosis-many disorders can mimic the clinical manifestations and paraclinical findings of this disease. A collaborative effort, organised by The International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis in 2008, provided diagnostic approaches to multiple sclerosis and identified clinical and paraclinical findings (so-called red flags) suggestive of alternative diagnoses. Since then, knowledge of disorders in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has expanded substantially. For example, CNS inflammatory disorders that present with syndromes overlapping with multiple sclerosis can increasingly be distinguished from multiple sclerosis with the aid of specific clinical, MRI, and laboratory findings; studies of people misdiagnosed with multiple sclerosis have also provided insights into clinical presentations for which extra caution is warranted. Considering these data, an update to the recommended diagnostic approaches to common clinical presentations and key clinical and paraclinical red flags is warranted to inform the contemporary clinical evaluation of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis.

Spinal cord and brain corticospinal tract lesions are associated with motor progression in tumefactive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord lesions have been associated with progressive disease in individuals with typical relapsing remitting MS (RRMS).

OBJECTIVE

In the current study, we aimed to determine if progressive disease is associated with spinal cord lesions in those with tumefactive multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of individuals presenting to Mayo Clinic with tumefactive MS with spinal cord MRIs available (n=159). Clinical data were extracted by chart review. Brain and spinal cord MRIs were reviewed to characterize the tumefactive demyelinating lesion(s) and assess the burden of spinal cord disease.

RESULTS

A total of 69 (43%) had spinal cord lesions. Progressive demyelinating disease was documented in 13 (8%); the majority (11/13) with secondary progressive disease. The method of progression was myelopathic in 8/13 (62%), cognitive in 3/13 (23%), motor from a supratentorial lesion in 2/13 (16%). EDSS at last follow-up was higher in those with progression than those without (median 6.0 (2.0-10.0) vs. 2.5 (0-10.0), p = < 0.001). Progressive demyelinating disease occurred in a minority.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with progression typically experienced progressive motor impairment, and this occurred exclusively in individuals with lesions in the corticospinal tracts of the brain and/or the spinal cord.

Long-term clinical, imaging and cognitive outcomes association with MS immunopathology

OBJECTIVE

In this observational study on a cohort of biopsy-proven central nervous system demyelinating disease consistent with MS, we examined the relationship between early-active demyelinating lesion immunopattern (IP) with subsequent clinical course, radiographic progression, and cognitive function.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients had at least one early-active lesion on biopsy and were pathologically classified into three immunopatterns based on published criteria. The median time from biopsy at follow-up was 11 years, median age at biopsy - 41, EDSS - 4.0. At last follow-up, the median age was 50, EDSS - 3.0. Clinical examination, cognitive assessment (CogState battery), and 3-Tesla-MRI (MPRAGE/FLAIR/T2/DIR/PSIR/DTI) were obtained.

RESULTS

IP-I was identified in 14/75 (19%), IP-II was identified in 41/75 (56%), and IP-III was identified in 18/75 (25%) patients. Patients did not differ significantly by immunopattern in clinical measures at onset or last follow-up. The proportions of disease courses after a median of 11 years were similar across immunopatterns, relapsing-remitting being most common (63%), followed by monophasic (32%). No differences in volumetric or DTI measures were found. CogState performance was similar for most tasks. A slight yet statistically significant difference was identified for episodic memory scores, with IP-III patients recalling one word less on average.

INTERPRETATION

In this study, immunopathological heterogeneity of early-active MS lesions identified at biopsy does not correlate with different long-term clinical, neuroimaging or cognitive outcomes. This could be explained by the fact that while active white matter lesions are pathological substrates for relapses, MS progression is driven by mechanisms converging across immunopatterns, regardless of pathogenic mechanisms driving the acute demyelinated plaque.

Imaging of Central Nervous System Demyelinating Disorders

OBJECTIVE

This article summarizes neuroimaging findings in demyelinating disease, the most common being multiple sclerosis. Revisions to criteria and treatment options have been ongoing, and MRI plays a pivotal role in diagnosis and disease monitoring. The common antibody-mediated demyelinating disorders with their respective classic imaging features are reviewed, as well as the differential diagnostic considerations on imaging.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The clinical criteria of demyelinating disease rely heavily on imaging with MRI. With novel antibody detection, the range of clinical demyelinating syndromes has expanded, most recently with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG antibodies. Imaging has improved our understanding of the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis and disease progression, and further research is underway. The importance of increased detection of pathology outside of the classic lesions will have an important role as therapeutic options are expanding.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

MRI has a crucial role in the diagnostic criteria and differentiation among common demyelinating disorders and syndromes. This article reviews the typical imaging features and clinical scenarios that assist in accurate diagnosis, differentiation between demyelinating diseases and other white matter diseases, the importance of standardized MRI protocols in clinical practice, and novel imaging techniques.