Rectifying global inequities in neuromyelitis optica diagnosis and treatment

Application and interpretation of core elements of the 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria in routine clinical practice

Background

We evaluated comprehension and application of the 2015 neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) criteria core elements by neurologists in Latin America (LATAM) who routinely diagnose and care for NMOSD patients by (i) identifying typical/suggestive NMOSD syndromes, (ii) detecting typical MRI NMOSD lesions and meeting MRI dissemination in space (DIS) criteria, and (iii) evaluating historical symptoms suggestive of NMOSD.

Methods

We conducted an anonymous, voluntary, self-administered web- and case-based survey cross-sectional study from October 2023 to January 2024 of neurologists identified through the LACTRIMS database. Questions were presented first through iterative clinical cases or imaging, followed by questions directly evaluating comprehension of definitions. "Correct" responses were based on the 2015 criteria and adjudicated by the consensus of the experts leading the project.

Results

A total of 106 neurologists (60.3% female; mean age: 46.6 ± 12.5 years) were included. Between 10.4% and 49.1% of neurologists inaccurately identified clinical or paraclinical aspects for DIS and 32.1% accurately identified the three non-cardinal (brainstem, diencephalic, and cerebral) syndromes for seronegative patients. Between 35.8% and 64.1% of neurologists identified the "optimal timing" of AQP4-IgG testing (e.g., during an attack or before receiving immunosuppressant treatments, among others); 56.6% considered live cell-based assay as the gold standard method for serological testing. Most neurologists accurately identified typical NMOSD MRI lesions, but periventricular, juxtacortical/cortical, fluffy infratentorial, corticospinal tract, and hypothalamic lesions were frequently misidentified.

Conclusion

Clinical scenarios were identified where the 2015 NMOSD criteria were susceptible to misinterpretation and misapplication by expert neurologists in LATAM. Implementing collaborative educational initiatives could improve NMOSD diagnosis and raise patient care standards.

Treatment strategies and responses for attacks of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A real-world retrospective cohort study

We aimed to assess the treatment strategies utilized in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) experiencing relapses, including their frequency, types, and response after 6 months based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study involving NMOSD patients from the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT03375177). Treatment response at 6 months was categorized as "good" if the EDSS score decreased by ≥1 point after a nadir EDSS score ≤ 3, or by ≥2 points after a nadir EDSS score > 3, "poor" if the EDSS score decrease was slighter, and as "absent" if the EDSS score remained unchanged or worsened.

RESULTS

We included 120 NMOSD patients (seropositive N = 75), who experienced 250 NMOSD-related relapses and received 248 treatments. At 6 months, complete recovery was achieved in 70/98 (71.4%) and 15/19 (79%) patients, respectively. Predictors of a "good" response in our regression model were a younger age at disease onset (OR:3.54, CI95% 2.45-5.01, p < 0.0001) and a short delay from onset of relapse to treatment initiation (OR:1.56, CI95% 1.22-2.13, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately two-thirds of patients experienced complete recovery, and younger age and a short delay to start treatment were independent predictors of a "good" response.

Predicting time to serologic diagnosis of AQP4+ NMOSD based on clinical factors and social determinants of health

BACKGROUND

Early serologic diagnosis and initiation of targeted therapy are associated with better outcomes in aquaporin-4 IgG positive (AQP4+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

OBJECTIVE

To determine predictors of time to serologic diagnosis of AQP4+ NMOSD.

METHODS

In CANOPTICS, a multi-centre, Canadian cohort study of NMOSD, we retrospectively evaluated time from the first clinical attack to first positive AQP4-IgG serology. We used a multivariable negative binomial regression model to evaluate possible predictors of time to diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 129 participants with AQP4+ NMOSD from 7 centres. Diagnostic delay of >1 month was observed in 82 (63.6 %). Asian compared to European (White) ethnicity (IRR:0.40, 95 % CI:0.21-0.78), female sex (IRR:0.56, 95 % CI:0.32-0.99), later calendar year (IRR:0.84, 95 % CI:0.81-0.86), and hospitalization for the first attack (IRR:0.35, 95 % CI:0.20-0.62) were associated with shorter times to serologic diagnosis. We did not observe any overall effect of Afro-Caribbean ethnicity, but in exploratory analyses, Afro-Caribbean individuals with low income had longer times to diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

More than 60 % of patients with NMOSD experienced delays to AQP4-IgG serologic diagnosis in this cohort. Given evidence of more adverse long-term outcomes in Afro-Caribbean individuals with NMOSD, intersectional effects of ethnicity and social determinants of health merit further study.