Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy.

METHODS

The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Heterogeneous Characteristics of Patients with Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Systematic Review of Therapeutic Solutions

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) has emerged as an alternative to open surgery, but direct comparisons are limited. The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes of endovascular and open repair for IAAA according with specific clinical characteristics.

METHODS

We performed a literature review of reports describing patients who had open or endovascular repair for IAAA. A literature search was performed in June 2022 by 2 investigators who conducted a review of papers reported in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Database. The strings "Inflammatory aneurysm" and "Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms" were used. There was no language restriction and screened reports were published from March 1972 to December 2021. We identified 2,062 patients who had open (1,586) or endovascular repair (476) for IAAA. Primary outcomes were operative mortality and morbidity. Secondary outcomes were complications during follow-up (mean follow-up: 48 months). Propensity score matching was performed between patients who had open or endovascular surgery.

RESULTS

In Western countries, propensity-weighted postoperative mortality (in-hospital) (1.5% endovascular vs. 6% open) and morbidity rates (6% vs. 18%) were significantly lower in patients who had endovascular repair (P < 0.0001); patients with larger aneurysm (more than 7 cm diameter), signs of active inflammation, and retroperitoneal rupture of the aneurysm had better outcomes after endovascular repair than after open surgery. Hydronephrosis was present in 20% of the patients. Hydronephrosis regressed in most patients when signs of active inflammation were present suggesting an acute onset of the hydronephrosis itself (fever, elevated serum C Reactive Protein) either after endovascular or open surgery. Long-standing hydronephrosis as suggested by the absence of signs of active inflammation rarely regressed after endovascular surgery despite associated steroid therapy. During a mean follow-up of 48 months, propensity-weighted graft-related complications were more common in patients who had endovascular repair (20% vs. 8%). For patients from Asia, short-term and medium-term results were similar after open and endovascular repair. IAAAs related with aortitis were more common in Asia. In Western countries, IAAAs were commonly associated with atherosclerosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IAAA represent a heterogeneous population, suggesting biological differences from continent to continent; conservative therapy and endovascular or open surgery should be chosen according to the patient clinical condition. Endovascular repair presents advantages in patients with signs of active inflammation and contained rupture of the IAAA and larger aneurysms. Hydronephrosis, without signs of active inflammation, rarely regresses after endovascular repair associated with steroid therapy. Further studies are needed to establish the long-term results of endovascular repair.

Management of Inflammatory Aortic Aneurysms - A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (InflAAAs) account for 5 - 10% of aortic aneurysms and are characterised by retroperitoneal fibrosis. Diagnosis is often delayed, and doubts remain about the optimal management strategy. This scoping review describes the current state of knowledge on InflAAAs.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched for relevant studies that evaluated the diagnosis and treatment of InflAAAs. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was followed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven papers were selected (low level of evidence), which included 1 554 patients, who were mostly male and heavy smokers. A triad of chronic abdominal or back pain, weight loss, and elevated inflammatory markers was highly suggestive of the diagnosis but rarely present, and fever was noted only randomly. A mantle sign was seen on computed tomography angiography (CTA) in 73 - 100% of patients. Open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) was reported in 1 376 and 178 patients, respectively. OSR was associated with significant iatrogenic bowel (n = 22), urinary tract system (n = 7), venous (n = 30), pancreatic (n = 6), and splenic (n = 5) injuries, while EVAR was associated with lower 30 day mortality (0 - 5% vs. 0 - 32%). One and two year mortality rates were similar between the two treatment modalities (0 - 20% and 0 - 36%, respectively). EVAR was more often associated with post-operative progression of inflammation (17% vs. 0.4%), and a higher frequency of persistent hydronephrosis (> 50%) and limb occlusion (20%). Used in < 10% of patients, corticosteroids led to complete pain relief and a reduction in peri-aortic inflammation within 6 - 18 months.

CONCLUSION

InflAAAs are characterised by non-specific symptoms, with the mantle sign on CTA being pathognomonic. Corticosteroids may be considered a basic treatment that all patients should receive initially. Low quality data indicate that EVAR (vs. OSR) is associated with fewer intra-operative complications and lower peri-operative mortality but more late fibrosis related adverse events. International multicentre registries are required to gather more insights into this challenging pathology.

Multidisciplinary diagnosis and management of inflammatory aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) are a variant involving a distinct immunoinflammatory process, with nearly one half believed to be associated with IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD).

METHODS

MEDLINE and Google Scholar searches were conducted for English-language publications relevant to inflammatory aortic aneurysms from January 1970 onward. The search terms included inflammatory aortic aneurysms, aortitis, periaortitis, IgG4-related disease, and retroperitoneal fibrosis. Relevant studies were selected for review based on their relevance.

RESULTS

Morphologically, IAAAs are characterized by a thickened aneurysm wall often displaying contrast enhancement and elevated metabolic activity on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging. A strong association exists with perianeurysmal and retroperitoneal fibrosis. Although the rupture risk appears lower with IAAAs than with noninflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), the currently recommended diameter threshold for operative management is the same. Open repair has been associated with increased morbidity compared with noninflammatory AAAs, and a retroperitoneal approach or minimal dissection transperitoneal approach has been recommended to avoid duodenal and retroperitoneal structural injuries. Endovascular aneurysm repair has been increasingly used, especially for patients unfit for open surgery. It is important to exclude an infectious etiology before the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy or operative repair. Multimodality imaging follow-up is critical to monitor disease activity and secondary involvement of retroperitoneal structures by the associated fibrotic process. Maintenance of immunosuppressive therapy will be needed postoperatively for most patients with active systemic disease, especially those with IgG4-RD and those with persistent symptoms. Additional interventions aimed at ureteral decompression could also be required, and lifelong follow-up is mandatory.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative multimodality imaging is a diagnostic cornerstone for assessment of the disease extent and activity. IgG4-RD is an increasingly recognized category of IAAAs, with implications for tailoring adjunctive medical therapy. Open surgical repair remains the procedure of choice, although endovascular aneurysm repair is increasingly being offered. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy can be offered according to the disease activity as assessed by follow-up imaging studies.

Abdominal aortic diameter and cardiovascular status in patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis

Although much debated, an exaggerated inflammatory response to advanced atherosclerosis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF). Clinical presentation, infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter and RPF mass thickness were retrospectively analyzed in 166 patients with idiopathic RPF seen at our referral center between April 1998 and December 2019. Patients were stratified to their infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter at presentation (i.e., non-ectatic [< 25 mm]; ectatic [25-29 mm]; and aneurysmal [≥ 30 mm]) to compare characteristics across groups with an undilated or dilated aorta. Ectatic or aneurysmal aortic dilatation was present in 34% of patients. Most clinical characteristics did not differ across abdominal aortic diameter stratified groups, but RPF mass thickness was greater in patients presenting with aortic aneurysmal dilatation compared to that in patients with an undilated aorta (49.0 mm [IQR 34.0-62.0] vs 32.5 mm [IQR 25.3-47.8]; P < 0.001). A positive linear association was found between aortic diameter on a continuous scale and RPF mass thickness (β 0.32 [95% CI 0.34-0.96]; P < 0.001). This association remained significant after adjusting for age, sex and acute-phase reactant levels (β 0.28 [95% CI 0.15-0.95]; P < 0.01). Treatment success across aortic diameter stratified groups did not differ (P = 0.98). Treatment induced RPF mass regression was not associated with an increase in aortic expansion rate (P = 0.44). Aortic dilatation was prevalent among patients. Infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter was independently associated with RPF mass thickness. Findings support the concept that at least in a subset of patients, RPF may be secondary to advanced atherosclerosis.

Aortitis and aortic aneurysm in systemic vasculitis

The term "large-vessel vasculitis" refers to chronic inflammation affecting the elastic arteries, mainly aorta and its major branches. Large-vessel vasculitis affecting the aorta is termed as "aortitis." This leads to diffuse wall thickening, loss of elasticity, stenosis, occlusion, dissection, calcification or aneurysm formation. Vasculitis involving the aorta includes Takayasu arteritis (commonest large-vessel vasculitis in India), giant cell arteritis (GCA), the periaortitis spectrum (including inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm), rheumatic diseases and IgG4-related disease. It is important for physicians to be aware of the aortic manifestations of common vasculitis-so that clinically relevant aortic involvement is not missed. Also, it is equally important for surgeons to keep in mind that aortic aneurysms can have an inflammatory aetiology. The primary reason for this is the central role that immunosuppressive therapy plays in the management of inflammatory aortic aneurysms. Surgical or percutaneous interventions, when needed, are most likely to succeed when performed after activity control; perioperative steroids may be beneficial in select cases, and postoperative disease activity control is imperative.

Inflammatory diseases of the aorta: Part 1: Non-infectious aortitis

Aortitis is a term which encompasses inflammatory changes to the aortic wall from various pathogenic etiologies. Large vessel vasculitis, such as Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis represent the most common entities; however, there is also an association with other rheumatological diseases. Chronic idiopathic periaortitis represents a distinct disease entity and infectious aortitis is a rare but life-threatening disease. Due to the diverse clinical pictures vascular surgeons often face a significant challenge in terms of making an accurate initial diagnosis. Treatment requires an interdisciplinary approach. This article describes the pathogenesis of the various forms of aortitis as well as the diagnostic methods and treatment approaches.

Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Objectives:

Open surgical repair (OSR) of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) can have significant morbidity. The aim of the present investigation was to compare IAAA outcome after OSR and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and perform a meta-analysis of the literature.

Methods:

Twenty-seven patients with an intact IAAA operated on during a 21-year period were included.

Results:

Nine patients were managed with EVAR and 18 with OSR. In the EVAR group, the number of transfused red blood cell units ( P = .001), procedure duration ( P < .001), and postoperative hospitalization ( P = .004) were significantly reduced compared to OSR. A trend for decreased morbidity with EVAR (11% vs 33% for OSR, P = .36) was observed. On literature review and meta-analysis, morbidity after EVAR was 8.3%, significantly lower compared to OSR (27.4%, P = .047). Mortality for nonruptured IAAAs was 0% after EVAR and 3.6% after OSR ( P = 1.00).

Conclusions:

Endovascular aneurysm repair of IAAAs is associated with decreased procedure duration, transfusion needs, hospitalization, and morbidity compared to OSR.

Late Conversion After Sac Anchoring Endoprosthesis for Secondary Aortic Aneurysm Infection

PURPOSE

To demonstrate explantation of the Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System in the setting of infection.

CASE REPORTS

Two male patients, 71 and 83 years old, underwent Nellix implantation for asymptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysms measuring 5.1 and 6.3 cm, respectively. Each developed late infections at 8 and 4 months post EVAS, respectively. The first patient experienced aneurysm rupture after medical therapy failed; the Nellix endosystem was explanted in an uneventful procedure. The second patient developed an aortoduodenal fistula, which was sutured before the Nellix device was removed without complications. The patient died 3 months later, presumably due to ongoing infection.

CONCLUSION

The need to explant a Nellix EVAS System due to graft infection is a straightforward procedure compared to the removal of a conventional endograft with suprarenal fixation. It requires only temporary suprarenal clamping. The devices can be easily removed due to the lack of penetrating components and without damage to the aortic segment needed to create an anastomosis.

Chimney-Graft as a Bail-Out Procedure for Endovascular Treatment of an Inflammatory Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Inflammatory and juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (j-iAAA) represents a technical challenge for open repair (OR) due to the peculiar anatomy, extensive perianeurysmal fibrosis, and dense adhesion to the surrounding tissues. A 68-year-old man with an 11 cm asymptomatic j-iAAA was successfully treated with elective EVAR and chimney-graft (ch-EVAR) without postprocedural complications. Target vessel patency and normal renal function are present at 24-month follow-up. The treatment of j-iAAA can be technically challenging. ch-EVAR is a feasible and safe bail-out method for elective j-iAAA with challenging anatomy.

Infectious or noninfectious? Ruptured, thrombosed inflammatory aortic aneurysm with spondylolysis

Osteolysis of vertebrae due to inflammatory aortic aneurysm is rarely observed. However, it is estimated that up to 10 % of infectious aneurysms coexist with bone tissue destruction, most commonly the vertebrae. Inflammatory aneurysms with no identified infection factor, along with infiltration of adjacent muscle and in particular extensive destruction of bone tissue have rarely been described in the literature. A case of inflammatory aneurysm with posterior wall rupture and inflammatory infiltration of the iliopsoas muscle and spine, together with extensive vertebral body destruction, is presented. The aneurysm was successfully treated with endovascular aneurysm repair EVAR.

Periaortic inflammation after endovascular aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

The periaortitis seen with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms usually resolves after repair by both open and endovascular techniques. Conversely, the de novo development of retroperitoneal fibrosis after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has also been rarely described, and we present a case and also review the literature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 63-year-old man underwent EVAR for an asymptomatic, noninflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm, presenting 9 months subsequently with left loin pain, raised inflammatory markers, and radiological evidence of periaortic inflammation causing significant left ureteric obstruction. Ureteric stenting resolved the hydronephrosis, and the periaortitis improved with combination of steroid and tamoxifen therapy.

CONCLUSION

Periaortitis causing renal impairment after EVAR is a rare complication. Prompt recognition and ureteric stenting helps to prevent long-term renal damage. Steroid and tamoxifen therapy is recommended to treat and avoid recurrence of periaortitis.

Endovascular repair of an inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm causing bilateral ureteric obstruction

BACKGROUND

Conventional open repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAA) remains challenging through the presence of extensive peri-aortic inflammation and fibrosis which makes dissection and vascular control difficult with a risk of inadvertent injury to adjacent visceral structures such as the ureters, duodenum, inferior vena cava, left renal vein and sigmoid colon.

METHODS

We describe a case of a 69-year-old gentleman who presented with acute renal failure due to bilateral ureteric obstruction in association with an IAAA and discuss the various management options available.

CONCLUSION

IAAAs and the associated peri-aortic inflammation and fibrosis can be successfully treated using endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with concurrent ureteric stenting.

Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (IAAA): Past and Present

Aim: The aim of the study is to determine whether presentation and outcomes of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAA) have changed over the last five decades. Methods: Comparison of current outcomes (January 2001 to December 2007) with results of the earliest report from our unit in 1972. Results: In contemporary series, 421 patients underwent AAA repair; 38 (9%) were IAAA. In 58% patients, IAAA was an incidental finding, whereas 42% patients were symptomatic with abdominal or back pain. Of those, 32% were ruptured IAAA. Male-to-female ratio was 12:1. Thirty-day mortality was 13%; elective 11.5%; emergency 17%. Comparison with 1972 study showed no change in the incidence and gender predilection. Presentation as an incidental finding and rupture increased 4- and 2-folds, respectively. Conclusion: The incidence and gender predilection of IAAA have remained unchanged. The 4-fold increase in the presentation as an incidental finding reflects current trends in patient evaluation.