Trends in statin utilization among adults with severe peripheral artery disease including critical limb ischemia in an integrated healthcare delivery system

Pharmacist optimization of lipid therapy in patients with peripheral vascular disease

PURPOSE

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend high-intensity statin therapy and consideration for nonstatin therapy for patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD); however, utilization rates remain suboptimal. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether pharmacist intervention for patients with PVD could improve the percentage of patients discharged on a high-intensity statin.

METHODS

The study used a single-center pre/post design and included patients with PVD who underwent peripheral bypass during their admission. Postintervention patients managed with an order set including a preselected consult for a pharmacy lipid protocol were compared to preintervention patients managed using the order set without the consult. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients discharged on a high-intensity statin. Secondary outcomes included intensification of statin therapy, the addition of ezetimibe, and referral to an outpatient lipid clinic.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients were included in the analysis, with 94 patients in the preintervention group and 81 patients in the postintervention group. The primary outcome met statistical significance, with an increase in the percentage of patients discharged on a high-intensity statin in the postintervention group (70.4%) compared to the preintervention group (38.3%) (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-2.46). Secondary outcomes that met statistical significance included an increase in the percentage of patients with any increase in statin intensity (35.8% vs 20.2%; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The addition of a pharmacist consult led to an increase in the percentage of patients discharged on a high-intensity statin and an increase in overall statin intensification.

Prevalence, Associated Risk Factors, and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes of Statins Discontinuation: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Statins are widely prescribed for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) prevention; however, a significant proportion of users discontinue the medication for various reasons. This review aimed to determine the prevalence of statin therapy discontinuation, its associated factors, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes within the first year of discontinuation.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched from their inception to December 2022. Manual searches were also conducted on the bibliographies of relevant articles. Studies were included for qualitative data synthesis and assessed for methodological quality.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies, predominantly cohort studies (n = 38), involving 4 277 061 participants were included. The prevalence of statin discontinuation within the first year of statin initiation ranged from 0.8% to 70.5%, which was higher for primary prevention indications. Factors frequently associated with an increased likelihood of statin discontinuation included male sex, nonWhite ethnicity, smoking status, and being uninsured. Conversely, discontinuation was less likely in patients with CVD who received secondary prevention statin therapy and in patients with polypharmacy. Furthermore, age showed diverse and inconsistent relationships with statin discontinuation among various age categories. Five studies that reported the cardiovascular risk of statin discontinuation within the first year of initiation showed significantly increased risk of discontinuation, including all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.36-3.65).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate a high prevalence of statin discontinuation and an increased likelihood of adverse cardiovascular outcomes within the first year of discontinuation, despite wide variability across published studies. This review highlights the importance of addressing the modifiable risk factors associated with statin discontinuation, such as smoking and lack of insurance coverage.

Assessment of Sex Disparities in Nonacceptance of Statin Therapy and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Among Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk

IMPORTANCE

Many patients at high cardiovascular risk-women more commonly than men-are not receiving statins. Anecdotally, it is common for patients to not accept statin therapy recommendations by their clinicians. However, population-based data on nonacceptance of statin therapy by patients are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate sex disparities in nonacceptance of statin therapy and assess their association with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol control.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, of statin-naive patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or LDL cholesterol levels of 190 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259) or more who were treated at Mass General Brigham between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2018.

EXPOSURE

Recommendation of statin therapy by the patient's clinician, ascertained from the combination of electronic health record prescription data and natural language processing of electronic clinician notes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Time to achieve an LDL cholesterol level of less than 100 mg/dL.

RESULTS

Of 24 212 study patients (mean [SD] age, 58.8 [13.0] years; 12 294 women [50.8%]), 5308 (21.9%) did not accept the initial recommendation of statin therapy. Nonacceptance of statin therapy was more common among women than men (24.1% [2957 of 12 294] vs 19.7% [2351 of 11 918]; P < .001) and was similarly higher in every subgroup in the analysis stratified by comorbidities. In multivariable analysis, female sex was associated with lower odds of statin therapy acceptance (0.82 [95% CI, 0.78-0.88]). Patients who did vs did not accept a statin therapy recommendation achieved an LDL cholesterol level of less than 100 mg/dL over a median of 1.5 years (IQR, 0.4-5.5 years) vs 4.4 years (IQR, 1.3-11.1 years) (P < .001). In a multivariable analysis adjusted for demographic characteristics and comorbidities, nonacceptance of statin therapy was associated with a longer time to achieve an LDL cholesterol level of less than 100 mg/dL (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.55-0.60]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study suggests that nonacceptance of a statin therapy recommendation was common among patients at high cardiovascular risk and was particularly common among women. It was associated with significantly higher LDL cholesterol levels, potentially increasing the risk for cardiovascular events. Further research is needed to understand the reasons for nonacceptance of statin therapy by patients and to develop methods to ensure that all patients receive optimal therapy in accordance with their preferences and priorities.

Analysis of 5-year Mortality following Lower Extremity Amputation due to Vascular Disease

Mortality rates following major lower extremity amputations (LEAs) 30 days-365 days postoperative have decreased, but 5-year rates remain high at 40.4%-70%. These data may not reflect recent advances in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) care, and comorbidities of chronic PAD may lead to mortality more frequently than the amputation itself. Mortality rates between diabetic and nondiabetic patients were also analyzed.

Methods

The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development hospital database was queried for patients admitted January 1, 2007-December 31, 2018. ICD-9-CM codes identified patients with vascular disease and an amputation procedure.

Results

There were 26,669 patients. The 30-day, 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year major LEA mortality rates were 4.82%, 8.62%, 12.47%, and 18.11%, respectively. Weighted averages of 30-day, 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year major LEA mortality rates in the literature are 13%, 15.40%, 47.93%, and 60.60%, respectively. Mortality risk associated with vascular disease after amputation (hazard ratio = 22.07) was 11 times greater than risk associated with amputation-specific complications from impaired mobility (hazard ratio = 1.90; P < 0.01). Having diabetes was associated with lower mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year (P < 0.01) but not at 5 years (P = 0.22).

Conclusions

This study suggests that people may be living longer after their major LEA than was previously thought. This study suggests that patients' PAD may play a bigger role in contributing to their mortality than complications from loss of mobility postamputation. Although having diabetes was associated with lower postamputation mortality, the difference was no longer significant by 5 years.

Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease: Lifestyle Modifications and Medical Therapies

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) commonly refers to atherosclerotic narrowing of noncoronary arteries, primarily those supplying the lower extremities. The risk factors for PAD include smoking, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Patients with PAD are at a heightened risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death) and major adverse limb events (including progressive symptoms or limb ischemia requiring peripheral revascularization, amputation, and acute limb ischemia), highlighting the need for guideline-directed therapies. Lifestyle modifications and medical therapies are utilized to improve function and outcomes in this patient population. Adherence to a healthy diet and smoking cessation are both associated with better outcomes in patients with PAD. Medical therapies targeting axes of risk, including lipid-modifying therapies, antithrombotic therapies, and targeted diabetes therapies, are available to reduce this risk in patients with PAD; however, significant residual risk remains. Unfortunately, despite guideline recommendations and efforts at education, even available medical therapies remain underutilized in patients with PAD. Continued development of novel therapies and efforts to improve the provision of care in patients with PAD are needed.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors, Statins, and Beta-Blockers in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia and Foot Lesions

Medical therapy for secondary prevention is known to be under-used in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Few data are available on the subgroup with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Prescription of cardiovascular preventive therapies was recorded at discharge in a large, prospective cohort of patients admitted for treatment of CLI and foot lesions, stratified for coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). 618 patients were observed for a median follow-up of 981 days. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, statins, beta-blockers, and antithrombotic drugs were prescribed in 52%, 80%, 51%, and 99% of patients, respectively. However, only 43% of patients received optimal medical therapy (OMT), defined as the combination of RAAS inhibitor plus statin plus at least one antithrombotic drug. It was observed that the prescription of OMT was not affected by the presence of a CAD diagnosis. On the other hand, it was noticed that the renal function affected the prescription of OMT. OMT was independently associated with MACE (HR 0.688, 95%CI 0.475-0.995, P = .047) and, after propensity matching, also with all-cause mortality (HR 0.626, 95%CI 0.409-0.958, P = .031). Beta-blockers prescription was not associated with any outcome. In conclusion, patients with critical limb ischemia are under-treated with cardiovascular preventive therapies, irrespective of a CAD diagnosis. This has consequences on their prognosis.

Statins and Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Narrative Review

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a highly prevalent atherosclerotic condition. In patients with PAD, the presence of intermittent claudication leads to a deterioration in quality of life. In addition, even in asymptomatic cases, patients with PAD are at high risk of cardiac or cerebrovascular events. Treatment of PAD is based on lifestyle modifications; regular exercise; smoking cessation; and control of cardiovascular risk factors, including hypercholesterolemia. A growing number of studies have shown that statins reduce cardiovascular risk and improve symptoms associated with PAD. Current guidelines recommend the use of statins in all patients with PAD in order to decrease cardiovascular events and mortality. However, the prescribing of statins in patients with PAD is lower than in those with coronary heart disease. This review provides relevant information from the literature that supports the use of statins in patients with PAD and shows their potential benefit in decreasing lower limb complications as well as cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Effectiveness of Blood Lipid Management in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is associated with heightened risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE) in peripheral artery disease (PAD). Lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) that reduce LDL-C decrease this risk.

OBJECTIVES

The authors examined LLT use and actual achieved LDL-C in PAD.

METHODS

PAD patients in MarketScan from 2014 to 2018 were identified. Outcomes included LLT use, defined as high-intensity (HI) (high-intensity statin, statin plus ezetimibe, or PCSK9 inhibitor), low-intensity (any other lipid regimen), or no therapy, and follow-up LDL-C. Factors associated with LDL-C <70 mg/dl were identified with multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 250,103 PAD patients, 20.5% and 39.5% were treated at baseline with HI and low-intensity LLT, respectively; 40.0% were on no LLT. Over a 15-month median follow-up period, HI LLT use increased by 1.5%. Among 18,747 patients with LDL-C data, at baseline, 25.1% were on HI LLT, median LDL-C was 91 mg/dl, and 24.5% had LDL-C <70 mg/dl. Within the HI LLT subgroup, median LDL-C was 81 mg/dl, and 64% had LDL-C ≥70 mg/dl. At follow-up, HI LLT use increased by 3.7%, median LDL-C decreased by 4.0 mg/dl, and an additional 4.1% of patients had LDL-C <70 mg/dl. HI LLT use was greater after follow-up MACE (55.0%) or MALE (41.0%) versus no ischemic event (26.1%). After MACE or MALE, LDL-C was <70 mg/dl in 41.5% and 36.1% of patients, respectively, versus 27.1% in those without an event. Factors associated with follow-up LDL-C <70 mg/dl included smoking, hypertension, diabetes, prior lower extremity revascularization, and prior myocardial infarction but not prior acute or critical limb ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

In PAD, LLT use is suboptimal, LDL-C remains elevated, and LLT intensity is a poor surrogate for achieved LDL-C. Less aggressive lipid management was observed in PAD versus cardiovascular disease, highlighting missed opportunities for implementation of proven therapies in PAD.

Evidence-based medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease: A rapid review

ABSTRACT Introduction: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) treatment guidelines recommend the use of statins and antiplatelets in all PAD patients to reduce adverse cardiovascular and limb-related outcomes. In addition, hypertension and diabetes should be treated to reach recommended targets. The aim of this rapid review was to evaluate the level of adherence to evidence-based medical therapy (EBMT) recommended by PAD treatment guidelines in the real-world setting. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase using keywords, MeSH and Emtree terms related to the population, exposure and outcomes from their inception to 22 September 2020. We included randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies, and observational studies reporting adherence to at least 1 of these 4 drug classes: (1) statins, (2) antiplatelets, (3) antihypertensives and (4) antidiabetic drugs. Non-English articles, abstracts, dissertations, animal studies and case reports or series were excluded. A narrative summary of the results was performed. Results: A total of 42 articles were included in the review. The adherence to lipid-lowering drugs/statins ranged from 23.5 to 92.0% and antiplatelets from 27.5 to 96.3%. Only 7 and 5 studies reported use of “any anti-hypertensive” and “any anti-diabetic” medications, respectively, and the proportion of the cohort treated were generally close to the proportion with hypertension and/or diabetes. Adherence in studies published in 2016–2020 ranged from 52.4–89.6% for lipid-lowering drugs and 66.2–96.3% for antiplatelets. Conclusion: EBMT adherence in PAD patients was highly variable and a substantial proportion in many settings were undertreated. There was also a notable lack of studies in Asian populations. Keywords: Evidence-practice gap, medication adherence, pharmacoepidemiology

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Initiating Statin Therapy After Index Revascularization In Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Background An increasing number of patients with a peripheral arterial occlusive disease were put on statins during the past years. This study assessed whether statin therapy was effective and safe for these new users. Methods and Results Using health insurance claims data from Germany's second-largest insurance fund, BARMER, we identified patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease who had index revascularization between 2008 and 2018 without prior statin therapy. We compared patients with and without statin therapy in addition to antithrombotics during the first quarter after discharge (new users versus nonusers). Outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and incident major amputation for effectiveness and incident diabetes mellitus and incident myopathy for safety. Propensity score matching was used to balance the study groups. All analyses were stratified into patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and intermittent claudication. A total of 22 208 patients (mean age 71.1 years and 50.3% women) were included in the study. In 10 922 matched patients, statin initiation was associated with lower all-cause mortality (chronic limb-threatening ischemia: hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.68-0.84]; intermittent claudication: HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70-0.92]), lower risk of major amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93) and lower risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92) in patients with intermittent claudication during 5 years of follow-up. Safety outcomes did not differ among the study groups. Conclusions Initiating statin therapy in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease after index revascularization is efficient and safe with an effect size comparable to earlier studies. Awareness campaigns for evidence-based optimal pharmacological treatment among patients are recommended.

Lipid-lowering therapies in peripheral artery disease: A review

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is estimated to affect approximately 8.5 million individuals in the US above the age of 40, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and impairment. Despite the significant adverse limb and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes seen in patients with PAD, there is typically less attention paid to risk factor modification relative to other atherosclerotic diseases such as coronary artery disease (CAD) or stroke. In the current literature, statins have been shown to reduce mortality, major adverse CV events, major adverse limb events, and improve symptomatic outcomes in patients with PAD. In addition, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are emerging as an additional lipid-lowering therapy for patients with PAD. However, despite current guideline recommendations based on growing evidence, patients with PAD are consistently undertreated with lipid-lowering therapies. We provide an extensive literature review and evidence-based recommendations for the use of statins and PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with PAD.

Premature Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: What Have We Learned Recently?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In contrast to patients with non-premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), patients with premature ASCVD have not observed a similar decline in cardiovascular mortality and recurrent adverse events. We sought to review the underlying risk factors, potential gaps in medical management, associated outcomes, and tools for risk prognostication among patients with premature ASCVD.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to traditional cardiovascular risk factors (i.e., diabetes, familial hypercholesterolemia), non-traditional risk factors such as chronic inflammatory conditions, recreational drug use, genetics, and pregnancy-related complications play a key role in development and progression of premature ASCVD. Patients with premature ASCVD, and especially women, receive less optimal medical management as compared to their non-premature counterparts. There is an increasing prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors among young adults. Hence, this population remains at an elevated risk for premature ASCVD and subsequent adverse cardiovascular events. Future studies evaluating different risk assessment tools and focusing on young patients across all three major domains of ASCVD are needed.