Sustained physical activity in peripheral artery disease: Associations with disease severity, functional performance, health-related quality of life, and subsequent serious adverse events in the LITE randomized clinical trial

Functional Status in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Rehabilitated Versus Nonrehabilitated

BACKGROUND

To analyze patient perception of functional status related to activity and participation of rehabilitated and nonrehabilitated individuals with peripheral arterial disease.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study assessing the activity and participation domain using the Human Activity Profile (HAP) questionnaire and the Participation Scale, respectively. Groups were compared using Chi-squared test and unpaired t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 87 individuals (36 rehabilitated) with 65.28 ± 8.29 years (66.7% male) were included. HAP classified 58.6% of individuals with weak or inactive physical activity level, and approximately half of the sample did not have participation restriction. HAP scores and Participation Scale (locomotion inside and outside home) were lower in nonrehabilitated than in rehabilitated individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with peripheral arterial disease presented little participation restriction and a great activity limitation, the last one being more evident among nonrehabilitated.

Home-based Circuit Training and Community Walking for Intermittent Claudication

BACKGROUND

Supervised exercise training is recommended for people with peripheral artery disease (PAD), yet it remains underutilized. Home-based exercise programs (HBEPs) are a potential alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full scale trial of a 12-week HBEP for people living with symptomatic PAD.

METHODS

In a randomized feasibility trial, patients with intermittent claudication were allocated to either an HBEP or a nonexercise control. The HBEP group was given a Fitbit to use during a 12-week exercise program comprising of personalized step goals and a resistance-based circuit to be undertaken at home twice weekly. The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed via eligibility, recruitment, attrition, tolerability, and adherence. Acceptability was assessed via semistructured interviews. Secondary analysis was undertaken to determine the feasibility of collecting clinical outcome data.

RESULTS

188 people were screened, 133 were eligible (70.7%), 30 were recruited (22.6%) and one withdrew (3.33%). Mean adherence to the daily step goal was 53.5% (range = 29.8-90.5%), and 58.6% of prescribed circuits were completed of which 56.4% were at the desired intensity. Six adverse events were recorded, 3 of which were related to study involvement. No significant differences were observed in exploratory outcomes. Small clinically important differences were seen in walking speed and pain-free treadmill walking distance which should be confirmed or refuted in a larger trial.

CONCLUSIONS

The HBEP was feasible and well tolerated, with successful recruitment and minimal attrition. The intervention was acceptable, with walking seen as more enjoyable than circuit exercise. The WALKSTRONG program may be suitable for those who will not, or cannot, take part in supervised exercise outside of the home.

A "test in-train out" program versus a "go home and walk" intervention for home-based exercise therapy in patients with peripheral artery disease: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

In this single-blinded randomized controlled trial, we compared the "Test in-Train Out" structured home-based exercise program (TiTo-SHB) with the traditional "go home and walk" exercise intervention in people with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

METHODS

Peripheral artery disease patients at Leriche-Fontaine's stage II were randomized to receive TiTo-SHB or walking advice (C-WA). The TiTo-SHB group performed two daily 8-min sessions of pain-free interval walking at progressive low-to-moderate speed maintained with a metronome. The C-WA group was recommended to walk for 30 min at least three times per week and to endure claudication pain. Outcomes collected at baseline and at the end of the program (6 months) included: 6-min and pain-free walking distance (6MWD, PFWD), ankle-brachial index (ABI), 5-time sit-to-stand test (5STS), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by the VascuQoL-6 questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were randomized (males n = 50; aged 73 ± 9; TiTo-SHB n = 34). At the end of the program, patients in the TiTo-SHB group compared with the C-WA group had significantly improved 6MWD (Δ + 60 ± 32 m vs. Δ - 5 ± 37 m; p < 0.001) and PFWD (Δ + 140 ± 92 m vs. Δ - 7 ± 87 m; p < 0.001). A significant between-group difference in favor of the TiTo-SHB group was also recorded for all the secondary outcomes, including 5STS (Δ - 2.6 ± 1.8 s vs. Δ + 0.8 ± 2.6 s; p < 0.001), ABI of the more impaired limb (Δ + 0.10 ± 0.11 vs. Δ + 0.02 ± 0.08; p = 0.003), and VascuQoL-6 score (Δ +2 ± 2 vs. -1 ± 4; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In PAD patients with claudication, the pain-free in-home TiTo-SHB program was more effective in improving exercise capacity and HRQoL than the traditional walking advice recommendation.

Health-related quality of life after a one-year follow-up of patients undergoing endovascular leg revascularization

BACKGROUND

Lower limb revascularization not only improves walking distance, but also disease-specific and general health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Therefore, we analyzed changes in HRQoL after endovascular leg revascularization in patients with chronic lower limb ischemia during a one-year follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was completed by 50 patients with intermittent claudication (IC) and 50 patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) who underwent endovascular revascularization with a stent implantation, as well as 40 patients with IC not requiring endovascular intervention who received medical management only. The survey was completed before and then 3 and 12 months after an intervention.

RESULTS

Patients with CLTI before endovascular intervention had the lowest HRQoL in the somatic, psychological, social, and environmental domains. After endovascular revascularization, these patients achieved the greatest improvement in HRQoL. Scores in the HRQoL domains correlated with Rutherford class, ankle-brachial index, and walking distance. The initial score in the somatic domain predicted the risk of target lesion revascularization (TLR) during the one-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular leg revascularization improved patients' functioning, not only in the physical, but also in the psychological, environmental and social domains of HRQoL. A higher score in the somatic domain of HRQoL before and at 3 months after an intervention predicted the risk of TLR during the one-year follow-up. It is recommended that scores for general HRQoL domains are added to the standard measures of the direct outcome of leg revascularization due to their one-year prognostic value.