Protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial of a stepped-care intervention for emergency department patients with panic-related anxiety

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% of Emergency Department (ED) patients with chest pain meet diagnostic criteria for panic-related anxiety, but only 1-2% are correctly diagnosed and appropriately managed in the ED. A stepped-care model, which focuses on providing evidence-based interventions in a resource-efficient manner, is the state-of-the art for treating panic disorder patients in medical settings such as primary care. Stepped-care has yet to be tested in the ED setting, which is the first point of contact with the healthcare system for most patients with panic symptoms.

METHODS

This multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the clinical, patient-centred, and economic effectiveness of a stepped-care intervention in a sample of 212 patients with panic-related anxiety presenting to the ED of Singapore's largest public healthcare group. Participants will be randomly assigned to either: 1) an enhanced care arm consisting of a stepped-care intervention for panic-related anxiety; or 2) a control arm consisting of screening for panic attacks and panic disorder. Screening will be followed by baseline assessments and blocked randomization in a 1:1 ratio. Masked follow-up assessments will be conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical outcomes will be panic symptom severity and rates of panic disorder. Patient-centred outcomes will be health-related quality of life, daily functioning, psychiatric comorbidity, and health services utilization. Economic effectiveness outcomes will be the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the stepped-care intervention relative to screening alone.

DISCUSSION

This trial will examine the impact of early intervention for patients with panic-related anxiety in the ED setting. The results will be used to propose a clinically-meaningful and cost-effective model of care for ED patients with panic-related anxiety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03632356. Retrospectively registered 15 August 2018.

Which symptoms are the psychopathological core affecting the manifestation of pseudo-cardiac symptoms and poor sleep quality in young adults? Symptoms of personality disorders versus clinical disorders

Background

Diagnosing and identifying the psychological origin of pseudo-cardiac symptoms and comorbid conditions such as poor sleep quality is very difficult due to its extensive and complex nature. The present study was conducted to determine the contribution of symptoms of personality disorders (PDs) and clinical disorders (CDs; i.e., psychological symptoms measured using the Symptom Checklist-90) to the manifestation of pseudo-cardiac symptoms and poor sleep quality.

Methods

Subjects in this cross-sectional study were 953 (64.3% female; 28.8 ± 6.2 years) community samples in the west of Iran who were selected by convenience sampling. After applying the inclusion criteria, data were collected using the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90-R), the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ-4), and the Scale for Pseudo-Cardiac Symptoms and Poor Sleep Quality (SPSQ). Pearson correlations, factor analytical techniques, and hierarchical regression models were used to examine associations between symptoms of PDs/CDs and outcome factors.

Results

Factor analytical techniques confirmed both the integrated structure of symptoms of PDs and CDs. Both pseudo-cardiac symptoms and poor sleep quality were more strongly associated with symptoms of CDs than PDs. The results of the hierarchical analysis show that the CDs factor alone could explain the total variance of both pseudo-cardiac symptoms (change in R² = 0.215 vs. 0.009; p < 0.001) and poor sleep quality (change in R² = 0.221 vs. 0.001; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The different capabilities of two unique factors for the symptoms of PDs and CDs were confirmed by factor analytical methods and regression analysis techniques. Although each of the symptoms of PDs and CDs independently contributes to the manifestation of pseudo-cardiac symptoms and poor sleep quality, the CDs factor is the psychopathological core.

Are Patients at Risk for Developing Panic Disorder After an Emergency Department Visit With Noncardiac Chest Pain?

BACKGROUND

Panic disorder (PD) is common in emergency department (ED) patients with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). The literature suggests that initially PD-free patients may be at increased risk of developing PD in the months or years following an ED visit.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to determine the incidence of PD in the 2 years following an ED visit with NCCP and to identify predictors of incident PD.

METHODS

This study was conducted using a longitudinal, observational design. Five hundred and eighty-five patients with NCCP (without PD) were recruited in two EDs. They underwent an interview and completed a series of questionnaires assessing anxiety disorders, perceived social support, psychological distress, anxiety sensitivity, comorbidities, and stressful life events. PD was assessed 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after the initial interview.

RESULTS

PD incidence was 11.1% (95% confidence interval: 8.7-13.9) in the two years following the baseline assessment. Anxiety sensitivity (odds ratio = 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.11; P < .001) and stress related to life events (odds ratio = 1.14; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.24; P = .001) significantly predicted incident PD.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NCCP are at high risk for developing PD in the 2 years following an ED visit with NCCP. Anxiety sensitivity and stress related to life events may be promising clinical targets for preventive interventions.