Interactions of Antiretroviral Drugs with Food, Beverages, Dietary Supplements, and Alcohol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Multiple factors may affect combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). We investigated the impact of food, beverages, dietary supplements, and alcohol on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of 33 antiretroviral drugs. Systematic review in adherence to PRISMA guidelines was performed, with 109 reports of 120 studies included. For each drug, meta-analyses or qualitative analyses were conducted. We have found clinically significant interactions with food for more than half of antiretroviral agents. The following drugs should be taken with or immediately after the meal: tenofovir disoproxil, etravirine, rilpivirine, dolutegravir, elvitegravir, atazanavir, darunavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir. Didanosine, zalcitabine, zidovudine, efavirenz, amprenavir, fosamprenavir, and indinavir should be taken on an empty stomach for maximum patient benefit. Antiretroviral agents not mentioned above can be administered regardless of food. There is insufficient evidence available to make recommendations about consuming juice or alcohol with antiretroviral drugs. Resolving drug-food interactions may contribute to maximized cART effectiveness and safety.

[Nephrotoxicity of antiretrovirals other than tenofovir]

The remarkable improvement of the outcome of HIV infection came with the price of substantial toxicity of some antiretrovirals. The first molecules used to treat HIV included an important nephrotoxicity. Zalcitabine, stavudine and didanosine can induce severe lactic acidosis. Lactate production is enhanced and the renal capacity to regulate pH is overwhelmed. However, this side effect is not due to a direct dysfunction of the kidneys. Zalcitabine was withdrawn from the market because of this risk. Indinavir, a protease inhibitor, is soluble only in very acidic solutions. Consequently, the small fraction that is excreted in the urine precipitates and can be responsible for uro-nephrolithiasis, leukocyturia, cristalluria, obstructive acute kidney failure, and acute or chronic interstitial nephritis. This is the reason why indinavir is almost not prescribed nowadays, even if it is still marketed. In addition to the direct nephrotoxicity of some antiretrovirals, anti-HIV treatment also includes a toxicity which pathophysiology is not completely elucidated. This nephrotoxicity is the consequence of organ accelerated ageing and of an increased vascular risk. Kidney vascularization (from renal arteries to capillaries) is essential to kidney function and all cardiovascular risks are also renal risks. It is now clearly established that combined antiretroviral treatment increases the vascular risk. A better comprehension of the links between HIV infection, its treatment and very long-term kidney risk is needed to improve the complex management of patients who have now cumulated several decades of HIV infection and treatment with various toxicities.

Pharmacokinetics of Reduced-Dose Indinavir/Ritonavir 400/100 Mg Twice Daily in HIV-1-Infected Thai Patients

Objective

To study the pharmacokinetics of indinavir/ ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily in antiretroviral-naive patients at Srinagarind Hospital in Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Methods

This was a steady-state, open-label pharmacokinetic study of 19 patients. A 12 h pharmacokinetic curve was recorded after an overnight fast. Plasma levels of indinavir and ritonavir were determined by a validated HPLC method. Virological failure was defined according to the most recent US Department of Health and Human Services guidelines as a viral load above 400 copies/ml at week 24.

Results

Median baseline values for CD4 and viral load were 13 cells/mm3 and 167000 copies/ml, respectively. The median (interquartile ranges) for indinavir AUC, Cmax and Cmin were 18.1 (15.3–23.8) mg/l•h, 4.1 (3.6–4.8) mg/l and 0.17 (0.12–0.30) mg/l, respectively. These values represent 37%, 39% and 24% of the AUC, Cmax and Cmin values found, respectively, for the indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg dose in HIV-1-infected Thai patients. Short-term virological response was satisfactory. There were three subjects with an indinavir Cmin below the target value of 0.10 mg/l, of whom one had virological failure (33%). Among the other 16 subjects with an indinavir Cmin above 0.10 mg/l, there was also one virological failure (6%) ( P=0.30).

Conclusions

Indinavir exposure in this reduced-dose regimen of 400 mg with 100 mg ritonavir twice daily was more than dose-proportionally lower than previously observed with the indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg twice daily regimen. Therapeutic Cmin levels of indinavir were achieved in >80% of the subjects and short-term virological response was satisfactory in this cohort of patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy at an advanced disease stage with high baseline viral loads.

Comparison of Two Reduced-Dose Regimens of Indinavir (600 Mg Vs 400 Mg Twice Daily) and Ritonavir (100 Mg Twice Daily) in Healthy Volunteers (Coredir)

Objective

To assess the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of reduced dosages of twice daily indinavir (IDV) boosted by low-dose ritonavir (RTV) in healthy volunteers.

Methods

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of IDV/RTV twice daily (600/100 mg and 400/100 mg) were assessed in a randomized crossover design in 16 healthy volunteers. Each dosage was taken twice daily for 2 weeks before 12 h pharmacokinetics were obtained.

Results

Sixteen subjects were included, with a mean age ±SD of 30 ±4 years; seven female, nine male. Fifteen subjects completed the study. After dose reduction of IDV AUC, Cmax and Cmin decreased significantly. In the 400 mg group three out of 15 subjects had IDV levels below 0.10 mg/l vs none in the 600 mg group. All subjects reported mild to moderate side effects throughout the study period, which were more severe in the 600 mg group (mostly renal, dry skin/lips, paresthesias/oral discomfort). In the 600 mg group four subjects reported dysuria and one subject discontinued because of flank pain, whereas two subjects reported dysuria and no subject discontinued in the 400 mg group, respectively. Eight subjects developed crystalluria without a significant difference between both groups. No significant change in serum creatinine was observed.

Conclusions

IDV/RTV 400/100 mg twice daily resulted in significant lower IDV exposure, with three out of 15 subjects revealing Cmin values below the recommended threshold for wild-type virus of 0.10 mg/l. Tolerability, however, was lower in the 600 mg IDV group. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the individual patient appears to be necessary to guarantee appropriate drug levels and simultaneously minimize toxicity. Presented in part at the 6th International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection. Glasgow, Scotland, UK, November 2002. Abstract P182.