Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of lipodystrophy in HIV-positive patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy

We evaluated retrospectively an automated method for the separate detection of subcutaneous and visceral fat in the abdominal region by magnetic resonance studies in HIV-positive patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. The patients were divided into four different groups: lipoatrophy, lipohypertrophy, mixed and the control group. The use of software for the automated detection of abdominal compartment visceral adipose tissue (VAT), total adipose tissue (TAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) was compared to manual evaluation methods (fuzzy C-mean). The results of ROC analysis showed that the parameters, particularly the VAT, are better than the VAT/TAT and at identifying patients with the symptoms of abdominal fat accumulation. A sensitivity of 80.3% and a specificity of 79.5% resulted from a threshold VAT value of >87 cm(2). Moreover, the manual evaluation method was shown to provide greater values for VAT and the VAT/TAT ratio than those given by the automated method. In the present study, a rapid MRI protocol for the detection and assessment of the course of lipodystrophy was presented and tested on a group of patients with signs of HALS, as well as on an antiretroviral naïve control group.

In Vitro Susceptibility of Adefovir-Associated Hepatitis B Virus Polymerase Mutations to other Antiviral Agents

Background

Adefovir dipivoxil is a nucleotide prodrug approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. During clinical trials, ADV-associated mutations were observed in 0, 3, 11, 18 and 29% of patients after 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240 weeks of therapy, respectively. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase mutations associated with virological breakthrough to ADV include rtA181V and rtN236T, which occur alone or in combination. The rtA181T mutation has also been observed at low frequency, alone or in combination with rtN236T.

Methods

To investigate the in vitro activity of adefovir and other anti-HBV agents against these mutants, we generated five stable cell lines that each expressed one of the following HBV mutants: rtN236T, rtA181V, rtA181V+rtN236T, rtA181T+rtN236T and rtA181T. Using these cell lines, we quantified in vitro changes in drug susceptibility for eight nucleotide/nucleoside analogues.

Results

The rtN236T mutant had 7-fold resistance to adefovir but remained sensitive to entecavir, telbivudine and torcitabine (≤3.2-fold reduced susceptibility). The A181V mutant had 4.3-fold resistance to adefovir and had reduced susceptibility to multiple other agents ranging from 3.2-fold (tenofovir) to >191-fold (clevudine). The A181V+rtN236T double mutant was the most highly resistant showing 18-fold resistance to adefovir and higher levels of resistance to other tested drugs with the exception of tenofovir (10-fold reduced susceptibility). Our results and preliminary clinical data suggest that patients with rtN236T or rtA181V remain susceptible to tenofovir, entecavir and lamivudine. Further clinical data are necessary to precisely define in vitro cutoffs indicative of clinically-relevant resistance, particularly for drugs in development such as emtricitabine, telbivudine, torcitabine and clevudine.