Implementing school-based cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety in students with autism or suspected autism via a train-the-trainer approach: Results from a clustered randomized trial

A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of two school-based interventions for autistic youth with anxiety

BACKGROUND

Recent systematic reviews have indicated that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective in reducing anxiety symptoms for autistic and non-autistic children. However, the vast majority of CBT research for autistic youth has been implemented within university settings and primarily by mental health providers. Schools hold great promise to equitably manage the mental health symptoms of autistic youth. Although preliminary research evaluating CBT within schools has been promising, CBT has not yet been compared to another readily available school mental health program. The goal of this protocol paper is to describe a multi-site study comparing two school-based interventions, Facing Your Fears-School Based (FYF-SB) and Zones of Regulation (ZOR) via a cluster randomized controlled type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to determine which of the two interventions will best support autistic youth with anxiety in schools.

METHODS

Up to 100 elementary and middle schools will be randomized into FYF-SB or ZOR. Once schools are randomized, a minimum of two interdisciplinary school providers at each school will be trained to deliver either FYF-SB or ZOR over the course of 12 weeks to groups of 2-5 autistic students ages 8-14 years. Over the course of two years, a total of 200 autistic students will receive either ZOR or FYF-SB. The primary outcome of this trial is child anxiety, as rated by masked evaluators and via caregiver- and student-report, which will be measured at baseline, post-treatment, and 6-month follow-up. Semi-structured interviews will also be conducted with a purposive sample of students, caregivers, and school providers to understand the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of either ZOR or FYF-SB. Stakeholder engagement is a central component of this project via two stakeholder advisory boards that will directly inform and oversee the project.

DISCUSSION

Results of this study will provide evidence about the relative impact of two school-based mental health interventions on outcomes reported as meaningful by caregivers and school providers. The additional focus on evaluating factors that support the implementation of FYF-SB and ZOR will allow future studies to test targeted implementation strategies that support mental health programming uptake and implementation within public schools.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05863520).

An affective assessment: incarnate biases in picture captions for autistic children

Previous studies have explored cognitive disabilities experienced by autistic children between the ages of 2 and 5 who attend special schools. However, there is still debate regarding the onset, scope, and causes of these problems, particularly when considering incarnate biases that may arise from affective notions. Early affective issues could potentially be a key factor contributing to observing such biases in picture captions. In this study, we employed an affective approach-simultaneous observation and questionnaire-to investigate how incarnate biases impact picture caption activities. Specifically, we looked at the performances of autistic children across four grades: PreK, K1, K2, and K3. We found that autistic children across all grades demonstrated instances of incarnation-biased interpretations in picture captions, although K3 performed better than the other grades. Furthermore, their incarnate biases tended to be negative rather than positive in affection, depending on the level of activity involved. Ultimately, the sources of these incarnate biases may stem from three spheres: school, society, and family. Thus, it is essential to consider these factors when designing educational programs for children with autism. It highlights the potential dangers associated with negative biases in picture captions. Unlike previous studies that focused on identifying discrepancies in picture caption, our research suggests that over time, as we take into account the onset of incarnate biases from the three affective spheres discussed in this study, picture caption may improve among autistic children as their incarnate biases decrease.